Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

64 bit generic driver?

61 views
Skip to first unread message

Frederick J. Barnett

unread,
Aug 17, 2009, 12:31:57 PM8/17/09
to
I have an AGFA Snapscan 1212u. Right now it's being used with
the 32 bit Windows 7 RC, and I've already ordered the retail version
of 7. I would like to install the 64 bit version, but I'm afraid I'll
lose my scanner. While it does work with 32 bit 7, it only works with
the Scanwise program. I can't scan inside any other program. They
can't find the scanner. AGFA got out of the scanner business years
ago, so no chance at all of updated drivers from them.

I don't want to have to replace an otherwise perfectly good
scanner just to use 64 bit, but on the other hand I hate the idea of
just one device (everything else will work fine, I checked) preventing
me from using it.

Any suggestions?

Frederick J. Barnett http://www.eatel.net/~fred/
"Someone's got to take the responsibility if the job's going to get done!! Do you think that's easy?!" Gregory Peck - The Guns Of Navarone

Massimo

unread,
Aug 17, 2009, 7:40:49 PM8/17/09
to
Hello,

On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:31:57 -0500, Frederick J. Barnett
<fr...@eatel.net> wrote:

> I have an AGFA Snapscan 1212u. Right now it's being used with
>the 32 bit Windows 7 RC, and I've already ordered the retail version
>of 7. I would like to install the 64 bit version, but I'm afraid I'll
>lose my scanner. While it does work with 32 bit 7, it only works with
>the Scanwise program. I can't scan inside any other program. They
>can't find the scanner. AGFA got out of the scanner business years
>ago, so no chance at all of updated drivers from them.
>

Is not it so that 32bit programs can work also under a 64bit Windows
in 32bits mode?

> I don't want to have to replace an otherwise perfectly good
>scanner just to use 64 bit, but on the other hand I hate the idea of
>just one device (everything else will work fine, I checked) preventing
>me from using it.
>

Some versions of Windows7 (at any rate Business and Ultimate versions)
will offer the possibility to work with kind of integrated
XP-compatibility mode. I forgot the 3-letter abbreviation for that
optional part of Win7 that you'll have to download separately.

> Any suggestions?
>
>Frederick J. Barnett http://www.eatel.net/~fred/
>"Someone's got to take the responsibility if the job's going to get done!! Do you think that's easy?!" Gregory Peck - The Guns Of Navarone

Massimo

Frederick J. Barnett

unread,
Aug 18, 2009, 10:48:31 AM8/18/09
to
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:40:49 +0200, Massimo
<o...@tisnietwaar.nl.invalid> wrote:

>Is not it so that 32bit programs can work also under a 64bit Windows
>in 32bits mode?
>

I've never used 64 bit before, but the fact other hardware has
64 and 32 versions, I doubt it. I also read somewhere that 32 drivers
don't work with 64 OSes.

>Some versions of Windows7 (at any rate Business and Ultimate versions)
>will offer the possibility to work with kind of integrated
>XP-compatibility mode. I forgot the 3-letter abbreviation for that
>optional part of Win7 that you'll have to download separately.
>

The version of 7 I'm getting doesn't have the XP compatibility
mode and can't use it.

Massimo

unread,
Aug 18, 2009, 10:55:32 AM8/18/09
to
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:48:31 -0500, Frederick J. Barnett
<fr...@eatel.net> wrote:

>On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:40:49 +0200, Massimo
><o...@tisnietwaar.nl.invalid> wrote:
>
>>Is not it so that 32bit programs can work also under a 64bit Windows
>>in 32bits mode?
>>
> I've never used 64 bit before, but the fact other hardware has
>64 and 32 versions, I doubt it. I also read somewhere that 32 drivers
>don't work with 64 OSes.
>

I read it in a newsgroup. Perhaps you could do some research in this
matter?

>>Some versions of Windows7 (at any rate Business and Ultimate versions)
>>will offer the possibility to work with kind of integrated
>>XP-compatibility mode. I forgot the 3-letter abbreviation for that
>>optional part of Win7 that you'll have to download separately.
>>
> The version of 7 I'm getting doesn't have the XP compatibility
>mode and can't use it.
>

That's a pity...

>Frederick J. Barnett http://www.eatel.net/~fred/
>"Someone's got to take the responsibility if the job's going to get done!! Do you think that's easy?!" Gregory Peck - The Guns Of Navarone

Massimo

Frederick J. Barnett

unread,
Aug 18, 2009, 10:58:47 AM8/18/09
to
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:55:32 +0200, Massimo
<o...@tisnietwaar.nl.invalid> wrote:

>I read it in a newsgroup. Perhaps you could do some research in this
>matter?
>

32 bit software will work, but hardware drivers are a
different matter.

Massimo

unread,
Aug 19, 2009, 7:18:05 PM8/19/09
to
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:58:47 -0500, Frederick J. Barnett
<fr...@eatel.net> wrote:

>On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:55:32 +0200, Massimo
><o...@tisnietwaar.nl.invalid> wrote:
>
>>I read it in a newsgroup. Perhaps you could do some research in this
>>matter?
>>
> 32 bit software will work, but hardware drivers are a
>different matter.
>

Ah! I see, so that makes a difference. :-)


>
>Frederick J. Barnett http://www.eatel.net/~fred/
>"Someone's got to take the responsibility if the job's going to get done!! Do you think that's easy?!" Gregory Peck - The Guns Of Navarone

Massimo

cat...@invalid.address.com

unread,
Aug 23, 2009, 11:06:57 AM8/23/09
to
http://www.hamrick.com/

Agfa Snapscan 1212U is listed as compatible
VueScan is listed as Windows 7 compatible

You could either try the free download and see if it works, or drop a
note to the program's author and ask. See
http://www.hamrick.com/sup.html

Frederick J. Barnett <fr...@eatel.net> wrote:

Frederick J. Barnett

unread,
Aug 24, 2009, 1:21:47 PM8/24/09
to
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 11:06:57 -0400, "cat...@invalid.address.com"
<cat...@invalid.address.com> wrote:

>http://www.hamrick.com/
>
>Agfa Snapscan 1212U is listed as compatible
>VueScan is listed as Windows 7 compatible
>
>You could either try the free download and see if it works, or drop a
>note to the program's author and ask. See
>http://www.hamrick.com/sup.html
>

Thanks. Even at $40 it's still cheaper than buying a new
scanner, which I don't otherwise need.

Frederick J. Barnett

unread,
Oct 30, 2009, 12:30:00 PM10/30/09
to
It worked!!! Thanks again.

On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 11:06:57 -0400, "cat...@invalid.address.com"
<cat...@invalid.address.com> wrote:

0 new messages