Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
comp.os.vms
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion DEFCON 16 and Hacking OpenVMS
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
davi...@alpha2.mdx.ac.uk  
View profile  
 More options Aug 12 2008, 10:49 am
Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
From: davi...@alpha2.mdx.ac.uk
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:49:51 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Tues, Aug 12 2008 10:49 am
Subject: Re: DEFCON 16 and Hacking OpenVMS
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
In article <6419afac-bb99-4d7d-b61c-2e29234df...@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>, samp...@gmail.com writes:

>Guys,

>I just finished reading the presenation slides from DEFCON and
>fortunately it doesn't to be anything earth-shattering, two exploits
>are described:

>1. A format string vulnerability in the FINGER client (VAX only). The
>example shellcode is stored on a remote system's .plan file and forces
>the victim FINGER client to modify SYSUAF.

Is this with DEC TCPIP services or is it something to do with the
Multinet finger vulnerability ?

see

http://www.multinet.process.com/scripts/eco/eco_tlb.com?FINGER-010_A052

>2. A CLI buffer overflow on Alphas. Basically any input over 511
>characters causes an overflow, it seems to be possible to have a
>privileged process execute arbitrary code.

Can you explain this one in a bit more detail ?
Is this an attack against DCL itself, images installed with privileges
or something else ?

David Webb
Security team leader
CCSS
Middlesex University

>Anyway, this is from a 10 minute reading of the slides, I might have
>missed something, but the important thing (IMHO) is that neither of
>these exploits are possible from remote but require a malicious user
>to already have an account on the targeted system.

>Sampsa


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2012 Google