Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion VMS security vulnerability (POP server)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Joseph Huber  
View profile  
 More options Jul 2 2007, 3:45 am
Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
From: Joseph Huber <joseph.hu...@NOSPAM.web.de>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 09:45:52 +0200
Local: Mon, Jul 2 2007 3:45 am
Subject: Re: VMS security vulnerability (POP server)

Chris Sharman wrote:
> Good job IUPOP3 does intrusion detection, and is easily available &
> installable - I'd often wondered whether I ought to ditch it in favour
> of the latest ucx/tcpip offering, but hadn't got around to it.

> You make a convincing case for IUPOP3. It's source code, too, so if it
> allows checking of user names in isolation, that would be easily fixable.

I some time ago also switched from IUPOP3 to TCPIP services, because it
serves the SSL port, and our domain requests that for outside connections.
I know one could tunnel SSL POP (using e.g. STUNNEL, which I do for IMAP
in my aging TCPIP 5.3), but this has the ugly effect of being one
connection at a time (and others get connection timeout and have to retry).

Although TCPIP services POP implementation seems to be based on IUPOP3,
is there a newer IUPOP3 implementation serving the SSL port ?

--

  Joseph Huber   - http://www.huber-joseph.de


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.