Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion DEFCON 16 and Hacking OpenVMS
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
vaxm...@sendspamhere.org  
View profile  
 More options Aug 13 2008, 7:30 am
Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
From: VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:30:15 GMT
Local: Wed, Aug 13 2008 7:30 am
Subject: Re: DEFCON 16 and Hacking OpenVMS
In article <9781c047-761a-4923-9aab-8c1a32ff7...@x35g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>, samp...@gmail.com writes:

>> I would have thought a CLI overflow to have been tried by at least a few
>> at DEFCON9 because the system automagically created service-rich user
>> accounts with of course DCL which the hackers were then free to abuse.

>> We were not scrutinizing buffers however and any such overflow may in
>> our case have done nothing harmful (by luck or design). I think it was
>> version 7.1-? if it makes a difference. Did the gentleman specify any
>> versions?

>Default 8.3 install on an Alpha according to the presentation notes.
>To reproduce this, apparently one is to enter exactly 511 characters
>of input, then press the up arrow three times and wait - a core dump
>follows.

I know you didn't make the claim but you should first test it out before
brandishing bullshit here.

I've tried to reproduce the claimed results from your posted instruction
and it does NOT produce a "core dump".

--
VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker      VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)COM

... pejorative statements of opinion are entitled to constitutional protection
no matter how extreme, vituperous, or vigorously expressed they may be. (NJSC)

Copr. 2008 Brian Schenkenberger.  Publication of _this_ usenet article outside
of usenet _must_ include its contents in its entirety including this copyright
notice, disclaimer and quotations.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.