On Feb 7, 2:08 pm, glen herrmannsfeldt <g...@ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote:
> Does anyone know where to get Fortran for a hobbyist IA64 system?
> (Is anyone here actually using Fortran on IA64?)
> -- glen
FORTRAN is on the layered products DVD. Please note that it is the
F90/95 compiler only NOT the F77. I support some code that originated
in 1976 and has some portions that need to be modified to work on the
I64 platform. If you are upgrading from Alpha and use the /F77
switch, be aware that changes are likely.
The 2 main categories for me thus far are:
1) F90/95 no longer supports octal constants (the use of "007" for
example). This is nothing more than an annoyance as the code can
simply be changed to use decimal constants. These were left over from
PDP11 days.
2) The standard has always stated that there was no particular order
of evaluation for segments of an IF statement. In other words, should
you have an IF statement with multiple conditions that are logically
connected (.and., .or. etc) these segments can be evaluated in any
order. It seems that F77 often evaluated them in left to right
order. This is no longer the case and caused problems for the code I
support. Please note that the code should NEVER require or depend
upon this evaluation order.
abrsvc <dansabrservi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Feb 7, 2:08 pm, glen herrmannsfeldt <g...@ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote:
>> Does anyone know where to get Fortran for a hobbyist IA64 system?
(snip)
> FORTRAN is on the layered products DVD. Please note that it is the
> F90/95 compiler only NOT the F77. I support some code that originated
> in 1976 and has some portions that need to be modified to work on the
> I64 platform. If you are upgrading from Alpha and use the /F77
> switch, be aware that changes are likely.
I have VAX and IA64, but still not Alpha. If I want to complete
my collection of VMS systems, then I will need one, but not so far.
> The 2 main categories for me thus far are:
> 1) F90/95 no longer supports octal constants (the use of "007" for
> example). This is nothing more than an annoyance as the code can
> simply be changed to use decimal constants. These were left over from
> PDP11 days.
I was using OS/360 before any DEC systems, and so was more used
to hex constants. For VAX/VMS, I always use(d) hex.
> 2) The standard has always stated that there was no particular order
> of evaluation for segments of an IF statement. In other words, should
> you have an IF statement with multiple conditions that are logically
> connected (.and., .or. etc) these segments can be evaluated in any
> order. It seems that F77 often evaluated them in left to right
> order. This is no longer the case and caused problems for the code I
> support. Please note that the code should NEVER require or depend
> upon this evaluation order.
I was not so long ago trying to get a program that I worked on
many years ago running again. With bounds-check turned on, it would fail on such IF statements. In most cases, fetching element
zero of an array won't cause problems in actual code, but bounds
check catches it anyway.
There is some suggestion to add new logical operators to
Fortran, though still not in the 2008 standard. Maybe for
the next one.
> abrsvc <dansabrservi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On Feb 7, 2:08 pm, glen herrmannsfeldt <g...@ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote:
> >> Does anyone know where to get Fortran for a hobbyist IA64 system?
> (snip)
> > FORTRAN is on the layered products DVD. Please note that it is the
> > F90/95 compiler only NOT the F77. I support some code that originated
> > in 1976 and has some portions that need to be modified to work on the
> > I64 platform. If you are upgrading from Alpha and use the /F77
> > switch, be aware that changes are likely.
> I have VAX and IA64, but still not Alpha. If I want to complete
> my collection of VMS systems, then I will need one, but not so far.
> > The 2 main categories for me thus far are:
> > 1) F90/95 no longer supports octal constants (the use of "007" for
> > example). This is nothing more than an annoyance as the code can
> > simply be changed to use decimal constants. These were left over from
> > PDP11 days.
> I was using OS/360 before any DEC systems, and so was more used
> to hex constants. For VAX/VMS, I always use(d) hex.
> > 2) The standard has always stated that there was no particular order
> > of evaluation for segments of an IF statement. In other words, should
> > you have an IF statement with multiple conditions that are logically
> > connected (.and., .or. etc) these segments can be evaluated in any
> > order. It seems that F77 often evaluated them in left to right
> > order. This is no longer the case and caused problems for the code I
> > support. Please note that the code should NEVER require or depend
> > upon this evaluation order.
> I was not so long ago trying to get a program that I worked on
> many years ago running again. With bounds-check turned on, it
> would fail on such IF statements. In most cases, fetching element
> zero of an array won't cause problems in actual code, but bounds
> check catches it anyway.
> There is some suggestion to add new logical operators to
> Fortran, though still not in the 2008 standard. Maybe for
> the next one.
> -- glen
Look for a DS10. Quiet machine (more so than the DS10L) and quick if
you get the 677Mhz version. You can get them on Ebay for around $300-
$400 if you keep watch.
Early on, there was talk of using the Intel
compilers, but I'm reasonably certain that
never happened. But I'm also not certain
that VMS Fortran got ported (more correctly,
translated) to IA64...
Ken Fairfield <ken.fairfi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Was there ever VMS Fortran on IA64?
> Early on, there was talk of using the Intel
> compilers, but I'm reasonably certain that
> never happened. But I'm also not certain
> that VMS Fortran got ported (more correctly,
> translated) to IA64...
I thought I knew that there was. Also, I have a license
for it. They wouldn't do that if there wasn't a compiler,
would they?
> Early on, there was talk of using the Intel
> compilers, but I'm reasonably certain that
> never happened. But I'm also not certain
> that VMS Fortran got ported (more correctly,
> translated) to IA64...
> > Early on, there was talk of using the Intel
> > compilers, but I'm reasonably certain that
> > never happened. But I'm also not certain
> > that VMS Fortran got ported (more correctly,
> > translated) to IA64...
Oh, well, that's very cool then. :-) And to Glen, yeah I'd
say having a PAK for it would be pretty good evidence.
Just demonstrating my ignorance (or lack of knowlege?) here.
I've had no opportunity to get onto IA64.
OTOH, it's still true that this is the F95 version, right,
and that there was not going to be any further development
of Fortran for VMS? No F2003, let alone F2008...
In article
<1e4c4d63-5424-4512-bd87-e55137bce...@q12g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>,
abrsvc <dansabrservi...@yahoo.com> writes: > Look for a DS10. Quiet machine (more so than the DS10L) and quick if
> you get the 677Mhz version. You can get them on Ebay for around $300-
> $400 if you keep watch.
