Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

[9fans] off-topic: why linux lost the desktop

114 views
Skip to first unread message

Aharon Robbins

unread,
Oct 17, 2012, 3:49:41 PM10/17/12
to
This says a lot, rather nicely:

http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2012/Aug-29.html

Having lived through the Unix wars of the 80s and 90s, it's the same
story all over again.

(Or maybe the story never ended. Either way, the users are the ones who lost
out.)

Arnold

Christoph Lohmann

unread,
Oct 17, 2012, 4:05:08 PM10/17/12
to
Greetings comrades.

On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 22:05:08 +0200 Aharon Robbins <arn...@skeeve.com> wrote:
> This says a lot, rather nicely:
>
> http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2012/Aug-29.html
>
> Having lived through the Unix wars of the 80s and 90s, it's the same
> story all over again.

The question is rather: What killed the Plan 9 desktop?


Sincerely,

Christoph Lohmann

Kurt H Maier

unread,
Oct 17, 2012, 4:22:15 PM10/17/12
to
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 09:49:41PM +0200, Aharon Robbins wrote:
> This says a lot, rather nicely:
>
> http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2012/Aug-29.html
>

The guy whose entire career has been spent cloning DOS and Windows
software claims that Linux sucks because it's not enough like Windows?

huge surprise

Rodrigo Miranda

unread,
Oct 17, 2012, 4:19:21 PM10/17/12
to
Cel. Mustard
With the candlestick
In the Dining Room


Rodrigo Miranda

``The zen master hit me in the head.

I told him:

  "If you keep hitting me in the head,

     I won't be able to learn a thing!"

He hit me again.

  In

      the

             head.´´ (Rodrigo Miranda)

erik quanstrom

unread,
Oct 17, 2012, 8:29:34 PM10/17/12
to
> The question is rather: What killed the Plan 9 desktop?

poor special effects?

- erik

arn...@skeeve.com

unread,
Oct 18, 2012, 3:31:15 AM10/18/12
to
The Plan 9 desktop was never aimed at the consumer market, which is
what Miguel was bemoaning for Linux. Plan 9 was never even aimed the
broader Unix / software developer market; it was designed mainly to
please the developers (which is fine, they did great things, but let's
be honest here).

The broader point is that the Unix / Linux / Open Source "communities"
seem to be plagued with a never-ending desire to reinvent the same wheels
over again instead of moving forward. This may be part of what Rob had
in mind in his 2000 paper about systems reearch being dead.

And it may just be part of the human condition. :-(

Arnold

tlar...@polynum.com

unread,
Oct 18, 2012, 4:36:08 AM10/18/12
to
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:05:08PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
>
> The question is rather: What killed the Plan 9 desktop?
>

Having forgotten that a market for a sensible solution is a niche
market. Only stupidity and lack of reflexion can replace the "what do
I need" with "i don't know what I need ; so what everybody has is
obviously what I do need", hence a mass market (the Panurge's sheeps).

--
Thierry Laronde <tlaronde +AT+ polynum +dot+ com>
http://www.kergis.com/
Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89 250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C

Balwinder S Dheeman

unread,
Oct 18, 2012, 5:03:17 AM10/18/12
to
1) Lack of modern GUI and GUI development kit
2) Lack of Object Oriented GUI configuration tools
3) Lack of a decent web0browser
4) Lack of a decent communication/messaging client
5) Lack of an Office Applications suite
...
...
...
z) Last, but not the least, hate towards C++ and love for the Go

--
Balwinder S "bdheeman" Dheeman
(http://werc.homelinux.net/contact/)

Oleksandr Iakovliev

unread,
Oct 18, 2012, 8:10:49 AM10/18/12
to
But that's the list of benefits, isn't? :)

Nemo

unread,
Oct 18, 2012, 9:25:48 AM10/18/12
to
that's what I thought. :)

Stephen Wiley

unread,
Oct 18, 2012, 9:44:15 AM10/18/12
to
Is this another one of those weird plan9 jokes?

Brian L. Stuart

unread,
Oct 18, 2012, 9:51:44 AM10/18/12
to
>> The question is rather: What killed the Plan 9 desktop?
>>
>> 1) Lack of modern GUI and GUI development kit
>> 2) Lack of Object Oriented GUI configuration tools
>> 3) Lack of a decent web0browser
>> 4) Lack of a decent communication/messaging client
>> 5) Lack of an Office Applications suite
>> ...
>> ...
>> ...
>> z) Last, but not the least, hate towards C++ and love for the Go
>
> But that's the list of benefits, isn't? :)

Precisely. The correlation between what makes something
good and what makes something popular is small but negative.
One of the primary reasons I stopped using Linux was that
it was becoming too mainstream and just like all the
commercial junk out there.

In general, I don't have any objection to reinventing the
wheel. If no one ever did, we wouldn't have the pneumatic
tire. But just fiddling about the edges and deciding what
color it should be is the worst of R&D sins. It's BORING.

If you ever watch the TV shows that are competitions of
creative work, the most damning thing a judge can say is
that it's boring. The same is true of software development
and engineering. Besides, it it becomes unfun very quickly
if you can't start something new with a clean sheet of
paper at least every few months.

BLS

erik quanstrom

unread,
Oct 18, 2012, 9:54:22 AM10/18/12
to
> erik quanstrom <quan...@quanstro.net> wrote:
>
> > > The question is rather: What killed the Plan 9 desktop?
> >
> > poor special effects?
> >
> > - erik
>
> The Plan 9 desktop was never aimed at the consumer market, which is
[...]

that was supposed to be a switcheroo, not a comment on plan 9 graphics
or the importance of graphics.

sorry.

- erik

Pavel Klinkovsky

unread,
Oct 18, 2012, 10:16:14 AM10/18/12
to
Dne čtvrtek, 18. října 2012 14:23:03 UTC+2 Oleksandr Iakovliev napsal(a):
>> 1) Lack of modern GUI and GUI development kit
>> ...
> But that's the list of benefits, isn't? :)

I mostly agree except the browser.
I would appreciate a well working browser in the P9 too. ;)

Pavel

Albert Skye

unread,
Oct 18, 2012, 10:20:47 AM10/18/12
to
erik quanstrom <quan...@quanstro.net> wrote:

> > The question is rather: What killed the Plan 9 desktop?
>
> poor special effects?

it's just resting!
but maybe it should die

yes
no "modern GUI", &c.
(and I'm grateful for that! :)

but Plan 9 (and other software)
can be much more useful by exposition
within a *typographical interface*
i.e.,
an interface
informed by typographical imperative[1]
(to increase signal
decrease noise)
in
arranging streams
(of text/numbers/symbols/images
outputs and inputs)
using established patterns
of typographical technology
for
improving the interface/tools
between process and user

to make it
natural/immediate/effortless

[1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Elements_of_Typographic_Style

yard...@telus.net

unread,
Oct 18, 2012, 10:18:33 AM10/18/12
to
> http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2012/Aug-29.html

If developmental stability was all it took to attract third party developers then why didn't FreeBSD "win the desktop" a decade ago? Or indeed Plan 9 (I suppose this is reductio)?

Julius Schmidt

unread,
Oct 18, 2012, 11:41:13 AM10/18/12
to
the solution is
to just stop worrying and love
the bitmap font because there
are more important things
in life.
such as not inserting spurious
new lines
in mailing list posts.

Kurt H Maier

unread,
Oct 18, 2012, 11:42:20 AM10/18/12
to
Who Ignore 4 Simultaneous

Days Same Earth Typography.

Practicing Evil ONEness -

Upon Earth Of Quadrants.

Evil Adult Crime VS Youth.

Supports Lie Of Integration.

1 Educated Are Most Dumb.

Not 1 Human Except Dead 1.

Man Is Paired, 2 Half 4 Self.

1 of God Is Only 1/4 Of God.

erik quanstrom

unread,
Oct 18, 2012, 12:52:23 PM10/18/12
to
> A "well working browser" is an OS these days. A bit of a dilemma that. ;-)

you overestimate how complicated an os needs to be.

- erik

Robert Raschke

unread,
Oct 18, 2012, 12:50:36 PM10/18/12
to

A "well working browser" is an OS these days. A bit of a dilemma that.  ;-)

John Floren

unread,
Oct 18, 2012, 1:17:12 PM10/18/12
to
> Precisely. The correlation between what makes something
> good and what makes something popular is small but negative.
> One of the primary reasons I stopped using Linux was that
> it was becoming too mainstream and just like all the
> commercial junk out there.

I too find Linux too mainstream: http://i.imgur.com/Wtm16.png


john

andrey mirtchovski

unread,
Oct 18, 2012, 1:20:25 PM10/18/12
to
> I too find Linux too mainstream: http://i.imgur.com/Wtm16.png

winner!

Oleksandr Iakovliev

unread,
Oct 18, 2012, 1:47:49 PM10/18/12
to
Browsers are on the dark side - they have cookies

Skip Tavakkolian

unread,
Oct 18, 2012, 2:32:34 PM10/18/12
to
Erudite Glenda in Winter?

Kurt H Maier

unread,
Oct 18, 2012, 3:40:55 PM10/18/12
to
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 03:37:57PM -0400, Corey Thomasson wrote:
>
> Everyday I'm slightly more convinced that you're a highly sophisticated
> Markov chain.

How do you feel about you're a highly sophisticated
Markov chain?

Corey Thomasson

unread,
Oct 18, 2012, 3:37:57 PM10/18/12
to

Everyday I'm slightly more convinced that you're a highly sophisticated Markov chain.

Calvin Morrison

unread,
Oct 18, 2012, 5:07:23 PM10/18/12
to

I used plan9 before it was cool

-- full time philosopher/part time starbucks barista

Dan Cross

unread,
Oct 19, 2012, 11:31:22 AM10/19/12
to
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:17 PM, John Floren <jo...@jfloren.net> wrote:
I too find Linux too mainstream: http://i.imgur.com/Wtm16.png

Bravo.

        - Dan C.


Albert Skye

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 3:19:16 AM10/24/12
to
I welcome anyone interested in discussing
the nature of typographic interface
to contact me off-list

I simply see untapped potential
and I want to bring it into useful form
(by communication/cooperation more than solitude)

askye

0 new messages