Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

[9fans] Announce: FreeBSD port of plan9port

4 views
Skip to first unread message

Serge Gagnon

unread,
Dec 30, 2005, 2:03:09 AM12/30/05
to
I just want to announce you that plan9port http://swtch.com/plan9port
is now in the FreeBSD ports tree.
http://www.freshports.org/devel/plan9port

It is just a new way to install/uppgrade plan9port for FreeBSD users.
There is nothing different than the version that you can grab at its
official page.

--
GAGNON serge <serge....@b2b2c.ca>
PGP KEY-ID: 0xBBC1478F
PGP Fingerprint: B48B 4633 28F5 28F6 7A62 5650 69C8 E293 BBC1 478F
PPG Key: http://quenix2.dyndns.org:7777 | telnet quenix2.dyndns.org 7777

Devon H. O'Dell

unread,
Dec 30, 2005, 4:16:06 AM12/30/05
to
2005/12/29, Serge Gagnon <serge....@b2b2c.ca>:

> I just want to announce you that plan9port http://swtch.com/plan9port
> is now in the FreeBSD ports tree.
> http://www.freshports.org/devel/plan9port
>
> It is just a new way to install/uppgrade plan9port for FreeBSD users.
> There is nothing different than the version that you can grab at its
> official page.

Make sure you mark this as only for i386. I had to make some changes
to build it on AMD64. I will send these to you as soon as I build it
again.

--Devon

Russ Cox

unread,
Dec 30, 2005, 10:56:58 AM12/30/05
to
> http://www.freshports.org/devel/plan9port

RESTRICTED: "Redistribution is not permitted"

What does this mean?

Russ

Serge Gagnon

unread,
Dec 30, 2005, 4:30:24 PM12/30/05
to

>From /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk

# RESTRICTED - Prevent the distribution of distfiles and
# packages to the FTP sites or on CDROM (e.g. forbidden by license
# considerations).

When i read the LICENSE for the first time, i understood that a FreeBSD
package couldn't not be redistributed because of the license in
fonts/lucida.

"No right is granted to create derivative works of or
to redistribute (other than with the Plan 9 Operating System)"

Plan9port is not an operating system itself, then it couldn't be
redistributed as a FreeBSD package. This is how i understood this line.

Sometimes, license are hard to understand especially for someone who
doesn't speak english.

I apologize if i have made a mistake. Just tell me if it is the case
and i'll remove the 'RESTRICTED' line.

Russ Cox

unread,
Dec 30, 2005, 4:40:19 PM12/30/05
to
> When i read the LICENSE for the first time, i understood that a FreeBSD
> package couldn't not be redistributed because of the license in
> fonts/lucida.
>
> "No right is granted to create derivative works of or
> to redistribute (other than with the Plan 9 Operating System)"
>
> Plan9port is not an operating system itself, then it couldn't be
> redistributed as a FreeBSD package. This is how i understood this line.

I would argue that distribution of the fonts with plan9port
counts as being with the Plan 9 Operating System, since
that's what plan9port is, just a port of the Plan 9 Operating System
software to Unix systems.

If you pulled the fonts out and distributed them with some
other piece of software, that wouldn't be allowed. But I think
distribution with plan9port is fine.

Russ

0 new messages