RLD
First I tried Matrox, then Diamond, and now I'm using the #9 771.
The 771 is the best of the lot, but it still won't do 1152 pixels
and it still locks up the system when I bring up full screen WinOS2.
I put a Kelvin 64 into a customer system and it worked flawlessly,
except that it doesn't support 1152 pixels at all. The #9 771 will
do 1152 pixels -- if you run it on Win/95, Win 3.1, or Win/NT.
For my next trick I'm going to try the ATI Mach64. I'll let you all
know how it goes.
--
Paul Vixie
La Honda, CA "Illegitimi non carborundum."
<pa...@vix.com>
pacbell!vixie!paul (dont let the bastards grind you down)