On Wed, 5 Sep 2012 22:44:29 UTC, tho...@antispam.ham wrote:
> "Doug Bissett" <dougb007!
SP...@telus.net> writes:
>
> > I saw the same thing, Lucide just folded up when i tried to open a
> > document. No apparent errors. My guess is that it is looking for some
> > sort of printer definition (bootAble does not, yet, support printers),
> > and decided to close when none was found.
>
> Hmm. You've just identified a difference between my home and
> office computers. At home, I have a laser printer on the
> parallel port, and that's where Lucide works. At work, I print
> to a print server, which routes the job to a printer on the
> network; nothing is attached to the parallel port, and no local
> printer is defined.
Try installing a printer driver. I don't think it would matter which
one (IBMNULL might even work). I never tried it with bootAble, because
the basic printer support isn't there, yet.
> If that's the cause, then it's not a difference between my two
> systems that is to blame, but rather how Lucide is coded, but
> without knowing for sure, should one file a bug report?
Yes, if you can demonstrate that it does work when a printer is
installed (a physical printer only counts when you want to actually
print). If you can, try to install a driver that would be reasonably
close to the real printer that you might want to use.
> Speaking of Lucide and printers, as I said, Lucide will load
> a document if I launch it from the command line, but printing
> doesn't work properly, in the sense that portrait documents
> get printed in landscape mode, and it doesn't matter how I
> configure the printer properties. I suppose that is a bug
> that can be reported, but to whom? When one piece of software
> interacts with another piece of software, how does one know
> where the bug lies? Because other applications print properly,
> I would assume that the bug lies in Lucide, but I don't understand
> how that's possible. I thought that was the whole idea behind
> using device drivers, to avoid having applications neeeding to
> support all the various printers themselves.
I haven't seen that trick, but I rarely try to print with Lucide. So
far, it has always worked properly, except in bootAble.
It is possible, because printing, even with a proper driver, is not as
simple as it would seem. You could have a driver problem, and/or, you
could have a problem in Lucide (it wouldn't be the first one, and it
could be both). What really should happen, when there is no printer
defined, is that the program should format the document for the
screen. It appears that that is not happening (or it is failing) with
Lucide (but that is only my guess).
Rather than reporting it as a bug, it might be better to start off by
reviewing the Lucide news group, and ask about it there. It is at:
>
news.gmane.org
Look up:
> gmane.org.netlabs.org.lucide.general