Message from discussion In regards to the deviant frank mccoy
Received: by 10.66.73.7 with SMTP id h7mr549732pav.6.1350001850619;
Thu, 11 Oct 2012 17:30:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Frank McCoy <mcc...@millcomm.com>
Subject: Re: In regards to the deviant frank mccoy
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 19:30:50 -0500
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
-???-? ??????â€¢?? â„¢Usenet Legends ÂªÂºÂªand?aÂ®ole
>> We know what happens to those who assume, they make asses out
>> of themselves.
>Proof? Cites? Anything at all? Nah... We assumed you were a
>clueless moron and we hit the nail on the head.
Well ... YOU made an ass out of yourself the other day, when you did
exactly the same thing *I* was charged-with; Posting a URL pointing to
where my stories could be found. I'm guessing you ass-u-me-d that
being an "anti-pedophile" and wanting people to be disgusted about the
stories they found there, would excuse you from being charged.
I'd provide a cite and newsgroup-message-number; but then I would be
doing the same thing: "Helping" people find my stories.
I'm *TEMPTED* sorely to point this out to the Agent that was so
obsessed with getting ME charged for doing the same thing.
Tempted; but not nearly as much of an ass as you are.
Well ... I understand that they DO follow me and my name on the
newsgroups. Perhaps, if the judge ever DOES render a guilty-verdict,
they'll successfully charge YOU under the same rules as they did me.
Not, mind, that I'd help them.
You shot yourself in the foot there, after all my warnings.
/ ' / â„¢
,-/-, __ __. ____ /_
(_/ / (_(_/|_/ / <_/ <_