"Lieutenant Scott" <
n...@spam.com> writes:
51> Newsgroups: alt.talk.bollocks,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
51> The question was wrong,
What does your classic substantiated and erroneous claim have to
do with OS/2, Scott?
51> so I corrected you.
What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with
OS/2, Scott?
51> I never claimed anything was to do with OS/2.
Irrelevant, given that I never said that you did make such a
claim, Scott. Nevertheless, you have posted something to an
OS/2 newsgroup, thus the question what your threat has to do
with OS/2, a newsgroup to which you posted it, is valid.
51> And you still haven't answered why you put numbers before
51> your greater than signs.
And you still haven't explained what you query has to do with
OS/2, Scott.
51> You are clearly suffering from logic problems.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, and rather ironic,
coming from someone who can't even understand that the newsgroup
comp.os.os2.advocacy in the newsgroups line of your post means
that you posted to an OS/2 newsgroup.
51> I'll help you a little - go to the start of the thread
51> (my post) and see what groups it was posted to.
Unecessary. The Newsgroups line on your latest posting has
all the evidence I need to demonstrate that you posted to
an OS/2 newsgroup, Scott.
51> You are the only one I see posting from there.
Kill filed everybody else, Scott?
51> I will be more precise in my claim. "even though nobody
51> with any sense uses that shite anymore".
Classic erroneous presupposition.