Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Hey, The [sic] Illiterate Grik Foreskin Peeler, feeling vengeful [sic] today? Clobber [sic] some bleeding psychopathic Nazi asses innit [sic]!
30 views
Skip to first unread message
Fred Hall
Aug 31, 2012, 12:14:22 PM8/31/12
to
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 18:10:02 +0200, "Heinrich" <Hein...@Ruhrgasnet.de> wrote:
>
>we ask the question, asshole
Himmler is dead. Follow his example.
--
August 2012 nominations:
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/2012/08/august-2012-nominations.html
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/p/award-winners-1994-2012.html
http://fnvw.databasix.com (awards descriptions and more)
>
>we ask the question, asshole
Himmler is dead. Follow his example.
--
August 2012 nominations:
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/2012/08/august-2012-nominations.html
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/p/award-winners-1994-2012.html
http://fnvw.databasix.com (awards descriptions and more)
Heinrich
Aug 31, 2012, 12:20:04 PM8/31/12
to
"Fred Hall" schreef in bericht
news:k1qmvd$idk$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
Fred Hall
Aug 31, 2012, 12:21:38 PM8/31/12
to
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 18:20:04 +0200, "Heinrich" <Hein...@Ruhrgasnet.de> wrote:
>poor
Most Neo's are, skinhead.
>poor
Most Neo's are, skinhead.
Heinrich
Aug 31, 2012, 12:26:36 PM8/31/12
to
"Fred Hall" schreef in bericht
Fred Hall
Aug 31, 2012, 12:28:50 PM8/31/12
to
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 18:26:36 +0200, "Heinrich" <Hein...@Ruhrgasnet.de> wrote:
>sucking jewish rectums
Radavich says that's your favorite pastime.
>sucking jewish rectums
Radavich says that's your favorite pastime.
Heinrich
Aug 31, 2012, 12:32:22 PM8/31/12
to
"Fred Hall" schreef in bericht
Fred Hall
Aug 31, 2012, 12:53:48 PM8/31/12
to
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 18:32:22 +0200, "Heinrich" <Hein...@Ruhrgasnet.de> wrote:
>who is radavich?
Dumbass skinhead.
>who is radavich?
Dumbass skinhead.
Heinrich
Aug 31, 2012, 12:58:58 PM8/31/12
to
"Fred Hall" schreef in bericht
The Peeler
Aug 31, 2012, 1:05:38 PM8/31/12
to
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 18:58:58 +0200, Dumb Heini, the Dutch resident Nazi
troll of sci and scj, wrote:
> stARTING NAME CALLING IS A SIGN OF WEAKNES SO YOU ARE CONSIDERED A LUL
Looks like the fame of your ABYSMAL STUPIDITY is quickly spreading, Dumb
troll of sci and scj, wrote:
> stARTING NAME CALLING IS A SIGN OF WEAKNES SO YOU ARE CONSIDERED A LUL
Dutch Nazi Heini! Let me assist you in that regard! LOL
--
Excerpts from Dumb Dutch Heini's unbelevbalbe vobcaburally:
sopend (take a guess)
eecute4d (take a guess! LOL)
aperuvisn (no idea)
kickihnbg (take a guess!)
eundereducaatged (Look who's talking about "undereducated"! LOL)
shjuit (shit? shut? LOL)
heionrich (his own name!!! LOL)
anothernbeville (no idea, LOL)
unbelevbalbe (unbelievable)
illeterate (illiterate) <--- my favourite!!!
res[popnsible (responsible)
tropubles (troubles)
unbeaable (unbearable)
compaire3d (compared)
cpontrolof (take a guess! LOL)
tomroor (tomorrow?)
anniliatyed (annihilated)
tie (time)
thewy (no idea LOL)
alkthouygh (although)
vocitory (victory)
d0onot (don't ?)
lisyten (listen)
thaen (then)
rep0ly (reply)
wjho (who)
wheb (when)
si8nce (since)
p9olice (police)
trill (thrill)
gwetting (getting)
weel (well)
bext (next)
mnayor (mayor)
getting updated constantly...
Checkmate
Aug 31, 2012, 2:07:12 PM8/31/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
First, check out what The Peeler said:
>
>On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 18:58:58 +0200, Dumb Heini, the Dutch resident Nazi
>troll of sci and scj, wrote:
>
>> stARTING NAME CALLING IS A SIGN OF WEAKNES SO YOU ARE CONSIDERED A LUL
>
>Looks like the fame of your ABYSMAL STUPIDITY is quickly spreading, Dumb
>Dutch Nazi Heini! Let me assist you in that regard! LOL
Are you back again, dumbass?
--
Checkmate
KotAGoR XXXIV
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012
co-winner, Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker award, May 2001
Copyright ￜ 2012
all rights reserved
"There are many here among us...
who feel that life is but a joke."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ&feature=youtu.be
Checkmate!
First, check out what The Peeler said:
>
>On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 18:58:58 +0200, Dumb Heini, the Dutch resident Nazi
>troll of sci and scj, wrote:
>
>> stARTING NAME CALLING IS A SIGN OF WEAKNES SO YOU ARE CONSIDERED A LUL
>
>Looks like the fame of your ABYSMAL STUPIDITY is quickly spreading, Dumb
>Dutch Nazi Heini! Let me assist you in that regard! LOL
--
Checkmate
KotAGoR XXXIV
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012
co-winner, Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker award, May 2001
Copyright ￜ 2012
all rights reserved
"There are many here among us...
who feel that life is but a joke."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ&feature=youtu.be
Vogelgrippe
Aug 31, 2012, 2:20:20 PM8/31/12
to
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 11:07:12 -0700, Checkmate wrote:
>>> stARTING NAME CALLING IS A SIGN OF WEAKNES SO YOU ARE CONSIDERED A LUL
>>
>>Looks like the fame of your ABYSMAL STUPIDITY is quickly spreading, Dumb
>>Dutch Nazi Heini! Let me assist you in that regard! LOL
>
> Are you back again, dumbass?
Still the same dumbass that you were already years ago? OBVIOUSLY! LOL
>>> stARTING NAME CALLING IS A SIGN OF WEAKNES SO YOU ARE CONSIDERED A LUL
>>
>>Looks like the fame of your ABYSMAL STUPIDITY is quickly spreading, Dumb
>>Dutch Nazi Heini! Let me assist you in that regard! LOL
>
> Are you back again, dumbass?
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Aug 31, 2012, 6:28:32 PM8/31/12
to
Fred Hall <fkh...@gmail.com> writes:
314> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.free.newsservers,gr.sodomy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
314> Himmler is dead. Follow his example.
What does Himmler's deadness have to do with OS/2, Hall?
315> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.free.newsservers,gr.sodomy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
315> Most Neo's are, skinhead.
Who is "skinhead", Hall? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
alias. And what do near-Earth objects have to do with OS/2, Hall?
316> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.free.newsservers,gr.sodomy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
316> Radavich says that's your favorite pastime.
What does Heinrich's favorite pastime have to do with OS/2, Hall?
317> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.free.newsservers,gr.sodomy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
317> Dumbass skinhead.
What does Heinrich's alleged dumbassness have to do with OS/2, Hall?
314> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.free.newsservers,gr.sodomy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
314> Himmler is dead. Follow his example.
What does Himmler's deadness have to do with OS/2, Hall?
315> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.free.newsservers,gr.sodomy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
315> Most Neo's are, skinhead.
Who is "skinhead", Hall? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
alias. And what do near-Earth objects have to do with OS/2, Hall?
316> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.free.newsservers,gr.sodomy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
316> Radavich says that's your favorite pastime.
What does Heinrich's favorite pastime have to do with OS/2, Hall?
317> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.free.newsservers,gr.sodomy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
317> Dumbass skinhead.
What does Heinrich's alleged dumbassness have to do with OS/2, Hall?
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Aug 31, 2012, 6:34:54 PM8/31/12
to
Heinrich <Hein...@Ruhrgasnet.de> writes:
77> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.free.newsservers,gr.sodomy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
77> poor nreply.
What does the poorness of Hall's "nreply" have to do with OS/2,
Heinrich?
77> try again
What does your directive have to do with OS/2, Heinrich?
78> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.free.newsservers,gr.sodomy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
78> aha i think we have met another supporter of sucking jewish
rectums
What does your thought have to do with OS/2, Heinrich?
79> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.free.newsservers,gr.sodomy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
79> who is radavich?
What does your question of Hall have to do with OS/2, Heinrich?
80> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.free.newsservers,gr.sodomy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
80> stARTING NAME CALLING IS A SIGN OF WEAKNES SO YOU ARE CONSIDERED A
LUL
What does Hall's being considered a "LUL" have to do with OS/2,
Heinrich, and why are you shouting?
77> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.free.newsservers,gr.sodomy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
77> poor nreply.
What does the poorness of Hall's "nreply" have to do with OS/2,
Heinrich?
77> try again
What does your directive have to do with OS/2, Heinrich?
78> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.free.newsservers,gr.sodomy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
78> aha i think we have met another supporter of sucking jewish
rectums
What does your thought have to do with OS/2, Heinrich?
79> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.free.newsservers,gr.sodomy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
79> who is radavich?
What does your question of Hall have to do with OS/2, Heinrich?
80> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.free.newsservers,gr.sodomy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
80> stARTING NAME CALLING IS A SIGN OF WEAKNES SO YOU ARE CONSIDERED A
LUL
What does Hall's being considered a "LUL" have to do with OS/2,
Heinrich, and why are you shouting?
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Aug 31, 2012, 6:36:40 PM8/31/12
to
The Peeler <finish...@themoronicRevd.invalid> writes:
179> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.free.newsservers,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
179> Looks like the fame of your ABYSMAL STUPIDITY is quickly
spreading, Dumb
179> Dutch Nazi Heini! Let me assist you in that regard! LOL
What does your assistance have to do with OS/2, The Peeler?
179> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.free.newsservers,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
179> Looks like the fame of your ABYSMAL STUPIDITY is quickly
spreading, Dumb
179> Dutch Nazi Heini! Let me assist you in that regard! LOL
What does your assistance have to do with OS/2, The Peeler?
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Aug 31, 2012, 6:38:16 PM8/31/12
to
Checkmate <Lunati...@The.Edge> writes:
300> Newsgroups:
alt.checkmate,alt.free.newsservers,alt.revisionism,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy,soc.culture.israel
300> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
posts by
300> Checkmate!
What does your warning have to do with OS/2, Checkmate?
300> First, check out what The Peeler said:
What does what The Peeler said have to do with OS/2, Checkmate?
300> Are you back again, dumbass?
What does your question of The Peeler have to do with OS/2, Checkmate?
300> Newsgroups:
alt.checkmate,alt.free.newsservers,alt.revisionism,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy,soc.culture.israel
300> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
posts by
300> Checkmate!
What does your warning have to do with OS/2, Checkmate?
300> First, check out what The Peeler said:
What does what The Peeler said have to do with OS/2, Checkmate?
300> Are you back again, dumbass?
What does your question of The Peeler have to do with OS/2, Checkmate?
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Aug 31, 2012, 6:39:22 PM8/31/12
to
Vogelgrippe <be...@beep.net> writes:
1> Newsgroups:
alt.checkmate,alt.free.newsservers,alt.revisionism,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy,soc.culture.israel
1> Still the same dumbass that you were already years ago? OBVIOUSLY!
LOL
What does your amusement with Checkmate have to do with OS/2,
Vogelgrippe?
1> Newsgroups:
alt.checkmate,alt.free.newsservers,alt.revisionism,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy,soc.culture.israel
1> Still the same dumbass that you were already years ago? OBVIOUSLY!
LOL
What does your amusement with Checkmate have to do with OS/2,
Vogelgrippe?
The Revd
Aug 31, 2012, 7:56:42 PM8/31/12
to
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:34:54 -0700 (PDT), "tho...@antispam.ham"
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
>Heinrich <Hein...@Ruhrgasnet.de> writes:
>
>77> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.free.newsservers,gr.sodomy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
>77> poor nreply.
>
>What does the poorness of Hall's "nreply" have to do with OS/2,
>Heinrich?
What the fuck *is* OX/2, tholoon?
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
>Heinrich <Hein...@Ruhrgasnet.de> writes:
>
>77> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.free.newsservers,gr.sodomy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
>77> poor nreply.
>
>What does the poorness of Hall's "nreply" have to do with OS/2,
>Heinrich?
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Sep 1, 2012, 5:27:22 AM9/1/12
to
The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
393> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
393> What the fuck *is* OX/2, tholoon?
Having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon" hasn't been
used on a posting since last November. And there also wasn't any
discussion of "OX/2", Revd, so your question of tholoon is a
non sequitur. What does your foul language have to do with OS/2,
Revd?
393> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
393> What the fuck *is* OX/2, tholoon?
Having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon" hasn't been
used on a posting since last November. And there also wasn't any
discussion of "OX/2", Revd, so your question of tholoon is a
non sequitur. What does your foul language have to do with OS/2,
Revd?
The Revd
Sep 1, 2012, 7:48:30 AM9/1/12
to
'anti-semitism'�� or revisionism, tholoon?
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Sep 2, 2012, 6:11:02 PM9/2/12
to
The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
394> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
394> What does your classic hysterical rant have to do with
394> 'anti-semitism'®┴ or revisionism, tholoon?
Having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon" hasn't been
used by a poster since last November.
394> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
394> What does your classic hysterical rant have to do with
394> 'anti-semitism'®┴ or revisionism, tholoon?
Having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon" hasn't been
The Revd
Sep 2, 2012, 7:27:09 PM9/2/12
to
On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 15:11:02 -0700 (PDT), "tho...@antispam.ham"
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
>The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
>
>394> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
>394> What does your classic hysterical rant have to do with
>394> 'anti-semitism'�? or revisionism, tholoon?
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
>The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
>
>394> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
>394> What does your classic hysterical rant have to do with
>
>Having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon" hasn't been
>used by a poster since last November.
Classic hallucination, tholoon. YOU are tholoon.
>Having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon" hasn't been
>used by a poster since last November.
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Sep 3, 2012, 6:42:41 AM9/3/12
to
The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
395> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
395> Classic hallucination,
I'm well aware that you have been hallucinating, Revd. No need
to tell me about it.
395> tholoon.
Having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon" hasn't been
used by a poster since last November.
395> YOU are tholoon.
Well, since you're hallucinating about responding to "tholoon", it
stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
395> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
395> Classic hallucination,
I'm well aware that you have been hallucinating, Revd. No need
to tell me about it.
395> tholoon.
Having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon" hasn't been
used by a poster since last November.
Well, since you're hallucinating about responding to "tholoon", it
stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
The Revd
Sep 3, 2012, 10:34:29 AM9/3/12
to
On Mon, 3 Sep 2012 03:42:41 -0700 (PDT), "tho...@antispam.ham"
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
>The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
>
>395> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
>395> Classic hallucination,
>
>I'm well aware that you have been hallucinating, Revd. No need
>to tell me about it.
Classic misinterpretation.
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
>The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
>
>395> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
>395> Classic hallucination,
>
>I'm well aware that you have been hallucinating, Revd. No need
>to tell me about it.
>395> tholoon.
>
>Having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon" hasn't been
>used by a poster since last November.
>395> YOU are tholoon.
>
>Well, since you're hallucinating about responding to "tholoon", it
>stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
>just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
>change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
What does your hysterical rant have to do with 'anti-semitism'�� or
revisionism, tholoon?
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Sep 3, 2012, 10:56:18 AM9/3/12
to
The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
396> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
396> Classic misinterpretation.
What does your misinterpretation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
396> YOU are tholoon, tholoon.
Well, since you're hallucinating about responding to "tholoon", it
stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
396> Classic equivocation.
What does your equivocation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
396> What does your hysterical rant have to do with 'anti-semitism'®┴
or
396> revisionism, tholoon?
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
396> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
396> Classic misinterpretation.
What does your misinterpretation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
396> YOU are tholoon, tholoon.
Well, since you're hallucinating about responding to "tholoon", it
stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
What does your equivocation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
396> What does your hysterical rant have to do with 'anti-semitism'®┴
or
396> revisionism, tholoon?
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
The Revd
Sep 3, 2012, 2:10:27 PM9/3/12
to
On Mon, 3 Sep 2012 07:56:18 -0700 (PDT), "tho...@antispam.ham"
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
Aloha, tholoon!
>The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
>
>396> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
>396> Classic misinterpretation.
>
>What does your misinterpretation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
YOUR misinterpretation, tholoon.
>396> YOU are tholoon, tholoon.
>
>Well, since you're hallucinating about responding to "tholoon", it
>stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
>just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
>change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
YOU are still tholoon, tholoon!
>396> Classic equivocation.
>
>What does your equivocation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
YOUR equivocation, tholoon.
>396> What does your hysterical rant have to do with 'anti-semitism'�?
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
Aloha, tholoon!
>The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
>
>396> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
>396> Classic misinterpretation.
>
>What does your misinterpretation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
>396> YOU are tholoon, tholoon.
>
>Well, since you're hallucinating about responding to "tholoon", it
>stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
>just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
>change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
>396> Classic equivocation.
>
>What does your equivocation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
>396> What does your hysterical rant have to do with 'anti-semitism'�?
>or
>396> revisionism, tholoon?
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Classic evasion. Answer the question, tholoon.
>396> revisionism, tholoon?
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
NoSpamAtAll
Sep 3, 2012, 2:12:13 PM9/3/12
to
In article <hhs948tnt8g1h2e1u...@4ax.com>,
The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> Classic evasion. Answer the question, tholoon.
WE give the orders here, cocksucking limey bastard.
> Classic evasion. Answer the question, tholoon.
Heinrich
Sep 3, 2012, 2:21:36 PM9/3/12
to
"NoSpamAtAll" schreef in bericht news:k22rtt$8h2$1...@pcls6.std.com...
you
NoSpamAtAll
Sep 3, 2012, 2:23:49 PM9/3/12
to
In article <Wy61s.1819$_I7...@newsfe20.iad>,
Heinrich <Hein...@Ruhrgasnet.de> wrote:
[...]
Drop dead, inferior kaaskop.
Heinrich <Hein...@Ruhrgasnet.de> wrote:
[...]
Drop dead, inferior kaaskop.
The Peeler
Sep 3, 2012, 2:38:11 PM9/3/12
to
On Mon, 3 Sep 2012 20:21:36 +0200, Dumb Heini, the Dutch resident Nazi
fag and laughing stock of sci and scj, wrote:
>> Classic evasion. Answer the question, tholoon.
>
> WE give the orders here, cocksucking limey bastard.
>
> nonsense, you are a jew so you follow orders failing which the bull awaits
> you
Oh, listen: Dumb Heini, The Rectum's faithful little dog is yapping! LOL
fag and laughing stock of sci and scj, wrote:
>> Classic evasion. Answer the question, tholoon.
>
> WE give the orders here, cocksucking limey bastard.
>
> nonsense, you are a jew so you follow orders failing which the bull awaits
> you
--
Here is a list (by no means complete) of the Dutch Nazi fag's favourite
topics posted to these groups. As you can see, the miserable Dutch fag
keeps obsessing about penises, penis sizes, sperm, sperm banks, male love,
etc.:
"World penis size map" Heinrich <Hein...@Ruhrgasnet.de> 12.04.2012
MID: <I3Ehr.16619$jZ1....@newsfe13.iad>
"American Sperm Is a Hot Commodity" Heinrich <Hein...@Ruhrgasnet.de>
09.04.2012
Message-ID: <%kwgr.16967$ie6...@newsfe14.iad>
"canada:catholic scchools to launch gay clubs" Heinrich
<Hein...@Ruhrgasnet.de> 13.04.2012
MID: <JSWhr.242$mH...@newsfe07.iad>
"jew wants his sperm back" Heinrich <Hein...@Ruhrgasnet.de> 04.06.2012
MID: <_45zr.54768$6Y6....@newsfe19.iad>
"I circumcised a baby with the smallest penis I've ever seen" Heinrich
<Hein...@Ruhrgasnet.de> 25.04.2012
MID: <BqQlr.21955$mL3....@newsfe23.iad>
"hill of foreskins" Heinrich <Hein...@Ruhrgasnet.de> 22.04.2012
Message-ID: <N8Vkr.11226$VF7....@newsfe02.iad>
"Jewish sperm donor οΏ½fathered 600 childrenοΏ½ in Britain" Heinrich
<Hein...@Ruhrgasnet.de> 09.04.2012
MID: <htvgr.32856$FA4....@newsfe03.iad>
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Sep 3, 2012, 5:47:33 PM9/3/12
to
"Heinrich" <Hein...@Ruhrgasnet.de> writes:
13> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
13> nonsense, you are a jew so you follow orders failing which the
13> bull awaits you
What does your claim about spamnot have to do with OS/2, Heinrich?
13> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
13> nonsense, you are a jew so you follow orders failing which the
13> bull awaits you
What does your claim about spamnot have to do with OS/2, Heinrich?
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Sep 3, 2012, 5:50:04 PM9/3/12
to
NoSpamAtAll <spa...@not.home> writes:
1> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
1> WE give the orders here, cocksucking limey bastard.
Who is "cocksucking limey bastard", spamnot? There is nobody in
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
2> [...]
What does your ellipsis have to do with OS/2, spamnot?
2> Drop dead, inferior kaaskop.
Who is "inferior kasskop", spamnot? There is nobody in this
newsgroup using that alias.
1> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
1> WE give the orders here, cocksucking limey bastard.
Who is "cocksucking limey bastard", spamnot? There is nobody in
this newsgroup using that alias.
2> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
2> [...]
What does your ellipsis have to do with OS/2, spamnot?
2> Drop dead, inferior kaaskop.
Who is "inferior kasskop", spamnot? There is nobody in this
newsgroup using that alias.
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Sep 3, 2012, 5:51:13 PM9/3/12
to
The Peeler <finish...@themoronicRevd.invalid> writes:
180> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
180> Oh, listen: Dumb Heini, The Rectum's faithful little dog is
yapping! LOL
What does your amusement have to do with OS/2, The Peeler?
180> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
180> Oh, listen: Dumb Heini, The Rectum's faithful little dog is
yapping! LOL
What does your amusement have to do with OS/2, The Peeler?
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Sep 3, 2012, 5:54:08 PM9/3/12
to
The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
397> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
397> Aloha, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
397> YOUR misinterpretation, tholoon.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
397> YOU are still tholoon, tholoon!
Well, since you're hallucinating about responding to "tholoon", it
stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
397> YOUR equivocation, tholoon.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
397> Classic evasion.
I'm well aware that you haven't answered the questions, Revd,
which constitutes evasion. No need to tell me about it.
397> Answer the question, tholoon.
397> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
397> Aloha, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Well, since you're hallucinating about responding to "tholoon", it
stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware that you haven't answered the questions, Revd,
which constitutes evasion. No need to tell me about it.
397> Answer the question, tholoon.
The Revd
Sep 3, 2012, 6:05:56 PM9/3/12
to
On Mon, 3 Sep 2012 14:54:08 -0700 (PDT), "tho...@antispam.ham"
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
Aloha, tholoon!
>The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
>
>397> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
>397> Aloha, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm fully aware that you have attribution problems, tholoon. No need
>397> YOU are still tholoon, tholoon!
>
>Well, since you're hallucinating about responding to "tholoon", it
>stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
>just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
>change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
Classic misrepresentation.
>397> YOUR equivocation, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
YOU are tholoon, tholoon!
>397> Classic evasion.
>
>I'm well aware that you haven't answered the questions, Revd,
>which constitutes evasion. No need to tell me about it.
Classic equivocation.
>397> Answer the question, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Classic lie, as can only be expected from an astrologer who has no
clue.
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
Aloha, tholoon!
>The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
>
>397> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
>397> Aloha, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
to tell me about it.
>397> YOUR misinterpretation, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
YOU are tholoon, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>397> YOU are still tholoon, tholoon!
>
>Well, since you're hallucinating about responding to "tholoon", it
>stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
>just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
>change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
>397> YOUR equivocation, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>397> Classic evasion.
>
>I'm well aware that you haven't answered the questions, Revd,
>which constitutes evasion. No need to tell me about it.
>397> Answer the question, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
clue.
Message has been deleted
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Sep 3, 2012, 11:26:57 PM9/3/12
to
I Bought DataBasix writes:
4> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
4> One must agree with this post.
What does agreeing with A = A have to do with OS/2, Databasix?
4> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
4> One must agree with this post.
What does agreeing with A = A have to do with OS/2, Databasix?
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Sep 3, 2012, 11:29:55 PM9/3/12
to
The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
398> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
398> Aloha, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
if you had better reading comprehension skills.
398> I'm fully aware that you have attribution problems, tholoon. No
need
398> to tell me about it.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
if you had better reading comprehension skills.
398> YOU are tholoon, tholoon!
Well, since you're hallucinating about responding to "tholoon", it
stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
398> Classic misrepresentation.
What does your misrepresentation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
398> YOU are tholoon, tholoon!
Well, since you're hallucinating about responding to "tholoon", it
stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
398> Classic equivocation.
What does your equivocation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
398> Classic lie, as can only be expected from an astrologer who has
no
398> clue.
What do your lying and astrology have to do with OS/2, Revd?
398> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
398> Aloha, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
if you had better reading comprehension skills.
398> I'm fully aware that you have attribution problems, tholoon. No
need
398> to tell me about it.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
if you had better reading comprehension skills.
398> YOU are tholoon, tholoon!
Well, since you're hallucinating about responding to "tholoon", it
stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
What does your misrepresentation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
398> YOU are tholoon, tholoon!
Well, since you're hallucinating about responding to "tholoon", it
stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
What does your equivocation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
no
398> clue.
What do your lying and astrology have to do with OS/2, Revd?
Checkmate
Sep 4, 2012, 12:47:30 AM9/4/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
First, check out what The Peeler said:
>
>On Mon, 3 Sep 2012 20:21:36 +0200, Dumb Heini, the Dutch resident Nazi
>fag and laughing stock of sci and scj, wrote:
>
>>> Classic evasion. Answer the question, tholoon.
>>
>> WE give the orders here, cocksucking limey bastard.
>>
>> nonsense, you are a jew so you follow orders failing which the bull awaits
>> you
>
>Oh, listen: Dumb Heini, The Rectum's faithful little dog is yapping! LOL
You have a dog in your rectum???
>fag and laughing stock of sci and scj, wrote:
>
>>> Classic evasion. Answer the question, tholoon.
>>
>> WE give the orders here, cocksucking limey bastard.
>>
>> nonsense, you are a jew so you follow orders failing which the bull awaits
>> you
>
>Oh, listen: Dumb Heini, The Rectum's faithful little dog is yapping! LOL
--
Checkmate
KotAGoR XXXIV
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012
co-winner, Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker award, May 2001
Copyright ￜ 2012
all rights reserved
"There are many here among us...
who feel that life is but a joke."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ&feature=youtu.be
The Peeler
Sep 4, 2012, 5:54:19 AM9/4/12
to
On Mon, 3 Sep 2012 21:47:30 -0700, Checkmate, one of Usenet's long-standing
assholes, wrote:
>>> WE give the orders here, cocksucking limey bastard.
>>>
>>> nonsense, you are a jew so you follow orders failing which the bull awaits
>>> you
>>
>>Oh, listen: Dumb Heini, The Rectum's faithful little dog is yapping! LOL
>
> You have a dog in your rectum???
"Shining" with your asshole nature again, as usual, asshole? What is "new"?
assholes, wrote:
>>> WE give the orders here, cocksucking limey bastard.
>>>
>>> nonsense, you are a jew so you follow orders failing which the bull awaits
>>> you
>>
>>Oh, listen: Dumb Heini, The Rectum's faithful little dog is yapping! LOL
>
> You have a dog in your rectum???
<BG>
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Sep 4, 2012, 7:10:13 AM9/4/12
to
Checkmate <Lunati...@The.Edge> writes:
303> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
303> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
posts by
303> Checkmate!
What does your warning have to do with OS/2, Checkmate?
303> First, check out what The Peeler said:
What does what The Peeler said have to do with OS/2, Checkmate?
303> You have a dog in your rectum???
What does your question of The Peeler have to do with OS/2, Checkmate?
303> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
303> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
posts by
303> Checkmate!
What does your warning have to do with OS/2, Checkmate?
303> First, check out what The Peeler said:
What does what The Peeler said have to do with OS/2, Checkmate?
303> You have a dog in your rectum???
What does your question of The Peeler have to do with OS/2, Checkmate?
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Sep 4, 2012, 7:11:20 AM9/4/12
to
The Peeler <finish...@themoronicRevd.invalid> writes:
181> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
181> "Shining" with your asshole nature again, as usual, asshole? What
is "new"?
181> <BG>
What do your questions of Checkmate have to do with OS/2, The Peeler?
181> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
181> "Shining" with your asshole nature again, as usual, asshole? What
is "new"?
181> <BG>
What do your questions of Checkmate have to do with OS/2, The Peeler?
The Revd
Sep 4, 2012, 8:25:26 AM9/4/12
to
On Mon, 3 Sep 2012 20:29:55 -0700 (PDT), "tho...@antispam.ham"
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
Aloha, tholoon!
>The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
>
>398> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
>398> Aloha, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
>I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
>if you had better reading comprehension skills.
Classic equivocation. YOU are tholoon, tholoon.
>398> I'm fully aware that you have attribution problems, tholoon. No
>need
>398> to tell me about it.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
>I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
>if you had better reading comprehension skills.
Classic repetition.
>398> YOU are tholoon, tholoon!
>
>Well, since you're hallucinating about responding to "tholoon", it
>stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
>just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
>change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
Classic misrepresentation.
>398> Classic misrepresentation.
>
>What does your misrepresentation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
YOUR misrepresentation, tholoon.
>398> YOU are tholoon, tholoon!
>
>Well, since you're hallucinating about responding to "tholoon", it
>stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
>just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
>change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
Classic repetition.
>398> Classic equivocation.
>
>What does your equivocation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
YOUR equivocation, tholoon!
>398> Classic lie, as can only be expected from an astrologer who has
>no
>398> clue.
>
>What do your lying and astrology have to do with OS/2, Revd?
YOU are the astrologer, tholoon. These are YOUR lies.
What the fuck is OX/2 anyway?
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
Aloha, tholoon!
>The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
>
>398> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
>398> Aloha, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
>I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
>if you had better reading comprehension skills.
>398> I'm fully aware that you have attribution problems, tholoon. No
>need
>398> to tell me about it.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
>I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
>if you had better reading comprehension skills.
>398> YOU are tholoon, tholoon!
>
>Well, since you're hallucinating about responding to "tholoon", it
>stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
>just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
>change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
>398> Classic misrepresentation.
>
>What does your misrepresentation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
>398> YOU are tholoon, tholoon!
>
>Well, since you're hallucinating about responding to "tholoon", it
>stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
>just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
>change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
>398> Classic equivocation.
>
>What does your equivocation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
>398> Classic lie, as can only be expected from an astrologer who has
>no
>398> clue.
>
>What do your lying and astrology have to do with OS/2, Revd?
What the fuck is OX/2 anyway?
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Sep 4, 2012, 12:49:56 PM9/4/12
to
The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
399> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
399> Aloha, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
if you had better reading comprehension skills.
399> Classic equivocation.
What does your equivocation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
399> YOU are tholoon, tholoon.
Well, since you're still hallucinating about responding to "tholoon",
What does your repetition have to do with OS/2, Revd?
399> Classic misrepresentation.
What does your misrepresentation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
399> YOUR misrepresentation, tholoon.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
399> Classic repetition.
What does your repetition have to do with OS/2, Revd?
399> YOUR equivocation, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
399> YOU are the astrologer, tholoon.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
399> These are YOUR lies.
I see that your hallucination now involves you disowning your
own writings, Revd.
399> What the fuck is OX/2 anyway?
What do your foul language and question have to do with OS/2, Revd?
399> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
399> Aloha, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
if you had better reading comprehension skills.
What does your equivocation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
Well, since you're still hallucinating about responding to "tholoon",
it stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
399> Classic repetition.
just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
What does your repetition have to do with OS/2, Revd?
399> Classic misrepresentation.
What does your misrepresentation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
What does your repetition have to do with OS/2, Revd?
399> YOUR equivocation, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I see that your hallucination now involves you disowning your
own writings, Revd.
399> What the fuck is OX/2 anyway?
What do your foul language and question have to do with OS/2, Revd?
The Revd
Sep 4, 2012, 1:15:36 PM9/4/12
to
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 09:49:56 -0700 (PDT), "tho...@antispam.ham"
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
Aloha, tholoon!
>The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
>
>399> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
>399> Aloha, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
>I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
>if you had better reading comprehension skills.
What do your attribution problems have to do with 'anti-semitism'�� or
revisionism, tholoon?
>399> Classic equivocation.
>
>What does your equivocation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
YOUR equivocation, tholoon.
>399> YOU are tholoon, tholoon.
>
>Well, since you're still hallucinating about responding to "tholoon",
>it stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
>just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
>change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
YOUR hallucinations, tholoon.
>399> Classic repetition.
>
>What does your repetition have to do with OS/2, Revd?
YOUR repetition, tholoon.
>399> Classic misrepresentation.
>
>What does your misrepresentation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
>
>399> YOUR misrepresentation, tholoon.
YOUR misrepresentation, tholoon.
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Classic evasion.
>399> Classic repetition.
>
>What does your repetition have to do with OS/2, Revd?
YOUR repetition, tholoon.
>399> YOUR equivocation, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Classic denial.
>399> YOU are the astrologer, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Classic non sequitur.
>399> These are YOUR lies.
>
>I see that your hallucination now involves you disowning your
>own writings, Revd.
Classic misrepresentation.
>399> What the fuck is OX/2 anyway?
>
>What do your foul language and question have to do with OS/2, Revd?
Answer the fucking question, tholoon! Do NOT consult your horoscope.
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
Aloha, tholoon!
>The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
>
>399> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
>399> Aloha, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
>I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
>if you had better reading comprehension skills.
revisionism, tholoon?
>399> Classic equivocation.
>
>What does your equivocation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
>399> YOU are tholoon, tholoon.
>
>Well, since you're still hallucinating about responding to "tholoon",
>it stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
>just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
>change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
>399> Classic repetition.
>
>What does your repetition have to do with OS/2, Revd?
>399> Classic misrepresentation.
>
>What does your misrepresentation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
>
>399> YOUR misrepresentation, tholoon.
YOUR misrepresentation, tholoon.
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>399> Classic repetition.
>
>What does your repetition have to do with OS/2, Revd?
>399> YOUR equivocation, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>399> YOU are the astrologer, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>399> These are YOUR lies.
>
>I see that your hallucination now involves you disowning your
>own writings, Revd.
>399> What the fuck is OX/2 anyway?
>
>What do your foul language and question have to do with OS/2, Revd?
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Sep 4, 2012, 2:36:26 PM9/4/12
to
The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
400> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
400> Aloha, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
if you had better reading comprehension skills.
400> What do your attribution problems have to do with 'anti-
semitism'®┴ or
400> revisionism, tholoon?
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
400> YOUR equivocation, tholoon.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
400> YOUR hallucinations, tholoon.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
400> YOUR repetition, tholoon.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
400> YOUR misrepresentation, tholoon.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
400> Classic evasion.
I'm well aware that you haven't answered my questions, Revd,
which constitutes evasion. No need to tell me about it.
400> YOUR repetition, tholoon.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
400> Classic denial.
What does your ambiguous denial have to do with OS/2, Revd?
400> Classic non sequitur.
What does your non sequitur have to do with OS/2, Revd?
400> Classic misrepresentation.
What does your misrepresentation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
400> Answer the fucking question, tholoon! Do NOT consult your
horoscope.
400> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
400> Aloha, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
if you had better reading comprehension skills.
semitism'®┴ or
400> revisionism, tholoon?
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware that you haven't answered my questions, Revd,
which constitutes evasion. No need to tell me about it.
400> YOUR repetition, tholoon.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
What does your ambiguous denial have to do with OS/2, Revd?
400> Classic non sequitur.
What does your non sequitur have to do with OS/2, Revd?
400> Classic misrepresentation.
What does your misrepresentation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
horoscope.
The Revd
Sep 4, 2012, 3:24:57 PM9/4/12
to
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 11:36:26 -0700 (PDT), "tho...@antispam.ham"
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
Aloha, tholoon!
>The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
>
>400> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
>400> Aloha, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
>I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
>if you had better reading comprehension skills.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no need
to tell me about them.
>400> What do your attribution problems have to do with 'anti-
>semitism'�? or
>400> YOUR equivocation, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Classic erroneous presuppository.
>400> YOUR hallucinations, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
YOU are tholoon, tholoon!
>400> YOUR repetition, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
YOU are tholoon, tholoon!
>400> YOUR misrepresentation, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
YOU are tholoon, tholoon.
>400> Classic evasion.
>
>I'm well aware that you haven't answered my questions, Revd,
>which constitutes evasion. No need to tell me about it.
Classic ambiguous non-reply.
>400> YOUR repetition, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
YOU are tholoon, tholoon!
>400> Classic denial.
>
>What does your ambiguous denial have to do with OS/2, Revd?
YOUR ambiguous denial, tholoon!
>400> Classic non sequitur.
>
>What does your non sequitur have to do with OS/2, Revd?
YOUR non sequitur, tholoon!
>400> Classic misrepresentation.
>
>What does your misrepresentation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
YOUR misrepresentation, tholoon!
>400> Answer the fucking question, tholoon! Do NOT consult your
>horoscope.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Just answer the fucking question, tholoon. What is OX/2? Something
to do with the signs of the Zodiac?
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
Aloha, tholoon!
>The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
>
>400> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
>400> Aloha, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
>I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
>if you had better reading comprehension skills.
to tell me about them.
>400> What do your attribution problems have to do with 'anti-
>400> revisionism, tholoon?
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Classic disingenuousness, tholoon. YOU are tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>400> YOUR equivocation, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>400> YOUR hallucinations, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>400> YOUR repetition, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>400> YOUR misrepresentation, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>400> Classic evasion.
>
>I'm well aware that you haven't answered my questions, Revd,
>which constitutes evasion. No need to tell me about it.
>400> YOUR repetition, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>400> Classic denial.
>
>What does your ambiguous denial have to do with OS/2, Revd?
>400> Classic non sequitur.
>
>What does your non sequitur have to do with OS/2, Revd?
>400> Classic misrepresentation.
>
>What does your misrepresentation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
>400> Answer the fucking question, tholoon! Do NOT consult your
>horoscope.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
to do with the signs of the Zodiac?
hu flung dung
Sep 5, 2012, 11:32:26 AM9/5/12
to
tho...@antispam.ham, thou appeareth nothing to me but a foul and
pestilent congregation of vapours, thou cockered toad-spotted pignut,
thou beslubbering base-court scullian, ye exclaimed:
> Still having attribution problems, Revd?
> Still having attribution problems, Revd?
> Still having attribution problems, Revd?
> Still having attribution problems, Revd?
> Still having attribution problems, Revd?
> Still having attribution problems, Revd?
Blow it out your I/O port.
pestilent congregation of vapours, thou cockered toad-spotted pignut,
thou beslubbering base-court scullian, ye exclaimed:
> Still having attribution problems, Revd?
> Still having attribution problems, Revd?
> Still having attribution problems, Revd?
> Still having attribution problems, Revd?
> Still having attribution problems, Revd?
> Still having attribution problems, Revd?
> I'm well aware that you haven't answered my questions, Revd, which
> constitutes evasion. No need to tell me about it.
> constitutes evasion. No need to tell me about it.
> Still having attribution problems, Revd?
> What does your ambiguous denial have to do with OS/2, Revd?
> What does your non sequitur have to do with OS/2, Revd?
> What does your misrepresentation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
> Still having attribution problems, Revd?
Still at it after all these years? Wow, you haven't changed a bit!
Blow it out your I/O port.
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Sep 6, 2012, 6:37:27 PM9/6/12
to
The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
401> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
401> Aloha, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
if you had better reading comprehension skills.
401> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need
401> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
401> Classic disingenuousness, tholoon.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
401> YOU are tholoon.
Well, since you're still hallucinating about responding to "tholoon",
it stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
401> Classic erroneous presuppository.
What does your presuppository have to do with OS/2, Revd?
401> YOU are tholoon, tholoon!
Well, since you're still hallucinating about responding to "tholoon",
it stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
401> YOU are tholoon, tholoon!
Well, since you're still hallucinating about responding to "tholoon",
it stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
401> YOU are tholoon, tholoon.
Well, since you're still hallucinating about responding to "tholoon",
it stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
401> Classic ambiguous non-reply.
What does your ambiguity have to do with OS/2, Revd?
401> YOU are tholoon, tholoon!
Well, since you're still hallucinating about responding to "tholoon",
it stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
401> YOUR ambiguous denial, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
401> YOUR non sequitur, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
401> YOUR misrepresentation, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
401> Just answer the fucking question, tholoon.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
401> What is OX/2?
What does your question have to do with OS/2, Revd?
401> Something to do with the signs of the Zodiac?
What does your question have to do with OS/2, Revd?
401> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
401> Aloha, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
if you had better reading comprehension skills.
need
401> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Well, since you're still hallucinating about responding to "tholoon",
it stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
What does your presuppository have to do with OS/2, Revd?
401> YOU are tholoon, tholoon!
Well, since you're still hallucinating about responding to "tholoon",
it stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
Well, since you're still hallucinating about responding to "tholoon",
it stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
Well, since you're still hallucinating about responding to "tholoon",
it stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
What does your ambiguity have to do with OS/2, Revd?
401> YOU are tholoon, tholoon!
Well, since you're still hallucinating about responding to "tholoon",
it stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
What does your question have to do with OS/2, Revd?
401> Something to do with the signs of the Zodiac?
What does your question have to do with OS/2, Revd?
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Sep 6, 2012, 6:39:01 PM9/6/12
to
hu flung dung <inv...@invalid.invalid> writes:
1> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
1> Still at it after all these years?
What does your question have to do with OS/2, dung?
1> Wow, you haven't changed a bit!
What does your comparison have to do with OS/2, dung?
1> Blow it out your I/O port.
What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to
do with OS/2, dung?
1> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
1> Still at it after all these years?
What does your question have to do with OS/2, dung?
1> Wow, you haven't changed a bit!
What does your comparison have to do with OS/2, dung?
1> Blow it out your I/O port.
What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to
do with OS/2, dung?
%
Sep 6, 2012, 7:09:48 PM9/6/12
to
%
Sep 6, 2012, 7:10:59 PM9/6/12
to
you do
The Revd
Sep 6, 2012, 7:46:18 PM9/6/12
to
On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 15:37:27 -0700 (PDT), "tho...@antispam.ham"
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
Aloha, tholoon!
>The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
>
>401> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
>401> Aloha, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
>I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
>if you had better reading comprehension skills.
Classic mindless repetition, tholoon.
>401> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>401> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Classic mindless repetition, tholoon.
>401> Classic disingenuousness, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Classic lie.
>401> YOU are tholoon.
>
>Well, since you're still hallucinating about responding to "tholoon",
>it stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
>just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
>change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
Classic misrepresentation.
>401> Classic erroneous presuppository.
>
>What does your presuppository have to do with OS/2, Revd?
YOUR presuppository, tholoon.
>401> YOU are tholoon, tholoon!
>
>Well, since you're still hallucinating about responding to "tholoon",
>it stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
>just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
>change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
Classic disingenuous equivocation.
>401> YOU are tholoon, tholoon!
>
>Well, since you're still hallucinating about responding to "tholoon",
>it stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
>just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
>change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
Classic mindless repetition.
>401> YOU are tholoon, tholoon.
>
>Well, since you're still hallucinating about responding to "tholoon",
>it stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
>just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
>change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
Classic mindless repetition.
>401> Classic ambiguous non-reply.
>
>What does your ambiguity have to do with OS/2, Revd?
YOUR ambiguity, tholoon!
>401> YOU are tholoon, tholoon!
>
>Well, since you're still hallucinating about responding to "tholoon",
>it stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
>just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
>change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
Classic mindless repetition.
>401> YOUR ambiguous denial, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>401> YOUR misrepresentation, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Classic repetition.
>401> Just answer the fucking question, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Classic disingenuousness.
>401> What is OX/2?
>
>What does your question have to do with OS/2, Revd?
See below, tholoon.
>401> Something to do with the signs of the Zodiac?
>
>What does your question have to do with OS/2, Revd?
What the fuck *is* OX/2, tholoon?
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
Aloha, tholoon!
>The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
>
>401> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
>401> Aloha, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
>I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
>if you had better reading comprehension skills.
>401> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>401> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>401> Classic disingenuousness, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>401> YOU are tholoon.
>
>Well, since you're still hallucinating about responding to "tholoon",
>it stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
>just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
>change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
>401> Classic erroneous presuppository.
>
>What does your presuppository have to do with OS/2, Revd?
>401> YOU are tholoon, tholoon!
>
>Well, since you're still hallucinating about responding to "tholoon",
>it stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
>just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
>change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
>401> YOU are tholoon, tholoon!
>
>Well, since you're still hallucinating about responding to "tholoon",
>it stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
>just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
>change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
>401> YOU are tholoon, tholoon.
>
>Well, since you're still hallucinating about responding to "tholoon",
>it stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
>just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
>change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
>401> Classic ambiguous non-reply.
>
>What does your ambiguity have to do with OS/2, Revd?
>401> YOU are tholoon, tholoon!
>
>Well, since you're still hallucinating about responding to "tholoon",
>it stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
>just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
>change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
>401> YOUR ambiguous denial, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no need
to tell me about them.
>401> YOUR non sequitur, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Classic repetition.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>401> YOUR misrepresentation, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>401> Just answer the fucking question, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>401> What is OX/2?
>
>What does your question have to do with OS/2, Revd?
>401> Something to do with the signs of the Zodiac?
>
>What does your question have to do with OS/2, Revd?
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Sep 7, 2012, 2:01:44 AM9/7/12
to
"%" <per...@gmail.com> writes:
639> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
639> there was no question
What does your reading comprehension problem have to do with OS/2,
persent?
640> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
640> i asked him to do it so he did and you replied just like i wanted
to make
640> you do
What does your recruiting of others have to do with OS/2, persent?
639> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
639> there was no question
What does your reading comprehension problem have to do with OS/2,
persent?
640> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
640> i asked him to do it so he did and you replied just like i wanted
to make
640> you do
What does your recruiting of others have to do with OS/2, persent?
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Sep 7, 2012, 2:06:17 AM9/7/12
to
The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
402> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
402> Aloha, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
if you had better reading comprehension skills.
402> Classic mindless repetition, tholoon.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
402> Classic mindless repetition, tholoon.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
402> Classic lie.
What does your lie have to do with OS/2, Revd?
402> Classic misrepresentation.
What does your misrepresentation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
402> YOUR presuppository, tholoon.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
402> Classic disingenuous equivocation.
What does your equivocation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
402> Classic mindless repetition.
What does your repetition have to do with OS/2, Revd?
402> Classic mindless repetition.
What does your repetition have to do with OS/2, Revd?
402> YOUR ambiguity, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
402> Classic mindless repetition.
What does your repetition have to do with OS/2, Revd?
402> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need
402> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
402> Classic repetition.
What does your repetition have to do with OS/2, Revd?
402> Classic repetition.
What does your repetition have to do with OS/2, Revd?
402> Classic disingenuousness.
What does your disingenuousness have to do with OS/2, Revd?
402> See below, tholoon.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
402> What the fuck *is* OX/2, tholoon?
402> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
402> Aloha, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
if you had better reading comprehension skills.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
What does your lie have to do with OS/2, Revd?
402> Classic misrepresentation.
What does your misrepresentation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
402> YOUR presuppository, tholoon.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
What does your equivocation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
402> Classic mindless repetition.
What does your repetition have to do with OS/2, Revd?
402> Classic mindless repetition.
What does your repetition have to do with OS/2, Revd?
402> YOUR ambiguity, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
What does your repetition have to do with OS/2, Revd?
402> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need
402> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
What does your repetition have to do with OS/2, Revd?
402> Classic repetition.
What does your repetition have to do with OS/2, Revd?
402> Classic disingenuousness.
What does your disingenuousness have to do with OS/2, Revd?
402> See below, tholoon.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
The Revd
Sep 7, 2012, 8:04:38 AM9/7/12
to
On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 23:06:17 -0700 (PDT), "tho...@antispam.ham"
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
Aloha, tholoon!
>The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
>
>402> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
>402> Aloha, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
>I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
>if you had better reading comprehension skills.
Classic mindless repetition, tholoon.
>402> Classic mindless repetition, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>402> Classic misrepresentation.
>
>What does your misrepresentation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
YOUR misrepresentation, tholoon.
>402> YOUR presuppository, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>402> Classic mindless repetition.
>
>What does your repetition have to do with OS/2, Revd?
YOUR repetition, tholoon.
>402> Classic mindless repetition.
>
>What does your repetition have to do with OS/2, Revd?
YOUR repetition, tholoon.
>402> YOUR ambiguity, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>402> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>402> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no need
to tell me about them.
>402> Classic repetition.
>
>What does your repetition have to do with OS/2, Revd?
YOUR repetition, tholoon.
>402> Classic repetition.
>
>What does your repetition have to do with OS/2, Revd?
YOUR repetition, tholoon.
>402> Classic disingenuousness.
>
>What does your disingenuousness have to do with OS/2, Revd?
YOUR disingenuousness, tholoon.
>402> See below, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
Aloha, tholoon!
>The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
>
>402> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
>402> Aloha, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
>I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
>if you had better reading comprehension skills.
>402> Classic mindless repetition, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no need
to tell me about them.
>402> Classic mindless repetition, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no need
to tell me about them.
>402> Classic lie.
>
>What does your lie have to do with OS/2, Revd?
YOUR lie, tholoon.
>
>What does your lie have to do with OS/2, Revd?
>402> Classic misrepresentation.
>
>What does your misrepresentation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
>402> YOUR presuppository, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no need
to tell me about them.
>402> Classic disingenuous equivocation.
>
>What does your equivocation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
YOUR equivocation, tholoon.
>
>What does your equivocation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
>402> Classic mindless repetition.
>
>What does your repetition have to do with OS/2, Revd?
>402> Classic mindless repetition.
>
>What does your repetition have to do with OS/2, Revd?
>402> YOUR ambiguity, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no need
to tell me about them.
>402> Classic mindless repetition.
>
>What does your repetition have to do with OS/2, Revd?
YOUR repetition, tholoon.
>
>What does your repetition have to do with OS/2, Revd?
>402> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>402> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no need
to tell me about them.
>402> Classic repetition.
>
>What does your repetition have to do with OS/2, Revd?
>402> Classic repetition.
>
>What does your repetition have to do with OS/2, Revd?
>402> Classic disingenuousness.
>
>What does your disingenuousness have to do with OS/2, Revd?
>402> See below, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no need
to tell me about them.
>402> What the fuck *is* OX/2, tholoon?
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Classic evasion. Answer the fucking question, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Sep 11, 2012, 3:48:00 PM9/11/12
to
The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
403> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
403> Aloha, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
if you had better reading comprehension skills.
403> Classic mindless repetition, tholoon.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
403> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need
403> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
403> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need
403> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
403> YOUR lie, tholoon.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
403> YOUR misrepresentation, tholoon.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
403> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need
403> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
403> YOUR equivocation, tholoon.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
403> YOUR repetition, tholoon.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
403> YOUR repetition, tholoon.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
403> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need
403> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
403> YOUR repetition, tholoon.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
403> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need
403> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
403> YOUR repetition, tholoon.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
403> YOUR repetition, tholoon.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
403> YOUR disingenuousness, tholoon.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
403> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need
403> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
403> Classic evasion. Answer the fucking question, tholoon.
403> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
403> Aloha, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
if you had better reading comprehension skills.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need
403> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need
403> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need
403> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need
403> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need
403> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need
403> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
%
Sep 11, 2012, 3:54:24 PM9/11/12
to
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Sep 11, 2012, 4:45:15 PM9/11/12
to
"%" <per...@gmail.com> writes:
675> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
675> hi , i'm tholoon
What does your schizophrenia have to do with OS/2, persent?
675> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
675> hi , i'm tholoon
What does your schizophrenia have to do with OS/2, persent?
%
Sep 11, 2012, 5:03:18 PM9/11/12
to
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Sep 11, 2012, 5:27:09 PM9/11/12
to
"%" <per...@gmail.com> writes:
677> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
677> what does your question have to do with os/2
Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, persent?
Reread the four characters before the comma, persent.
677> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
677> what does your question have to do with os/2
Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, persent?
Reread the four characters before the comma, persent.
%
Sep 11, 2012, 5:42:04 PM9/11/12
to
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Sep 11, 2012, 7:59:33 PM9/11/12
to
"%" <per...@gmail.com> writes:
679> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
679> what does what i have have to do with os/2
Still having writing problems, persent?
679> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
679> what does what i have have to do with os/2
Still having writing problems, persent?
%
Sep 11, 2012, 8:41:12 PM9/11/12
to
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Sep 11, 2012, 8:44:49 PM9/11/12
to
"%" <per...@gmail.com> writes:
684> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
684> what does what i have have to do with os/2
You should know, persent, given that you keep posting
evidence for your writing proboems to an OS/2 newsgroup.
684> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
684> what does what i have have to do with os/2
You should know, persent, given that you keep posting
evidence for your writing proboems to an OS/2 newsgroup.
%
Sep 11, 2012, 9:36:43 PM9/11/12
to
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Sep 11, 2012, 10:04:15 PM9/11/12
to
"%" <per...@gmail.com> writes:
687> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
687> what does my writing , " proboems " have to do with os/2
You should know, persent, given that you keep posting
evidence for your writing problems to an OS/2 newsgroup.
687> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
687> what does my writing , " proboems " have to do with os/2
You should know, persent, given that you keep posting
%
Sep 11, 2012, 10:54:45 PM9/11/12
to
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Sep 12, 2012, 9:08:28 AM9/12/12
to
"%" <per...@gmail.com> writes:
688> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
688> what does what i should know have to do with os/2
You should know, persent, given that you keep posting
claims about what you should know in an OS/2 newsgroup.
688> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
688> what does what i should know have to do with os/2
You should know, persent, given that you keep posting
The Revd
Sep 12, 2012, 9:50:51 AM9/12/12
to
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 12:48:00 -0700 (PDT), "tho...@antispam.ham"
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
Aloha, tholoon!
>The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
>
>403> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
>403> Aloha, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
>I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
>if you had better reading comprehension skills.
I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>403> Classic mindless repetition, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>403> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>403> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>403> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>403> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>403> YOUR lie, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>403> YOUR misrepresentation, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>403> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>403> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>403> YOUR equivocation, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>403> YOUR repetition, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>403> YOUR repetition, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>403> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>403> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>403> YOUR repetition, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>403> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>403> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>403> YOUR repetition, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>403> YOUR repetition, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>403> YOUR disingenuousness, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>403> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>403> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>403> Classic evasion. Answer the fucking question, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Is your bot broken, tholoon? It seems to be stuck on stock response
#403.
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
Aloha, tholoon!
>The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
>
>403> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
>403> Aloha, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
>I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
>if you had better reading comprehension skills.
need to tell me about them.
>403> Classic mindless repetition, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need to tell me about them.
>403> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>403> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need to tell me about them.
>403> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>403> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need to tell me about them.
>403> YOUR lie, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need to tell me about them.
>403> YOUR misrepresentation, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need to tell me about them.
>403> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>403> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need to tell me about them.
>403> YOUR equivocation, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need to tell me about them.
>403> YOUR repetition, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need to tell me about them.
>403> YOUR repetition, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need to tell me about them.
>403> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>403> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need to tell me about them.
>403> YOUR repetition, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need to tell me about them.
>403> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>403> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need to tell me about them.
>403> YOUR repetition, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need to tell me about them.
>403> YOUR repetition, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need to tell me about them.
>403> YOUR disingenuousness, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need to tell me about them.
>403> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>403> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need to tell me about them.
>403> Classic evasion. Answer the fucking question, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
#403.
The Revd
Sep 12, 2012, 9:52:24 AM9/12/12
to
The Revd
Sep 12, 2012, 9:53:43 AM9/12/12
to
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Sep 12, 2012, 6:31:45 PM9/12/12
to
The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
404> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
404> Aloha, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
if you had better reading comprehension skills.
404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
no
404> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
no
404> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
no
404> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
no
404> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
no
404> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
no
404> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
no
404> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
no
404> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
no
404> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
no
404> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
no
404> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
no
404> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
no
404> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
no
404> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
no
404> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
no
404> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
no
404> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
404> Is your bot broken, tholoon? It seems to be stuck on stock
response
404> #403.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
405> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
405> What *is* OX/2, persent?
What does your question of persent have to do with OS/2, Revd?
406> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
406> Aloha, tholoon!
404> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
404> Aloha, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
if you had better reading comprehension skills.
no
404> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
no
404> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
no
404> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
no
404> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
no
404> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
no
404> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
no
404> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
no
404> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
no
404> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
no
404> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
no
404> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
no
404> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
no
404> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
no
404> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
no
404> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
no
404> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
no
404> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
response
404> #403.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
405> What *is* OX/2, persent?
What does your question of persent have to do with OS/2, Revd?
406> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
406> Aloha, tholoon!
The Revd
Sep 13, 2012, 9:45:10 AM9/13/12
to
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:31:45 -0700 (PDT), "tho...@antispam.ham"
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
Aloha, tholoon!
>The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
>
>404> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
>404> Aloha, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
>I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
>if you had better reading comprehension skills.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no need
>404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
>no
>404> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no need
revisionism, tholoon?
>406> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
>406> Aloha, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
>I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
>if you had better reading comprehension skills.
Classic delusion.
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
Aloha, tholoon!
>The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
>
>404> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
>404> Aloha, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
>I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
>if you had better reading comprehension skills.
to tell me about them.
>404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
>no
>404> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no need
>404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
>no
>404> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
to tell me about them.
>404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
>no
>404> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no need
>404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
>no
>404> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
to tell me about them.
>404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
>no
>404> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no need
>404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
>no
>404> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
to tell me about them.
>404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
>no
>404> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no need
>404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
>no
>404> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
to tell me about them.
>404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
>no
>404> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no need
>404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
>no
>404> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
to tell me about them.
>404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
>no
>404> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
YOU are tholoon, tholoon.
>404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
>no
>404> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
>no
>404> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
to tell me about them.
>404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
>no
>404> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no need
>404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
>no
>404> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
to tell me about them.
>404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
>no
>404> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no need
>404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
>no
>404> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
to tell me about them.
>404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
>no
>404> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no need
>404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
>no
>404> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
to tell me about them.
>404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
>no
>404> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no need
>404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
>no
>404> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
to tell me about them.
>404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
>no
>404> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no need
>404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
>no
>404> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
to tell me about them.
>404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
>no
>404> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no need
>404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
>no
>404> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
to tell me about them.
>404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
>no
>404> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no need
>404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
>no
>404> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
to tell me about them.
>404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
>no
>404> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no need
>404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
>no
>404> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
to tell me about them.
>404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
>no
>404> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no need
>404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
>no
>404> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
to tell me about them.
>404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
>no
>404> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no need
>404> I'm well award of your atttribution problems, tholoon. There's
>no
>404> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
to tell me about them.
>404> Is your bot broken, tholoon? It seems to be stuck on stock
>response
>404> #403.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no need
>response
>404> #403.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
to tell me about them.
>405> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
>405> What *is* OX/2, persent?
>
>What does your question of persent have to do with OS/2, Revd?
What does YOUR question have to do with 'anti-semitism'®™ or
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
>405> What *is* OX/2, persent?
>
>What does your question of persent have to do with OS/2, Revd?
revisionism, tholoon?
>406> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
>406> Aloha, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
>I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
>if you had better reading comprehension skills.
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Oct 1, 2012, 2:06:41 PM10/1/12
to
The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
408> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
408> Aloha, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
if you had better reading comprehension skills.
408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need
408> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need
408> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need
408> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need
408> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need
408> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need
408> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
408> YOU are tholoon, tholoon.
Well, since you're still hallucinating about responding to "tholoon",
it stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need
408> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need
408> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need
408> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need
408> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need
408> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need
408> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need
408> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need
408> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need
408> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need
408> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need
408> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need
408> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
408> What does YOUR question have to do with 'anti-semitism'®┴ or
408> revisionism, tholoon?
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
408> Classic delusion.
What does your delusion have to do with OS/2, Revd?
408> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
408> Aloha, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
if you had better reading comprehension skills.
need
408> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need
408> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need
408> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need
408> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need
408> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need
408> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Well, since you're still hallucinating about responding to "tholoon",
it stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
need
408> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need
408> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need
408> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need
408> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need
408> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need
408> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need
408> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need
408> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need
408> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need
408> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need
408> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
need
408> to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
408> revisionism, tholoon?
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
What does your delusion have to do with OS/2, Revd?
The Revd
Oct 1, 2012, 5:13:57 PM10/1/12
to
On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 11:06:41 -0700 (PDT), "tho...@antispam.ham"
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
Aloha, tholoon!
>The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
>
>408> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
>408> Aloha, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
>I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
>if you had better reading comprehension skills.
>408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>408> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>408> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>408> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>408> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>408> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>408> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>408> YOU are tholoon, tholoon.
>
>Well, since you're still hallucinating about responding to "tholoon",
>it stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
>just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
>change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
Classic evasion/misrepresentation.
>408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>408> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>408> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>408> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>408> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>408> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>408> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>408> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>408> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>408> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>408> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>408> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>408> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>408> What does YOUR question have to do with 'anti-semitism'�? or
>408> Classic delusion.
>
>What does your delusion have to do with OS/2, Revd?
YOUR delusion, tholoon.
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
Aloha, tholoon!
>The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
>
>408> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
>408> Aloha, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
>I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
>if you had better reading comprehension skills.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>408> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>408> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>408> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>408> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>408> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>408> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>408> YOU are tholoon, tholoon.
>
>Well, since you're still hallucinating about responding to "tholoon",
>it stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
>just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
>change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
>408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>408> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>408> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>408> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>408> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>408> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>408> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>408> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>408> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>408> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>408> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>408> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>408> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>need
>408> to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>408> What does YOUR question have to do with 'anti-semitism'�? or
>408> revisionism, tholoon?
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>408> Classic delusion.
>
>What does your delusion have to do with OS/2, Revd?
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Oct 1, 2012, 8:05:15 PM10/1/12
to
The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
409> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
409> Aloha, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
if you had better reading comprehension skills.
409> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> Classic evasion/misrepresentation.
What does your evasion/misrepresentation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
409> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> YOUR delusion, tholoon.
409> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
409> Aloha, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
if you had better reading comprehension skills.
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
What does your evasion/misrepresentation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
409> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
409> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
The Revd
Oct 1, 2012, 8:32:48 PM10/1/12
to
On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 17:05:15 -0700 (PDT), "tho...@antispam.ham"
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
Aloha, tholoon!
>The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
>
>409> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
>409> Aloha, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
>I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
>if you had better reading comprehension skills.
What the fuck *is* OX/2 anyway?
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
Aloha, tholoon!
>The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
>
>409> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
>409> Aloha, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
>I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
>if you had better reading comprehension skills.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>409> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>409> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>409> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>409> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>409> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>409> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>409> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>409> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>409> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>409> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>409> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>409> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>409> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>409> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>409> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>409> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>409> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>409> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>409> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>409> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>409> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>409> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>409> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>409> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>409> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>409> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>409> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>409> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>409> Classic evasion/misrepresentation.
>
>What does your evasion/misrepresentation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
YOUR evasion/misrepresentation, tholoon.
>
>What does your evasion/misrepresentation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
What the fuck *is* OX/2 anyway?
>409> YOUR delusion, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Classic hallucination.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
CUNTICA
Oct 1, 2012, 8:47:04 PM10/1/12
to
Ayup!
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Oct 2, 2012, 11:11:45 AM10/2/12
to
CUNTICA <brianla...@yahoo.com> writes:
8> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
8> Ayup!
What does your agreement with whatever have to do with OS/2,
CUNTICA?
8> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
8> Ayup!
What does your agreement with whatever have to do with OS/2,
CUNTICA?
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Oct 2, 2012, 11:14:46 AM10/2/12
to
The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
410> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
410> Aloha, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
if you had better reading comprehension skills.
410> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> YOUR evasion/misrepresentation, tholoon.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> What the fuck *is* OX/2 anyway?
What do your foul language and question have to do with OS/2, Revd?
410> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> Classic hallucination.
What does your hallucination have to do with OS/2, Revd?
410> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
410> Aloha, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
if you had better reading comprehension skills.
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
What do your foul language and question have to do with OS/2, Revd?
410> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
410> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
What does your hallucination have to do with OS/2, Revd?
The Revd
Oct 2, 2012, 11:37:12 AM10/2/12
to
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 08:14:46 -0700 (PDT), "tho...@antispam.ham"
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
Aloha, tholoon!
>The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
>
>410> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
>410> Aloha, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
>I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
>if you had better reading comprehension skills.
I'm well aware of your lack of comprehension skills, tholoon. There's
no need to tell me about them.
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
Aloha, tholoon!
>The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
>
>410> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
>410> Aloha, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
>I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
>if you had better reading comprehension skills.
no need to tell me about them.
>410> YOUR evasion/misrepresentation, tholoon.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>410> What the fuck *is* OX/2 anyway?
>
>What do your foul language and question have to do with OS/2, Revd?
Classic evasion. Answer the question, tholoon!
>
>What do your foul language and question have to do with OS/2, Revd?
>410> Classic hallucination.
>
>What does your hallucination have to do with OS/2, Revd?
YOUR hallucination, tholoon!
>
>What does your hallucination have to do with OS/2, Revd?
CUNTICA
Oct 2, 2012, 11:56:09 AM10/2/12
to
What a wacky guy!
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Oct 2, 2012, 7:07:03 PM10/2/12
to
CUNTICA <brianla...@yahoo.com> writes:
9> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
9> What a wacky guy!
What does The Revd's wackyiness have to do with OS/2, CUNTICA?
9> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
9> What a wacky guy!
What does The Revd's wackyiness have to do with OS/2, CUNTICA?
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Oct 2, 2012, 7:10:23 PM10/2/12
to
The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
411> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
411> Aloha, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
if you had better reading comprehension skills.
411> I'm well aware of your lack of comprehension skills, tholoon.
There's
411> no need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> Classic evasion. Answer the question, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> YOUR hallucination, tholoon!
411> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
411> Aloha, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
if you had better reading comprehension skills.
There's
411> no need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
411> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
The Revd
Oct 2, 2012, 7:23:15 PM10/2/12
to
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 16:10:23 -0700 (PDT), "tho...@antispam.ham"
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
Aloha, tholoon! Things a bit slow in the astrology business?
>The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
>
>411> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
>411> Aloha, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
>I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
>if you had better reading comprehension skills.
Classic equivocation.
>411> I'm well aware of your lack of comprehension skills, tholoon.
>There's
>411> no need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
Aloha, tholoon! Things a bit slow in the astrology business?
>The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
>
>411> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
>411> Aloha, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
>I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
>if you had better reading comprehension skills.
>411> I'm well aware of your lack of comprehension skills, tholoon.
>There's
>411> no need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>411> Classic evasion. Answer the question, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
.
>411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>411> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>411> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>411> YOUR hallucination, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
YOU are tholoon, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
dizzy
Oct 2, 2012, 9:20:10 PM10/2/12
to
tholen tholed:
>CUNTICA <brianla...@yahoo.com> writes:
>
>9> What a wacky guy!
>
>What does The Revd's wackyiness have to do with OS/2, CUNTICA?
What do your approximately 180 worthless, kooky posts of the past week
have to do with OS/2, tholen?
You are a kook, tholen. Admit it.
>CUNTICA <brianla...@yahoo.com> writes:
>
>9> What a wacky guy!
>
>What does The Revd's wackyiness have to do with OS/2, CUNTICA?
have to do with OS/2, tholen?
You are a kook, tholen. Admit it.
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Oct 3, 2012, 8:04:25 AM10/3/12
to
dizzy <di...@nospam.com> writes:
1578> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
1578> tholen tholed:
What was allegedly endured while writing, dizzy?
1578> What do your approximately 180 worthless, kooky posts of the
past week
1578> have to do with OS/2, tholen?
Classic erroneous presupposition, and rather ironic, coming from
someone who has posted at least 1578 worthless, kooky postings.
1578> You are a kook, tholen.
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
with OS/2, dizzy?
1578> Admit it.
What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with
OS/2, dizzy?
1578> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
1578> tholen tholed:
What was allegedly endured while writing, dizzy?
1578> What do your approximately 180 worthless, kooky posts of the
past week
1578> have to do with OS/2, tholen?
Classic erroneous presupposition, and rather ironic, coming from
someone who has posted at least 1578 worthless, kooky postings.
1578> You are a kook, tholen.
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
with OS/2, dizzy?
1578> Admit it.
What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with
OS/2, dizzy?
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Oct 3, 2012, 8:08:24 AM10/3/12
to
The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
412> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
412> Aloha, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
if you had better reading comprehension skills.
412> Things a bit slow in the astrology business?
What does your classic erroneous presupposition of a question
What does your equivocation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
412> need to tell me about them.
412> ..
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> YOU are tholoon, tholoon!
412> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
412> Aloha, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
if you had better reading comprehension skills.
What does your classic erroneous presupposition of a question
have to do with OS/2, Revd?
412> Classic equivocation.
What does your equivocation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> need to tell me about them.
412> ..
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
412> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
The Revd
Oct 3, 2012, 9:19:42 AM10/3/12
to
On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 05:08:24 -0700 (PDT), "tho...@antispam.ham"
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
Aloha, tholoon!
>The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
>
>412> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
That's right, tholoon!
>412> Aloha, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
>I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
>if you had better reading comprehension skills.
Classic hypocrisy.
>412> Things a bit slow in the astrology business?
>
>What does your classic erroneous presupposition of a question
>have to do with OS/2, Revd?
What does YOUR erroneous presuppository have to do with 'Israel' or
kookery, tholoon?
>412> Classic equivocation.
>
>What does your equivocation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
YOUR equivocation, tholoon?
>412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
hasn't been used by a poster since last October.
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
Aloha, tholoon!
>The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
>
>412> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>412> Aloha, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
>I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
>if you had better reading comprehension skills.
>412> Things a bit slow in the astrology business?
>
>What does your classic erroneous presupposition of a question
>have to do with OS/2, Revd?
kookery, tholoon?
>412> Classic equivocation.
>
>What does your equivocation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
>412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>412> ..
Bot playing up, tholoon?
>412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>412> ..
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>412> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>412> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>412> YOU are tholoon, tholoon!
>
>Well, since you're still hallucinating about responding to "tholoon",
>it stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
>just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
>change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
Still having attribution problems, tholoon? The alias "John Doe"
>
>Well, since you're still hallucinating about responding to "tholoon",
>it stands to reason that "tholoon" is "tholoon", Revd. You could have
>just as easily written "Hey, John Doe, YOU are John Doe." Doesn't
>change the fact that you're hallucinating, Revd.
hasn't been used by a poster since last October.
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Oct 3, 2012, 3:36:13 PM10/3/12
to
The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
413> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
413> Aloha, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
if you had better reading comprehension skills.
413> That's right, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> Classic hypocrisy.
What does your classic hypocrisy have to do with OS/2, Revd?
413> What does YOUR erroneous presuppository have to do with 'Israel'
or
413> kookery, tholoon?
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> YOUR equivocation, tholoon?
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> Bot playing up, tholoon?
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> Still having attribution problems, tholoon? The alias "John Doe"
413> hasn't been used by a poster since last October.
413> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
413> Aloha, tholoon!
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
if you had better reading comprehension skills.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
What does your classic hypocrisy have to do with OS/2, Revd?
413> What does YOUR erroneous presuppository have to do with 'Israel'
or
413> kookery, tholoon?
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> need to tell me about them.
Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
413> hasn't been used by a poster since last October.
bozo
Oct 3, 2012, 5:29:13 PM10/3/12
to
On Sep 11, 7:51 pm, "%" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
> tho...@antispam.ham wrote:
> > "%" <pers...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > 687> Newsgroups:
> > soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp. os.os2.advocacy
Tholen is bitch-slapping you so hard, your dress is falling off and
Revd is trying to take advantage of it and mount you, don't let the
rectum do that to you
> tho...@antispam.ham wrote:
> > "%" <pers...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > 687> Newsgroups:
> > soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp. os.os2.advocacy
>
> > 687> what does my writing , " proboems " have to do with os/2
>
> > You should know, persent, given that you keep posting
> > evidence for your writing problems to an OS/2 newsgroup.
>
> what does what i should know have to do with os/2
persent, please give-up, can't you tell when you've been beaten,
> > 687> what does my writing , " proboems " have to do with os/2
>
> > You should know, persent, given that you keep posting
> > evidence for your writing problems to an OS/2 newsgroup.
>
> what does what i should know have to do with os/2
Tholen is bitch-slapping you so hard, your dress is falling off and
Revd is trying to take advantage of it and mount you, don't let the
rectum do that to you
bozo
Oct 3, 2012, 5:52:52 PM10/3/12
to
On Sep 5, 8:32 am, hu flung dung <inva...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> tho...@antispam.ham, thou appeareth nothing to me but a foul and
> pestilent congregation of vapours, thou cockered toad-spotted pignut,
> thou beslubbering base-court scullian, ye exclaimed:
> > constitutes evasion. No need to tell me about it.
> > What does your non sequitur have to do with OS/2, Revd?
> > What does your misrepresentation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
>
> Blow it out your I/O port.
Give up Revd, you little mental midget, Tholen has just bitch-slapped
you way up into percent's ass headfirst so hard that only your little
feet are sticking out, fitting-end though to a little rectum-troll
who's always full of shit
> tho...@antispam.ham, thou appeareth nothing to me but a foul and
> pestilent congregation of vapours, thou cockered toad-spotted pignut,
> thou beslubbering base-court scullian, ye exclaimed:
>
> > Still having attribution problems, Revd?
> > Still having attribution problems, Revd?
> > Still having attribution problems, Revd?
> > Still having attribution problems, Revd?
> > Still having attribution problems, Revd?
> > Still having attribution problems, Revd?
> > I'm well aware that you haven't answered my questions, Revd, which
> > Still having attribution problems, Revd?
> > Still having attribution problems, Revd?
> > Still having attribution problems, Revd?
> > Still having attribution problems, Revd?
> > Still having attribution problems, Revd?
> > Still having attribution problems, Revd?
> > constitutes evasion. No need to tell me about it.
> > Still having attribution problems, Revd?
> > What does your ambiguous denial have to do with OS/2, Revd?
> > What does your non sequitur have to do with OS/2, Revd?
> > What does your misrepresentation have to do with OS/2, Revd?
> > Still having attribution problems, Revd?
>
> Still at it after all these years? Wow, you haven't changed a bit!
>
>
> Blow it out your I/O port.
Give up Revd, you little mental midget, Tholen has just bitch-slapped
you way up into percent's ass headfirst so hard that only your little
feet are sticking out, fitting-end though to a little rectum-troll
who's always full of shit
dizzy
Oct 3, 2012, 7:05:55 PM10/3/12
to
tholen tholed:
> dizzy writes:
>
>1578> What do your approximately 180 worthless, kooky posts of the
>past week
>1578> have to do with OS/2, tholen?
>
>Classic erroneous presupposition, and rather ironic, coming from
>someone who has posted at least 1578 worthless, kooky postings.
You sure have a kooky sense of irony, tholen.
Across how many *years* are my alleged "at least 1578" postings to the
OS/2 group distributed, tholen?
You posted more in the past week than I have in the past 3 years,
kook.
> dizzy writes:
>
>1578> What do your approximately 180 worthless, kooky posts of the
>past week
>1578> have to do with OS/2, tholen?
>
>Classic erroneous presupposition, and rather ironic, coming from
>someone who has posted at least 1578 worthless, kooky postings.
Across how many *years* are my alleged "at least 1578" postings to the
OS/2 group distributed, tholen?
You posted more in the past week than I have in the past 3 years,
kook.
The Revd
Oct 3, 2012, 9:19:00 PM10/3/12
to
On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 14:29:13 -0700 (PDT), bozo <Bozo_D...@37.com>
wrote:
Go greek yourself, bozo, you stupid cunt. You KNOW it makes sense.
wrote:
Michael MacCarty -- copypasting fool, troll, pedophile, pervert, child molester, misfit, failed dog Catcher, and lifelong 50-year old LOSER
Oct 4, 2012, 1:55:03 AM10/4/12
to
On Oct 3, 6:19 pm, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 14:29:13 -0700 (PDT), bozo <Bozo_De_N...@37.com>
you poor lame sub-human limey, i think you're confusing me with your
mother and her home business
> On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 14:29:13 -0700 (PDT), bozo <Bozo_De_N...@37.com>
mother and her home business
The Revd
Oct 4, 2012, 8:15:39 AM10/4/12
to
On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 12:36:13 -0700 (PDT), "tho...@antispam.ham"
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
Aloha, tholoon!
>The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
>
>413> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
That's right, tholoon!
>413> Aloha, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
>I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
>if you had better reading comprehension skills.
I'm well aware of your comprehension problems, tholoon. There's no
>413> What does YOUR erroneous presuppository have to do with 'Israel'
>or
>413> kookery, tholoon?
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Classic evasion.
>413> YOUR equivocation, tholoon?
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu> wrote:
Aloha, tholoon!
>The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
>
>413> Newsgroups:
>soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>413> Aloha, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November. Of course,
>I've told you that already, Revd, which you would know by now
>if you had better reading comprehension skills.
need to tell me about them.
>413> That's right, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>413> Classic hypocrisy.
>
>What does your classic hypocrisy have to do with OS/2, Revd?
YOUR classic hypocrisy, tholoon!
>
>What does your classic hypocrisy have to do with OS/2, Revd?
>413> What does YOUR erroneous presuppository have to do with 'Israel'
>or
>413> kookery, tholoon?
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>413> YOUR equivocation, tholoon?
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>413> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>413> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>413> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>413> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>413> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>413> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>413> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>413> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>413> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>413> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>413> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>413> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>413> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>413> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>413> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>413> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>413> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>413> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>413> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>413> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>413> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>413> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>413> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>413> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>413> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>413> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>413> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>413> I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
>413> need to tell me about them.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
I'm well aware of your attribution problems, tholoon. There's no
need to tell me about them.
>413> Bot playing up, tholoon?
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
Answer the fucking question, tholoon!
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
>413> Still having attribution problems, tholoon? The alias "John Doe"
>413> hasn't been used by a poster since last October.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
YOU are tholoon, tholoon.
>413> hasn't been used by a poster since last October.
>
>Still having attribution problems, Revd? The alias "tholoon"
>hasn't been used by a poster since last November.
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Oct 4, 2012, 8:16:54 AM10/4/12
to
bozo <Bozo_D...@37.com> writes:
52> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
52> persent, please give-up, can't you tell when you've been beaten,
52> Tholen is bitch-slapping you so hard, your dress is falling off
and
52> Revd is trying to take advantage of it and mount you, don't let
the
52> rectum do that to you
What does your advice to persent have to do with OS/2, Bozo_De_Niro?
53> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
53> Give up Revd, you little mental midget, Tholen has just bitch-
slapped
53> you way up into percent's ass headfirst so hard that only your
little
53> feet are sticking out, fitting-end though to a little rectum-troll
53> who's always full of shit
What does your advice to The Revd have to do with OS/2, Bozo_De_Niro?
52> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
52> persent, please give-up, can't you tell when you've been beaten,
52> Tholen is bitch-slapping you so hard, your dress is falling off
and
52> Revd is trying to take advantage of it and mount you, don't let
the
52> rectum do that to you
What does your advice to persent have to do with OS/2, Bozo_De_Niro?
53> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
53> Give up Revd, you little mental midget, Tholen has just bitch-
slapped
53> you way up into percent's ass headfirst so hard that only your
little
53> feet are sticking out, fitting-end though to a little rectum-troll
53> who's always full of shit
What does your advice to The Revd have to do with OS/2, Bozo_De_Niro?
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Oct 4, 2012, 8:19:20 AM10/4/12
to
dizzy <di...@nospam.com> writes:
1579> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
1579> tholen tholed:
What was allegedly endured while writing, dizzy?
1579> You sure have a kooky sense of irony, tholen.
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have
to do with OS/2, dizzy?
1579> Across how many *years* are my alleged "at least 1578" postings
to the
1579> OS/2 group distributed, tholen?
Having memory problems, dizzy? Can't remember when your own postings
were made, dizzy?
1579> You posted more in the past week than I have in the past 3
years,
1579> kook.
Who is "kook", dizzy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using
that alias, though you've used it as a signature line from time
to time.
1579> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
1579> tholen tholed:
What was allegedly endured while writing, dizzy?
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have
to do with OS/2, dizzy?
1579> Across how many *years* are my alleged "at least 1578" postings
to the
1579> OS/2 group distributed, tholen?
Having memory problems, dizzy? Can't remember when your own postings
were made, dizzy?
1579> You posted more in the past week than I have in the past 3
years,
1579> kook.
Who is "kook", dizzy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using
that alias, though you've used it as a signature line from time
to time.
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Oct 4, 2012, 8:20:29 AM10/4/12
to
The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> writes:
414> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
414> Go greek yourself, bozo, you stupid cunt. You KNOW it makes
sense.
What does your evaluation of bozo have to do with OS/2, Revd?
414> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
414> Go greek yourself, bozo, you stupid cunt. You KNOW it makes
sense.
What does your evaluation of bozo have to do with OS/2, Revd?
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Oct 4, 2012, 8:21:38 AM10/4/12
to
bozo <Bozo_D...@37.com> writes:
54> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
54> you poor lame sub-human limey, i think you're confusing me with
your
54> mother and her home business
What does The Revd's alleged confusion have to do with OS/2,
Bozo_De_Niro?
54> Newsgroups:
soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,alt.fan.prettyboy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
54> you poor lame sub-human limey, i think you're confusing me with
your
54> mother and her home business
What does The Revd's alleged confusion have to do with OS/2,
Bozo_De_Niro?
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages