Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Catholic university includes ‘homosexuality’ in course on ‘deviant behavior’

23 views
Skip to first unread message

RedDog

unread,
Sep 4, 2012, 11:21:18 PM9/4/12
to
On Sep 5, 3:08 am, -̮̮̃-̃ ̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾ ™Usenet Legends ªºªandɔa®ole
<usenetlegends00...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Shades of Chick-Fil-A, the faggots are whining again. Remember,
> according to the turd-tamers Heterosexuals are not allowed free speech
> or free thought .. b&c

Ain't no question about it. Those cocksuckers want us to accept their
deviance and if we don't, then they do their best to deny us of our
constitutional rights.

> `````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
>
> STEUBENVILLE, Ohio — A group of gay university alumni and allies is
> challenging the Franciscan University in Steubenville, Ohio, over its
> inclusion of homosexuality in its course on “deviant behavior.”
>
> The group, Gay Alumni and Allies of Catholic Universities, said that
> Franciscan University, a conservative Catholic institution on the Ohio-
> West Virginia border, is “contributing” to a “culture of hate and
> ignorance” by teaching “ideological falsehoods in the classroom rather
> than solid, proven research and evidence.”
>
> Franciscan University
>
> But according to the University, the principles of academic freedom
> apply to the course and that “homosexual acts are intrinsically
> disordered.”
>
> At issue is this course on “Deviant Behavior,” found on Franciscan
> University’s active course offerings listed on its website:
>
>     SWK 314
>     DEVIANT BEHAVIOR focuses on the sociological theories of deviant
> behavior such as strain theory, differential association theory,
> labeling theory, and phenomenological theory. The behaviors that are
> primarily examined are murder, rape, robbery, prostitution,
> homosexuality, mental illness, and drug use. The course focuses on
> structural conditions in society that potentially play a role in
> influencing deviant behavior. (Emphasis added.)
>     3 credit hours
>
> The group, which has no official connection to Franciscan University
> and initially identified itself as “Franciscan Gay Alumni & Allies,”
> issued a statement last week condemning the course, and asking the
> University to revise its curriculum.
>
>     Despite more than 25 years of solid mainstream scholarship in the
> fields of psychology, social work, and mental health demonstrating the
> psychological health of gay and lesbian individuals, Franciscan
> University continues to teach otherwise, allowing pseudo-science to be
> taught at an accredited university.
>
>     To classify the normal day-to-day life of gay and lesbian citizens
> as being on par with that of murderers, rapists, and prostitutes is
> offensive, untrue, and an example of religious ideology being allowed
> to trump the scientifically demonstrated truth of the matter.
>
>     The latest version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
> Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) does NOT include homosexuality as a disorder
> or form of deviant behavior. All major professional mental health
> organizations have gone on record to affirm that homosexuality is not
> a mental disorder or deviant behavior. The continued classification of
> homosexuality as deviant behavior is rejected by the overwhelming
> majority of the professional psychological community and by many
> Catholic theologians.
>
> But in response, the group said it received only a “cease and desist”
> notice by the University’s General Counsel, Adam E. Scurti, advising
> the group that it had “no right to use the Name of Franciscan
> University, its logo or any other reference to the University” in any
> of its activities.
>
> The alumni group has since dropped the words “Franciscan University”
> from its name, but continues to ask why the course is being described
> or taught in that manner.
>
> Daniel R. Kempton, vice president for academic affairs, in a statement
> responding to Inside Higher Ed, said that some materials used in the
> course “present the view that homosexual behavior is not deviant,” but
> added that principles of academic freedom apply to the course and that
> the view that homosexuality is deviant is a legitimate perspective for
> the course.
>
> While critics of the university are “entitled to their opinion that
> their understanding of homosexual behavior is scientifically confirmed
> and thus should be imposed on all universities, we respectfully
> disagree,” he said.
>
> Kempton quoted Catechism of the Catholic Church as saying that while
> gay people should be treated with respect and dignity, “homosexual
> acts are intrinsically disordered. They are contrary to the natural
> law.”

-̮̮̃-̃ ̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾ ™Usenet Legends ªºªandɔa®ole

unread,
Sep 5, 2012, 10:10:09 AM9/5/12
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
On Sep 5, 3:21 am, RedDog <reddog1...@budweiser.com> wrote:
> On Sep 5, 3:08 am, -̮̮̃-̃ ̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾ ™Usenet Legends ªºªandɔa®ole
>
> <usenetlegends00...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Shades of Chick-Fil-A, the faggots are whining again. Remember,
> > according to the turd-tamers Heterosexuals are not allowed free speech
> > or free thought .. b&c
>
> Ain't no question about it. Those cocksuckers want us to accept their
> deviance and if we don't, then they do their best to deny us of our
> constitutional rights.

It's kinda ironic that the fuckin' faggots whine like little bitches,
literally demanding that we give them equal rights when in fact they
only desire to forcibly push their lifestyle on others who have a
constitutional right to believe anything they choose to believe
regarding faggotry, including the TRUTH it is weird, sickening and in
fact dangerous.. .

They attempt to force others to accept their strange and bizarre
fetishes.

tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu

unread,
Sep 6, 2012, 8:31:24 AM9/6/12
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
Usenet Legends writes:

130> Newsgroups: alt.support.boy-
lovers,alt.politics.homosexuality,rec.music.classical,rec.music.classical.recordings,comp.os.os2.advocacy

130> It's kinda ironic that the fuckin' faggots whine like little
bitches,
130> literally demanding that we give them equal rights when in fact
they
130> only desire to forcibly push their lifestyle on others who have a
130> constitutional right to believe anything they choose to believe
130> regarding faggotry, including the TRUTH it is weird, sickening
and in
130> fact dangerous.. .

130> They attempt to force others to accept their strange and bizarre
130> fetishes.

What do your objections have to do with OS/2, Legends? Rather ironic,
coming from someone who is forcing others to accept their strange and
off-topic postings.

tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu

unread,
Sep 6, 2012, 8:32:36 AM9/6/12
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
RedDog <reddo...@budweiser.com> writes:

76> Newsgroups: alt.support.boy-
lovers,alt.politics.homosexuality,rec.music.classical,rec.music.classical.recordings,comp.os.os2.advocacy

76> Ain't no question about it. Those cocksuckers want us to accept
their
76> deviance and if we don't, then they do their best to deny us of
our
76> constitutional rights.

What does your objection have to do with OS/2, RedDog?

RedDog

unread,
Sep 6, 2012, 7:56:29 PM9/6/12
to
On Sep 6, 12:31 pm, "tho...@antispam.ham" <tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu>
wrote:
OMG! Poor widdle faggot suk-boi tholen! Is that what we're forcing you
to do? LOL! :-)

tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu

unread,
Sep 7, 2012, 5:43:58 PM9/7/12
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
RedDog <reddo...@budweiser.com> writes:

86> Newsgroups: alt.support.boy-
lovers,rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy

86> OMG! Poor widdle faggot suk-boi tholen!

What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with
OS/2, RedDog?

86> Is that what we're forcing you to do?

What does your question have to do with OS/2, RedDog?

86> LOL! :-)

What do your amusement and emoticon have to do with OS/2, RedDog?
0 new messages