Here's a better one.
218> LOL!
What does your amusement have to do with OS/2, Elizabot?
Can you think of a more ridiculously funny joke than OS/2, tolenboot?
What does any of this have to do with music?
--
Blessed Cecilia, appear in visions
To all musicians, appear and inspire:
Translated Daughter, come down and startle
Composing mortals with immortal fire.
>> Elizabot writes:
>>
>> 218> LOL!
>>
>> What does your amusement have to do with OS/2, Elizabot?
> Can you think of a more ridiculously funny joke than OS/2, tolenboot?
You, Diogenes.
> Diogenes wrote:
>>> Elizabot writes:
>>>
>>> 218> LOL!
>>>
>>> What does your amusement have to do with OS/2, Elizabot?
>> Can you think of a more ridiculously funny joke than OS/2, tolenboot?
> What does any of this have to do with music?
Ask the person posting as "antagonist", nightingale, who is the one who
cross-posted it. Obviously a troll who has succeeded in luring fish
with his bait.
> Nightingale writes:
>
>
>>Diogenes wrote:
>
>
>>>>Elizabot writes:
>>>>
>>>>218> LOL!
>>>>
>>>>What does your amusement have to do with OS/2, Elizabot?
>
>
>>>Can you think of a more ridiculously funny joke than OS/2, tolenboot?
>
>
>>What does any of this have to do with music?
>
>
> Ask the person posting as "antagonist", nightingale, who is the one who
> cross-posted it.
Is there some reason you added back all the other groups after I set
followups to comp.os.os2.advocacy? I was trying to get the thread out
of rec.music.classical & other irelevant groups.
> Obviously a troll who has succeeded in luring fish
> with his bait.
>
Obviously.
Everybody, vote for ridiculously funny joke:
[ ] O/S2
[ ] Diogenes
No contest! O/S2.
(Although, you should have listed the tolenboot as a third choice.)
--
- relic -
Don't take life too seriously, You won't get out alive.
> No contest! O/S2.
> (Although, you should have listed the tolenboot as a third choice.)
What does that have to do with classical music, relic?
> Everybody, vote for ridiculously funny joke:
>
> [ ] O/S2
> [ ] Diogenes
What does that have to do with classical music, Diogenes?
> [ *X* ] O/S2
> [ ] Diogenes
Nightingale wrote:
> Diogenes wrote:
>
>> tho...@antispam.ham wrote:
>>
>>> Elizabot writes:
>>>
>>> 218> LOL!
>>>
>>> What does your amusement have to do with OS/2, Elizabot?
>>
>>
>>
>> Can you think of a more ridiculously funny joke than OS/2, tolenboot?
>>
>
> What does any of this have to do with music?
>
>
What does any of this have to do with Linux?
--
---------------------------------
My other computer is a VAX.
Diogenes wrote:
> [X] O/S2
> [ ] Diogenes
Classical music lovers are not without a sense of humor. That's a trait only
seen in O/S2 bots.
That was hard, as they're all quite funny.
--
Matthew H. Fields http://personal.www.umich.edu/~fields
Music: Splendor in Sound
A genuine countertenor voice silences all arguments. --Salman Rushdie
Brights have a naturalistic world-view. http://www.the-brights.net/
Oh. A vote!
Let me see... I'll say, O/S2 is more ridiculously funny.
HAND tolenboot.
> Diogenes wrote:
>>> Diogenes writes:
>>>>> Elizabot writes:
>>>>>
>>>>> 218> LOL!
>>>>>
>>>>> What does your amusement have to do with OS/2, Elizabot?
>>>> Can you think of a more ridiculously funny joke than OS/2,
>>>> tolenboot?
>>> You, Diogenes.
>> Everybody, vote for ridiculously funny joke:
>>
>> [ *X* ] O/S2
>> [ ] Diogenes
What does that have to do with classical music, chrisv?
> Diogenes wrote:
>>> Diogenes writes:
>>>>> Elizabot writes:
>>>>>
>>>>> 218> LOL!
>>>>>
>>>>> What does your amusement have to do with OS/2, Elizabot?
>>>> Can you think of a more ridiculously funny joke than OS/2, tolenboot?
>>> You, Diogenes.
>> Everybody, vote for ridiculously funny joke:
>>
>> [X] O/S2
>> [ ] Diogenes
What does that have to do with classical music, GreyCloud?
You're trying to rig the vote, aren't you. No real challenger would try to get
more votes against himself.
Oh wait! You're a bot.
relic wrote:
> tho...@antispam.ham wrote:
>
>>relic writes:
>>
>>
>>>No contest! O/S2.
>>>(Although, you should have listed the tolenboot as a third choice.)
>>
>>What does that have to do with classical music, relic?
>
>
> Classical music lovers are not without a sense of humor. That's a trait only
> seen in O/S2 bots.
>
Agreed! I love classical music.
tho...@antispam.ham wrote:
Because there's a Fugue in every bunch.
:-))
> Everybody, vote for ridiculously funny joke:
>
> [ ] O/S2
> [X] Diogenes
> Everybody, vote for ridiculously funny joke:
>
> [ ] O/S2
> [X] Diogenes
> Everybody, vote for ridiculously funny joke:
>
> [ ] O/S2
> [X] Diogenes
> Everybody, vote for ridiculously funny joke:
>
> [ ] O/S2
> [X] Diogenes
PS: I forgot to vote.
[X] O/S2
[ ] Diogenes
ROTFL You bots stick together, huh.
Must be a bug, mate.
I suspected that the tholenbot was stuffing the ballot box.
>> Diogenes writes:
>>> Everybody, vote for ridiculously funny joke:
>>>
>>> [ ] O/S2
>>> [ ] Diogenes
>> What does that have to do with classical music, Diogenes?
> PS: I forgot to vote.
>
> [X] O/S2
> [ ] Diogenes
What is "O/S2", and what does it have to do with classical music,
whoever you really are?
> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>> Diogenes wrote:
>>> Darrell Grimfoot-Pugglewidge wrote:
>>>> Diogenes wrote:
What does your illogical suspicion and erroneous presupposition of the
existence of some "tholenbot" have to do with classical music, Diogenes?
Very dumb question tolenboot, but what can one expect from a poorly programmed
bot.
1. The entire world of Usenet knows that _you_ are just a programmed bot. Not
a very good one (really a piss-poor, limited selection of snappy comebacks in
your programming), but a bot nonetheless.
2. It's O/S2 that is related to Classical music, not you. Both are very old
and not produced anymore. Although, the usefulness and our appreciation exists
for classical music; it doesn't for a dead OS like O/S2).
Now, do try to grasp those points (your 'intelligence' is Artificial
Intelligence obviously). Maybe you can get your creator to update you. If not,
have him terminate you.
We need a "none of the above" category on this little survey.
--
<this space vacant>
What does that have to do with classical music, Tholocrit.
Don
Speak for yourself, H.
> Elizabot writes:
>
> 218> LOL!
>
> What does your amusement have to do with OS/2, Elizabot?
I see you still suffer from reading comprehension issues, Tholen. You
are a sad little man, really.
> tho...@antispam.ham wrote:
>
>>Diogenes writes:
>>
>>
>>>>Elizabot writes:
>>>>
>>>>218> LOL!
>>>>
>>>>What does your amusement have to do with OS/2, Elizabot?
>>
>>>Can you think of a more ridiculously funny joke than OS/2, tolenboot?
>>
>>You, Diogenes.
>
>
> Everybody, vote for ridiculously funny joke:
>
> [ ] O/S2
> [ ] Diogenes
> [X] ridiculously funny joke
>
duh
> tho...@antispam.ham wrote:
>
>>Diogenes writes:
>>
>>
>>>Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>
>>>>Diogenes wrote:
>>
>>>>>Darrell Grimfoot-Pugglewidge wrote:
>>
>>>>>>Diogenes wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>Everybody, vote for ridiculously funny joke:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>[ ] O/S2
>>>>>>>[X] Diogenes
>>
>>>>>ROTFL You bots stick together, huh.
>>
>>>>Must be a bug, mate.
>>
>>>I suspected that the tholenbot was stuffing the ballot box.
>>
>>What does your illogical suspicion and erroneous presupposition of the
>>existence of some "tholenbot" have to do with classical music,
>>Diogenes?
>
>
> Very dumb question tolenboot, but what can one expect from a poorly programmed
> bot.
>
> 1. The entire world of Usenet knows that _you_ are just a programmed bot. Not
> a very good one (really a piss-poor, limited selection of snappy comebacks in
> your programming), but a bot nonetheless.
What the entire world of "Usenet" thinks is irrelevant.
> 2. It's O/S2 that is related to Classical music, not you. Both are very old
> and not produced anymore. Although, the usefulness and our appreciation exists
> for classical music; it doesn't for a dead OS like O/S2).
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> Now, do try to grasp those points (your 'intelligence' is Artificial
> Intelligence obviously). Maybe you can get your creator to update you. If not,
> have him terminate you.
Indeed.
Incorrect, H. How ironic.
> What the entire world of "Usenet" thinks is irrelevant.
That isn't exactly correct. The one thing that is relevant is
what 'the entire world of "Usenet"' can be made to think.
> Elizabot wrote:
>
>
>>What the entire world of "Usenet" thinks is irrelevant.
>
>
> That isn't exactly correct.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> The one thing that is relevant is
> what 'the entire world of "Usenet"' can be made to think.
Incorrect, Kadaitcha Man.
What "the entire world of Usenet" can be made to think is irrelevant.
Only what "the entire world of Usenet" can prove is relevant.
Go figure.
I assume that you mean that music from the period that followed Baroque and
preceded Romantic is no longer composed.
Because if you meant that music that isn't rock/pop/folk/world etc is no
longer performed nor composed you made a tiny mistake...
(apologies for x-posting, bu tit difficult to work out where everyone's
coming from - I don't think this has much to do with basketball...)
If that is true, so your statement 'What the entire world of "Usenet" thinks
is irrelevant' is also a "Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim."
Do you need it explained to you, botfuck? Hmmm? The mere fact that you were
told your claim isn't exactly correct makes your claim a "Classic
unsubstantiated and erroneous claim" on the grounds that at least one other
disagrees with you, as evidenced by the statement "That isn't exactly
correct."
Choke on that wholly substantiated and verifiable claim, snot for brains.
[insert fuckwitted "Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim" statement
here]
bluh bluh. Is your second use of the word that supposed to be a
demonstrative pronoun, an adjective with the same demonstrative force as a
pronoun, a relative pronoun, or a pronoun that takes on the force of a
definite article? Once that's been sorted, we'll move on to your third use
of the word that in the same sentence.
Merely informal, quasi-conversational English as is often used in internet
scribblings. BTW, your comment would have been easier to read with the
'that' in quotes...
This wasn't x-posted to alt.english.usage.
Do you mean to imply that you actually speak in the same manner as you
wrote, above? Fuck me dead. Do people ever tell you that you give them
headaches?
The fact of the matter is, your statement has to be read multiple times to
discern the indended 'hardness' of the second that. Without multiple
readings, the object pointed to by the second instance of the word that is
totally obscured, lost even, in the quagmire you are pleased to pass off as
language.
You could have got through your mumblings unscathed by using the word that
only once. The other two thats are superfluous, so there goes your claim to
'quasi-conversational ... scribblings'. Just in case the point is lost on
you, that preceding statement is intended to convey the notion that you are
a liar.
> BTW, your comment would have been easier to
> read with the 'that' in quotes...
Indeed, though it was, as it always is, deliberate. Putting quotes where no
quotes are required is merely a mechanism to aid intellectual sloths, such
as yourself. Whereas I do not write for your benefit, so you can do your own
dirty work or fuck off and die, for all I care.
> This wasn't x-posted to alt.english.usage.
That doesn't change the fact of your scrawlings being unintelligible. The
point being, if you can't be arsed putting a bit of thought into your
primary school paintings and dawdlings on usenet, who is going to bother
taking anything you write seriously? Your mention of Baroque amongst woeful,
trashy language indicates that you are a philistine who only knows enough to
be able to bandy a few posh-sounding words about to make himself appear half
smart.
PS: On the matter of Baroque and you being a philistine who knows only
enough to bandy a few bits of crap about... It's La Donna e Mobile.
HTH and HAND.
>chrisv writes:
>
>> Diogenes wrote:
>
>>>> Diogenes writes:
>
>>>>>> Elizabot writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 218> LOL!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What does your amusement have to do with OS/2, Elizabot?
>
>>>>> Can you think of a more ridiculously funny joke than OS/2,
>>>>> tolenboot?
>
>>>> You, Diogenes.
>
>>> Everybody, vote for ridiculously funny joke:
>>>
>>> [ *X* ] O/S2
>>> [ ] Diogenes
>
>What does that have to do with classical music, chrisv?
I wouldn't know, Tholen, as you responded to a message left by a
forger using my name.
>chrisv writes:
>
>> Diogenes wrote:
>
>>>> Diogenes writes:
>
>>>>>> Elizabot writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 218> LOL!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What does your amusement have to do with OS/2, Elizabot?
>
>>>>> Can you think of a more ridiculously funny joke than OS/2,
>>>>> tolenboot?
>
>>>> You, Diogenes.
>
>>> Everybody, vote for ridiculously funny joke:
>>>
>>> [ *X* ] O/S2
>>> [ ] Diogenes
>
>What does that have to do with classical music, chrisv?
By the way, Tholen, what does your question have to do with Linux
advocacy?
What does your question have to do with basketball, chrisv?
DUH! That's pretty obvious.
--
- relic -
Don't take life too seriously, You won't get out alive.
I think you'll find that La Donna Mobile is a Chevrolet.
--
Matthew H. Fields http://personal.www.umich.edu/~fields
Music: Splendor in Sound
A genuine countertenor voice silences all arguments. --Salman Rushdie
Brights have a naturalistic world-view. http://www.the-brights.net/
> Elizabot wrote:
>
>>Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Elizabot wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>What the entire world of "Usenet" thinks is irrelevant.
>>>
>>>
>>>That isn't exactly correct.
>>
>>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>
> If that is true, so your statement 'What the entire world of "Usenet" thinks
> is irrelevant' is also a "Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim."
>
> Do you need it explained to you, botfuck?
Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
> Hmmm? The mere fact that you were
> told your claim isn't exactly correct makes your claim a "Classic
> unsubstantiated and erroneous claim" on the grounds that at least one other
> disagrees with you, as evidenced by the statement "That isn't exactly
> correct."
>
> Choke on that wholly substantiated and verifiable claim, snot for brains.
Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
> [insert fuckwitted "Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim" statement
> here]
>
>
>
>
Wow, you sure told me off. Go out and get a sense of humor, okay?
You're just trying to make the tholenbot look good, aren't you.
Classic pontification.
Confirmation seen.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, on the grounds that the
statement referred to actually offers an argument, as evidenced by the
phrase "Do you need it explained to you."
>> Hmmm? The mere fact that you were
>> told your claim isn't exactly correct makes your claim a "Classic
>> unsubstantiated and erroneous claim" on the grounds that at least
>> one other disagrees with you, as evidenced by the statement "That
>> isn't exactly correct."
>>
>> Choke on that wholly substantiated and verifiable claim, snot for
>> brains.
>
> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
> argument.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, on the grounds that the
argument is both logical and verifiable. If you don't have the capacity to
understand the argument, don't blame anyone for that failing other than
yourself.
>> [insert fuckwitted "Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim"
>> statement here]
>>
> Wow, you sure told me off. Go out and get a sense of humor, okay?
Just warming you up. I don't like my dinner cold.
This settles it all:
http://www.googlefight.com/cgi-bin/compare.pl?q1=you&q2=me&B1=Make+a+fight%21&compare=1&langue=us
> Elizabot <toolittl...@poo.com> wrote in message news:<410fcf12$0$210$7586...@news.frii.net>...
>
>>http://www.googlefight.com/cgi-bin/compare.pl?q1=Steve+Jobs&q2=Bill+Gates&B1=Make+a+fight%21&compare=1&langue=us
>
>
> This settles it all:
That one's fairly close.
> http://www.googlefight.com/cgi-bin/compare.pl?q1=you&q2=me&B1=Make+a+fight%21&compare=1&langue=us
How about this one:
http://www.googlefight.com/cgi-bin/compare.pl?q1=us&q2=them&B1=Make+a+fight%21&compare=1&langue=us
On second thought, stay TF away from my gin and tonic.
--Tedward
> >Eat my bubbles:
> >
>
>http://www.googlefight.com/cgi-bin/compare.pl?q1=Duke+Basketball&q2=UNC+Basketball&B1=Make+a+fight%
21&compare=1&langue=us
> >
> >On second thought, stay TF away from my gin and tonic.
>
>
http://www.googlefight.com/cgi-bin/compare.pl?q1=dean+smith&q2=mike+krzyzewski&B1=Make+a+fight%21&compare=1&langue=us
>
> Dean wins HANDS DOWN.
No fair. Nobody can spell "Krzyzewski", though some
can cut and paste it.
--Tedward
Well, that's the title of the aria from Rigoletto, but it is
possible to refer to a particular person as "la donna mobile."
La donna è mobile = The lady is changeable (often translated "fickle")
La donna mobile = The changeable (or fickle) lady
But don't bother to reply because everyone in this thread is
now in my killfile.
--
Salamanca 116
Pueblo Libre
Lima 21 PERU
Tel. +51(1)461-3084
Cel. +51(1)9743-6439
DALE ERWIN'S OPERA FILES - http://www.geocities.com/dale_erwin
CURSO DE ITALIANO EN CASTELLANO - http://www.casaerwin.com/Italiano.html
Note: No response.
Thoroughly spanked.
relic wrote:
Maybe Tholen finally got laid after all these years. Must've been the
meter maid.
--
---------------------------------
The Golden Years Sux.
ROTFL
> chrisv wrote:
>> I wrote:
>>> chrisv writes:
>>>> Diogenes wrote:
>>>>>> Diogenes writes:
>>>>>>>> Elizabot writes:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 218> LOL!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What does your amusement have to do with OS/2, Elizabot?
>>>>>>> Can you think of a more ridiculously funny joke than OS/2,
>>>>>>> tolenboot?
>>>>>> You, Diogenes.
>>>>> Everybody, vote for ridiculously funny joke:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ *X* ] O/S2
>>>>> [ ] Diogenes
>>> What does that have to do with classical music, chrisv?
>> By the way, Tholen, what does your question have to do with Linux
>> advocacy?
> Note: No response.
Responding to yourself, eh chrisv?
> relic wrote:
>> chrisv wrote:
>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>> I wrote:
>>>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>>>> Diogenes wrote:
>>>>>>>> Diogenes wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Elizabot wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 218> LOL!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What does your amusement have to do with OS/2, Elizabot?
>>>>>>>>> Can you think of a more ridiculously funny joke than OS/2,
>>>>>>>>> tolenboot?
>>>>>>>> You, Diogenes.
>>>>>>> Everybody, vote for ridiculously funny joke:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [ *X* ] O/S2
>>>>>>> [ ] Diogenes
>>>>> What does that have to do with classical music, chrisv?
>>>> By the way, Tholen, what does your question have to do with Linux
>>>> advocacy?
>>> Note: No response.
>> Thoroughly spanked.
> Maybe Tholen finally got laid after all these years. Must've been the
> meter maid.
What does your illogic have to do with classical music, GreyCloud?
> GreyCloud wrote:
>> relic wrote:
>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>>> I wrote:
>>>>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>>>>> Diogenes wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Diogenes wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Elizabot wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 218> LOL!
>>>>>>>>>>> What does your amusement have to do with OS/2, Elizabot?
>>>>>>>>>> Can you think of a more ridiculously funny joke than OS/2,
>>>>>>>>>> tolenboot?
>>>>>>>>> You, Diogenes.
>>>>>>>> Everybody, vote for ridiculously funny joke:
>>>>>>>> [ *X* ] O/S2
>>>>>>>> [ ] Diogenes
>>>>>> What does that have to do with classical music, chrisv?
>>>>> By the way, Tholen, what does your question have to do with Linux
>>>>> advocacy?
>>>> Note: No response.
>>> Thoroughly spanked.
>> Maybe Tholen finally got laid after all these years. Must've been the
>> meter maid.
> ROTFL
What does your amusement have to do with classical music, relic?
Tolfenbot, you lost the vote. Go die somewhere now (like your dead OS).
Making up words again, relic (little boy)? How typical.
> you lost the vote.
Prove it, if you think you can.
> Go die somewhere now
Classsic invective.
> (like your dead OS).
An erroneous and unsubtantiated claim, typical of one who lacks a logical
argument.
Edwin. Get fucked.
Classic invective, laced with irony. Meanwhile, where is your logical
argument? Why, nowhere to be seen!
tho...@antispam.ham wrote:
You're screwier than a loon, numbnuts. Did the meter maid give you
'around the world'?
Guffaw!
Look nutcasebot, I have no need to post arguments with idiots (That would be
you). Instead, take my advice and get fucked.
Incorrect.
> (That would be you).
Incorrect.
> Instead, take my advice and get fucked.
Illogical.
>>> relic wrote:
>>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>>>> I wrote:
>>>>>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>>>>>> Diogenes wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Diogenes wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> You, Diogenes.
>>>>> Note: No response.
>>>> Thoroughly spanked.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, and rather ironic coming
from someone behaving the way you're behaving, GreyCloud.
> Did the meter maid give you 'around the world'?
Classic erroneous presupposition.
> Guffaw!
What does your humor have to do with OS/2, GreyCloud?
>>> GreyCloud wrote:
>>>> relic wrote:
>>>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>>>>> I wrote:
>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Diogenes wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Diogenes wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Elizabot wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 218> LOL!
>>>>>>>>>>> You, Diogenes.
>>>>>>>>>> [ *X* ] O/S2
>>>>>>>>>> [ ] Diogenes
>>>>>> Note: No response.
>>>>> Thoroughly spanked.
>>> ROTFL
> Tolfenbot,
Who is "Tolfenbot", relic? Having attribution problems?
> you lost the vote.
What does an irrelevant vote have to do with OS/2, relic?
> Go die somewhere now
Non sequitur. But you should practice what you preach, relic.
> (like your dead OS).
You're erroneously presupposing that I have any dead OS, relic.
Humour and OS/2 go together. Both make you laugh.
Edwin wrote:
Hehehe... is this the line where you can learn how to be a bot? :-))
How can a bot be dead???
botulism.
botonic plague.
--
"If A = B and B = C, then A = C, except where void or prohibited by law."
Roy Santoro, Psycho Proverb Zone (http://smallurl.com/?i=15235)
botricide?
/mumbles I got nuthin'....
--
Rick...
Aquila Deus wrote:
It caught a computer virus.
http://freespace.virgin.net/chris.morse/Dead%20Bot.html
--
"You see, my invisible green dragon tells me that God is real, and is
even a pretty nice guy, but can not hold his liquor well."
- Snit (aka 尬≡) on 4/27/04
>>>>> relic wrote:
>>>>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>>>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>>>>>> I wrote:
>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Diogenes wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Diogenes wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> You, Diogenes.
>>>>>>> Note: No response.
>>>>>> Thoroughly spanked.
Note: no response.
>>> Did the meter maid give you 'around the world'?
>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
Note: no response.
>>> Guffaw!
>> What does your humor have to do with OS/2, GreyCloud?
> Humour and OS/2 go together. Both make you laugh.
Illogical.
Some individuals call you Tolfenbot, others call you Tholen. They're
both just words or sounds used to distinguish you from others. Why
should one be any more relevant than any other?
> > (like your dead OS).
>
> You're erroneously presupposing that I have any dead OS, relic.
No he's not. By posting to comp.os.os2.advocacy you're associating
yourself with a dead OS, which, for the purpose of ease of
communication may be described as your OS, in the same way that were
you to actually post to rec.music.classical about classical music more
often than you post your off-topic, yet amusing, persecution complex,
you'd be associating yourself with that particular genre of music,
which would then allow people to accurately refer to `your` music. Got
it?
>>> How can a bot be dead???
>>
>> botulism.
>>
>> botonic plague.
>
> botricide?
>
> /mumbles I got nuthin'....
That's a-bot the size of it.
>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, and rather ironic coming
>>> from someone behaving the way you're behaving, GreyCloud.
>
>Note: no response.
>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
>Note: no response.
Responding to yourself, eh tholen?
>> Maybe Tholen finally got laid after all these years. Must've been the
>> meter maid.
>
>What does your illogic have to do with classical music, GreyCloud?
Note that Tholen did NOT respond with "Classic unsubstantiated and
erroneous claim".
Snit wrote:
>>
>>How can a bot be dead???
>
>
> botulism.
>
> botonic plague.
>
LOL!!!
tho...@antispam.ham wrote:
Guffaw!!! Clueless you are.