Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
comp.os.minix
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion What would you like to see most in minix?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
changming.yang...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Sep 6 2012, 10:48 am
Newsgroups: comp.os.minix
From: changming.yang...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 07:48:45 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Sep 6 2012 10:48 am
Subject: Re: What would you like to see most in minix?
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
在 1991年8月26日星期一UTC+9下午3时12分08秒，Linus Benedict Torvalds写道：

> Hello everybody out there using minix -

> I'm doing a (free) operating system (just a hobby, won't be big and
> professional like gnu) for 386(486) AT clones.  This has been brewing
> since april, and is starting to get ready.  I'd like any feedback on
> things people like/dislike in minix, as my OS resembles it somewhat
> (same physical layout of the file-system (due to practical reasons)
> among other things).

> I've currently ported bash(1.08) and gcc(1.40), and things seem to work.
> This implies that I'll get something practical within a few months, and
> I'd like to know what features most people would want.  Any suggestions
> are welcome, but I won't promise I'll implement them :-)

>            Linus (torva...@kruuna.helsinki.fi)

> PS.  Yes - it's free of any minix code, and it has a multi-threaded fs.
> It is NOT protable (uses 386 task switching etc), and it probably never
> will support anything other than AT-harddisks, as that's all I have :-(.

i have seen  [just for fun].
Thank you for the linux so much.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google