Message from discussion
LINUX is obsolete
Newsgroups: comp.os.minix
Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!utgpu!news-server.ecf!epas!meggin
From: meg...@epas.utoronto.ca (David Megginson)
Subject: Re: LINUX is obsolete
Organization: University of Toronto - EPAS
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 1992 14:12:12 GMT
Message-ID: <1992Jan29.141212.29636@epas.toronto.edu>
References: <12595@star.cs.vu.nl>
Sender: n...@epas.toronto.edu (USENET)
Nntp-Posting-Host: epas.utoronto.ca
I would like to at least look at LINUX, but I cannot, since I run
a 68000-based machine. In any case, it is nice having the kernel
independent, since patches like the multi-threaded FS patch don't
have to exist in a different version for each CPU.
I second everything AST said, except that I would like to see
the kernel _more_ independent from everything else. Why does the
Intel architecture _not_ allow drivers to be independent programs?
I also don't like the fact that the kernel, mm and fs share the
same configuration files. Since they _are_ independent, they should
have more of a sense of independence.
David
#################################################################
David Megginson meg...@epas.utoronto.ca
Centre for Medieval Studies da...@doe.utoronto.ca
University of Toronto 39 Queen's Park Cr. E.
#################################################################