Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion at&t-free ksh (was: job control is a bug, not a feature)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
news  
View profile  
 More options Jun 13 1989, 8:12 pm
Newsgroups: comp.os.minix
From: n...@sq.sq.com
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 89 00:12:34 GMT
Local: Tues, Jun 13 1989 8:12 pm
Subject: at&t-free ksh (was: job control is a bug, not a feature)

>I get the impression that a number of people dislike csh, but
>have a hard time getting along without job control.
>Anyone care to take a crack at writing an AT&T-free ksh?  :-) Tom.

Yup, the gnu project's Born Again Shell ("bash") is an attempt
at bashing all the features of sh together with many of those
from both csh and ksh. It is not subject to any AT&T or BSD license,
nor is it subject to any constraints imposed by segmented architectures,
i.e., it won't run on your PC/XT, period. To wit:
$ size bin/bash
text    data    bss     dec     hex
188416  16384   10992   215792  34af0

If you have a reasonable computer to run it on, and a compiler
that isn't hamstrung by historical necessity for compatibility
with segmented architectures, you can get the source (it's free)
and try running it. As with all GNU-ware, THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO
WARRANTY, etc., etc. See the file COPYING in the source directory
for details.

What does this have to do with the original thread of discussion?
Oh yeah, I almost forgot. Bash has had csh-style job control bashed
into it, along with csh-style history but with Bourne-shell
control syntax (for f in $x  instead of   foreach f ($x)  etc).
Something for everybody?

Ian Darwin              | Segmented architecture is great...
i...@sq.com            | for platyhelminths. Why are there so many
                        | worm programs on PC-class machines?

P.S. I don't work for the Free Software Foundation, I just happen


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.