Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Comparison between the MINIX and L4 micro kernels
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  2 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
sdx  
View profile  
 More options Sep 8 2007, 3:43 am
Newsgroups: comp.os.minix
From: sdx <datta.sand...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2007 07:43:31 -0000
Local: Sat, Sep 8 2007 3:43 am
Subject: Comparison between the MINIX and L4 micro kernels
Hi,

I am an absolute newbie in this field so please excuse me if you find
my question silly/obnoxious. We already have many excellent micro-
kernels floating around (say L4 for instance) then what is the point
in continuing with our own version of the same?


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
sinu.nayak2001@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Sep 10 2007, 2:42 am
Newsgroups: comp.os.minix
From: "sinu.nayak2...@gmail.com" <sinu.nayak2...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 06:42:33 -0000
Local: Mon, Sep 10 2007 2:42 am
Subject: Re: Comparison between the MINIX and L4 micro kernels
Hi,
We no doubt have a lot many micro kernels around. But each vary with
their goal. Some may want performance while some may look at
security...here in minix, we wanted reliability the most...as
Tanenbaum says...we want our computer to be like our TV in all
respect, i.e. in terms of reliability...(other factors also keeping in
mind, like security and performance...). Hence we have a new kind of
micro kernel...Self recovering is another beautiful feature of this
micro kernel...I hope this clarifies our doubt (why one more micro
kernel?) a bit...more on the differences and similarities with other
micro kernels can be found in the papers listed in minix.org...

Thanks
Srinu.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »