<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>comp.os.linux.networking Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.networking</link>
  <description>Networking and communications under Linux.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Keeping a VERY accurate time (within a millisecond)</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.networking/browse_thread/thread/846306094fd5eb42/82d5baba2b4c2c6f?show_docid=82d5baba2b4c2c6f</link>
  <description>
  I thought about this back when I was running sendmail open to the Internet &lt;br&gt; so people could send to me directly. I did get a lot of spam and I thought &lt;br&gt; it would help when getting in touch with other users of sendmail to have &lt;br&gt; accurate time so they could find things in their logs by knowing when they
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.networking/browse_thread/thread/846306094fd5eb42/82d5baba2b4c2c6f?show_docid=82d5baba2b4c2c6f</guid>
  <author>
  jeandav...@verizon.net
  (Jean-David Beyer)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 11:44:52 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: piping a data feed through a connectionless UDP driver</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.networking/browse_thread/thread/99a166a241ca4ced/b206fe64c7bbef11?show_docid=b206fe64c7bbef11</link>
  <description>
  Yes. I think netcat (nc) can do this, and I have used ttcp as well. &lt;br&gt; But do you realize that because UDP is unreliable, the OS may not even &lt;br&gt; TRANSMIT outgoing packets? &lt;br&gt; Also - the jitter may be unpredictable.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.networking/browse_thread/thread/99a166a241ca4ced/b206fe64c7bbef11?show_docid=b206fe64c7bbef11</guid>
  <author>
  nos...@com.invalid
  (Maxwell Lol)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 11:12:14 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>piping a data feed through a connectionless UDP driver</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.networking/browse_thread/thread/99a166a241ca4ced/e8745a474bbc5716?show_docid=e8745a474bbc5716</link>
  <description>
  Hi, &lt;br&gt; ~ &lt;br&gt; I need to stream/convert bytes of data from a file or connection &lt;br&gt; oriented TC Protocol to connectionless UDP using Linux &lt;br&gt; ~ &lt;br&gt; I would like to be able to do something like going: &lt;br&gt; ~ &lt;br&gt; cat filename &amp;gt; /dev/udpdrvr &lt;br&gt; ~ &lt;br&gt; I was wondering if there exist such a utility in Linux? &lt;br&gt; ~ &lt;br&gt; Thanks &lt;br&gt; lbrtchx
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.networking/browse_thread/thread/99a166a241ca4ced/e8745a474bbc5716?show_docid=e8745a474bbc5716</guid>
  <author>
  cml...@acedsl.com
  (Albretch Mueller)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 10:23:29 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: LAN IP addresses</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.networking/browse_thread/thread/e8af940671fb878b/92b792a0d5c40623?show_docid=92b792a0d5c40623</link>
  <description>
  Moe Trin a écrit : &lt;br&gt; Wasn&#39;t this true already with subnetting, even before CIDR ? &lt;br&gt; Hey, I interpret this paragraph this way too ! :-o &lt;br&gt; I quote it for completeness : &lt;br&gt; IP addresses are not permitted to have the value 0 or -1 for &lt;br&gt; any of the &amp;lt;Host-number&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;Network-number&amp;gt;, or &amp;lt;Subnet- &lt;br&gt; number&amp;gt; fields (except in the special cases listed above).
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.networking/browse_thread/thread/e8af940671fb878b/92b792a0d5c40623?show_docid=92b792a0d5c40623</guid>
  <author>
  boite-a-s...@plouf.fr.eu.org
  (Pascal Hambourg)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 10:21:24 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Activating routing</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.networking/browse_thread/thread/f502d3807383c323/9a8fc6a1ee8308c4?show_docid=9a8fc6a1ee8308c4</link>
  <description>
  Use NAT (a.k.a. masquerading) on swift when forwarding packets to/from &lt;br&gt; slick. As slick uses the private IP number 192.168.1.4 you can&#39;t &lt;br&gt; simply forward slicks packets unmodified to the public internet. &lt;br&gt; Regards, &lt;br&gt; Kees.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.networking/browse_thread/thread/f502d3807383c323/9a8fc6a1ee8308c4?show_docid=9a8fc6a1ee8308c4</guid>
  <author>
  theun...@rijnh.nl
  (Kees Theunissen)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 09:22:09 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Activating routing</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.networking/browse_thread/thread/f502d3807383c323/903f5bf541da030d?show_docid=903f5bf541da030d</link>
  <description>
  Yes, I did that too, but still can&#39;t access the internet from slick... Is &lt;br&gt; there anything else to configure (I have enable &amp;quot;Advanced route&amp;quot; in the &lt;br&gt; kernel options)? &lt;br&gt; Thanks.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.networking/browse_thread/thread/f502d3807383c323/903f5bf541da030d?show_docid=903f5bf541da030d</guid>
  <author>
  fdele...@mail.cpod.fr
  (Fabrice Delente)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 05:05:02 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Keeping a VERY accurate time (within a millisecond)</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.networking/browse_thread/thread/846306094fd5eb42/b5d23dfb23748701?show_docid=b5d23dfb23748701</link>
  <description>
  Just to have accurate timestamps. &lt;br&gt; This is a big topic. I do not feel up to starting it. But suffice it &lt;br&gt; to say that response times improve greatly when nothing is swapped out &lt;br&gt; and there are more CPUs than the amount of stuff to compute.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.networking/browse_thread/thread/846306094fd5eb42/b5d23dfb23748701?show_docid=b5d23dfb23748701</guid>
  <author>
  ignoramus19...@nospam.19762.invalid
  (Ignoramus19762)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 03:25:09 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Help understanding nameservers</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.networking/browse_thread/thread/ff2f0da122e8f23d/3d9166c6a640a8ac?show_docid=3d9166c6a640a8ac</link>
  <description>
  Thanks for the input.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.networking/browse_thread/thread/ff2f0da122e8f23d/3d9166c6a640a8ac?show_docid=3d9166c6a640a8ac</guid>
  <author>
  cr...@this-is-bogus.sbcglobal.net
  (CRC)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 02:19:34 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Do I need a software firewall in addition to a NAT router/firewall?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.networking/browse_thread/thread/496f1f6ca8555f69/1868121d09fcfd9c?show_docid=1868121d09fcfd9c</link>
  <description>
  Thanks for the responses, folks.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.networking/browse_thread/thread/496f1f6ca8555f69/1868121d09fcfd9c?show_docid=1868121d09fcfd9c</guid>
  <author>
  cr...@this-is-bogus.sbcglobal.net
  (CRC)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 02:16:42 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Detecting Zombies?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.networking/browse_thread/thread/2b0bd4c77d790ee0/cf6a0bf29d43af3a?show_docid=cf6a0bf29d43af3a</link>
  <description>
  Actually, I have done that. In fact, it is the only computer thing I have &lt;br&gt; done there. My career was computers from the mainframe days in 1968 to &lt;br&gt; a few years ago when I retired. Now I only work at different jobs that I &lt;br&gt; enjoy, and this one happens to have nothing to do with any type of system &lt;br&gt; admin or computers of any kind other than using one on occasion.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.networking/browse_thread/thread/2b0bd4c77d790ee0/cf6a0bf29d43af3a?show_docid=cf6a0bf29d43af3a</guid>
  <author>
  dbxxxx...@yahoo.com
  (DanB)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 01:23:07 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Experience Virtualization with VM-Knoppix</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.networking/browse_thread/thread/22c4ee00db6454a0/6215788c52b64bb8?show_docid=6215788c52b64bb8</link>
  <description>
  Hi to all, &lt;br&gt; This is my First post here, i have been working on linux for last 2 &lt;br&gt; years, few days i was wondoring to play with virutalization so i came &lt;br&gt; accross a good brief over view &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.technorabit.com/2008/09/07/experience-virtualization-with-vm-knoppix/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; share your comments will improve the content of future posts.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.networking/browse_thread/thread/22c4ee00db6454a0/6215788c52b64bb8?show_docid=6215788c52b64bb8</guid>
  <author>
  jamshed.ji...@gmail.com
  (Jamy-Virus)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 01:15:57 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: privoxy crash</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.networking/browse_thread/thread/2efbf757973ba807/6affa7b27504a240?show_docid=6affa7b27504a240</link>
  <description>
  Actually, I rotate my logs weekly and expire them monthly. &lt;br&gt; Thanks for the ideas!
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.networking/browse_thread/thread/2efbf757973ba807/6affa7b27504a240?show_docid=6affa7b27504a240</guid>
  <author>
  nob...@cosgroves.us
  (Kevin the Drummer)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:40:26 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Keeping a VERY accurate time (within a millisecond)</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.networking/browse_thread/thread/846306094fd5eb42/8ad68dc6a59ef007?show_docid=8ad68dc6a59ef007</link>
  <description>
  What are your application requirements? Do you just need a highly &lt;br&gt; accurate time reference, or do you need the system to respond to &lt;br&gt; sub-millisecond events in sub-millisecond timeliness? &lt;br&gt; Linux is not a realtime system. Thread priorities can keep one thread &lt;br&gt; from responding to an event for 100s of milliseconds. Even acquiring a
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.networking/browse_thread/thread/846306094fd5eb42/8ad68dc6a59ef007?show_docid=8ad68dc6a59ef007</guid>
  <author>
  jmm-list.axspa...@sohnen-moe.com
  (Jim Moe)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:31:48 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Activating routing</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.networking/browse_thread/thread/f502d3807383c323/380621025c6eb0d1?show_docid=380621025c6eb0d1</link>
  <description>
  In addition to Moe&#39;s excellent advice be sure ip forwarding is enabled &lt;br&gt; on swift: &lt;br&gt; corncob:~# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward &lt;br&gt; 1 &lt;br&gt; corncob:~# &lt;br&gt; That can be done at runtime in a script or with sysctl.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.networking/browse_thread/thread/f502d3807383c323/380621025c6eb0d1?show_docid=380621025c6eb0d1</guid>
  <author>
  k...@not.available.tld
  (Clifford Kite)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 18:59:40 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Keeping a VERY accurate time (within a millisecond)</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.networking/browse_thread/thread/846306094fd5eb42/dddcc1e7356e5a5f?show_docid=dddcc1e7356e5a5f</link>
  <description>
  No, it is not. The delay comes about because of the traversal of the &lt;br&gt; operating system and the network card to finally getting the stuff out onto &lt;br&gt; the internet. Even the packet length on the network is greater than a usec. &lt;br&gt; You cannot get nanosecond precision, even with a GPS attached directly to &lt;br&gt; your system. And ntp does not do the best possible job of getting rid of
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.networking/browse_thread/thread/846306094fd5eb42/dddcc1e7356e5a5f?show_docid=dddcc1e7356e5a5f</guid>
  <author>
  unruh-s...@physics.ubc.ca
  (Unruh)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 17:48:19 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
