--
@~@ Might, Courage, Vision, SINCERITY.
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and Farce be with you!
/( _ )\ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.32
^ ^ 18:44:01 up 7 days 6:37 2 users load average: 1.10 1.24 1.18
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
(
supposed concern of the post is probably what was
curiously found in the subject line only:
> Re: Error applying patch-o-matic to iptables
)
> root@server:/home/src# ls -l
> total 692
> drwx------ 9 root root 4096 Dec 13 18:41 iptables-1.4.4
> -rw------- 1 root toylet 108447 Jul 16 15:04
> iptables_1.4.4-1ubuntu1.diff.gz
does it mean that your iptables is an 1ubuntu1 specific one?
and then, what's a "patchomatic"? what's is it supposed to achieve,
where does it come fron? did you try to achieve the equivalent
elseway anywhere?
> 5 root root 4096 Nov 16 19:44 patch-o-matic-ng-20091115
ah, an "unknowstuff" growing "unknowndoodah-NewGen", good idea,
probably a change in exchange rules in some place ,-)
More seriously, do you have any documentation about that "patchomatic"?
> root@server:/home/src# cd patch*
> root@server:/home/src/patch-o-matic-ng-20091115# ls Netfilter_POM.pm
> patchlets README.newpatches sources.list patch2pom pom2patch
> runme
> root@server:/home/src/patch-o-matic-ng-20091115# ./runme Hey! KERNEL_DIR
> is not set.
> Where is your kernel source directory? [/usr/src/linux]
> /home/src/linux-2.6.32
> Hey! IPTABLES_DIR is not set.
> Where is your iptables source code directory? [/usr/src/iptables]
> /home/src/iptables-1.4.4
> /home/src/iptables-1.4.4 doesn't look like a iptables source code
> directory to me.
uh oh, smells like either a pebcak or some toolie's gone mad
while facing the real world?-)
Can you reproduce the problem
on every case you try and do that "patcho" thing? What if
on another machine? What if done after reading the Catch22 in
the doc? And what about an answer from 1ubuntu1 specialized group?
(FU2 positionned)