What happens when you didn't get enough sleep...
The Natural Philosopher
the master encryption password validation...
You spend hours wondering why all the new users added to your .htpasswd
file don't work, until you remember that you copied the .htaccess from
another virtual server and its still pointing at the old .htpasswd file..
Sheesh. I'm having an early night tonight..
Balwinder S Dheeman
Hmm ...
An early to bed and early to rise,
Makes a person healthy, wealthy and wise.
--
Balwinder S "bdheeman" Dheeman Registered Linux User: #229709
Anu'z Linux@HOME (Unix Shoppe) Machines: #168573, 170593, 259192
Chandigarh, UT, 160062, India Plan9, T2, Arch/Debian/FreeBSD/XP
Home: http://cto.homelinux.net/~bsd/ Visit: http://counter.li.org/
Andrew Halliwell
> On 05/05/2009 11:07 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>> You delete a database record that you forgot you defined as containing
>> the master encryption password validation...
>>
>> You spend hours wondering why all the new users added to your .htpasswd
>> file don't work, until you remember that you copied the .htaccess from
>> another virtual server and its still pointing at the old .htpasswd file..
>>
>> Sheesh. I'm having an early night tonight..
>
> Hmm ...
>
> An early to bed and early to rise,
> Makes a person healthy, wealthy and wise.
Early to rise and late to bed,
Makes a person, knackered, smelly and dead.
--
| |What to do if you find yourself stuck in a crack|
| spi...@freenet.co.uk |in the ground beneath a giant boulder, which you|
| |can't move, with no hope of rescue. |
| Andrew Halliwell BSc |Consider how lucky you are that life has been |
| in |good to you so far... |
| Computer Science | -The BOOK, Hitch-hiker's guide to the galaxy.|
UncleEnglish
wrote:
> On 05/05/2009 11:07 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>
> > You delete a database record that you forgot you defined as containing
> > the master encryption password validation...
>
> > You spend hours wondering why all the new users added to your .htpasswd
> > file don't work, until you remember that you copied the .htaccess from
> > another virtual server and its still pointing at the old .htpasswd file..
>
> > Sheesh. I'm having an early night tonight..
>
> Hmm ...
>
> An early to bed and early to rise,
>
> --
> Balwinder S "bdheeman" Dheeman Registered Linux User: #229709
> Anu'z Linux@HOME (Unix Shoppe) Machines: #168573, 170593, 259192
> Chandigarh, UT, 160062, India Plan9, T2, Arch/Debian/FreeBSD/XP
> Home:http://cto.homelinux.net/~bsd/ Visit:http://counter.li.org/
Funny! Yet, 5 or 6 years ago, one of my students left her disssertaion
on a train, 70k words, 6 floppies on a train, nothing on the HD, she
was sharing a PC, had deleted her work, and had to spend several
months reconstructing it. My guess? They were better! But be careful
not to lose your stuff!
--
UncleEnglish.
Jules
> Funny! Yet, 5 or 6 years ago, one of my students left her disssertaion
> on a train, 70k words, 6 floppies on a train
70 thousand words and it needed 6 floppies? That's gotta be an MS format
;-)
UncleEnglish
Michael Black
"Words" is the key thing, he's surely not talking about the size of
storage. When counting Morse Code, one treated every five characters
as a word, but in real life, likely the words vary in size, and likely
for the worst.
70K * 5 is 350K, just under the size of a 5.25" single sided double
density floppy. The Apple II would store something like 170K on a
floppy. There was a period when there was no double density, so
it could be less. The battery operated floppy drive for the old Radio
Shack Model 100 used single sided disks, and would take only 100K.
Maybe some of the disks were duplicate backups, but I can imagine if
this was early enough, 70K words straddling more than one floppy even
without the help of Microsoft.
Michael
David Woodhouse
> Maybe some of the disks were duplicate backups, but I can imagine if
> this was early enough, 70K words straddling more than one floppy even
> without the help of Microsoft.
This was "5 or 6 years ago".
Long after the time when sane people stopped using floppy disks for
_anything_ they actually cared about.
--
dwmw2
Jules
> On Tue, 5 May 2009, Jules wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 05 May 2009 13:21:03 -0700, UncleEnglish wrote:
>>> Funny! Yet, 5 or 6 years ago, one of my students left her disssertaion
>>> on a train, 70k words, 6 floppies on a train
>>
>> 70 thousand words and it needed 6 floppies? That's gotta be an MS format
>> ;-)
>>
> "Words" is the key thing, he's surely not talking about the size of
> storage. When counting Morse Code, one treated every five characters
> as a word, but in real life, likely the words vary in size, and likely
> for the worst.
Yeah, I put a guesstimate on an average of 6 characters per word, but I'm
not sure if that's sane (plus I didn't count whitespace :-)
> 70K * 5 is 350K, just under the size of a 5.25" single sided double
> density floppy. The Apple II would store something like 170K on a
> floppy. There was a period when there was no double density, so it
> could be less. The battery operated floppy drive for the old Radio
> Shack Model 100 used single sided disks, and would take only 100K.
Sure - but not 5 or 6 years ago...
> Maybe some of the disks were duplicate backups
That would be my guess, so it was very much a tongue in cheek post - plus
it didn't say that all of those 6 floppies contained the doc, just that
it was that many left on the train...
> but I can imagine if
> this was early enough, 70K words straddling more than one floppy even
> without the help of Microsoft.
I'm not so sure; older wordprocessors were very efficient with their
storage, with very low overheads for formatting information (I used to
have a Diamond D5 dedicated WP machine, complete with 8" single-sided
drives) - it was pretty surprising how much text could be crammed onto a
disk.
I think the bloat only started to creep in with the GUI-based WP's, to be
honest. (although it still beats me why someone can send me a Word doc
that's just a page or so of plain text, and it's several MB in size; it
must take real talent to make an app that bad)
cheers
Jules
Chrisjoy
I just saved the plain text of your posting, including quotes, into
Word 97/03 format and Word 2007 format and it turned out to be,
respectively, 27 and 13Kbyte. I do understand one must feel the need
to dupe MS, even with the use of lies, to feel at home in this group.
Jules
> I just saved the plain text of your posting, including quotes, into
> Word 97/03 format and Word 2007 format and it turned out to be,
> respectively, 27 and 13Kbyte. I do understand one must feel the need
> to dupe MS, even with the use of lies, to feel at home in this group.
Hmm, you've lost me as to where the lies are - unless you're referring to
my comment about receiving Word docs that are several MB for something
that appears to be just text, in which case I don't understand how you'd
know ;-)
(Aside: I'm reading this on cam.misc - I assume "this group" refers to the
Linux one? I suspect you may have missed my use of smileys and reference
to tongue in cheek posts, although my comment about bloat* in wp's over
the years very much stands...)
* raw text here is 2279 bytes - 13K is a six-fold increase, 27K
twelve-fold (Openoffice comes out as 13K too, incidentally)
cheers
Jules
Chrisjoy
wrote:
> On Wed, 06 May 2009 04:48:05 -0700, Chrisjoy wrote:
> > I just saved the plain text of your posting, including quotes, into
> > Word 97/03 format and Word 2007 format and it turned out to be,
> > respectively, 27 and 13Kbyte. I do understand one must feel the need
> > to dupe MS, even with the use of lies, to feel at home in this group.
>
> Hmm, you've lost me as to where the lies are - unless you're referring to
> my comment about receiving Word docs that are several MB for something
> that appears to be just text, in which case I don't understand how you'd
> know ;-)
So let me quote you sinse your short term memory don't serve you well.
"a Word doc
that's just a page or so of plain text, and it's several MB in size"
> (Aside: I'm reading this on cam.misc - I assume "this group" refers to the
> Linux one? I suspect you may have missed my use of smileys and reference
> to tongue in cheek posts, although my comment about bloat* in wp's over
> the years very much stands...)
Not a single smiley in the paragraph where you claimed a page or so of
text made Mbyte file.
> * raw text here is 2279 bytes - 13K is a six-fold increase, 27K
> twelve-fold (Openoffice comes out as 13K too, incidentally)
How many folds it is, is not relevant because a word 2007 file starts
at 10 500 bytes. This header holds alot for useful information you
lack in your generic file format, thus cannot compare directly.
Anyways, we're far away from your Mbyte claim.
Is it fun to be a dumb fuck unable to admit your lies?
Jon Green
> Is it fun to be a dumb fuck unable to admit your lies?
Can you say "over-reaction"?
Jon
--
SPAM BLOCK IN USE! To reply in email, replace 'deadspam'
with 'green-lines'.
Chrisjoy
> Chrisjoy wrote:
> > Is it fun to be a dumb fuck unable to admit your lies?
>
> Can you say "over-reaction"?
Yes, and I can say "sensetive to bullshit" too.
Jon Green
But you can't spell it...
Chrisjoy
> Chrisjoy wrote:
> > On 6 Mai, 17:50, Jon Green <jo...@deadspam.com> wrote:
> >> Chrisjoy wrote:
> >>> Is it fun to be a dumb fuck unable to admit your lies?
> >> Can you say "over-reaction"?
>
> > Yes, and I can say "sensetive to bullshit" too.
>
> But you can't spell it...
How do you know, dumb fuck?
Tim Ward
news:Pine.LNX.4.64.09...@darkstar.example.net...
> On Tue, 5 May 2009, Jules wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 05 May 2009 13:21:03 -0700, UncleEnglish wrote:
>>> Funny! Yet, 5 or 6 years ago, one of my students left her disssertaion
>>> on a train, 70k words, 6 floppies on a train
>>
>> 70 thousand words and it needed 6 floppies? That's gotta be an MS format
>> ;-)
>>
> "Words" is the key thing, he's surely not talking about the size of
> storage. When counting Morse Code, one treated every five characters
> as a word, but in real life, likely the words vary in size, and likely
> for the worst.
A word is five characters for a typist, too.
--
Tim Ward - posting as an individual unless otherwise clear
Brett Ward Limited - www.brettward.co.uk
Cambridge Accommodation Notice Board - www.brettward.co.uk/canb
Cambridge City Councillor
Jon Green
> On 6 Mai, 18:20, Jon Green <jo...@deadspam.com> wrote:
>> Chrisjoy wrote:
>>> On 6 Mai, 17:50, Jon Green <jo...@deadspam.com> wrote:
>>>> Chrisjoy wrote:
>>>>> Is it fun to be a dumb fuck unable to admit your lies?
>>>> Can you say "over-reaction"?
>>> Yes, and I can say "sensetive to bullshit" too.
>> But you can't spell it...
>
> How do you know, dumb fuck?
'Cos I've got a clue. And, if I ever need it, a dictionary.
With any luck, you'll get at least one of those at some point.
John Hasler
> jo...@deadspam.com
> ...
> SPAM BLOCK IN USE! To reply in email, replace 'deadspam'
> with 'green-lines'.
Domain Name: DEADSPAM.COM
Registrar: MELBOURNE IT, LTD. D/B/A INTERNET NAMES WORLDWIDE
Whois Server: whois.melbourneit.com
Referral URL: http://www.melbourneit.com
Name Server: NS.UKSERVERS.NET
Name Server: NS1.UKSERVERS.NET
Name Server: NS3.UKSERVERS.NET
Status: clientTransferProhibited
Updated Date: 20-jan-2009
Creation Date: 11-jan-2000
Expiration Date: 11-jan-2010
Please use a reserved domain such as ".invalid" or "example.com" for your
spamblock address.
--
John Hasler
jo...@dhh.gt.org
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA
Harold Stevens
[Snip...]
> With any luck, you'll get at least one of those at some point.
We're talking Wintroll here. The dork's lucky to find the power switch.
--
Regards, Weird (Harold Stevens) * IMPORTANT EMAIL INFO FOLLOWS *
Pardon any bogus email addresses (wookie) in place for spambots.
Really, it's (wyrd) at airmail, dotted with net. DO NOT SPAM IT.
I toss GoogleGroup posts from gitgo (http://improve-usenet.org).
Jules
> So let me quote you sinse your short term memory don't serve you well.
> "a Word doc
> that's just a page or so of plain text, and it's several MB in size"
Yes, I've been emailed Word docs that are 'plain text' - in the sense that
they contain no fancy formatting, images, multiple fonts/styles etc. and
yet they are several MB in size. (I'm guessing that it's something to do
with previous revisions hanging around in the file, tbh)
> Not a single smiley in the paragraph where you claimed a page or so of
> text made Mbyte file.
Oh, sorry. I didn't realise that you were incapable of following a thread
of conversation.
> How many folds it is, is not relevant because a word 2007 file starts at
> 10 500 bytes. This header holds alot for useful information you lack in
> your generic file format, thus cannot compare directly. Anyways, we're
> far away from your Mbyte claim.
Aha - the old "I tried it myself for a single case therefore it must be
true for all cases" approach to logic.
> Is it fun to be a dumb fuck unable to admit your lies?
I don't know - have you tried asking yourself recently?
(no smileys in this post because you clearly don't deserve them)
cheers
J.
Jules
> In <LcudnQ0Yd_dhXJzX...@bt.com> Jon Green:
>
> [Snip...]
>
>> With any luck, you'll get at least one of those at some point.
>
> We're talking Wintroll here. The dork's lucky to find the power switch.
I'm not so sure about that - elsewhere they seem to have asked a sane
Linux-related question. I do seem to have hit a nerve with them, though
(as does Jon) :-)
Chrisjoy
> Chrisjoy wrote:
> > On 6 Mai, 18:20, Jon Green <jo...@deadspam.com> wrote:
> >> Chrisjoy wrote:
> >>> On 6 Mai, 17:50, Jon Green <jo...@deadspam.com> wrote:
> >>>> Chrisjoy wrote:
> >>>>> Is it fun to be a dumb fuck unable to admit your lies?
> >>>> Can you say "over-reaction"?
> >>> Yes, and I can say "sensetive to bullshit" too.
> >> But you can't spell it...
>
> > How do you know, dumb fuck?
>
> 'Cos I've got a clue. And, if I ever need it, a dictionary.
Where in a dictionary do you find proof to support your claim I can't
spell a certain word, dumb fuck?
Jon Green
The entry for "sensitive". There is no entry for "sensetive".
Oh, by the way, you might want to check the Google Groups Terms of
Service, specifically section 6:
You agree that [...] you will not:
* defame, abuse, harass, stalk, threaten or otherwise violate the
legal rights (such as rights of privacy and publicity) of others;
* post any inappropriate, defamatory, infringing, obscene, or
unlawful Content;
Chrisjoy
> > Where in a dictionary do you find proof to support your claim I can't
> > spell a certain word, dumb fuck?
>
> The entry for "sensitive". There is no entry for "sensetive".
My question stands unanswered, dumb fuck.
Brian Morrison
If you're truly a libertarian, why would any of this concern you?
--
Brian
Duncan Wood
He's deeply confused?
Chrisjoy
I'm truely a libertarian, further more, of such kind who love to make
fun of dumb fucks who didn't understand yet, the only reason behind
language, is to get understood, and not to follow certain rules. Can I
speak frankly?
Jon Green
Only in your strange little world.
First time I've come across someone suffering from a /written/ form of
Asperger's. Interesting.
Chrisjoy
> Chrisjoy wrote:
> > On 7 Mai, 14:02, Jon Green <jo...@deadspam.com> wrote:
> >>> Where in a dictionary do you find proof to support your claim I can't
> >>> spell a certain word, dumb fuck?
> >> The entry for "sensitive". There is no entry for "sensetive".
>
> > My question stands unanswered, dumb fuck.
>
> Only in your strange little world.
No, dumb fuck, in any reasonable world my question stands unanswered.
Just because I mistyped a word doesn't mean I don't know how to spell
it.
Is it fun to be an extreamly dumb fuck?
Duncan Wood
<ultralibe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6 Mai, 18:43, "Tim Ward" <t...@brettward.co.uk> wrote:
>> Chrisjoy wrote:
>> > On 7 Mai, 14:02, Jon Green <jo...@deadspam.com> wrote:
>> >>> Where in a dictionary do you find proof to support your claim I
>> can't
>> >>> spell a certain word, dumb fuck?
>> >> The entry for "sensitive". ï¿œThere is no entry for "sensetive".
>>
>> > My question stands unanswered, dumb fuck.
>>
>> Only in your strange little world.
>
> No, dumb fuck, in any reasonable world my question stands unanswered.
> Just because I mistyped a word doesn't mean I don't know how to spell
> it.
>
> Is it fun to be an extreamly dumb fuck?
Ah, the TNP defense.
Chrisjoy
wrote:
> On Wed, 06 May 2009 05:48:40 -0700, Chrisjoy wrote:
> > So let me quote you sinse your short term memory don't serve you well.
> > "a Word doc
> > that's just a page or so of plain text, and it's several MB in size"
>
> Yes, I've been emailed Word docs that are 'plain text' - in the sense that
> they contain no fancy formatting, images, multiple fonts/styles etc. and
> yet they are several MB in size. (I'm guessing that it's something to do
> with previous revisions hanging around in the file, tbh)
I much more creditable explaination is that you're a duckin' lyar.
> > Not a single smiley in the paragraph where you claimed a page or so of
> > text made Mbyte file.
>
> Oh, sorry. I didn't realise that you were incapable of following a thread
> of conversation.
Still not a single smiley in that paragraph, duck.
> > How many folds it is, is not relevant because a word 2007 file starts at
> > 10 500 bytes. This header holds alot for useful information you lack in
> > your generic file format, thus cannot compare directly. Anyways, we're
> > far away from your Mbyte claim.
>
> Aha - the old "I tried it myself for a single case therefore it must be
> true for all cases" approach to logic.
>
> > Is it fun to be a dumb fuck unable to admit your lies?
>
> I don't know - have you tried asking yourself recently?
The reason why dumb fucks are not able to understand that they are
dumb fucks is becuse they are dumb fucks.
Chrisjoy
> On Thu, 07 May 2009 14:13:17 +0100, Chrisjoy
>
>
>
> <ultralibertaria...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 6 Mai, 18:43, "Tim Ward" <t...@brettward.co.uk> wrote:
> >> Chrisjoy wrote:
> >> > On 7 Mai, 14:02, Jon Green <jo...@deadspam.com> wrote:
> >> >>> Where in a dictionary do you find proof to support your claim I
> >> can't
> >> >>> spell a certain word, dumb fuck?
>
> >> > My question stands unanswered, dumb fuck.
>
> >> Only in your strange little world.
>
> > No, dumb fuck, in any reasonable world my question stands unanswered.
> > Just because I mistyped a word doesn't mean I don't know how to spell
> > it.
>
> > Is it fun to be an extreamly dumb fuck?
>
> Ah, the TNP defense.
Rather "don't rest your conclusion on premisis only your opponent
knows something sure about"- defence.
Jon Green
Good luck getting a job that needs literacy, then. Still, I suspect
there's a good few years before that's going to be a worry for you.
Jon Green
Dunno. Is it fun to be a functional illiterate with a pathetically
limited range of expression?
Chrisjoy
> Chrisjoy wrote:
> > On 6 Mai, 18:43, "Tim Ward" <t...@brettward.co.uk> wrote:
> >> Chrisjoy wrote:
> >>> On 7 Mai, 14:02, Jon Green <jo...@deadspam.com> wrote:
> >>>>> Where in a dictionary do you find proof to support your claim I can't
> >>>>> spell a certain word, dumb fuck?
> >>>> The entry for "sensitive". There is no entry for "sensetive".
> >>> My question stands unanswered, dumb fuck.
> >> Only in your strange little world.
>
> > No, dumb fuck, in any reasonable world my question stands unanswered.
> > Just because I mistyped a word doesn't mean I don't know how to spell
> > it.
>
> > Is it fun to be an extreamly dumb fuck?
>
> Dunno. Is it fun to be a functional illiterate with a pathetically
> limited range of expression?
If that's what I am in your confused world, and if I am to answer in
such a way you can comprehend, then a big YES is unavoidable, if I
want to justify your moronic question with an answer.
Chrisjoy
> Chrisjoy wrote:
> > On 7 Mai, 15:03, Brian Morrison <scraps...@fenrir.org.uk> wrote:
> >> Chrisjoy wrote:
> >>> On 7 Mai, 14:02, Jon Green <jo...@deadspam.com> wrote:
> >>>>> Where in a dictionary do you find proof to support your claim I can't
> >>>>> spell a certain word, dumb fuck?
> >>>> The entry for "sensitive". There is no entry for "sensetive".
> >>> My question stands unanswered, dumb fuck.
> >> If you're truly a libertarian, why would any of this concern you?
>
> > I'm truely a libertarian, further more, of such kind who love to make
> > fun of dumb fucks who didn't understand yet, the only reason behind
> > language, is to get understood, and not to follow certain rules. Can I
> > speak frankly?
>
> Good luck getting a job that needs literacy,
Assuming I don't have that literacy already, conclusion saying I don't
need it, is unavoidable. Only by reason I have nuked any lame moronic
attacks and showd them to be immature. The climax was when I made it
clear that one must be an extreamly dumb fuck complaining about
spelling when language is not context, when he perfectly well
understood the meaning of the message. The fact that you didn't
capture this prying point only increase the size of the class DUMB
FUCKS{} in this group.
Jon Green
> On 7 Mai, 15:30, Jon Green <jo...@deadspam.com> wrote:
>> Chrisjoy wrote:
>>> On 6 Mai, 18:43, "Tim Ward" <t...@brettward.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> Chrisjoy wrote:
>>>>> On 7 Mai, 14:02, Jon Green <jo...@deadspam.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Where in a dictionary do you find proof to support your claim I can't
>>>>>>> spell a certain word, dumb fuck?
>>>>>> The entry for "sensitive". There is no entry for "sensetive".
>>>>> My question stands unanswered, dumb fuck.
>>>> Only in your strange little world.
>>> No, dumb fuck, in any reasonable world my question stands unanswered.
>>> Just because I mistyped a word doesn't mean I don't know how to spell
>>> it.
>>> Is it fun to be an extreamly dumb fuck?
>> Dunno. Is it fun to be a functional illiterate with a pathetically
>> limited range of expression?
>
> If that's what I am in your confused world, and if I am to answer in
> such a way you can comprehend, then a big YES is unavoidable, if I
> want to justify your moronic question with an answer.
I'm getting bored of troll-taunting. *plonk*
Chrisjoy
When dumb fucks are unable to support their psychotic rant, then it is
that their oponents are trolls. Where does Gov't grow psychotic
crackpots like these?
John Prentice
Check your birth certificate!
John
--
Maintainer of the s.g.b FAQs, at http://www.genealogy-britain.org.uk/
Currently researching LEE and BEDFORD families from Islington
Chrisjoy
prentice.com.invalid> wrote:
> Chrisjoy wrote:
> > On 7 Mai, 17:02, Jon Green <jo...@deadspam.com> wrote:
> >> I'm getting bored of troll-taunting. *plonk*
>
> > When dumb fucks are unable to support their psychotic rant, then it is
> > that their oponents are trolls. Where does Gov't grow psychotic
> > crackpots like these?
>
> Check your birth certificate!
Hit harder, girl.
The Natural Philosopher
Apparently you can't speak intelligibly at all.
But then again, its not hard to follow the speech of someone so mind
numbingly vacuous that they haven't anything to say.
The Natural Philosopher
Oh what is your native language by the way?
Is the above Serbo Croation?
The Natural Philosopher
A question you might well address to yourself, it seems.
The Natural Philosopher
> On Thu, 07 May 2009 14:13:17 +0100, Chrisjoy
> <ultralibe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 6 Mai, 18:43, "Tim Ward" <t...@brettward.co.uk> wrote:
>>> Chrisjoy wrote:
>>> > On 7 Mai, 14:02, Jon Green <jo...@deadspam.com> wrote:
>>> >>> Where in a dictionary do you find proof to support your claim I
>>> can't
>>> >>> spell a certain word, dumb fuck?
>>>
>>> > My question stands unanswered, dumb fuck.
>>>
>>> Only in your strange little world.
>>
>> No, dumb fuck, in any reasonable world my question stands unanswered.
>> Just because I mistyped a word doesn't mean I don't know how to spell
>> it.
>>
>> Is it fun to be an extreamly dumb fuck?
>
>
> Ah, the TNP defense.
Now now. I have a tad more finesse in my ad hominems, surely?
The Natural Philosopher
> On 7 Mai, 15:17, "Duncan Wood" <nntpn...@dmx512.co.uk> wrote:
>> On Thu, 07 May 2009 14:13:17 +0100, Chrisjoy
>>
>>
>>
>> <ultralibertaria...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 6 Mai, 18:43, "Tim Ward" <t...@brettward.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> Chrisjoy wrote:
>>>>> On 7 Mai, 14:02, Jon Green <jo...@deadspam.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Where in a dictionary do you find proof to support your claim I
>>>> can't
>>>>>>> spell a certain word, dumb fuck?
>>>>>> The entry for "sensitive". There is no entry for "sensetive".
>>>>> My question stands unanswered, dumb fuck.
>>>> Only in your strange little world.
>>> No, dumb fuck, in any reasonable world my question stands unanswered.
>>> Just because I mistyped a word doesn't mean I don't know how to spell
>>> it.
>>> Is it fun to be an extreamly dumb fuck?
>> Ah, the TNP defense.
>
> Rather "don't rest your conclusion on premisis only your opponent
> knows something sure about"- defence.
Well you would say that, wouldn't you?
The Natural Philosopher
> On 7 Mai, 15:30, Jon Green <jo...@deadspam.com> wrote:
>> Chrisjoy wrote:
>>> On 6 Mai, 18:43, "Tim Ward" <t...@brettward.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> Chrisjoy wrote:
>>>>> On 7 Mai, 14:02, Jon Green <jo...@deadspam.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Where in a dictionary do you find proof to support your claim I can't
>>>>>>> spell a certain word, dumb fuck?
>>>>>> The entry for "sensitive". There is no entry for "sensetive".
>>>>> My question stands unanswered, dumb fuck.
>>>> Only in your strange little world.
>>> No, dumb fuck, in any reasonable world my question stands unanswered.
>>> Just because I mistyped a word doesn't mean I don't know how to spell
>>> it.
>>> Is it fun to be an extreamly dumb fuck?
>> Dunno. Is it fun to be a functional illiterate with a pathetically
>> limited range of expression?
>
> If that's what I am in your confused world, and if I am to answer in
> such a way you can comprehend, then a big YES is unavoidable, if I
> want to justify your moronic question with an answer.
>
The Natural Philosopher
> On 7 Mai, 18:04, John Prentice <johnp.use...@john-
> prentice.com.invalid> wrote:
>> Chrisjoy wrote:
>>> On 7 Mai, 17:02, Jon Green <jo...@deadspam.com> wrote:
>>>> I'm getting bored of troll-taunting. *plonk*
>>> When dumb fucks are unable to support their psychotic rant, then it is
>>> that their oponents are trolls. Where does Gov't grow psychotic
>>> crackpots like these?
>> Check your birth certificate!
>
> Hit harder, girl.
Gosh. We will have to revise the date on that upward.
Are you old enough to be allowed to use a computer?
Duncan Wood
I was only referring to the typing, may I proffer a sincere apologiy if I
implied you have anything else in common.
The Natural Philosopher
>
> The reason why dumb fucks are not able to understand that they are
> dumb fucks is becuse they are dumb fucks.
Indeed. We have all gathered that from your responses.
Do you know any other naughty words?
Chrisjoy
> Chrisjoy wrote:
> > On 7 Mai, 15:03, Brian Morrison <scraps...@fenrir.org.uk> wrote:
> >> Chrisjoy wrote:
> >>> On 7 Mai, 14:02, Jon Green <jo...@deadspam.com> wrote:
> >>>>> Where in a dictionary do you find proof to support your claim I can't
> >>>>> spell a certain word, dumb fuck?
> >>>> The entry for "sensitive". There is no entry for "sensetive".
> >>> My question stands unanswered, dumb fuck.
> >> If you're truly a libertarian, why would any of this concern you?
>
> > I'm truely a libertarian, further more, of such kind who love to make
> > fun of dumb fucks who didn't understand yet, the only reason behind
> > language, is to get understood, and not to follow certain rules. Can I
> > speak frankly?
>
> Apparently you can't speak intelligibly at all.
Even though you tried all FIVE times, you have shown nothing to the
contrary. In fact, your five answers in in this thread, this very
afternoon, stands out as an confimation to the uposite of your
conclusion.
How is it to be so fuckin' stupid as your? Will you share with me what
an average day looks like?
Jules
> Even though you tried all FIVE times, you have shown nothing to the
> contrary. In fact, your five answers in in this thread, this very
> afternoon, stands out as an confimation to the uposite of your
> conclusion.
>
> How is it to be so fuckin' stupid as your?
You really meant: "How is it to be so fuckin' stupid as you're?", didn't
you?
I shouldn't laugh, I really shouldn't...
Harold Stevens
[Snip...]
> I shouldn't laugh, I really shouldn't...
Sad, no? How swiftly fall the Knights Of The Mall Food Court.
--
Regards, Weird (Harold Stevens) * IMPORTANT EMAIL INFO FOLLOWS *
Pardon any bogus email addresses (wookie) in place for spambots.
Really, it's (wyrd) at airmail, dotted with net. DO NOT SPAM IT.
I toss GoogleGroup posts from gitgo (http://improve-usenet.org).
Robert Foreman
A few posts back I started mentally replacing "dumb fuck" with "asshat",
just to inject some variety into the conversation. If it goes on much
longer, I might try "nutcrumpet" as well.
HTH.
Bill Marcum
image search. That page would make an interesting poster.
Paul Leyland
> An early to bed and early to rise,
> Makes a person healthy, wealthy and wise.
Early to rise and early to bed,
Makes worms breakfast, eaten and dead.
Paul
--
Paul Leyland <pc...@gen.cam.ac.uk> | Hanging on in quiet desperation is
Dept. of Genetics, Cambridge University | the English way.
Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EH, UK | The time is gone, the song is over.
Tel: +44-1223-333963 Fax: +44-1223-333992 | Thought I'd something more to say.