Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

is this group is still active ???

12 views
Skip to first unread message

ephlodur

unread,
Jan 28, 2013, 8:29:52 PM1/28/13
to
need some help with pthread..

Lew Pitcher

unread,
Jan 28, 2013, 8:44:59 PM1/28/13
to
On Monday 28 January 2013 20:29, in comp.os.linux.development.apps,
ephl...@linuxmail.org wrote:

> need some help with pthread..

It helps if you ask the question

--
Lew Pitcher
"In Skills, We Trust"

ephlodur

unread,
Jan 28, 2013, 11:57:21 PM1/28/13
to
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 20:44:59 -0500, Lew Pitcher wrote:

> On Monday 28 January 2013 20:29, in comp.os.linux.development.apps,
> ephl...@linuxmail.org wrote:
>
>> need some help with pthread..
>
> It helps if you ask the question

thanks for your reply...

my problem is with pthread... I have a class that handle access to a msg
queue with the below code..
this the part that is causing me problem...the init for the
pthread_con_timewait is below..
protected:
pthread_cond_t _event_id;
pthread_condattr_t cattr;

// Prevent copying or assignment
CEvent(const CEvent& _arg);
CEvent& operator=(const CEvent& _rhs);
public:
CEvent(){
//pthread_attr_init(&cattr);
pthread_condattr_setclock(&cattr,
CLOCK_MONOTONIC);
pthread_cond_init(&_event_id,&cattr);


the call to the pthread_con_timewait is below

struct timespec ts;
clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC,&ts);

ts.tv_sec += delay; //time that I want to wait


lock();//unlock in this case is define as a base
class CEvent...
_ret = pthread_cond_timedwait(&_event_id, &_m_mutex, &ts);
unlock();

but when ever I make that call it always return with EPERM

My system is ubuntu 11.X I have done a lot of google search a lot on
implementation are like that ...If I use gettimeofday a make the proper
adjustment the call to timewait never return ...in other cases when I use
CLOCK_REALTIME it always return with EPERM ... can you give me any pointer
how should this call be implemented on linux...

thanks for any help..

ephlodur

0 new messages