Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.alpha
From: mattst88 <matts...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 08:30:54 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Oct 27 2010 11:30 am
Subject: Re: API UP2000+ 2x833MHz Question
On Oct 14, 2:31 am, DiskMan <wlgiv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 6, 1:45 am, Marc Schlensog <mschlens+n...@gmail.com> wrote: sigh. > > On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 23:54:56 -0700 (PDT) > > DiskMan <wlgiv...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > You see a similar issue with the UP1500. With the UP1500, they > > > followed the AGP standard to the letter (for a change) and when > > > manufacturers changed the voltage settings on AGP 8x cards, API didn't > > > bother to follow suite. So the UP1500 is particular to which cards it > > > will and can run but nowhere near as bad at the UP2000 series > > AGP 3.0 spec has been released in 2002, the UP1500 in 2001. Find > > Just sayin'. > I have an old Intel Celery 500mhz released in 2000 and it works FINE I see you still haven't lost the art form of replying with some Really though, the UP1500's AGP will never work like a regular AGP, Take a quote from Ivan Kokshaysky, maybe the only guy to try to It's like this because it would have been a ton of work for anything Don't bother repeating that around, because inevitably it'll get You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||