Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

100 Days of 3D Desktop - Ubuntu Compiz

1 view
Skip to first unread message

7

unread,
Dec 21, 2008, 9:41:05 AM12/21/08
to
100 Days of 3D Desktop - Ubuntu Compiz
--------------------------------------

1. Do you want to go back to 2D desktop after 100 days on 3D Compiz Linux ?
NO THANK YOU!!!

2. Has your productivity gone through the roof?
YES THANKS!!!

3. What of the appil/windummy retards who fluff about on 2D?
HOORA! GOOD LUCK TO THOSE RETARTDS!!!!

4. So what holds you back from improving productivity?
a) - Disk speed! Disk speed! Disk speed!
SSDs MUST improve their speed x10 to gain ANY further advantages
b) - Suite Catasrophe
Todays suites are the catastrophic failure points
for productivity loss. A productivity suite like Open Office
contain a handful of members that provide various functions
word processing and spreadsheet.

New suite building application framework
for suite builders that allows
functions to be dropped in from ALL GPL'd applications.
A suite builder application will glue relevant applications
into one application that can be opened once to process one
kind of job. For example a embedded electronic project development
kit and html documention suit could improve my productivity.
I would open the suit builder, drop in Konqueror for HTML
viewing, Seamonkey composer for HTML editing,
Eagle CAD for PCB schematic, Gambas for RS232 communications and
data gathering, SQL Server for data processing,
Open Office Calc for spreadsheet analysis and graphing tools.
The purpose of suit builder is to facilitate rapid
creation of work and its communication.
With GLP's code, this is entirely feasible.
With proprietory code, this is entirely IMPOSSIBLE.

5. Anything missing?
Post processing free drop in of audio and video clips.
Don't want to spend time converting audio to mp3/ogg/proprietory etc.
Don't want to spend time cleaning up and compressing videos.
Just want to take the best compressed, noise eliminated
license free format ogg and theora and drop it in directly from
recorder/video camera/web cam directly into HTML documentation
and suite built applications to widely distribute and communicate.

6. Any final parting insults to the COLA-TROLLs?
Yes - up yours!
3D desktops and free software delivers power
that proprietory WILL NEVER DELIVER.
Use it for 100 days and your brain will start to take advantage
of 3D working and you will never go back to the 2D desktop again.


Snit

unread,
Dec 21, 2008, 9:48:52 AM12/21/08
to
"7" <web_ha...@enemygadgets.com> stated in post
bAs3l.20699$er1....@newsfe18.ams2 on 12/21/08 7:41 AM:

What do you think of Compiz in comparison to what Windows and Apple offer?


--
I know how a jam jar feels...
... full of jam!

7

unread,
Dec 21, 2008, 10:45:53 AM12/21/08
to
Snit wrote:


That would be cruel of me to educate you to that level.

However I can point - LOOK! OVER THERE!!! ---->
---->-----> http://tinyurl.com/a8ky6j


Snit

unread,
Dec 21, 2008, 10:56:40 AM12/21/08
to
"7" <web_ha...@enemygadgets.com> stated in post
Qwt3l.20703$er1....@newsfe18.ams2 on 12/21/08 8:45 AM:

>> What do you think of Compiz in comparison to what Windows and Apple offer?
>
>
> That would be cruel of me to educate you to that level.

Education is not "cruel". I would love to hear your thoughts. Assuming you
have any.


--
The answer to the water shortage is to dilute it.

Ezekiel

unread,
Dec 21, 2008, 5:25:25 PM12/21/08
to
Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> "7" <web_ha...@enemygadgets.com> stated in post
> Qwt3l.20703$er1....@newsfe18.ams2 on 12/21/08 8:45 AM:
>
> >> What do you think of Compiz in comparison to what Windows and Apple
> offer?
> >
> >
> > That would be cruel of me to educate you to that level.
>
> Education is not "cruel". I would love to hear your thoughts.
> Assuming you
> have any.

Compiz is a lot of eye-candy and special effects with no purpose other
than glitz. OSS on the other hand uses visual effects more sparingly but
there's a purpose to them. Example - wobbly windows are totally useless.

Snit

unread,
Dec 21, 2008, 5:46:17 PM12/21/08
to
"Ezekiel" <ze...@yo-momma.com> stated in post
1376618208251590842.9...@news.motzarella.org on 12/21/08
3:25 PM:

I agree about Compiz... can you give some examples of innovative or creative
ways OSS uses visual effects "with a purpose to them"?


--
Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and
conscientious stupidity. -- Martin Luther King, Jr.

7

unread,
Dec 21, 2008, 6:29:36 PM12/21/08
to
Micoshaft asstroturfing fraudster pounding the sock Ezekiel
wrote on behalf of Half Wits from Micoshaft Department of Marketing:

The anti-thesis to your asstroturfing claims have already been addressed:

Snit

unread,
Dec 21, 2008, 7:21:34 PM12/21/08
to
"7" <web_ha...@enemygadgets.com> stated in post
xjA3l.16275$i_6....@newsfe11.ams2 on 12/21/08 4:29 PM:

> Micoshaft asstroturfing fraudster pounding the sock Ezekiel
> wrote on behalf of Half Wits from Micoshaft Department of Marketing:
>
>
>> Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> "7" <web_ha...@enemygadgets.com> stated in post
>>> Qwt3l.20703$er1....@newsfe18.ams2 on 12/21/08 8:45 AM:
>>>
>>>>> What do you think of Compiz in comparison to what Windows and Apple
>>> offer?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That would be cruel of me to educate you to that level.
>>>
>>> Education is not "cruel". I would love to hear your thoughts.
>>> Assuming you
>>> have any.
>>
>> Compiz is a lot of eye-candy and special effects with no purpose other
>> than glitz. OSS on the other hand uses visual effects more sparingly but
>> there's a purpose to them. Example - wobbly windows are totally useless.
>
> The anti-thesis to your asstroturfing claims have already been addressed:
>
>
> 100 Days of 3D Desktop - Ubuntu Compiz
> --------------------------------------
>
> 1. Do you want to go back to 2D desktop after 100 days on 3D Compiz Linux ?
>    NO THANK YOU!!!
>
> 2. Has your productivity gone through the roof?
>    YES THANKS!!!

How?

--
... something I'm committed to work on, focusing increasing amounts of
resources of Canonical on figuring out on how we actually move the desktop
experience forward to compete with Mac OS X.
- Mark Shuttleworth (founded Canonical Ltd. / Ubuntu Linux)

The Lost Packet

unread,
Dec 21, 2008, 7:54:37 PM12/21/08
to
Snit wrote:
> "Ezekiel" <ze...@yo-momma.com> stated in post
> 1376618208251590842.9...@news.motzarella.org on 12/21/08
> 3:25 PM:
>
>> Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> "7" <web_ha...@enemygadgets.com> stated in post
>>> Qwt3l.20703$er1....@newsfe18.ams2 on 12/21/08 8:45 AM:
>>>
>>>>> What do you think of Compiz in comparison to what Windows and Apple
>>> offer?
>>>>
>>>> That would be cruel of me to educate you to that level.
>>> Education is not "cruel". I would love to hear your thoughts.
>>> Assuming you
>>> have any.
>> Compiz is a lot of eye-candy and special effects with no purpose other
>> than glitz. OSS on the other hand uses visual effects more sparingly but
>> there's a purpose to them. Example - wobbly windows are totally useless.
>
> I agree about Compiz... can you give some examples of innovative or creative
> ways OSS uses visual effects "with a purpose to them"?
>
>

KDE through version 3 (and possibly earlier) has the adjustable
translucency effect on menus and later on, on application windows which
I think is very useful. For example, when I'm running all nodes on video
rendering, I still like to run my xchat; I'll have this at 75% opaque so
I can see what Kino's doing rather than just guess by looking at the
progress % on the taskbar...

--
TLP

- Last night I played a blank tape at full volume. The mime next door
went nuts.

- No, I will not fix your computer.

Snit

unread,
Dec 21, 2008, 8:17:55 PM12/21/08
to
"The Lost Packet" <jmthelo...@googlemail.com> stated in post
izB3l.28200$AL7....@newsfe14.ams2 on 12/21/08 5:54 PM:

OK: so you find the ability to make a chat window partially transparent to
be useful. While I do not think I would like that - and have not in the
past when I have tested such things, I can understand that.


--
Try not to become a man of success, but rather try to become a man of value.
--Albert Einstein

Ruel Smith

unread,
Dec 21, 2008, 9:51:18 PM12/21/08
to
Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> said on 2008-12-21:

> "Ezekiel" <ze...@yo-momma.com> stated in post
> 1376618208251590842.9...@news.motzarella.org on 12/21/08
> 3:25 PM:
>
>> Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> "7" <web_ha...@enemygadgets.com> stated in post
>>> Qwt3l.20703$er1....@newsfe18.ams2 on 12/21/08 8:45 AM:
>>>
>>>>> What do you think of Compiz in comparison to what Windows and Apple
>>> offer?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That would be cruel of me to educate you to that level.
>>>
>>> Education is not "cruel". I would love to hear your thoughts.
>>> Assuming you
>>> have any.
>>
>> Compiz is a lot of eye-candy and special effects with no purpose other
>> than glitz. OSS on the other hand uses visual effects more sparingly but
>> there's a purpose to them. Example - wobbly windows are totally useless.
>
> I agree about Compiz... can you give some examples of innovative or creative
> ways OSS uses visual effects "with a purpose to them"?
>
Compiz is great for guest display/fancy kiosks. Otherwise, its just
useless to me.

Snit

unread,
Dec 21, 2008, 10:22:29 PM12/21/08
to
"Ruel Smith" <No...@NoWhere.com> stated in post
slrngku056...@SAE206-06C1DR.jacks.local on 12/21/08 7:51 PM:

Seems like the norm. Seems lots of systems are heading toward this glitz
that does no good... Vista is a mess with it and even OS X has the
reflecting dock, transparent menu bar, and Dashboard's ripple... and, of
course, the moving background of Time Machine. All glitz that does little
to aid in usage... but Compiz takes the cake!


--
"Uh... ask me after we ship the next version of Windows [laughs] then I'll
be more open to give you a blunt answer." - Bill Gates
<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/gates/>

Norman Peelman

unread,
Dec 22, 2008, 6:26:05 AM12/22/08
to

The difference is Linux isn't being sold for what Compiz can do.
Nothing like selling a new OS based on a desktop theme...


--
Norman
Registered Linux user #461062

Peter Köhlmann

unread,
Dec 22, 2008, 6:32:44 AM12/22/08
to
Norman Peelman wrote:

It takes a Snot Michael Glassers dishonesty to dismiss *technical*
*capabilities* as unnessessary "glitz" while constantly trying to advocate
the overpolished but useless OSX as the way to go.
Especially as the "glitz" effects of compiz are *configurable* and it is
the users choice what to enable and what left disabled.

In reality Snot Glasser sees that linux again has achieved technical status
he would rather see with his apple crap
--
For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat,
and wrong. -- H. L. Mencken

Snit

unread,
Dec 22, 2008, 11:27:42 AM12/22/08
to
"Peter Köhlmann" <peter.k...@arcor.de> stated in post
494f7adc$0$30226$9b4e...@newsspool1.arcor-online.net on 12/22/08 4:32 AM:

One: where have I advocated, in COLA, as OS X being the way to go?

Two: please note I have been very clear where I think Apple has useless
"glitz" for OS X... something you show no sign of understanding.

And, yes, I know you will run like a scared bunny from this... you simply
cannot defend your claims. You just make them up... and show off your
ignorance.

> Especially as the "glitz" effects of compiz are *configurable* and it is
> the users choice what to enable and what left disabled.
>
> In reality Snot Glasser sees that linux again has achieved technical status
> he would rather see with his apple crap

You just make up things and attribute them to me. Why?

--
I think we [the folks who make Linux desktops] don't yet deliver a good
enough user experience.

Snit

unread,
Dec 22, 2008, 11:57:53 AM12/22/08
to
"Norman Peelman" <npee...@cfl.rr.com> stated in post
494f7947$0$4961$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com on 12/22/08 4:26 AM:

Not sure what you are getting at.


--
Dear Aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1123221217782777472

Sermo Malifer

unread,
Jan 29, 2009, 1:02:47 PM1/29/09
to
Snit wrote:
> "7" <web_ha...@enemygadgets.com> stated in post
> Qwt3l.20703$er1....@newsfe18.ams2 on 12/21/08 8:45 AM:
>
>>> What do you think of Compiz in comparison to what Windows and Apple offer?
>>
>> That would be cruel of me to educate you to that level.
>
> Education is not "cruel". I would love to hear your thoughts. Assuming you
> have any.

Snit uses a Mac.

'nuff said.

Clogwog

unread,
Jan 29, 2009, 4:03:27 PM1/29/09
to
"Sermo Malifer" <sermom...@noemail.com> schreef in bericht
news:glsr15$a6l$1...@news.albasani.net...

Like 99.32% of the peoples on this planet who use Windows or Mac. Only a few
oddballs run Linux.
http://www.bbspot.com/News/2000/4/linux_distros.html
>
> 'nuff said.

Fuck off, lintard!


Snit

unread,
Jan 29, 2009, 4:16:52 PM1/29/09
to
Clogwog stated in post 200901292103...@mta-fe.casema.nl on 1/29/09
2:03 PM:

What he neglected to say is that I run OS X, Windows, and Linux on my Mac.


>>
>> 'nuff said.
>
> Fuck off, lintard!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]


Sermo Malifer

unread,
Jan 29, 2009, 5:44:20 PM1/29/09
to

IOW, you're an oddball in the eyes of the guy who came to your defense.

Snit

unread,
Jan 29, 2009, 5:56:14 PM1/29/09
to
Sermo Malifer stated in post gltbg4$v4$1...@news.albasani.net on 1/29/09 3:44
PM:

Oh no! I am not the standard user! The world shall come to an end!

LOL!

--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]


0 new messages