Message from discussion Microsoft plans midnight launch for Surface
Received: by 10.224.117.143 with SMTP id r15mr15994909qaq.1.1349828664606;
Tue, 09 Oct 2012 17:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.93.132 with SMTP id cu4mr3510052vdb.14.1349828664525; Tue,
09 Oct 2012 17:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 17:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
Injection-Info: hj1g2000vbb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=126.96.36.199; posting-account=qzPusQoAAADVdKNEKE-jqIVbecHp7oZ7
References: <ad81clFofabU1@mid.individual.net> <3869424.rvhe51IAf3@sitting.at.this.computer>
<firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_5)
AppleWebKit/537.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/22.0.1229.92 Safari/537.4,gzip(gfe)
Subject: Re: Microsoft plans midnight launch for Surface
From: Steve Carroll <fretwiz...@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 00:24:24 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Oct 9, 5:21=A0pm, Goblin <bytes4f...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 10/10/12 00:11, Steve Carroll wrote:
> > I'm open to any other analysis
> > out there.
> You are not open to anything.
I'm open to the fact that you are now pointing out what numerous
people already have about Snit... which makes my point. See how this
reality thing doesn't *really* go away, Tim?
> I have discussed points with Michael. =A0We
> have disagreed and stayed civil. =A0Others have not. =A0Thats fine with m=
> and I'm the first to say to Michael that I think he brings many problems
> on himself.
Correction: You're the last to say. It's that nasty ol' reality
rearing it's head again.
> You on the other hand post many more times a month than I have the time
> for - with the same anti-snit posts. =A0Maybe you feel hard done by, that=
> your business but when you are placed into the spam filters of a group
> that in anycase doesn't like Snit as a whole. =A0I'd say the analysis tha=
> needs to be done in addition to your request - why on earth do you
> subject everyone to your works?
Snit knows why... that's all I'm concerned with. I couldn't care less
about most of the silly COLA arguments, really. Of course, unlike
Snit, I've never said anything to the contrary. I'm not pretending to
be a linux advocate, either.
> Whats wrong with you?
The same thing that is "wrong" with 165+ posters who have all labeled
Snit a liar, troll or worse. I'm already pointing out what's wrong
with you so I won't bother asking... not that I'd get an honest answer
> Bringing up points about Snits mother
Snit brought them up to usenet, I merely point to them as one
potential (likely) source of his anger... after all, no denying that
he's the guy who is always talking about "hatred".
> in an
> attempt to play Sigmund freud to an audience that doesn't on the whole
> get on with Snit and has you blacklisted in the spam filters?
LOL! All the people who have *claimed* to have killfiled me have
proven not to have done so.
> The mind boggles. =A0And the brain dead one seems to carry on this issue
> with Snit.
Whatever. Snit knows what he needs to do if he wants me to stop