Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

7, how was your company left 'high and dry' by a proprietary system? (2nd request)

0 views
Skip to first unread message

DFS

unread,
Feb 11, 2012, 9:11:19 AM2/11/12
to
You claimed "The companies that sell proprietary solutions make their
money supporting stuff while you pay, then they abandon their product
some 10 years in after milking the system and you are left high
and dry unable to migrate."

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/d0b8e3df153f83dd?hl=en


What proprietary solution did this to your company?

Voodoo Magoo

unread,
Feb 11, 2012, 4:05:26 PM2/11/12
to
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 09:11:19 -0500, DFS wrote:

this method of demanding an explanation is intriguing.
lets see if it works.

DFS

unread,
Feb 11, 2012, 4:32:27 PM2/11/12
to
Why wouldn't it?

Why would they hesitate to answer and support their [ludicrous and
irrational and bogus] claims?

Oh...


Voodoo Magoo

unread,
Feb 11, 2012, 4:47:18 PM2/11/12
to
yes. Oh...

Chris Ahlstrom

unread,
Feb 11, 2012, 6:35:07 PM2/11/12
to
Voodoo Magoo wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 09:11:19 -0500, DFS wrote:
>
> this method of demanding an explanation is intriguing.
> lets see if it works.

Why would it work? DFS is a troll, and can demand nothing.
Might as well supply info to a street schizo.

"2nd request"

*LMAO*

--
You mean free as in freetard I hope.
WTF are you talking about this time? Are you even aware of the context?
Or are you, as I suspect, sucking up to people who call you a Nazi if
one suggests that FSF/FOSS/Linux development resources try working
together and not against each other? God, you're becoming worse by the
day. And you being a contribute nothing Windows programming big mouth to
boot. The stench of hypocrisy is fogging up this group.
-- "Hadron" <941ka7-...@news.eternal-september.org>

7

unread,
Feb 11, 2012, 9:27:38 PM2/11/12
to
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:


>> this method of demanding an explanation is intriguing.
>> lets see if it works.
>
> Why would it work? DFS is a troll, and can demand nothing.
> Might as well supply info to a street schizo.
>
> "2nd request"
>
> *LMAO*


Exactly! Nobody owes a discussion to trolls.

Any minute now the trolls will understand this.

7

unread,
Feb 11, 2012, 9:27:38 PM2/11/12
to
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:


>> this method of demanding an explanation is intriguing.
>> lets see if it works.
>
> Why would it work? DFS is a troll, and can demand nothing.
> Might as well supply info to a street schizo.
>
> "2nd request"
>
> *LMAO*


0 new messages