Received: by 10.68.222.225 with SMTP id qp1mr3802152pbc.8.1349581155403;
        Sat, 06 Oct 2012 20:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
Path: t10ni23619759pbh.0!nntp.google.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: iPhone 5 Quality Control Slipping
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2012 20:39:08 -0700
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <CC96476C.C89A%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
References: <k4pbg5$ncs$1@dont-email.me>   <CC95F1A2.C846%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <32c5fa8a-b291-4337-8b0e-9047e9586ed5@googlegroups.com> <CC95F85C.C850%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <853bd835-c04e-475d-bc1b-0838e84285ce@googlegroups.com> <CC95FD56.C85B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <614bb9e6-f996-4edf-97d1-76909700fc8e@googlegroups.com> <CC9601D8.C85E%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <6e5c39ed-2fba-43cd-87e9-28047c588b1c@googlegroups.com> <CC960949.C864%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <d55.wp@rooftop.invalid>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: individual.net zw/tBwDGJXR51VsqfBUhyQjzbEpJB/FAowgiJAdI1xTLv+rY6G
Cancel-Lock: sha1:BwTKdiSkPfDiSUVnANkLQ3QzqN0=
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.34.0.120813
Thread-Topic: iPhone 5 Quality Control Slipping
Thread-Index: Ac2kPU53FC44HxV+TUqDD8o9qNwnTw==
X-Received-Bytes: 2338
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 10/6/12 8:16 PM, in article d55...@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
<o...@rooftop.invalid> wrote:

> Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 10/6/12 4:00 PM, in article
>> 6e5c39ed-2fba-43cd-87e9-28047c588b1c@googlegroups.com, "fungus"
>> <fungee2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>> On Saturday, October 6, 2012 6:42:19 PM UTC-4, Snit wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Yes, it is funny how much of a failure you have been in backing your claim.
>>>> Anyway, step up your game if you want another response from me.  As I
>>>> noted,
>>>> you are boring.
>>> 
>>> That's the difference between you and I snit.
> 
>> Sure: I back my accusations and you do not.
> 
> Hmm.  "Between you and I".
> Where have I seen that sort of illiteracy before?
> 
In other words, you have now realized the mistake I made is a common one,
*not* like the utter illiteracy of 7.  Good to see you recognize that.
Before you showed no understanding of this.


-- 
<http://goo.gl/uFKQS>
15 points Foster and his farm of loonies will *always* run from... and
absolute proof they know their accusations are false.