Doofus (DFS) has finally stopped posting his fake Linux user experiences
George Orwell
Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
https://www.mixmaster.it
Peter
"George Orwell" <nob...@mixmaster.it> wrote in message
news:3a6ac2ec79d8279e...@mixmaster.it...
How many computer users have even heard of newsgroups ?
You can't seriously belive that Microsoft pay people to post here!
Peter
Phil Da Lick!
You can't seriously believe the wintrolls come here for any other reason.
Hadron
From what I've seen, the people you refer to as "Wintrolls" come here to
have a good laugh at the crap the likes of you spout. You know, where
you were "advocating" that companies should be forced to share all their
R&D with their competitors for nothing!
--
"Off the top of my head, I can't tell you which sites. They are ones that
throw up some kind of dialog, I change the user agent and look at them
again, then move on."
-- Rick <no...@nomail.com> telling lies in comp.os.linux.advocacy
Phil Da Lick!
I advocated no such thing. As you well know. Now stop lying.
Chris Ahlstrom
this bit o' wisdom:
> Hadron wrote:
>>
>> From what I've seen, the people you refer to as "Wintrolls" come here to
>> have a good laugh at the crap the likes of you spout. You know, where
>> you were "advocating" that companies should be forced to share all their
>> R&D with their competitors for nothing!
>
> I advocated no such thing. As you well know. Now stop lying.
Now now, Phil, don't make Hadron stop the habit that has served him so well
since early childhood.
--
Positively no smoking.
DFS
> I was going to ask if anyone here ever read his fake user experiences
> ("I can't install Linux because my CD-ROM isn't recognized"), I
> ussually just ignore them
You're lying right now, moron. You haven't ignored my posts - I bet they're
why you tune into this slop-pit.
And posting "fake user experiences" is a common Linux "advocate*" tactic:
* Windows crashes 3x per day
* Windows has to be rebooted constantly
* blah blah blah
> but he probably noticed people weren't
> responding to them and probably never read them either so now he's
> switching to personal attacks.
I've been making personal attacks on lying cola idiots since way back, but I
almost never insult someone unless I'm insulted first.
> To me they're just 'noise' drowned out
> by tne music of Roy's virulent post
Yes, many of his stupid lying posts are malicious.
> which, and I agree with Terry
> here, are the most successfull anti-Microsoft PR campaign EVER.
That would probably be the Apple ads, if you had to point to a single
campaign.
> Roy's
> posts alone are doing billions of dollars in damages to M$'s
> stockvalue and will eventually lead to the company's downfall.
Free Linux crapware has NO chance of taking down Microsoft. The slop's been
available for 17 years, is given away freely... and for all practical
purposes has no users. 0.71% is nothing to be proud of.
> No
> wonder the Wintroll's masters in Redmond have ordered personal
> attacks on Roy and Terry,
I don't know if you understand what a true dumbass Terry Porter really is.
It's nearly 2009 and the fool still thinks you can't run virtual desktops on
Windows.
And Spamowitz is just a news-reposting robot; his own analysis and comments
are ALWAYS stupid.
> they know they are taking damage, but they
> are doing themselves more harm than good by attacking Roy, because it
> shows how Evil the management of Microsoft really is. They became
> number one not by making great software,
By consumer concensus, many if not most of their products are number one in
their respective markets.
> but by playing dirty tricks on others,
uh huh... if I haven't heard this a thousand times from jealous OSS
victim-lusers my name isn't DFS.
> most of which were illegal but were 'bought off' by
> bribing politicians and donating hundreds of millions to anonymous,
> coded Swiss bank accounts. But their day of reckoning is coming,
> believe me, and I will savior every moment of it!
Your entire stupid post reads like the Cliff Notes of the Cliff Notes of
Linux "advocacy". Everything is silly, regurgitated 5th hand idiocy.
Hadron
Yes you did. Numerous times.
Don't make me provide the links .....
--
"Well stop covering your monitor in spunk over it then and piss off to
a pro windows group. The more you tantrum here, the more obvious it is
that linux *does* bother you."
-- "Phil Da Lick!" <phil_t...@REMOVETHISSPAMTRAP.hotmail.com> in comp.os.linux.advocacy
High Plains Thumper
> Phil Da Lick! belched:
>> Hadron wrote:
>>
>>> From what I've seen, the people you refer to as
>>> "Wintrolls" come here to have a good laugh at the crap the
>>> likes of you spout. You know, where you were "advocating"
>>> that companies should be forced to share all their R&D
>>> with their competitors for nothing!
>>
>> I advocated no such thing. As you well know. Now stop lying.
>
> Now now, Phil, don't make Hadron stop the habit that has
> served him so well since early childhood.
We mustn't forget the greatest Hadron lie of all, that he thinks
I am you and Robin T Cox!
From: Hadron <hadronqu...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Microsoft stock at 10-year low
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:05:45 +0100
Message-ID: <ggh0p5$nu3$1...@reader.motzarella.org>
[quote]
High Plains Thumper [...] writes:
> Traits:
>
> * [...]
> * Habitual liar
Please post a single link to a single lie.
[/quote]
--
HPT
Quando omni flunkus moritati
(If all else fails, play dead)
- "Red" Green
Peter Köhlmann
> "Phil Da Lick!" <phil_t...@spammerskissmyarse.hotmail.com> writes:
>
>> Hadron wrote:
< snip >
>>> From what I've seen, the people you refer to as "Wintrolls" come here to
>>> have a good laugh at the crap the likes of you spout. You know, where
>>> you were "advocating" that companies should be forced to share all their
>>> R&D with their competitors for nothing!
>>>
>>
>> I advocated no such thing. As you well know. Now stop lying.
>
> Yes you did. Numerous times.
Good thing that you provided those numerous links too...
> Don't make me provide the links .....
>
Please do so. Otherwise one could think that you are lying again
--
You're genuinely bogus.
Phil Da Lick!
No I didn't. At all.
> Don't make me provide the links .....
Go for it.
Andrew Halliwell
> Yes you did. Numerous times.
>
> Don't make me provide the links .....
>
When you make a stupid accusation like that, you should provide proof
immediately without having to be asked or "made".
--
| spi...@freenet.co,uk | "Are you pondering what I'm pondering Pinky?" |
| Andrew Halliwell BSc | |
| in | "I think so brain, but this time, you control |
| Computer Science | the Encounter suit, and I'll do the voice..." |
Phil Da Lick!
> Hadron <hadro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yes you did. Numerous times.
>>
>> Don't make me provide the links .....
>>
> We shouldn't be expected to MAKE you do anything.
> When you make a stupid accusation like that, you should provide proof
> immediately without having to be asked or "made".
Unfortuantely in Hardon's world being against a pure software patent
regime means you must expect and require every bit of software to be
open sourced. Classic confusion of "free", "open" and "freedom". Being
for "freedom" does not preclude closed source companies making a mint.
chrisv
>>
>> From what I've seen, the people you refer to as "Wintrolls" come here to
>> have a good laugh at the crap the likes of you spout.
What shameless liars like you claim to have seen does not count for
much, Hadron Quack. What the moral and intelligent users of this
group have seen are "Wintrolls" who are attention-starved idiots and
assholes.
chrisv
>We mustn't forget the greatest Hadron lie of all, that he thinks
>I am you and Robin T Cox!
Well, that could be just a stupid mistake. He's told blatant lies
*much* worse than that...
Hadron
I know that. As you well know.
But "Free" also means pirated and copied a LOT easier.
It works for SOME people. But not by all by any means.
--
"There is no such thing as Intellectual Property"
Mark Kent
COLA Hypocrite
Phil Da Lick!
> "Phil Da Lick!" <phil_t...@spammerskissmyarse.hotmail.com> writes:
>
>> Andrew Halliwell wrote:
>>> Hadron <hadro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Yes you did. Numerous times.
>>>>
>>>> Don't make me provide the links .....
>>>>
>>> We shouldn't be expected to MAKE you do anything.
>>> When you make a stupid accusation like that, you should provide proof
>>> immediately without having to be asked or "made".
>> Unfortuantely in Hardon's world being against a pure software patent
>> regime means you must expect and require every bit of software to be
>> open sourced. Classic confusion of "free", "open" and "freedom". Being
>> for "freedom" does not preclude closed source companies making a mint.
>
> I know that. As you well know.
>
> But "Free" also means pirated and copied a LOT easier.
You know very well that patents have nothing - zero - to do with piracy.
Just because someone is in favour of a software ecosystem based on
freedom does not make them tolerant of pirates.
> It works for SOME people. But not by all by any means.
Who said it had to? In an environment of freedom you can do what the
hell you like. Open source, closed source, whatever - you just can't
dictate to everyone else.
Hadron
Yes you did.
>
>
>> Don't make me provide the links .....
>
> Go for it.
OK: here -
http://www.archivum.info/comp.os.linux.advocacy/2008-07/msg02575.html
,----
| > Again you seem to be implying that because a company invests in R&D it
| > has some divine protected right to be paid for it.
`----
Now, feel free to run off and cry.
Phil Da Lick!
Erm please point out where that sentence contains anything remotely like
yor accusation:
"you were "advocating" that companies should be forced to share all
their R&D with their competitors for nothing!"
I suppose the possibility that the R&D in question is crap and therefore
not commercially viable without patentlockin never entered your mind huh?
Hadron
> Hadron wrote:
>> "Phil Da Lick!" <phil_t...@spammerskissmyarse.hotmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> Andrew Halliwell wrote:
>>>> Hadron <hadro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Yes you did. Numerous times.
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't make me provide the links .....
>>>>>
>>>> We shouldn't be expected to MAKE you do anything.
>>>> When you make a stupid accusation like that, you should provide proof
>>>> immediately without having to be asked or "made".
>>> Unfortuantely in Hardon's world being against a pure software patent
>>> regime means you must expect and require every bit of software to be
>>> open sourced. Classic confusion of "free", "open" and "freedom". Being
>>> for "freedom" does not preclude closed source companies making a mint.
>>
>> I know that. As you well know.
>>
>> But "Free" also means pirated and copied a LOT easier.
>
> You know very well that patents have nothing - zero - to do with
> piracy. Just because someone is in favour of a software ecosystem
> based on freedom does not make them tolerant of pirates.
You keep trying to drag back to patents.
You're erecting a strawman to hide your idiocy.
--
"If only someone would kill you two. Literally."
-- Tattoo Vampire <sit...@this.computer> in comp.os.linux.advocacy
Sinister Midget
> Hadron wrote:
>> From what I've seen, the people you refer to as "Wintrolls" come here to
>> have a good laugh at the crap the likes of you spout. You know, where
>> you were "advocating" that companies should be forced to share all their
>> R&D with their competitors for nothing!
>>
>
> I advocated no such thing. As you well know. Now stop lying.
You know he can't stop lying. He'll turn (back) into a (different kind
of) turd if he doesn't lie.
--
We're all colored, or you wouldn't be able to see anyone.
-- Captain Beefheart
Peter Köhlmann
"Numerous times" even, according to you
>>
>>> Don't make me provide the links .....
>>
>> Go for it.
>
> OK: here -
>
> http://www.archivum.info/comp.os.linux.advocacy/2008-07/msg02575.html
>
> ,----
> | > Again you seem to be implying that because a company invests in R&D it
> | > has some divine protected right to be paid for it.
> `----
>
> Now, feel free to run off and cry.
>
Idiot. That is *not* *at* *all* what you claimed he has said.
Where is the "being forced to share" part in that, you cretinous liar?
All he is saying there that nobody has any divine right to be able to sell
their R&D, just because they invested in it
Now come on, provide the very first example (of those numerous ones). And
this time without your glaring reading comprehension problems
--
Howe's Law: Everyone has a scheme that will not work.
Phil Da Lick!
> "Phil Da Lick!" <phil_t...@spammerskissmyarse.hotmail.com> writes:
>
>> Hadron wrote:
>>> "Phil Da Lick!" <phil_t...@spammerskissmyarse.hotmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Andrew Halliwell wrote:
>>>>> Hadron <hadro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Yes you did. Numerous times.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Don't make me provide the links .....
>>>>>>
>>>>> We shouldn't be expected to MAKE you do anything.
>>>>> When you make a stupid accusation like that, you should provide proof
>>>>> immediately without having to be asked or "made".
>>>> Unfortuantely in Hardon's world being against a pure software patent
>>>> regime means you must expect and require every bit of software to be
>>>> open sourced. Classic confusion of "free", "open" and "freedom". Being
>>>> for "freedom" does not preclude closed source companies making a mint.
>>> I know that. As you well know.
>>>
>>> But "Free" also means pirated and copied a LOT easier.
>> You know very well that patents have nothing - zero - to do with
>> piracy. Just because someone is in favour of a software ecosystem
>> based on freedom does not make them tolerant of pirates.
>
> You keep trying to drag back to patents.
>
> You're erecting a strawman to hide your idiocy.
>
Well, when you try and take my comment out of context I'm bound to go
back to the topic being discussed.
Phil Da Lick!
> On 2008-12-02, Phil Da Lick! <phil_t...@spammerskissmyarse.hotmail.com> claimed:
>> Hadron wrote:
>
>>> From what I've seen, the people you refer to as "Wintrolls" come here to
>>> have a good laugh at the crap the likes of you spout. You know, where
>>> you were "advocating" that companies should be forced to share all their
>>> R&D with their competitors for nothing!
>>>
>> I advocated no such thing. As you well know. Now stop lying.
>
> You know he can't stop lying. He'll turn (back) into a (different kind
> of) turd if he doesn't lie.
>
At twenty minutes before the end of the working day, this post made me
laugh!
Hadron
> On 2008-12-02, Phil Da Lick! <phil_t...@spammerskissmyarse.hotmail.com> claimed:
>> Hadron wrote:
>
>>> From what I've seen, the people you refer to as "Wintrolls" come here to
>>> have a good laugh at the crap the likes of you spout. You know, where
>>> you were "advocating" that companies should be forced to share all their
>>> R&D with their competitors for nothing!
>>>
>>
>> I advocated no such thing. As you well know. Now stop lying.
>
> You know he can't stop lying. He'll turn (back) into a (different kind
> of) turd if he doesn't lie.
Please see link I posted to where Phil Da Cryte did indeed advocate R&D
being made available to competitors for FREE.
His words were approximately "why the hell should they get paid for
their ideas".
So thats you and him beotch slapped
*schhhllllaappppppppp*.
--
"Unfortunately, once again, the user-unfriendly dirtware sucks so bad it's
hard to prove how bad it sucks."
-- "DFS" <nospam@dfs_.com> in comp.os.linux.advocacy
Peter Köhlmann
> Sinister Midget <fardb...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On 2008-12-02, Phil Da Lick!
>> <phil_t...@spammerskissmyarse.hotmail.com> claimed:
>>> Hadron wrote:
>>
>>>> From what I've seen, the people you refer to as "Wintrolls" come here
>>>> to have a good laugh at the crap the likes of you spout. You know,
>>>> where you were "advocating" that companies should be forced to share
>>>> all their R&D with their competitors for nothing!
>>>>
>>>
>>> I advocated no such thing. As you well know. Now stop lying.
>>
>> You know he can't stop lying. He'll turn (back) into a (different kind
>> of) turd if he doesn't lie.
>
> Please see link I posted to where Phil Da Cryte did indeed advocate R&D
> being made available to competitors for FREE.
What you posted was another example of your reading comprehension problems
> His words were approximately "why the hell should they get paid for
> their ideas".
No, they were not. Not even close. Quit lying, you asshole
> So thats you and him beotch slapped
>
> *schhhllllaappppppppp*.
>
Idiot
--
Like being presumed a thief and a liar before using a product?
If so, use M$ XP
Phil Da Lick!
> Sinister Midget <fardb...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On 2008-12-02, Phil Da Lick! <phil_t...@spammerskissmyarse.hotmail.com> claimed:
>>> Hadron wrote:
>>>> From what I've seen, the people you refer to as "Wintrolls" come here to
>>>> have a good laugh at the crap the likes of you spout. You know, where
>>>> you were "advocating" that companies should be forced to share all their
>>>> R&D with their competitors for nothing!
>>>>
>>> I advocated no such thing. As you well know. Now stop lying.
>> You know he can't stop lying. He'll turn (back) into a (different kind
>> of) turd if he doesn't lie.
>
> Please see link I posted to where Phil Da Cryte did indeed advocate R&D
> being made available to competitors for FREE.
>
> His words were approximately "why the hell should they get paid for
> their ideas".
The words were approximately "no divine right exists for R&D to be paid
for". In the context of the thread in question a very sensible
statement. Well, to advocates of free markets anyhow.
Glad to help you out (again) with your reading comprehension difficulties.
> So thats you and him beotch slapped
Dream on.
SomeBloke
He thinks I am you as well! That clonings going well!!
--
I'm always kind, polite and reasonable...
except when I'm not.
chrisv
>On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 09:19:13 -0600, chrisv wrote:
>
>> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>>
>>>We mustn't forget the greatest Hadron lie of all, that he thinks I am
>>>you and Robin T Cox!
>>
>> Well, that could be just a stupid mistake. He's told blatant lies
>> *much* worse than that...
>
>He thinks I am you as well! That clonings going well!!
And William Poster, too. 8)
chrisv
>Hadron quacked:
>>
>> Please see link I posted to where Phil Da Cryte did indeed advocate R&D
>> being made available to competitors for FREE.
>>
>> His words were approximately "why the hell should they get paid for
>> their ideas".
>
>The words were approximately "no divine right exists for R&D to be paid
>for". In the context of the thread in question a very sensible
>statement. Well, to advocates of free markets anyhow.
>
>Glad to help you out (again) with your reading comprehension difficulties.
>
>> So thats you and him beotch slapped
>
>Dream on.
Poor Quack. Good thing for him that he does not mind making a jackass
of himself - he's done it again.
SomeBloke
It wouldn't surprise me if Hardon thinks that we are all one poster who
spends all day and night frantically uploading posts to COLA. He's right
of course, it's Doofy!
Hadron
Throwing you idiots a bone and watching you enjoy an orgy of feasting
is a wonderful way to spend a few minutes.
Poor, poor Willy. The most useless poster in the history of usenet. Him
and his killfiles and "header technology" could send a viagra to sleep.
--
"Poor fishfarb! Pissed because s/h/it doesn't get all the attention s/h/it craves due to wise use of filtering."
-- Sinister Midget <fardb...@gmail.com> trying to impress Willy Filters in comp.os.linux.advocacy
William Poaster
Oh, shit...d'ya think Quack is TAB's brother? =)
--
Most people are sheep.
Microsoft is very effective
at fleecing the flockers.
Gregory Shearman
> Hadron wrote:
>>
>> http://www.archivum.info/comp.os.linux.advocacy/2008-07/msg02575.html
>>
>> ,----
>> | > Again you seem to be implying that because a company invests in R&D it
>> | > has some divine protected right to be paid for it.
>> `----
>>
>> Now, feel free to run off and cry.
>>
>
> Idiot. That is *not* *at* *all* what you claimed he has said.
> Where is the "being forced to share" part in that, you cretinous liar?
> All he is saying there that nobody has any divine right to be able to sell
> their R&D, just because they invested in it
Typical lie from the slimy cunt. When forced to actually provide a link
we see the lies exposed. Does the insane quark troll think that no one
will follow the link to check up on this slimy weasel?
--
Regards,
Gregory.
Gentoo Linux - Penguin Power
Tattoo Vampire
> Now now, Phil, don't make Hadron stop the habit that has served him so well
> since early childhood.
He wants Hadron to quit whacking off?
--
Regards,
[tv]
Owner/proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC
...Never judge a man by his taglines.
Sinister Midget
Obviously Quirk lied again.
Glad to point out another of your lies, Quack, seeing as you asked for
evidence of their existence. I'll help when I can.
--
Outdoors for me is walking from the car to the ticket desk at the airport.
-- Frank Zappa
Tattoo Vampire
> I've been making personal attacks on lying cola idiots since way back, but I
> almost never insult someone unless I'm insulted first.
You're a worthless piece of lying troll shit, d00F. Do you ever take time
off to see your family? Or are you like Snit, loafing around online all day
while others support you?
--
Regards,
[tv]
Owner/proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC
...So many books; So little time.
Hadron
> On 2008-12-02, Phil Da Lick! <phil_t...@spammerskissmyarse.hotmail.com> claimed:
>> Hadron wrote:
>>> "Phil Da Lick!" <phil_t...@spammerskissmyarse.hotmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Hadron wrote:
>
>>>>>>> From what I've seen, the people you refer to as "Wintrolls" come here to
>>>>>>> have a good laugh at the crap the likes of you spout. You know, where
>>>>>>> you were "advocating" that companies should be forced to share all their
>>>>>>> R&D with their competitors for nothing!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I advocated no such thing. As you well know. Now stop lying.
>>>>> Yes you did. Numerous times.
>>>> No I didn't. At all.
>>>
>>> Yes you did.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Don't make me provide the links .....
>>>> Go for it.
>>>
>>> OK: here -
>>>
>>> http://www.archivum.info/comp.os.linux.advocacy/2008-07/msg02575.html
>>>
>>> ,----
>>> | > Again you seem to be implying that because a company invests in R&D it
>>> | > has some divine protected right to be paid for it.
>>> `----
>>>
>>> Now, feel free to run off and cry.
>>
>> Erm please point out where that sentence contains anything remotely like
>> yor accusation:
Above,
>>
>> "you were "advocating" that companies should be forced to share all
>> their R&D with their competitors for nothing!"
>>
>> I suppose the possibility that the R&D in question is crap and therefore
>> not commercially viable without patentlockin never entered your mind
>> huh?
Crap determined by who? You?
lets look at what you said AGAIN:
>>> ,----
>>> | > Again you seem to be implying that because a company invests in R&D it
>>> | > has some divine protected right to be paid for it.
>>> `----
Now one does not have to as sharp as a razor to see what you meant -
Companies should NOT be protected from people stealing their work for
nothing.
Phil, Phil, Phil. Take the slapdown like a man and move on. You're only
making yourself look more stupid.
>
> Obviously Quirk lied again.
No. I did not. See above.
>
> Glad to point out another of your lies, Quack, seeing as you asked for
> evidence of their existence. I'll help when I can.
You're either mad or stupid. I dont care enough to determine which.
--
"My college theater antics were the inspiration for Robin
Williams' character on Mork & Mindy"
-- Rex Ballard in comp.os.linux.advocacy
Snit
cgg9ehusor04$.dlg@this.domain.or.that on 12/2/08 2:51 PM:
> DFS wrote:
>
>> I've been making personal attacks on lying cola idiots since way back, but I
>> almost never insult someone unless I'm insulted first.
>
> You're a worthless piece of lying troll shit, d00F. Do you ever take time
> off to see your family? Or are you like Snit, loafing around online all day
> while others support you?
Hint: accusing others of lying in a post where you make up stories about me
is, well, counter productive. Just though you should know. :)
But, hey, at least you admitted you are just a troll begging for my
attention... are you happy you are getting some? Maybe you can make up
stories about me calling you. Again. You never did explain why you lied
about that.
--
It usually takes me more than three weeks to prepare a good impromptu
speech. -- Mark Twain
Tattoo Vampire
> You're either mad or stupid. I dont care enough to determine which.
You must care, since you dwell on the same 4 or so topics over and over and
over again.
--
Regards,
[tv]
Owner/proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC
..."Never repeat codes," said the telegrapher remorselessly.
Tattoo Vampire
> You never did explain why you lied about that.
I didn't.
The voice on the phone was the same voice heard in your videos. So unless
you've got someone doing voiceovers for those, it was indeed you who called.
With a blocked caller ID, no less.
Not that I really minded you calling, I just hate it when people whine over
the telephone. :-P
--
Regards,
[tv]
Owner/proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC
..."Never repeat codes," said the telegrapher remorselessly.
Snit
> Snit wrote:
>
>> You never did explain why you lied about that.
>
> I didn't.
Ah, so you just snipped what you lied about for no reason! LOL!
You lied and claimed I called you. Yes, you lied. Outright lied.
There is no gray area here - you lied.
> The voice on the phone was the same voice heard in your videos. So unless
> you've got someone doing voiceovers for those, it was indeed you who called.
> With a blocked caller ID, no less.
>
> Not that I really minded you calling, I just hate it when people whine over
> the telephone. :-P
Ah, and you just repeated your lie. You are, clearly, a liar.
Then again, elsewhere you have admitted you lie just to troll me - just to
beg for my attention. Great... you "win" by having me reply to your lies.
Want a gold star?
--
But if you are somebody who is not too concerned about price, who is not too
concerned about freedom, I don't think we can say the Linux desktop offers
the very best experience.
- Mark Shuttleworth (founded Canonical Ltd. / Ubuntu Linux)
Chris Ahlstrom
this bit o' wisdom:
> There is about 8 Linux advocates left because Schestowitz scared them all
> away with his SPAM.
Seriously doubt it, since filtered on "Subject: [News]" is too easy.
I think the posters that leave probably do so because they get tired of
reading the insulting garbage that you, DFS, Hadron, Clogwog, and OK post.
"Lying for LIEnux"
What do you do in Toyota forums? "Toyota is a toy"
I don't think Erik or Tim scared them away. Maybe Ezekiel, because back
then he was much more of a troll.
> Those 8 don't care who reads the group because all they are interested in
> is seeding the search engines with their Microsoft hate and FUD.
(And he thinks /we/ are the loonies!)
--
We all know Linux is great... it does infinite loops in 5 seconds.
- Linus Torvalds about the superiority of Linux on the Amsterdam
Linux Symposium
Chris Ahlstrom
this bit o' wisdom:
> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> Now now, Phil, don't make Hadron stop the habit that has served him so well
>> since early childhood.
>
> He wants Hadron to quit whacking off?
No, that would be /late/ childhood. I understand that Hadron has the
situation well in hand at this time.
--
SHIFT TO THE LEFT!
SHIFT TO THE RIGHT!
POP UP, PUSH DOWN,
BYTE, BYTE, BYTE!
Chris Ahlstrom
this bit o' wisdom:
> You're either mad or stupid. I dont care enough to determine which.
Translation:
Wahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! <sniffle>
--
There are three kinds of intelligence: one kind understands things for itself,
the other appreciates what others can understand, the third understands neither
for itself nor through others. This first kind is excellent, the second good,
and the third kind useless.
-- Niccolo Machiavelli
Hadron
> After takin' a swig o' grog, Tattoo Vampire belched out
> this bit o' wisdom:
>
>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>> Now now, Phil, don't make Hadron stop the habit that has served him so well
>>> since early childhood.
>>
>> He wants Hadron to quit whacking off?
>
> No, that would be /late/ childhood. I understand that Hadron has the
> situation well in hand at this time.
Why did you snip the quote which proves I am not lying? My God but
you're a snip and run little weasel.
Do TRY to read a thread before getting it wrong again.
--
"BOY is Microsoft doomed! LOL!"
comp.os.linux.advocacy - where they put the lunacy in advocacy
Hadron
> After takin' a swig o' grog, Hadron belched out
> this bit o' wisdom:
>
>> You're either mad or stupid. I dont care enough to determine which.
>
> Translation:
>
> Wahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! <sniffle>
As you know well, I do not "Waa" and "sniffle". I do not killfile entire
servers. I do not snip and run like you. You're a suck up Liarnut.
And just to prove what an arse kisser and shameless liar you are, I will
repost the stuff you snipped:
,----
| lets look at what you said AGAIN:
|
| >>> ,----
| >>> | > Again you seem to be implying that because a company invests in R&D it
| >>> | > has some divine protected right to be paid for it.
| >>> `----
|
| Now one does not have to as sharp as a razor to see what you meant -
| Companies should NOT be protected from people stealing their work for
| nothing.
|
| Phil, Phil, Phil. Take the slapdown like a man and move on. You're only
| making yourself look more stupid.
|
| >
| > Obviously Quirk lied again.
|
| No. I did not. See above.
`----
You lose again.
Heel Liarnut! Heel! here, catch a doggy drop ....
Chris Ahlstrom
this bit o' wisdom:
> DFS wrote:
>
>> I've been making personal attacks on lying cola idiots since way back, but I
>> almost never insult someone unless I'm insulted first.
>
> You're a worthless piece of lying troll shit, d00F. Do you ever take time
> off to see your family? Or are you like Snit, loafing around online all day
> while others support you?
DFS -- dying from extreme liquefaction necrosis is too good for him!
(That ought to get me into Hadron's "repellent Linux advocate" sig-file:
DFS -- dying from extreme liquefaction necrosis is too good for him!
-- Chris ("Liarnut") Ahlstrom, COLA, wishing a horrible death on
an honest operating system advocate
And I can't wait for DFS: "These slimy low-lying Linux advocates actually
prayed for me to die of a necrotizing disease!!!")
--
Gratitude, like love, is never a dependable international emotion.
-- Joseph Alsop
Chris Ahlstrom
this bit o' wisdom:
> Snit wrote:
>
>> You never did explain why you lied about that.
>
> I didn't.
>
> The voice on the phone was the same voice heard in your videos. So unless
> you've got someone doing voiceovers for those, it was indeed you who called.
> With a blocked caller ID, no less.
>
> Not that I really minded you calling, I just hate it when people whine over
> the telephone. :-P
At least he didn't try to get you to donate to the "state troopers".
--
If you want to be ruined, marry a rich woman.
-- Michelet
Hadron
> "Tattoo Vampire" <sit...@this.computer> stated in post
> cgg9ehusor04$.dlg@this.domain.or.that on 12/2/08 2:51 PM:
>
>> DFS wrote:
>>
>>> I've been making personal attacks on lying cola idiots since way back, but I
>>> almost never insult someone unless I'm insulted first.
>>
>> You're a worthless piece of lying troll shit, d00F. Do you ever take time
>> off to see your family? Or are you like Snit, loafing around online all day
>> while others support you?
>
> Hint: accusing others of lying in a post where you make up stories about me
> is, well, counter productive. Just though you should know. :)
>
> But, hey, at least you admitted you are just a troll begging for my
> attention... are you happy you are getting some? Maybe you can make up
> stories about me calling you. Again. You never did explain why you lied
> about that.
What the hell? Please tell me COLA has not spilled further into the real
world.
--
"This year with the release of XP, they are actually behind. The end days
are near for the BIOS reading inferior OS. It is inevitable."
Peter Köhlmann
> Chris Ahlstrom <lin...@bollsouth.nut> writes:
>
>> After takin' a swig o' grog, Tattoo Vampire belched out
>> this bit o' wisdom:
>>
>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>> Now now, Phil, don't make Hadron stop the habit that has served him so
>>>> well since early childhood.
>>>
>>> He wants Hadron to quit whacking off?
>>
>> No, that would be /late/ childhood. I understand that Hadron has the
>> situation well in hand at this time.
>
> Why did you snip the quote which proves I am not lying?
Well, it *did* prove that you are indeed lying
> My God but you're a snip and run little weasel.
And you are a liar
> Do TRY to read a thread before getting it wrong again.
>
He has read it. And, unlike you, also understood it
--
You're genuinely bogus.
Tattoo Vampire
> There is no gray area here - you lied.
I know what I heard, Michael.
--
Regards,
[tv]
Owner/proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC
...I forget the dream, but I'm missing a pajama button...
Tattoo Vampire
> What the hell? Please tell me COLA has not spilled further into the real
> world.
No, this is old news, Hadron - a few months ago, Snit called me at work and
asked me to "please stop" - apparently a reference to the little flame fest
he and I had going on at the time.
(Which started over nonexistent EXIF data that he said "proved" me a liar
about when a particular photo was taken.)
--
Regards,
[tv]
Owner/proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC
...Human Being: Bag of mostly water
Tattoo Vampire
> As you know well, I do not "Waa" and "sniffle".
You sure did when they were pummeling you in AOLU.
Chris Ahlstrom
this bit o' wisdom:
> Chris Ahlstrom <lin...@bollsouth.nut> writes:
>
>> After takin' a swig o' grog, Tattoo Vampire belched out
>> this bit o' wisdom:
>>
>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>> Now now, Phil, don't make Hadron stop the habit that has served him so well
>>>> since early childhood.
>>>
>>> He wants Hadron to quit whacking off?
>>
>> No, that would be /late/ childhood. I understand that Hadron has the
>> situation well in hand at this time.
>
> Why did you snip the quote which proves I am not lying? My God but
> you're a snip and run little weasel.
Uh, because I was simply making a joke? One that, obviously, flew right
over your thick little head?
> Do TRY to read a thread before getting it wrong again.
Do stop by at Buy.com and purchase yourself a two-fer: some intelligence
and a sense of humor.
(My god, how can someone be /this/ dense!?)
--
To say you got a vote of confidence would be to say you needed a vote of
confidence.
-- Andrew Young
Chris Ahlstrom
this bit o' wisdom:
> Hadron wrote:
>
>> As you know well, I do not "Waa" and "sniffle".
>
> You sure did when they were pummeling you in AOLU.
I read the post you're responding to. Weird as hell.
Hadron is crazy.
--
Don't put off for tomorrow what you can do today because if you enjoy it today,
you can do it again tomorrow.
Hadron
> After takin' a swig o' grog, Tattoo Vampire belched out
> this bit o' wisdom:
>
>> Hadron wrote:
>>
>>> As you know well, I do not "Waa" and "sniffle".
>>
>> You sure did when they were pummeling you in AOLU.
>
> I read the post you're responding to. Weird as hell.
> Hadron is crazy.
No you didn't since it never happened.
Do you ever tell the truth?
--
"The Linux community re-invents the wheel every month or so. The only
problem is, their version is square"
-- "Moshe Goldfarb." <brick_...@gmail.com> in comp.os.linux.advocacy
Hadron
> After takin' a swig o' grog, Hadron belched out
> this bit o' wisdom:
>
>> Chris Ahlstrom <lin...@bollsouth.nut> writes:
>>
>>> After takin' a swig o' grog, Tattoo Vampire belched out
>>> this bit o' wisdom:
>>>
>>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Now now, Phil, don't make Hadron stop the habit that has served him so well
>>>>> since early childhood.
>>>>
>>>> He wants Hadron to quit whacking off?
>>>
>>> No, that would be /late/ childhood. I understand that Hadron has the
>>> situation well in hand at this time.
>>
>> Why did you snip the quote which proves I am not lying? My God but
>> you're a snip and run little weasel.
>
> Uh, because I was simply making a joke? One that, obviously, flew right
> over your thick little head?
>
>> Do TRY to read a thread before getting it wrong again.
>
> Do stop by at Buy.com and purchase yourself a two-fer: some intelligence
> and a sense of humor.
>
> (My god, how can someone be /this/ dense!?)
I don't know. But if we keep studying you we might get a clue.
Gregory Shearman
>
> I don't think Erik or Tim scared them away. Maybe Ezekiel, because back
> then he was much more of a troll.
TwoBeamer told them about his two beamers and a garage bigger than the
big bang.... and it made them laugh so much they dropped their laptops.
DFS
> On 2008-12-02, Chris Ahlstrom <lin...@bollsouth.nut> wrote:
>>
>> I don't think Erik or Tim scared them away. Maybe Ezekiel, because
>> back then he was much more of a troll.
>
> TwoBeamer told them about his two beamers and a garage bigger than the
> big bang.... and it made them laugh so much they dropped their
> laptops.
We laughed at you, Mr. Linux Is Perfect, after Ezekiel called you out and
made you tuck tail and run behind your killfile.
Such a good cola "advocate*" you are.
Cork Soaker
Cork Soaker
> After takin' a swig o' grog, Phil Da Lick! belched out
> this bit o' wisdom:
>
>>> From what I've seen, the people you refer to as "Wintrolls" come here to
>>> have a good laugh at the crap the likes of you spout. You know, where
>>> you were "advocating" that companies should be forced to share all their
>>> R&D with their competitors for nothing!
>> I advocated no such thing. As you well know. Now stop lying.
>
> since early childhood.
>
What makes you think she's reached puberty yet?
Cork Soaker
> Hadron wrote:
>> "Phil Da Lick!" <phil_t...@spammerskissmyarse.hotmail.com> writes:
>>
>>>> "George Orwell" <nob...@mixmaster.it> wrote in message
>>>> news:3a6ac2ec79d8279e...@mixmaster.it...
>>>>> I was going to ask if anyone here ever read his fake user
>>>>> experiences ("I can't install Linux because my CD-ROM isn't
>>>>> recognized"), I ussually just ignore them but he probably noticed
>>>>> people weren't responding to them and probably never read them
>>>>> either so now he's switching to personal attacks. To me they're
>>>>> just 'noise' drowned out by tne music of Roy's virulent post which,
>>>>> and I agree with Terry here, are the most successfull
>>>>> anti-Microsoft PR campaign EVER. Roy's posts alone are doing
>>>>> billions of dollars in damages to M$'s stockvalue and will
>>>>> eventually lead to the company's downfall. No wonder the Wintroll's
>>>>> masters in Redmond have ordered personal attacks on Roy and Terry,
>>>>> they know they are taking damage, but they are doing themselves
>>>>> more harm than good by attacking Roy, because it shows how Evil the
>>>>> management of Microsoft really is. They became number one not by
>>>>> making great software, but by playing dirty tricks on others, most
>>>>> of which were illegal but were 'bought off' by bribing politicians
>>>>> and donating hundreds of millions to anonymous, coded Swiss bank
>>>>> accounts. But their day of reckoning is coming, believe me, and I
>>>>> will savior every moment of it!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
>>>>> non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
>>>>> reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
>>>>> di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
>>>>> Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
>>>>> https://www.mixmaster.it
>>>>>
>>>> How many people do you think read this newgroup ?
>>>> How many computer users have even heard of newsgroups ?
>>>> You can't seriously belive that Microsoft pay people to post here!
>>> You can't seriously believe the wintrolls come here for any other
>>> reason.
>>
>> From what I've seen, the people you refer to as "Wintrolls" come here to
>> have a good laugh at the crap the likes of you spout. You know, where
>> you were "advocating" that companies should be forced to share all their
>> R&D with their competitors for nothing!
>>
>
> I advocated no such thing. As you well know. Now stop lying.
Hardon lying? NO WAY!!!
Cork Soaker
>
> Wibble wobble I'm lying I'm lying.
Shut up, shit head.
anti_what_ever_you_got
news:h84h06-...@quarkbomb.dyndns.org:
> Hadron wrote:
>>
>> Wibble wobble I'm lying I'm lying.
>
> Shut up, shit head.
Please give me a count of how many people in this NG respond to your
juvenile posts?
--
anti_what_ever_you_got
Linux newbies, ask your questions in a moderated safe haven:
http://ubuntuforums.org
On 11/26/08 networking_at_home said:
"I learned from the best Dan, I learned from you. How do you like me now?"
A good read indeed:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=378694&highlight=dan+c
Dan C Wannabes: Cork Soaker, SINNER
Now Playing: Nektar, Remember the Future
anti_what_ever_you_got
news:964h06-...@quarkbomb.dyndns.org:
In all the posts you've made here only myself and one other person has ever
responded to your oral diarrhea.
anti_what_ever_you_got
They can't hear you little boy. Cry louder and your mommy might hear you
though.
anti_what_ever_you_got
ou4...@quarkbomb.dyndns.org:
> Are you trying to encourage him back?
Only two replies to your pitiful cries for attention. This I so sad I
almost feel sorry for you.
Cork Soaker
>
> Don't make me provide the links .....
>
BWAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
The Google-spastic is back!
Cork Soaker
> Hadron wrote:
>> "Phil Da Lick!" <phil_t...@spammerskissmyarse.hotmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> Hadron wrote:
>>>> "Phil Da Lick!" <phil_t...@spammerskissmyarse.hotmail.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>>>> Hadron <hadro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Yes you did. Numerous times.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Don't make me provide the links .....
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> When you make a stupid accusation like that, you should provide proof
>>>>>> immediately without having to be asked or "made".
>>>>> Unfortuantely in Hardon's world being against a pure software patent
>>>>> regime means you must expect and require every bit of software to be
>>>>> open sourced. Classic confusion of "free", "open" and "freedom". Being
>>>>> for "freedom" does not preclude closed source companies making a mint.
>>>> I know that. As you well know.
>>>>
>>>> But "Free" also means pirated and copied a LOT easier.
>>> You know very well that patents have nothing - zero - to do with
>>> piracy. Just because someone is in favour of a software ecosystem
>>> based on freedom does not make them tolerant of pirates.
>>
>> You keep trying to drag back to patents.
>>
>> You're erecting a strawman to hide your idiocy.
>>
>
> Well, when you try and take my comment out of context I'm bound to go
> back to the topic being discussed.
You've confused her.
Cork Soaker
> I am a fucking loser.
We know!
> Chris Ahlstrom <lin...@bollsouth.nut> writes:
>
>> After takin' a swig o' grog, Tattoo Vampire belched out
>> this bit o' wisdom:
>>
>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>> Now now, Phil, don't make Hadron stop the habit that has served him so well
>>>> since early childhood.
>>> He wants Hadron to quit whacking off?
>> No, that would be /late/ childhood. I understand that Hadron has the
>> situation well in hand at this time.
>
> Why did you snip the quote which proves I am not lying? My God but
> you're a snip and run little weasel.
>
> Do TRY to read a thread before getting it wrong again.
>
Wibble wobble wiffle waffle.
Stop fucking lying Hardon, you pathetic piece of shit!
Cork Soaker
> On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:31:52 -0000, Peter wrote:
>
>
>> How many people do you think read this newgroup ?
>> How many computer users have even heard of newsgroups ?
>> You can't seriously belive that Microsoft pay people to post here!
>>
>
> There is about 8 Linux advocates left because Schestowitz scared them all
> away with his SPAM.
> Those 8 don't care who reads the group because all they are interested in
> is seeding the search engines with their Microsoft hate and FUD.
Where the fuck would you discover FUD for Microshaft, you frigging in-breed?
Cork Soaker
> "Phil Da Lick!" <phil_t...@spammerskissmyarse.hotmail.com> writes:
>
>> Andrew Halliwell wrote:
>>> Hadron <hadro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Yes you did. Numerous times.
>>>>
>>>> Don't make me provide the links .....
>>>>
>>> We shouldn't be expected to MAKE you do anything.
>>> When you make a stupid accusation like that, you should provide proof
>>> immediately without having to be asked or "made".
>> Unfortuantely in Hardon's world being against a pure software patent
>> regime means you must expect and require every bit of software to be
>> open sourced. Classic confusion of "free", "open" and "freedom". Being
>> for "freedom" does not preclude closed source companies making a mint.
>
> I know that. As you well know.
>
> But "Free" also means pirated and copied a LOT easier.
You deluded little spastic!
>
> It works for SOME people. But not by all by any means.
>
Cork Soaker
> On 2008-12-02, Peter Köhlmann <peter.k...@arcor.de> wrote:
>> Hadron wrote:
>>> http://www.archivum.info/comp.os.linux.advocacy/2008-07/msg02575.html
>>>
>>> ,----
>>> | > Again you seem to be implying that because a company invests in R&D it
>>> | > has some divine protected right to be paid for it.
>>> `----
>>>
>>> Now, feel free to run off and cry.
>>>
>> Idiot. That is *not* *at* *all* what you claimed he has said.
>> Where is the "being forced to share" part in that, you cretinous liar?
>> All he is saying there that nobody has any divine right to be able to sell
>> their R&D, just because they invested in it
>
> Typical lie from the slimy cunt. When forced to actually provide a link
> we see the lies exposed. Does the insane quark troll think that no one
> will follow the link to check up on this slimy weasel?
>
No, he just genuinely can not understand English. Poor little waste of
snot.
anti_what_ever_you_got
Is this pityful spectale you're putting on as painful for you as it is for
me? I feel truly sorry for you!
anti_what_ever_you_got
That sounds like sour grapes to me. Too bad noone but me will ever see it.
anti_what_ever_you_got
ou4...@quarkbomb.dyndns.org:
And I still see nary a reply to your sad display. How sad is that?
anti_what_ever_you_got
You truly have no life at all do you? Why don't you do us all a favor and
end...
anti_what_ever_you_got
I just can't punish you anymore tonight. It's just too sad. Run along
little tadpole and I will taunt you again tomorrow.
Cork Soaker
> Cork Soaker <Thund...@Intrepid.invalid> poopied his diaper in
> news:h84h06-...@quarkbomb.dyndns.org:
>
>> Hadron wrote:
>>> Wibble wobble I'm lying I'm lying.
>> Shut up, shit head.
>
> Please give me a count of how many people in this NG respond to your
> juvenile posts?
>
Says you, the child on the killfile. Who the fuck do you think gives a
shit what you think?
I don't mean your boyfriend Hardon, you silly little bitch.
Now stop lying, or you'll end up in the same hole as your boyfriend!
Cork Soaker
> Cork Soaker <Thund...@Intrepid.invalid> wrote in news:i94h06-
> ou4...@quarkbomb.dyndns.org:
>
>> Are you trying to encourage him back?
>
> Only two replies to your pitiful cries for attention. This I so sad I
> almost feel sorry for you.
>
You haven't got any but me, you deluded little fucktard.
I'll leave you alone now, to play with your tiny tail.
It's perfectly clear you're a retard, and on the permanent killfile of
every non-n00b on the planet.
I know, you don't understand!
Cork Soaker
> Cork Soaker <Thund...@Intrepid.invalid> wrote in
> news:964h06-...@quarkbomb.dyndns.org:
>
>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>> After takin' a swig o' grog, Phil Da Lick! belched out
>>> this bit o' wisdom:
>>>
>>>> Hadron wrote:
>>>>> From what I've seen, the people you refer to as "Wintrolls" come
>>>>> here to have a good laugh at the crap the likes of you spout. You
>>>>> know, where you were "advocating" that companies should be forced
>>>>> to share all their R&D with their competitors for nothing!
>>>> I advocated no such thing. As you well know. Now stop lying.
>>> Now now, Phil, don't make Hadron stop the habit that has served him
>>> so well since early childhood.
>> What makes you think she's reached puberty yet?
>
> In all the posts you've made here only myself and one other person has ever
> responded to your oral diarrhea.
>
You mean, during the five minutes you've been here, and yet you're
already killfiled by all but me?
You silly little bitch, you're so deluded.
Once I stop responding to you, you and Hardon won't know who else to
play with!
Cork Soaker
Mommy? And you dare call anyone else a child!
Bitch needs a cuddle.
Snit
1wdp58wp6dstp$.dlg@this.domain.or.that on 12/2/08 5:07 PM:
> Hadron wrote:
>
>> What the hell? Please tell me COLA has not spilled further into the real
>> world.
>
> No, this is old news, Hadron - a few months ago, Snit called me at work and
> asked me to "please stop" - apparently a reference to the little flame fest
> he and I had going on at the time.
>
> (Which started over nonexistent EXIF data that he said "proved" me a liar
> about when a particular photo was taken.)
Gee, now you are not just lying about me having called you but you are
showing your word does not matter to you... remember, you said you would
drop your asinine EXIF data claims. By the way, have you figured out *yet*
that EXIF data can be forged?
--
Computers are incredibly fast, accurate, and stupid: humans are incredibly
slow, inaccurate and brilliant; together they are powerful beyond
imagination. - attributed to Albert Einstein, likely apocryphal
Snit
> Snit wrote:
>
>> There is no gray area here - you lied.
>
> I know what I heard, Michael.
Who cares what you heard - the topic here is the lies you have written.
You are a liar. It is *that* simple.
--
Never stand between a dog and the hydrant. - John Peers
Snit
gh4gvf$jte$1...@reader.motzarella.org on 12/2/08 4:38 PM:
> Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> writes:
>
>> "Tattoo Vampire" <sit...@this.computer> stated in post
>> cgg9ehusor04$.dlg@this.domain.or.that on 12/2/08 2:51 PM:
>>
>>> DFS wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've been making personal attacks on lying cola idiots since way back, but
>>>> I
>>>> almost never insult someone unless I'm insulted first.
>>>
>>> You're a worthless piece of lying troll shit, d00F. Do you ever take time
>>> off to see your family? Or are you like Snit, loafing around online all day
>>> while others support you?
>>
>> Hint: accusing others of lying in a post where you make up stories about me
>> is, well, counter productive. Just though you should know. :)
>>
>> But, hey, at least you admitted you are just a troll begging for my
>> attention... are you happy you are getting some? Maybe you can make up
>> stories about me calling you. Again. You never did explain why you lied
>> about that.
>
> What the hell? Please tell me COLA has not spilled further into the real
> world.
Tattoo has repeatedly accused me of having called him. I did no such thing.
He is, flat out, lying. He recently admitted, though, that he lies just to
get my attention.
--
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
--Aldous Huxley
Johan Lindquist
Chris Ahlstrom was all like, "Dude,
> (My god, how can someone be /this/ dense!?)
See, this is what I mean by "9% subtle trolling". Noone can, and the
bait worked. ;)
--
Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana. Perth ---> *
09:32:35 up 40 days, 22:20, 2 users, load average: 0.18, 0.18, 0.11
Linux 2.6.27.2 x86_64 GNU/Linux Registered Linux user #261729
Phil Da Lick!
>>>> Now, feel free to run off and cry.
>>> yor accusation:
>
> Above,
>
>>> "you were "advocating" that companies should be forced to share all
>>> their R&D with their competitors for nothing!"
>>>
>>> not commercially viable without patentlockin never entered your mind
>>> huh?
>
> Crap determined by who? You?
Usual procedure is to let the customers decide in a free market, not
some twat in an R&D department.
> lets look at what you said AGAIN:
>
>>>> ,----
>>>> | > Again you seem to be implying that because a company invests in R&D it
>>>> | > has some divine protected right to be paid for it.
>>>> `----
>
> Now one does not have to as sharp as a razor to see what you meant -
> Companies should NOT be protected from people stealing their work for
> nothing.
Well, obviously you're not that sharp. What I meant was what was said.
Now stop trying to twist it out of context to suit your trolling.
> Phil, Phil, Phil. Take the slapdown like a man and move on. You're only
> making yourself look more stupid.
>
>> Obviously Quirk lied again.
>
> No. I did not. See above.
? You're an idiot. Learn to read.
Chris Ahlstrom
this bit o' wisdom:
> Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana. Perth ---> *
Are you trying to imply that Perth is the Asshole of the Universe?
--
I am a traffic light, and Alan Ginzberg kidnapped my laundry in 1927!
Tattoo Vampire
> Gee, now you are not just lying about me having called you but you are
> showing your word does not matter to you... remember, you said you would
> drop your asinine EXIF data claims. By the way, have you figured out *yet*
> that EXIF data can be forged?
Yes, by you.
--
Regards,
[tv]
Owner/proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC
...Money is the Root of All Evil. For more info, send $10.
Tattoo Vampire
> You are a liar. It is *that* simple.
POT-KETTLE-BLACK
You're also a crybaby.
Tattoo Vampire
> I did no such thing.
I'm saying you did. What are you going to do beside lie and deny?
Johan Lindquist
Chris Ahlstrom was all like, "Dude,
> this bit o' wisdom:
>> Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana. Perth ---> *
>
> Are you trying to imply that Perth is the Asshole of the Universe?
You're reading too much into the illustration. Sometimes an ink blot
is just a spot.
--
Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana. Perth ---> *
13:50:02 up 41 days, 2:37, 4 users, load average: 0.10, 0.10, 0.09
Chris Ahlstrom
this bit o' wisdom:
> So anyway, it was like, 13:08 CET Dec 03 2008, you know? Oh, and, yeah,
> Chris Ahlstrom was all like, "Dude,
>
>>> Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana. Perth ---> *
>>
>> Are you trying to imply that Perth is the Asshole of the Universe?
>
> You're reading too much into the illustration. Sometimes an ink blot
> is just a spot.
>
> --
> Humor flies right over Johan Lindquist's head
You're the one that used an assterisk!
chrisv
>>
>> You're either mad or stupid. I dont care enough to determine which.
Quack. You lied. He never said "forced to share" ideas. He never
said "should not" get paid for ideas. He said that there is "no
devine right" to get paid for ideas. Not all ideas are marketable.
Duh.
Of course, you cannot expect your fsckwitted, dishonest
"approximations" of what people said to stand-up to scrutiny. Once
again, you attempted to make an advocate look bad, by lying about what
they claimed, only succeeding at making yourself look bad.
You're a silly little lying idiot, Quack, apparently here to entertain
us by making a jackass of yourself. I almost pity you.
Johan Lindquist
Chris Ahlstrom was all like, "Dude,
> After takin' a swig o' grog, Johan Lindquist belched out
> this bit o' wisdom:
>> So anyway, it was like, 13:08 CET Dec 03 2008, you know? Oh, and, yeah,
>> Chris Ahlstrom was all like, "Dude,
>>>> Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana. Perth ---> *
>>>
>>> Are you trying to imply that Perth is the Asshole of the Universe?
>>
>> You're reading too much into the illustration. Sometimes an ink blot
>> is just a spot.
>>
>> --
>> Humor flies right over Johan Lindquist's head
If you say so.
--
Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana. Perth ---> *
14:25:56 up 41 days, 3:13, 4 users, load average: 0.13, 0.10, 0.09
chrisv
>>
>> You are a liar.
Question for you, shit: What do you think should happen to liars?
Should they burn in hell?
chrisv
>>
>> I did no such thing.
Don't you sometimes wish that you were not a serial liar, Sn^Hhit, so
that when you make a claim like this, that relies only on your word,
someone might believe you?
Phil Da Lick!
> Chris Ahlstrom <lin...@bollsouth.nut> writes:
>
>> After takin' a swig o' grog, Hadron belched out
>> this bit o' wisdom:
>>
>>> You're either mad or stupid. I dont care enough to determine which.
>>
>> Wahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! <sniffle>
>
> As you know well, I do not "Waa" and "sniffle". I do not killfile entire
> servers. I do not snip and run like you. You're a suck up Liarnut.
>
> And just to prove what an arse kisser and shameless liar you are, I will
> repost the stuff you snipped:
You can repost it as many times as you like. As has been pointed out to
you many times in this thread by many people, at best you misunderstood
my plainly worded statement, at worst you mirepresented it. Which makes
you either clueless or a shameless liar.
>
> ,----
> | lets look at what you said AGAIN:
> |
> | >>> ,----
> | >>> | > Again you seem to be implying that because a company invests in R&D it
> | >>> | > has some divine protected right to be paid for it.
> | >>> `----
> |
> | Now one does not have to as sharp as a razor to see what you meant -
> | Companies should NOT be protected from people stealing their work for
> | nothing.
> |
> | Phil, Phil, Phil. Take the slapdown like a man and move on. You're only
> | making yourself look more stupid.
> |
> | >
> | > Obviously Quirk lied again.
> |
> | No. I did not. See above.
> `----
>
> You lose again.
>
> Heel Liarnut! Heel! here, catch a doggy drop ....
>