Verily I say unto thee that Chris Ahlstrom spake thusly:
> After swilling some grog, Gregory Shearman belched this bit o' wisdom:
>> On 2012-10-04, Clogwog <
clo...@anon.eu> wrote:
>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Turned out the .config for the Gentoo kernel I'm using didn't have
>>>> the USB video module enabled.
>>>
>>> Welcome to Linux!!! OS X and Windows: plug in the webcam, done!
>>
>> Run Ubuntu and the webcam runs.. this has nothing to do with Linux.
>
> Same for Debian.
Same for Gentoo, if you choose to include support for it.
The alternative is the One Microsoft Way, where you don't actually get a
choice, but have to endure a bloated system stuffed with redundant
components, including drivers for non-existent hardware that steals
valuable system resources, like this:
[quote]
Memory is getting cheaper every day. This is one reason why more and
more people are equipping their PCs with 4GB RAM or more. Modern
desktops often support up to 8GB. So it happens quite often these days
that a proud owner of a new a PC wonders why Vista only reports about
3GB RAM even though he bought 4GB. I have been asked this question by
several people within the last weeks. Some of them were IT pros, so I
thought I should post something about it here. The things I say in this
post mostly apply to Windows XP as well.
In theory, a 32-bit operating system should be able to support 232 bytes
= 4GB memory. Thus the first reaction usually is that the memory chips
or with the mainboard has a hardware defect. Unfortunately, that's not
the case. Vista can indeed address 4GB of memory. However, the maximum
amount of RAM that can be used by the system and applications is 3.12
GB.
The cause for this is the so-called memory-mapped I/O (MMIO). Some
devices need a dedicated space in memory. A typical example is a video
card that utilizes the system memory. Now, you might object that your
video card has its own memory and you didn't install any additional
devices that could occupy so much RAM.
Well, for compatibility reasons Vista reserves memory for devices even
if they don't exist in your computer. That means that if you have 4GB
RAM in your computer and Vista displays only 3.12 GB available memory,
about 1GB is indeed not used by the OS. You might as well remove it.
That is quite strange, isn't it? I am not a system programmer, but for
me that seems to be a design error, probably one that is very old.
[/quote]
http://goo.gl/d9M4s
--
K. | "You see? You cannot kill me. There is no flesh
http://slated.org | and blood within this cloak to kill. There is
Fedora 8 (Werewolf) on šky | only an idea. And ideas are bulletproof."
kernel 2.6.31.5, up 43 days | ~ V for Vendetta.