On May 16, 9:42 pm, Snit <
use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> Bilk is clearly becoming untied... more and more angry and
> irrational... whining about "psychopaths" and how he was
> hated by his parents, many of his teachers, his principal,
> his camp staff... on and on and on. Just going further and
> further off the deep end.
The reason I wrote about those childhood events is that Snit
Michael Glasser had posted hundreds of times this quote from me,
out of context, from #techrights:
"Maybe I am that way because people kept telling me I was mentally
ill. But I never was. I just saw monsters. Them." - Mark S. Bilk"
Since Glasser has been attacking me for months in thousands of
Usenet posts, I knew that he was using that quote to make people
think I'm mentally ill. In every one of those hundreds of posts
of the quote he was lying about me by omission, by posting it
out of context.
In another recent post, Snit Michael Glasser told a lie so obvious
that I can't believe he thinks anyone could possibly believe it:
> >> [Bilk] has claimed others control [his] actions
>
> > No, I have _never_ said anything like that. Snit is
> > totally lying!
>
> You claimed it was up to others how you acted:
> "They've changed the Subject line to hide the thread,
> so I'll have to repost."
>
> See: you claimed that because others changed a subject line
> you *have to repost*. Have to. You believed others were
> controlling you and that you were not responsible for your
> own actions.
>
> Another sign you need to seek professional help.
IIRC, the context, which as usual Snit omitted to reinforce
his lie, was that Snit had changed the title of a pro-human
thread, which in many newsreaders, including the popular Google
Groups, is the Subject line of the most recent post. By posting
to the thread with a Subject line like "Chris posts to please
the herd", Snit hid the title of the thread to prevent people
from finding it. Snit does this many times a day. I wanted
people to be able to find the pro-human thread, so to allow that
after Snit's sabotage I had to repost the article. Any moderately
intelligent person would be aware of the implied facts.
But Snit, using his very frequent lying strategy of intentional
misunderstanding, claims that I meant I was somehow "controlled"
by "others". and therefore "need to seek professional help".
This shows why it is not possible to have a rational dialog with
Snit Michael Glasser. He lies constantly. He piles lie upon lie.
It would take forever to correct his intentional misinterpretations,
because he keeps adding more of them for every one that's corrected.