-- "Always do the right thing: It will delight / Aluminum Foil Deflector Beanies some and astound the rest" - Mark Twain / Psychotronic protection, low prices
__/ [ arachnid ] on Saturday 16 September 2006 21:05 \__
> <snip />
He has just made a terrible mistake by irritating a Web celebrity' who regularly eliminates some of UseNet's biggest kooks, at ISP level (header forging won't help and posting record makes this a trivial task). His track record could lead to Flatfish departure from UseNet.
Now, if only we had faced that guy behind the nym, we'd leave him with a couple of black eyes and no penis, assuming he even has one.
roiboi wrote: > Now, if only we had faced that guy behind the nym, we'd leave him > with a couple of black eyes and no penis, assuming he even has one.
You'd make him wear eyeliner *and* suck his cock clean off.
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 22:53:07 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote: > __/ [ arachnid ] on Saturday 16 September 2006 21:05 \__
>> <snip />
> He has just made a terrible mistake by irritating a Web celebrity' who > regularly eliminates some of UseNet's biggest kooks, at ISP level (header > forging won't help and posting record makes this a trivial task). His track > record could lead to Flatfish departure from UseNet.
Highly doubtful. OOL gets a good check every month and compared to the child molesters, porn addicts, etc that they receive complaints about, flatfish is a minor item.
Besides, the items are on topic.
Good luck..........
> Now, if only we had faced that guy behind the nym, we'd leave him with a > couple of black eyes and no penis, assuming he even has one.
"T3 Timeout" <t...@local.host.abc> wrote: > roiboi wrote: > > Now, if only we had faced that guy behind the nym, we'd leave him > > with a couple of black eyes and no penis, assuming he even has one.
> You'd make him wear eyeliner *and* suck his cock clean off.
Roy Schestowitz <newsgro...@schestowitz.com> writes: > __/ [ arachnid ] on Saturday 16 September 2006 21:05 \__
>> <snip />
> He has just made a terrible mistake by irritating a Web celebrity' who > regularly eliminates some of UseNet's biggest kooks, at ISP level (header > forging won't help and posting record makes this a trivial task). His track > record could lead to Flatfish departure from UseNet.
> Now, if only we had faced that guy behind the nym, we'd leave him with a > couple of black eyes and no penis, assuming he even has one.
This coming from the weasel who accused me of "ad hominem" attacks?
You do realise you are openly advocating physical violence and mutilation?
You do realise that this is not amusing? That it crosses unwritten lines and boundaries?
Possibly you would like to extend on who "we" is? Do you have a gang which tracks people down and does them physical mischief?
>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgro...@schestowitz.com> writes:
>>> __/ [ arachnid ] on Saturday 16 September 2006 21:05 \__
>>>> <snip />
>>> He has just made a terrible mistake by irritating a Web celebrity' who >>> regularly eliminates some of UseNet's biggest kooks, at ISP level (header >>> forging won't help and posting record makes this a trivial task). His track >>> record could lead to Flatfish departure from UseNet.
>>> Now, if only we had faced that guy behind the nym, we'd leave him with a >>> couple of black eyes and no penis, assuming he even has one.
>> This coming from the weasel who accused me of "ad hominem" attacks?
>> You do realise you are openly advocating physical violence and >> mutilation?
>> You do realise that this is not amusing? That it crosses unwritten >> lines and boundaries?
>> Possibly you would like to extend on who "we" is? Do you have a gang >> which tracks people down and does them physical mischief?
>> I think an apology is in order.
> Why bother? > Based upon my email, Roy has had a number of emails sent to his school and > his friends in the compsci dept are protecting him.
> However, it's just a matter of time before the > provost/dean/pres/headmaster etc shuts him down due to violation of school > policy.
> Enough letters, and the list is growing daily, and he will be gone.
I wouldn't like to see him lose his cushy role as a fresher fluffer / tutorial fellow though. A lot of what's said here is just "give and take". I see no reason to bring it into the real world : especially where threats of physical violence are concerned.
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 00:49:31 +0200, Hadron Quark wrote: > I wouldn't like to see him lose his cushy role as a fresher fluffer / > tutorial fellow though. A lot of what's said here is just "give and > take". I see no reason to bring it into the real world : especially where > threats of physical violence are concerned.
Fresher fluffers are always in demand. As for physical violence is concerned obviously that is for lamers.
I don't even agree with reporting Roy, but evidently he has pissed off a good number of people, much like Peter Kohlmann did when he got his account suspended.
My feeling is free speech, minus threats, is all fine and good.
I really don't care at all.
To me, Roy is a joke, a gaff, a jester whom I am able to pull strings with.
ed wrote: > On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 17:15:36 -0500 > "T3 Timeout" <t...@local.host.abc> wrote:
>> roiboi wrote: >>> Now, if only we had faced that guy behind the nym, we'd leave him >>> with a couple of black eyes and no penis, assuming he even has one.
>> You'd make him wear eyeliner *and* suck his cock clean off.
> > ... or I'd tell him how I got my Vision:M working with Linux :o]
> No need to. > It works fine with PCLinuxOS v.93a
> You might want to help the people in alt.os.linux.suse though because I > couldn't make it work with Suse 10.1.
This is useful information.
One of the things I have noticed about the TRUE Flatfish postings is that he provides real, specific information, related to exact hardware and exact versions of software.
as opposed to the peculiar person who uses 98 pseudonyms to post complaints about unspecified versions of Linux with little or no information about the hardware being used, describes his/her 8-10 hours of futile efforts, downloading from an unspecified site, refusing to get help from anyone who knows anything about Linux (like a support line, e-mail, or just someone who has actually USED Linux), and then pronounces Linux "unfit for human consumption" based on his "expert opinion".
Flatfish has used Linux, including a number of different versions, and on hardware that was never meant to run Linux (in fact, he has created systems consisting entirely of hardware that is documented as unsupported).
The good news is that the Linux community often rises to the challenge, quickly coming up with drivers, or configurations for existing drivers, or patches for existing drivers, to support the "unsupported" new hardware.
Flatfish, thanks for your contributions to the Linux desktop environment.
No developer likes the tester who hammers his code with rediculous negative tests that the developer would never think of, but that's what makes a system reliable and supportable.
> No developer likes the tester who hammers his code with rediculous > negative tests that the developer would never think of, but that's what > makes a system reliable and supportable.
Running "Linux" on "a pc" is hardly hammering the code. It should "just work".
> Roy Schestowitz <newsgro...@schestowitz.com> writes:
>> __/ [ arachnid ] on Saturday 16 September 2006 21:05 \__
>>> <snip />
>> He has just made a terrible mistake by irritating a Web celebrity' who >> regularly eliminates some of UseNet's biggest kooks, at ISP level (header >> forging won't help and posting record makes this a trivial task). His track >> record could lead to Flatfish departure from UseNet.
>> Now, if only we had faced that guy behind the nym, we'd leave him with a >> couple of black eyes and no penis, assuming he even has one.
> This coming from the weasel who accused me of "ad hominem" attacks?
> You do realise you are openly advocating physical violence and > mutilation?
> You do realise that this is not amusing? That it crosses unwritten > lines and boundaries?
Get real Hadron.
> Possibly you would like to extend on who "we" is? Do you have a gang > which tracks people down and does them physical mischief?
-- "Always do the right thing: It will delight / Aluminum Foil Deflector Beanies some and astound the rest" - Mark Twain / Psychotronic protection, low prices
"Mathew P." <Mat...@COLA.com> writes: > On 2006-09-16, Hadron Quark spake thusly: >> Roy Schestowitz <newsgro...@schestowitz.com> writes:
>>> __/ [ arachnid ] on Saturday 16 September 2006 21:05 \__
>>>> <snip />
>>> He has just made a terrible mistake by irritating a Web celebrity' who >>> regularly eliminates some of UseNet's biggest kooks, at ISP level (header >>> forging won't help and posting record makes this a trivial task). His track >>> record could lead to Flatfish departure from UseNet.
>>> Now, if only we had faced that guy behind the nym, we'd leave him with a >>> couple of black eyes and no penis, assuming he even has one.
>> This coming from the weasel who accused me of "ad hominem" attacks?
>> You do realise you are openly advocating physical violence and >> mutilation?
>> You do realise that this is not amusing? That it crosses unwritten >> lines and boundaries?
> Get real Hadron.
Excuse me? What is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander : and if Roytoy wants to make statements about other people making "ad hominem attacks" then he should behave accordingly. If you live by the sword then you die by the sword.
-- The only "intuitive" interface is the nipple. After that, it's all learned. (Bruce Ediger, bedi...@teal.csn.org, in comp.os.linux.misc, on X interfaces.)
Hadron Quark <qadronhu...@geemail.com> wrote: > Roy Schestowitz <newsgro...@schestowitz.com> writes:
>> __/ [ arachnid ] on Saturday 16 September 2006 21:05 \__
>>> <snip />
>> He has just made a terrible mistake by irritating a Web celebrity' who >> regularly eliminates some of UseNet's biggest kooks, at ISP level (header >> forging won't help and posting record makes this a trivial task). His track >> record could lead to Flatfish departure from UseNet.
>> Now, if only we had faced that guy behind the nym, we'd leave him with a >> couple of black eyes and no penis, assuming he even has one.
> This coming from the weasel who accused me of "ad hominem" attacks?
> You do realise you are openly advocating physical violence and > mutilation?
> You do realise that this is not amusing? That it crosses unwritten > lines and boundaries?
> Possibly you would like to extend on who "we" is? Do you have a gang > which tracks people down and does them physical mischief?
>>> __/ [ arachnid ] on Saturday 16 September 2006 21:05 \__
>>>> <snip />
>>> He has just made a terrible mistake by irritating a Web celebrity' who >>> regularly eliminates some of UseNet's biggest kooks, at ISP level (header >>> forging won't help and posting record makes this a trivial task). His track >>> record could lead to Flatfish departure from UseNet.
>>> Now, if only we had faced that guy behind the nym, we'd leave him with a >>> couple of black eyes and no penis, assuming he even has one.
>> This coming from the weasel who accused me of "ad hominem" attacks?
>> You do realise you are openly advocating physical violence and >> mutilation?
>> You do realise that this is not amusing? That it crosses unwritten >> lines and boundaries?
>> Possibly you would like to extend on who "we" is? Do you have a gang >> which tracks people down and does them physical mischief?
>> I think an apology is in order.
> Hell and goddamn you need a punch in the mouth.
I demand an apology for that .....
*plonk*
btw, I was being sarcastic .... Roy has a habit of preaching netiquette and never quite keeping to his own high standards.
> -----yttrx
--
> What does ELF stand for (in respect to Linux?)
ELF is the first rock group that Ronnie James Dio performed with back in the early 1970's. In constrast, a.out is a misspelling of the French word for the month of August. What the two have in common is beyond me, but Linux users seem to use the two words together. -- seen on c.o.l.misc
>> Hadron Quark <qadronhu...@geemail.com> wrote: >>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgro...@schestowitz.com> writes:
>>>> __/ [ arachnid ] on Saturday 16 September 2006 21:05 \__
>>>>> <snip />
>>>> He has just made a terrible mistake by irritating a Web celebrity' who >>>> regularly eliminates some of UseNet's biggest kooks, at ISP level (header >>>> forging won't help and posting record makes this a trivial task). His track >>>> record could lead to Flatfish departure from UseNet.
>>>> Now, if only we had faced that guy behind the nym, we'd leave him with a >>>> couple of black eyes and no penis, assuming he even has one.
>>> This coming from the weasel who accused me of "ad hominem" attacks?
>>> You do realise you are openly advocating physical violence and >>> mutilation?
>>> You do realise that this is not amusing? That it crosses unwritten >>> lines and boundaries?
>>> Possibly you would like to extend on who "we" is? Do you have a gang >>> which tracks people down and does them physical mischief?
>>> I think an apology is in order.
>> Hell and goddamn you need a punch in the mouth.
> I demand an apology for that .....
> *plonk*
*PLONK*
> btw, I was being sarcastic .... Roy has a habit of preaching netiquette > and never quite keeping to his own high standards.
Yeah I know, didnt you get my joke? I thought it was funny.
ed wrote: > On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 17:15:36 -0500 > "T3 Timeout" <t...@local.host.abc> wrote:
>> roiboi wrote: >>> Now, if only we had faced that guy behind the nym, we'd leave him >>> with a couple of black eyes and no penis, assuming he even has one.
>> You'd make him wear eyeliner *and* suck his cock clean off.
>>> Hadron Quark <qadronhu...@geemail.com> wrote: >>>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgro...@schestowitz.com> writes:
>>>>> __/ [ arachnid ] on Saturday 16 September 2006 21:05 \__
>>>>>> <snip />
>>>>> He has just made a terrible mistake by irritating a Web celebrity' who >>>>> regularly eliminates some of UseNet's biggest kooks, at ISP level (header >>>>> forging won't help and posting record makes this a trivial task). His track >>>>> record could lead to Flatfish departure from UseNet.
>>>>> Now, if only we had faced that guy behind the nym, we'd leave him with a >>>>> couple of black eyes and no penis, assuming he even has one.
>>>> This coming from the weasel who accused me of "ad hominem" attacks?
>>>> You do realise you are openly advocating physical violence and >>>> mutilation?
>>>> You do realise that this is not amusing? That it crosses unwritten >>>> lines and boundaries?
>>>> Possibly you would like to extend on who "we" is? Do you have a gang >>>> which tracks people down and does them physical mischief?
>>>> I think an apology is in order.
>>> Hell and goddamn you need a punch in the mouth.
>> I demand an apology for that .....
>> *plonk*
> *PLONK*
>> btw, I was being sarcastic .... Roy has a habit of preaching netiquette >> and never quite keeping to his own high standards.
> Yeah I know, didnt you get my joke? I thought it was funny.
Yeah, but you're a fucking arsehole : everything you say is funny, in a "laugh at the chimp making farting noises" kind of way ...
>>>> Hadron Quark <qadronhu...@geemail.com> wrote: >>>>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgro...@schestowitz.com> writes:
>>>>>> __/ [ arachnid ] on Saturday 16 September 2006 21:05 \__
>>>>>>> <snip />
>>>>>> He has just made a terrible mistake by irritating a Web celebrity' who >>>>>> regularly eliminates some of UseNet's biggest kooks, at ISP level (header >>>>>> forging won't help and posting record makes this a trivial task). His track >>>>>> record could lead to Flatfish departure from UseNet.
>>>>>> Now, if only we had faced that guy behind the nym, we'd leave him with a >>>>>> couple of black eyes and no penis, assuming he even has one.
>>>>> This coming from the weasel who accused me of "ad hominem" attacks?
>>>>> You do realise you are openly advocating physical violence and >>>>> mutilation?
>>>>> You do realise that this is not amusing? That it crosses unwritten >>>>> lines and boundaries?
>>>>> Possibly you would like to extend on who "we" is? Do you have a gang >>>>> which tracks people down and does them physical mischief?
>>>>> I think an apology is in order.
>>>> Hell and goddamn you need a punch in the mouth.
>>> I demand an apology for that .....
>>> *plonk*
>> *PLONK*
>>> btw, I was being sarcastic .... Roy has a habit of preaching netiquette >>> and never quite keeping to his own high standards.
>> Yeah I know, didnt you get my joke? I thought it was funny.
> Yeah, but you're a fucking arsehole : everything you say is funny, in a > "laugh at the chimp making farting noises" kind of way ...
See, all you had to do was open your mind a little.
>> On 2006-09-16, Hadron Quark spake thusly: >>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgro...@schestowitz.com> writes:
>>>> __/ [ arachnid ] on Saturday 16 September 2006 21:05 \__
>>>>> <snip />
>>>> He has just made a terrible mistake by irritating a Web celebrity' who >>>> regularly eliminates some of UseNet's biggest kooks, at ISP level (header >>>> forging won't help and posting record makes this a trivial task). His track >>>> record could lead to Flatfish departure from UseNet.
>>>> Now, if only we had faced that guy behind the nym, we'd leave him with a >>>> couple of black eyes and no penis, assuming he even has one.
>>> This coming from the weasel who accused me of "ad hominem" attacks?
>>> You do realise you are openly advocating physical violence and >>> mutilation?
>>> You do realise that this is not amusing? That it crosses unwritten >>> lines and boundaries?
>> Get real Hadron.
> Excuse me? What is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander : and if > Roytoy wants to make statements about other people making "ad hominem > attacks" then he should behave accordingly. If you live by the sword > then you die by the sword.
Do you understand the difference between simple name-calling, and ad hominem? doesn't seem so from your post...
>>>> Hadron Quark <qadronhu...@geemail.com> wrote: >>>>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgro...@schestowitz.com> writes:
>>>>>> __/ [ arachnid ] on Saturday 16 September 2006 21:05 \__
>>>>>>> <snip />
>>>>>> He has just made a terrible mistake by irritating a Web celebrity' who >>>>>> regularly eliminates some of UseNet's biggest kooks, at ISP level (header >>>>>> forging won't help and posting record makes this a trivial task). His track >>>>>> record could lead to Flatfish departure from UseNet.
>>>>>> Now, if only we had faced that guy behind the nym, we'd leave him with a >>>>>> couple of black eyes and no penis, assuming he even has one.
>>>>> This coming from the weasel who accused me of "ad hominem" attacks?
>>>>> You do realise you are openly advocating physical violence and >>>>> mutilation?
>>>>> You do realise that this is not amusing? That it crosses unwritten >>>>> lines and boundaries?
>>>>> Possibly you would like to extend on who "we" is? Do you have a gang >>>>> which tracks people down and does them physical mischief?
>>>>> I think an apology is in order.
>>>> Hell and goddamn you need a punch in the mouth.
>>> I demand an apology for that .....
>>> *plonk*
>> *PLONK*
>>> btw, I was being sarcastic .... Roy has a habit of preaching netiquette >>> and never quite keeping to his own high standards.
>> Yeah I know, didnt you get my joke? I thought it was funny.
> Yeah, but you're a fucking arsehole : everything you say is funny, in a > "laugh at the chimp making farting noises" kind of way ...
|
