Stats: Cola poster stats is back!
Terry Porter@gronk.porter.net
once a month from now on due to a bug in this stat software.
Don't ask me why all place numbers are not present!
Turquoise SuperStat 2.2 * Message area statistics
=================================================
(c) Copyright 1998-2001 Peter Karlsson
This report covers 17986 messages that were received at this system
between 2002-05-03 00:41:29 and 2002-06-04 00:32:01
(written between 2002-04-06 20:37:37 and 2002-05-10 00:47:13)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Toplist of writers
Place Name Msgs Bytes Quoted
1. GreyCloud <mi...@cumulus.com> 1407 2126165 3.6%
2. Mark Kent <ma...@NOHAM.otford.kent.btinternet.co.uk 920 1455720 0.4%
3. mjt <mtobler@removethis_sbcglobal.net> 867 861209 11.7%
4. rapskat <rap...@hotmail.com> 603 861153 48.8%
5. Jim Richardson <war...@eskimo.com> 600 1129704 25.2%
6. wjbell <wj...@pacbell.net> 566 817112 32.8%
7. Johan Lindquist <sp...@smilfinken.net> 535 716856 36.3%
8. Erik Funkenbusch <er...@visi.com> 518 832197 24.4%
9. Terry Por...@gronk.porter.net <tjpo...@gronk.port 491 649571 43.1%
10. Mike. <rapaci...@gingin.net> 463 488049 34.5%
11. Peter Köhlmann <Peter.K...@t-online.de> 436 630690 6.7%
12. Donn Miller <hac...@yahoo.com> 372 301045 33.0%
13. Jason Bowen <bow...@rintintin.colorado.edu> 343 650377 13.0%
14. Roy Culley <r...@swissonline.ch> 279 387910 61.6%
15. Kenneth Downs <ex...@downsfam.net> 275 695903 46.0%
16. Matthew Gardiner <matga...@yahoo.co.nz> 254 373397 75.7%
17. flatfish+++ <flatf...@mariana.trench> 252 249701 58.3%
18. Edward Rosten <lo...@my.sig> 223 287302 49.0%
19. . <yt...@mutilation.net> 220 293564 72.7%
20. Linonut <lin...@bone.com> 216 176089 54.6%
21. Pete Goodwin <pgoo...@REMOVE-TO-REPLY.sensaura.co 208 249692 62.2%
22. Paul Robson <auti...@aol.com.leechux> 208 224553 53.2%
23. amonre <amo...@xpress93133.htc.net> 191 430313 27.1%
24. Don't have a cow man... <Milhouse@BartSimpsonNOT.c 178 283096 74.8%
25. Dr Scab <sca...@herpes.co.uk> 173 163056 63.6%
26. Sinister Midget <kcs...@k.c-r.r.com> 164 261044 52.7%
27. Terry Porter <tjpo...@gronk.porter.net> 162 153479 61.7%
28. Sam Richards <n...@spam.com> 161 178357 62.9%
29. TuxTrax <ARC...@zerospamtuxtrax.com> 155 264061 37.9%
Joe Potter <j...@home.org> 155 158337 68.2%
Andrew Preater <pre...@linuxmail.org> 155 156394 25.6%
32. D. C. Sessions <d...@lumbercartel.com> 154 189413 65.9%
33. Mart van de Wege <mvdwege.usenet@drebbelstraat20.d 147 197494 47.2%
Jim Lascola <jimla...@yahoo.com> 147 143002 70.8%
35. Paul Cooke <you.m...@joking.com> 140 88609 52.8%
36. Michael Vester <mve...@v-wave.com> 138 221516 69.6%
37. Charlie Ebert <kd...@mmcable.com> 137 249403 53.2%
38. Craig Kelley <i...@inconnu.isu.edu> 132 176854 49.0%
Ian Pegel <IanP...@netscape.net> 132 82408 62.1%
40. Greg Cox <gr...@magivark.com> 121 284207 76.8%
mlw <ma...@mohawksoft.com> 121 121298 62.1%
42. ECS Sales <rm...@fast.net> 111 139686 65.6%
43. Jan <jan....@yucom.be> 103 117100 50.7%
44. Tom Wilson <twi...@goliath.tomhome.net> 96 128281 66.9%
Bones <Bo...@you.should.know> 96 122709 30.1%
46. Peter Hayes <pe...@seahaze.demon.co.uk> 87 98474 61.2%
47. Tim Smith <reply_i...@mouse-potato.com> 84 89594 25.5%
chrisv <chr...@chrisv.com> 84 45361 66.9%
49. Rob S. Wolfram <aze...@hamal.xs4all.nl> 77 90716 42.9%
50. The Ghost In The Machine <ewi...@earthlink.net> 74 161745 37.6%
51. Mr. I.M. Kitty <war...@nointegrity.org> 69 75333 38.7%
52. Lee Sau Dan <dan...@informatik.uni-freiburg.de> 67 94840 9.6%
53. James Rowe <jim...@rover.com> 66 228734 39.4%
SyntheToonz <Synth...@email.msn.com> 66 71947 55.6%
55. Brad Sims <bs...@abnt.org> 64 40594 30.4%
56. Robt. Miller <robtmil....@ptd.net> 62 48067 49.1%
57. SubZero <fho...@ebpurfgre.ee.pbz> 61 84922 49.8%
58. Dave Martel <no...@nospam123.com> 59 78629 40.1%
Tsu Dho Nimh <aba...@hotmail.com> 59 75850 40.9%
Mike <mi...@nospam.com> 59 72341 43.6%
61. mjcr <mj...@mindspring.com> 58 774943 4.4%
62. kickaha <nomai...@devnull.net> 54 80368 59.3%
63. Paolo Ciambotti <pac...@fuckmicrosoft.com> 53 31316 52.8%
64. Steve <interne...@rogers.com> 52 55469 70.9%
jackson <o51...@yahoo.com> 52 41474 37.6%
66. Bob Hauck <b...@this-is.invalid> 51 52337 37.1%
67. Frank <sol...@us.ibm.com> 49 63026 72.8%
68. Mark S Bilk <ma...@cosmicpenguin.com> 48 132549 36.8%
timeOday <timeOda...@theknack.net> 48 47410 69.8%
70. Jesse F. Hughes <jes...@cs.kun.nl> 47 63827 31.8%
71. Jerry Nash <jry...@attglobal.net> 45 65154 57.6%
Tom Gough <gou...@email.com> 45 48190 69.2%
73. asj <ka...@SPAMerols.com> 44 58683 59.6%
74. Rick <rha...@excite.com> 43 64037 81.4%
75. Jan Sabbe <jan....@student.kuleuven.ac.be> 41 44301 52.8%
Simon Cooke <PLEASEsimonREMOVEcooke@THEearthlinkTE 41 43971 63.4%
77. Mark Miller <mmil...@attbi.com> 40 119751 56.4%
Bob Young <BYo...@2BRemoved.NuCoreTech.Com> 40 95300 31.5%
79. Damon Brinkley <sige...@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> 39 41096 76.6%
80. Doug.M <dsf...@fuckMicrosoft.com> 38 88456 86.0%
81. Darren <Darre...@Frankenstein.com> 36 49701 75.8%
82. whytewolf <whyt...@techie.com> 35 76040 68.3%
Bigby <bml...@myglo.net> 35 23418 52.2%
84. gswork <gsw...@mailcity.com> 33 60139 38.6%
Joel Mayes <blue...@optushome.com.au> 33 47477 38.4%
86. philicorda <philicord...@ntlworld.com> 32 24372 61.0%
87. David Mohring <her...@heretic.ihug.co.nz> 31 71079 25.6%
-glenn- <som...@example.com> 31 57861 72.2%
Richard Thrippleton <re...@ObviousSPAMBLOCKcam.ac. 31 31846 62.3%
Cameron Purdy <cpu...@tangosol.com> 31 30951 35.1%
Rusty Shackelford <da...@gribble.com> 31 26399 37.7%
92. Jim Trice <nothappyj...@senet.com.au> 27 57882 51.2%
93. central authority <centrala...@yahoo.com> 26 44019 68.1%
94. Stuart Fox <stua...@hotmail.com> 25 24163 56.5%
95. Marc Geerlings <m.gee...@rad.ObviousSPAMBlock.u 24 49075 21.5%
Xaonon <xao...@hotpop.com> 24 26366 35.0%
97. Jerry <sp...@inthecan.com> 23 27282 50.6%
98. Tim Tyler <t...@tt1.org> 22 20096 13.8%
jynyl <dontsp...@yahoo.co.nz> 22 13458 50.3%
100. Chronos Tachyon <chr...@chronos.dyndns.org.no.spa 21 47396 29.3%
A total of 695 people were identified.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Toplist of subjects
Place Subject Msgs Bytes
1. propaganda primer 372 723956
2. PhotoShop 7 309 321135
3. How do people do it?!? 268 474345
4. Has America Missed The Open Source Boat? 250 480280
5. OS's that SUCK and the People that Love them... 218 294875
6. Microsoft's Dirty OEM-Secret 207 295448
7. Wjbell says my fonts don't look that great 196 360033
8. SUSE LINUX SUXKS 183 289277
KDE 3.0 on RH shipjack. 183 261690
10. Linux comes of age... 167 280779
11. the many things Windows can do 160 241294
12. 6 months with Linux, what fun it's been! 155 234789
13. Why .NET/C# will last at most 5 years (PLUS - why IIS wil 151 227219
14. Linux desktop really ugly !!! 143 190812
15. why do you have to reboot ??? 141 145130
16. Did you ever notice.... 136 189672
What a joke. 136 160593
18. $120.00 - Linux:0 Windows:1 133 210963
19. Does Windows Hold The Interest of College Programmers And 128 171931
20. Hey all you linux 122 196257
Erik, I'm still uncomfortable with your response 122 175858
22. And yet ANOTHER Windows Security Fix 113 170568
23. WinME vs. Linux 111 136234
24. Undeleting files under linux 109 153260
25. the real wjbell? 107 163652
power users windows setup & linux setup - spooky 107 118931
27. Please Report This Forgery -was- FAQ? Based on what autho 106 299776
28. Why .NET/C# will last at most 5 years (PLUS - why IIS wil 104 165730
C: A Dead Language 104 113877
30. Um, WJBell, where's your proof that you're running FreeBS 102 104889
31. Getting a service to start on Linux Mandrake 8.2 99 127869
32. Lies about XP 93 87736
33. Wjbell's Anti-Linux Lies -- 5/7/2002 92 145604
34. Rapskat and the clique 90 101114
35. How do you do it? 87 106517
36. BSOD -> BSOD 86 140227
Good Enough to Sleep With but not Good Enough to Marry? 86 126687
Mandrake 8.2 and KDE 3.0 86 118680
39. annonymous posting and X-No-Archive was Re: Lame trolls . 84 121310
40. I'm Impressed!! 82 164512
can linux do something that windows can't? 82 147930
42. (OT) Gates admits Windows can be used without middleware 80 119381
Linux 80 85539
44. "Jason Bowen" 79 182222
About identity theft.. 79 146064
Apology to mjt from flatfish+++ 79 106441
47. Hailstorm is dead 78 105493
48. Bad Windows Programming 77 111269
49. Fonts and Wintrolls 76 98292
50. Gartner: Microsoft licensing could push users to StarOffi 75 113890
Bill Claims GPL destroys jobs. 75 106506
52. LaTeX is so cool! 73 97950
OT (?) Nectar of the Gods.... 73 83188
54. Stallman Strikes Back At Gates 72 99300
55. Interesting idea for a survey... 70 82372
56. Hey all you linux crooks 68 64872
57. Why .NET/C# will last at most 5 years (PLUS - why IIS wil 67 135743
SuSE 8.0 First impressions. 67 105751
Bill Gates Goes to Heaven. (joke upgrade) 67 80146
60. Let's get Erik started on one of his diatribes 66 74893
61. Microsoft Doesn't Want You To Buy SuSE 8.0 65 100284
XP vs Linux Google Hits 65 84852
My Experience with the Linux 65 79761
Linux graphics appearance 65 76162
65. Linux fist impressions 64 73949
66. Gentoo compile times vs other 63 129038
How you know you've failed as a U.S. President... 63 120890
continental ignorance 63 96940
My Linux experience... 63 68440
70. Wjbell's 43 Anti-Linux Lies -- 4/14/2002 62 94256
Reliability, sometimes I just don't get it. 62 64997
72. Advantages & disadvantages of linux 61 95719
73. 00 COLA FAQ and Primer, Edition I 60 209066
what I like about gentoo so far.. 60 107752
An alternative to TiVo? 60 93779
Windows is much better than Linux 60 60325
77. Gates prepares for 10 year trip thru time! 59 58361
78. Mozilla goes down for the count! 58 66947
79. Wal-Mart PC provider to correct Linux modem problem 57 64892
80. How can PDI/DreamWorks make movies without PhotoShop? 56 92068
81. My Linux system imploded itself :( 55 80716
Why .NET/C# will last at most 5 years (PLUS - why IIS wil 55 79424
SOT - A Somewhat Intelligent Tek Flik? 55 65484
linux and xbox 55 55200
85. Linux slogans 53 50702
86. Melissa Virus Author Finally Jailed 52 82358
87. The Completely Unauthorized COLA FAQ 50 83907
Windoze ME woes 50 65093
Peru rejects MS 50 56112
Wintrolls Stepping Up the Pace 50 46219
91. The GPL: Intellectual Protection or Intellectual Theft? 49 72361
[linux vs. windows] Need help with thesis 49 53102
I tried Linux and it sucked.. 49 43988
94. Texas Suicide the Bush MS way... 47 68654
95. STRONG FAQ CANDIDATE (Was: FAQ Anyone? (repost)) 46 133693
Pro-MS Crowd Not Looking Good Lately 46 73518
Ever Notice... 46 46600
Linux: praised by MS employee 46 25553
99. WOT - The racist wjbell (Re: Apology to mjt from flatfish 45 93429
Why .NET will be ahead in 5 years and Java will be margin 45 49024
A total of 1178 subjects were identified.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Toplist of programs
Place Program Msgs
1. slrn 4657
0.9.5.4:1 0.9.5.5:1 0.9.5.6:2 0.9.5.7:48 0.9.6.2:699
0.9.6.3:134
0.9.6.3pl4:30 0.9.6.4:32 0.9.7.1:255 0.9.7.2:4 0.9.7.3:1096
0.9.7.4:2355
2. KNode 2873
0.3.2:3 0.3.3:138 0.4:60 0.6:1 0.6.1:973 0.7.1:1698
3. Pan 2222
0.10.0:3 0.11.1:51 0.11.2:914 0.11.2.90:2 0.11.2.91:489
0.11.3:522
0.11.90:33 0.11.91:1 0.9.6:119 0.9.7:43 0.9.7pre1:33 0.9.7_images:12
4. Microsoft Outlook Express 1464
5.00.2314.1300:14 5.00.2615.200:21 5.00.2919.6700:7
5.50.4133.2400:149
5.50.4522.1200:47 5.50.4807.1700:143 6.0.2616.200:2 6.00.2462.0000:14
6.00.2530.0001:5 6.00.2600.0000:1062
5. tin 744
1.4.1-19991201:6 1.4.2-20000205:5 1.4.3-20000502:22
1.4.4-20000803:7
1.4.5-20010409:2 1.5.10-20011117:1 1.5.11-20020124:220
1.5.11-20020130:6
1.5.11-20020419:9 1.5.12-20020311:462 1.5.6-20000803:3
1.5.8-20010221:1
6. Forte Agent 687
1.1.2.3.5.8.13.21:1
1.4142135623730950488016887242096980785696718753769480731766797379907
324784621:1 1.7/32.534:59 1.8/32.548:359 1.8/32.553:7 1.9/32.560:31
1.91/32.564:224 1.92/3.1415926535:1
1.92/32.56.3556.2323.123.3443.565:1 1.92/32.564:1
2.7182818284590452353602874713526624977572470936999595749669676277
2407663035354759457138217852516642742746639193200305992181741359662
9043572900334295260595630738132328627943490763:1 2/4/19/pre7:1
7. Xnews 319
4.05.03:1 4.06.22:2 4.11.09:1 5.02.17:1 5.02.24:1
5.03.24:146 5.04.25:1 L5:166
8. Mozilla 305
3.0:2 5.0:303
9. knews 284
1.0b.0:1 1.0b.1:283
10. Session Scheduler 208
Queue:208
11. Gnus 172
5.0807:1 5.0808:132 5.09:11 5.090006:13 5.090007:3
v5.6.45/XEmacs:1 v5.7/Emacs:11
12. MicroPlanet Gravity 158
v2.30:1 v2.50:155 v2.60:2
13. KForteAgent for 37
FreeBSD:37
14. Not 34
OE:34
15. MT-NewsWatcher 30
3.1:5 3.2:25
16. Forte Free Agent 25
1.21/32.243:25
17. Microhard Lookout Expresstrain 20
6.66.satan:20
18. trn 4.0-test72 16
19:16
19. Sylpheed 11
0.7.0:2 0.7.4:1 0.7.5:4 0.7.5claws10:2 0.7.5claws8:2
20. newspost 6
v1.13:6
trn 4.0-test62 6
21:6
22. Codeforge Sophax 5
1.0:5
23. trn 4.0-test70 3
17:3
trn 4.0-test76 3
Apr:3
25. Direct 2
Read:2
Forte Agent v<insert irrational num 2
here>:2
Halime 2
Pine 2
LNX 4.44:2
Thoth 2
1.5.0:1 1.5.2:1
trn 4.0-test74 2
May:2
Turnpike 2
6.01-S:2
32. Microsoft-Entourage 1
9.0.2509:1
Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh 1
5.0.4:1
News Xpress 1
2.01:1
NewsPro 1
3.1.6:1
TIN [ 1
1.2:1
YA-NewsWatcher 1
5.0.1:1
xrn 1
9.02:1
Yarn for OS/2 1
v0.92:1
A total of 39 different programs (not counting different versions)
were identified.
--
Kind Regards from Terry
My Desktop is powered by GNU/LinuX, Sorcerer kernel 2.4.17
Free Micro burner: http://w3w.arafuraconnect.com.au/~tp/burn.html
** Linux Registration Number: 103931, http://counter.li.org **
Mike.
say: <slrnadm7os....@gronk.porter.net>
> Don't ask me why all place numbers are not present!
Can we tell you why?
> 29. TuxTrax <ARC...@zerospamtuxtrax.com> 155
> Joe Potter <j...@home.org> 155
> Andrew Preater <pre...@linuxmail.org> 155
> 33. Mart van de Wege <mvdwege.usenet@drebbelstraat20.d 147
> Jim Lascola <jimla...@yahoo.com> 147
> 38. Craig Kelley <i...@inconnu.isu.edu> 132
> Ian Pegel <IanP...@netscape.net> 132
Note they all have the same number of posts...
We have a tie! ;-)
I'm tempted to write my own stats scripts now, just for the fun of it.
Hmmmm. ;-)
--
Mike. (remove "-spam" to mail me)
Johan Lindquist
Terry Por...@gronk.porter.net <tjpo...@gronk.porter.net> suddenly blurted:
> Hi all, Cola poster stats are here again, and I'll probably post
> them once a month from now on due to a bug in this stat software.
I'm glad, that only makes it once a month I have to realise should
Ipost less crap on the internet.
> Don't ask me why all place numbers are not present!
I won't, because I know. Mike knows too. Nyaah.
> Toplist of subjects
Is this really interesting? I'm kinda.. nonplussed.. if that's the
word.
> Toplist of programs
>
> Place Program Msgs
> 1. slrn 4657
Slrn rules, nothing new there. ;)
> 14. Not 34
> OE:34
Low incidence of this one. Suprising, really, since there are so many
who doesn't use OE.
cheers,
/Johan
--
Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana. Perth ---> *
10:43am up 4 days, 16:22, 3 users, load average: 1.05, 1.31, 1.31
$ cat /dev/bollocks Registered Linux user #261729
cultivate scalable metrics
paul cooke
>
>>14. Not 34
>>OE:34
>
> Low incidence of this one. Suprising, really, since there are so many
> who doesn't use OE.
that's me running Knode 0.6.1.
I normally run Pan though. But was trying out Knode after upgrading from
mandrake 8.0 to 8.2.
Paul Cooke
Terry Porter@gronk.porter.net
and this is what they wrote:
> Terry Por...@gronk.porter.net (tjpo...@gronk.porter.net) had this to
> say: <slrnadm7os....@gronk.porter.net>
>
>> Don't ask me why all place numbers are not present!
>
> Can we tell you why?
Hahahah when has anyone needed permission to educate me !
Please tell me why ?
> I'm tempted to write my own stats scripts now, just for the fun of it.
> Hmmmm. ;-)
Go ahead, there aren't many good ones around, and may I suggest doing
it in C as Perl or Python type langs are easy but too slow for a big
spool.
Hard code it to do the last 7 days, and ask here for suggestions as to
the output required ?
Cat
Hash: SHA1
> Go ahead, there aren't many good ones around, and may I suggest doing
> it in C as Perl or Python type langs are easy but too slow for a big
> spool.
Really how big is the spool?
- --
Cat
Linux 2.4.9-31
7:22pm up 18 days, 23:39, 6 users, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.03
http://www.ratrobot.com/brainzilla/brainzilla.htm What's the absolute
limit of intelligence in this universe? And why should I turn of the
abflex2000 infomercials long enough to read about it?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8
iQA/AwUBPN40tih0Y2LcENUAEQKHXgCgkzhCDY9x6aMWldk3DnARp/yv4/MAmgLc
scFDb9ezxnbO8JREzA1pkTbz
=r2SO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Jim Richardson
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 12 May 2002 09:22:16 GMT,
Cat <MyRealEmailAddressIs@OnMyWebSite_ratrobot.com> wrote:
>
>> Go ahead, there aren't many good ones around, and may I suggest doing
>> it in C as Perl or Python type langs are easy but too slow for a big
>> spool.
> Really how big is the spool?
> - --
> Cat
>
> Linux 2.4.9-31
> 7:22pm up 18 days, 23:39, 6 users, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.03
>
>
> http://www.ratrobot.com/brainzilla/brainzilla.htm What's the absolute
> limit of intelligence in this universe? And why should I turn of the
> abflex2000 infomercials long enough to read about it?
In my case, /var/spool/news/comp/os/linux/advocacy is 396MB and has some
83519 articles.
Now if I can just get off my duff and make the postgresql db for
that....
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE83s/id90bcYOAWPYRAiAmAKCw7nOKIxQTwDwyWLwxyPmn/dAz1ACeKdS6
3UrG2KTb9fyEBUftor4Qiro=
=zDna
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Jim Richardson
Anarchist, pagan and proud of it
http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
Linux, from watches to supercomputers, for grandmas and geeks.
Terry Porter@gronk.porter.net
and this is what they wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>> Go ahead, there aren't many good ones around, and may I suggest doing
>> it in C as Perl or Python type langs are easy but too slow for a big
>> spool.
> Really how big is the spool?
I've got a couple, the biggest is 380 megabytes across 70,000 files.
I know thats not much in the real world on a powerful multi processor
machine running a database, however on my Ext3 partition and 233mhz
Cyrix 686 it takes 5 minutes to scan with my Python program "Colatroll"
and 10 minutes with Superstat which is written in C++.
Superstat gathers all kind of statistics which is why it takes longer.
Terry Porter@gronk.porter.net
and this is what they wrote:
> On Sun, 12 May 2002 09:22:16 GMT,
> Cat <MyRealEmailAddressIs@OnMyWebSite_ratrobot.com> wrote:
> Really how big is the spool?
>> In my case, /var/spool/news/comp/os/linux/advocacy is 396MB and has some
>> 83519 articles.
>>
>> Now if I can just get off my duff and make the postgresql db for
>> that....
Or me, but I'm too busy at the moment!
Cat
Hash: SHA1
> I've got a couple, the biggest is 380 megabytes across 70,000 files.
>
> I know thats not much in the real world on a powerful multi processor
> machine running a database, however on my Ext3 partition and 233mhz
> Cyrix 686 it takes 5 minutes to scan with my Python program "Colatroll"
> and 10 minutes with Superstat which is written in C++.
>
> Superstat gathers all kind of statistics which is why it takes longer.
It's sort of interest bc I have project gathering dust for a web server log
analysis program written in Java. Seemed to have similar performance to what
you are talking about admittedly on my old PIII 450mhz. Of course when
you do all of the processing in the middle of the night it's not a big factor.
- --
Cat
Linux 2.4.9-31
2:17pm up 19 days, 18:34, 6 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
http://www.ratrobot.com/charity/charityframeset.htm What is charity?
Is it charitable to give people a blanket but not a job? In this
article I will explore exactly what charity is.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8
iQA/AwUBPN9AHSh0Y2LcENUAEQLHGwCg93Fmtp93JFgjnUvE57fR3hunqlIAn0Fx
jHHWEcL2IYyJZb89AfZkCacE
=xqAg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Terry Porter@gronk.porter.net
and this is what they wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>> I've got a couple, the biggest is 380 megabytes across 70,000 files.
>>
>> I know thats not much in the real world on a powerful multi processor
>> machine running a database, however on my Ext3 partition and 233mhz
>> Cyrix 686 it takes 5 minutes to scan with my Python program "Colatroll"
>> and 10 minutes with Superstat which is written in C++.
>>
>> Superstat gathers all kind of statistics which is why it takes longer.
> It's sort of interest bc I have project gathering dust for a web server log
> analysis program written in Java. Seemed to have similar performance to what
> you are talking about admittedly on my old PIII 450mhz. Of course when
> you do all of the processing in the middle of the night it's not a big factor.
I'd agree with you on the statistics, but Colatrolls output is just too
interesting to wait all night for :)
Here is a sample:-
Searching_for: -- drsquare --
Newsreader search criteria 1: X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548
Org search criteria 1: X-Trace: paris.btinternet.com
....Found 67370 files
Sat, 15 Dec 2001 11:48:12 +0000 (UTC)
host213-122-195-88.btinternet.com drsquare <now...@nowhere.co.uk>
Thu, 14 Mar 2002 20:50:42 +0000 (UTC)
host213-122-194-166.in-addr.btopenworld.com <flatf...@mariana.trench>
Tue, 19 Mar 2002 20:43:06 +0000 (UTC)
host213-122-200-237.in-addr.btopenworld.com Dr Scab <sca...@herpes.co.uk>
Tue, 19 Mar 2002 20:42:53 +0000 (UTC)
host213-122-200-237.in-addr.btopenworld.com Qe Fpno <fpn...@urecrf.pb.hx>
Wed, 20 Mar 2002 22:24:07 +0000 (UTC)
host213-122-194-165.in-addr.btopenworld.com <Nob...@In.Particular>
Wed, 20 Mar 2002 22:20:53 +0000 (UTC)
host213-122-194-165.in-addr.btopenworld.com
Flatfish+++ <flatf...@mariana.trench>
Cat
Hash: SHA1
> I'd agree with you on the statistics, but Colatrolls output is just too
> interesting to wait all night for :)
It really isn't that bad. My current project is to do my web site in xml using
a java program. It's mostly finished and doing 73 xslt transforms (one per
page) on a 3500 line xml file takes 25-30 seconds on a PIII 450mhz. Not
blistering pace but then I haven't done the same in C++/C.
- --
Cat
Linux 2.4.9-31
8:43am up 20 days, 13:00, 7 users, load average: 0.23, 0.11, 0.06
http://www.ratrobot.com/tiger/tigerframeset.htm TradeMark Tiger is an economic
argument for conservation. Why not use nature to save itself?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8
iQA/AwUBPOBDtih0Y2LcENUAEQJsYgCg2aMvAG0W3XDVupnq8JerxdGk2FAAoLcs
f7n1vBJe1d/Q6SGMYUriT+cY
=ZopQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----