Re: snopes reaching new lows
Kadaitcha Man
> richard wrote:
>> Snopes.com seems to think that one page of advertising isn't enough.
>> When ever you go there, you maybe get one, somestime two other pages of
>> advertising to load.
>>
>> What's even worse is, some sites I've been to lately insist on adding
>> on ads on top of their site you can't click close no how no way. When
>> you click on them, you get another page you want nothing to do with.
>
> I just went to snopes and viewed several pages, not one of which was an
> advertisement. Do you know how to check your computer for
> spyware/trojans/viruses?
I just went to snopes and got several blocked popup warnings from
Firefox, plus I saw several unblocked ads for "shocking photos" of flabby
women. I use linux. Do you know how to check your skull for a brain?
Kadaitcha Man
> It isn't me having trouble configuring a browser. It was totally clean
> for me at snopes.
It's you who doesn't have the brains required to divorce the idea that
you may have configured your browser from the idea that 'therefore
everyone else who gets ads must have spyware, trojans or viruses.'
I'd ask you how feels to be looking so stupid right now, but truthfully,
I doubt you even have the brains to realise that you do indeed look
really stupid.
Kadaitcha Man
> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
> You're a tiresome little twit.
Perhaps I am, but then, unlike you, I am right.
Kadaitcha Man
> richard wrote:
>
>> Must have been something from a history cached file. Cleaned out the
>> temp files, tried it again and this time no other pages showed up.
>
> Now go help KTwit clean up his cache.
You seem rather bitchy today, Woger. Did your sweat-stinking, grossly
obese partner tell you you'd stuck your pencil-dick into the wrong flab
fold last night?
So tell me, how will clearing my cache/temp files fix anything in my
Linux browser, setting aside that RtS is using VVindows, considering I
have never been to that site before? Hmmm?
It must really fucking suck to be you, hey.
Kadaitcha Man
> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:18:51 -0500, Rôgêr wrote:
>>
>>> richard wrote:
>>>
>>>> Must have been something from a history cached file. Cleaned out the
>>>> temp files, tried it again and this time no other pages showed up.
>
>>> Now go help KTwit clean up his cache.
>
>> So tell me, how will clearing my cache/temp files fix anything in my
>> Linux browser, setting aside that RtS is using VVindows, considering I
>> have never been to that site before? Hmmm?
>
> You seem to need help and I figure who better than RtS to be the one to
> lend you guidance on Linux? You two are peas in a pod.
Woger, you can equate me with RtS until the cows come home, but you
cannot duck, dodge, weave or evade the fact that you equated your own
lack of being pestered by ads, due perhaps to an all-encompassing ad-
block, with the idea that those who see ads must necessarily have
spyware, trojans or viruses.
PS: Your lack of denial in sticking your pencil dick into the wrong flab
fold on your morbidly obese partner's greasy, sweaty carcass is noted.
PPS: Your lack of denial that it must suck to be you is also noted.
Say, Woger! Whilst I have your minuscule attention span by the short and
curlies, your assumed all-encompassing ad-block is rather selfish, and
certainly it is an expression of ungratefulness in the extreme. There are
many, many informative websites out there that offer free advice on any
number of subjects, and the only thing that keeps them going is the
revenue generated by the clicks of the grateful, thankful masses.
It can only be said that when you visit a site in order to obtain
information you did not previously have that once you get the information
you ungratefully leave. Whereas those who are grateful for being made
privy to otherwise esoteric information will click on an ad to show their
appreciation.
There is a word for selfish scumbag cunts like you, Woger. However it is
stinking fucking hot here tonight and I've sweated out no less than 15
cans of Tooheys Red Bitter and since I'm about to crack open another one,
the best I can offer is a summary of the meaning of that one word:
Conceited, egoistical, narcissistic, pompous, self-absorbed, self-
centred, self-indulgent, self-interested, stuck-up, puffed up, arrogant,
presumptuous, uncharitable, unkind, unthinking, cheap, contemptible,
miserly, narrow-minded, parsimonious, stingy, ungenerous, inappreciative,
thoughtless, ungrateful, unthankful, inconsiderate, apathetic,
egocentric, insensitive, rude, tactless, uncaring, ungracious, grasping
and insensible.
Bugger, hey. After all that I remember the word.
Lifshine.
Aratzio
alt.usenet.kooks, Kadaitcha Man <an...@no.spam> got double secret
probation for writing:
are not!