Microsoft Sucks and AOL is just as bad...
COLA Quality Control Comittee
Longhorn is losing features by the day to make a 2006 release date.
First it was the TCPA, now it's the WinFS. So, what's next? Your
mamma's tit?
The Winfucktards here, DFS, Mike Cox, Simon Cooke, that transvestite
K-Man or K-Woman or whatever the hell it is, Lindy, Keyser, Relic, and
others. All of you are a bunch of morons. Why do you side with a money
grubbing company like Microsoft who is trying to fleece the public for
even more money? Why side with a company that gives much defective
software so we have the global internet events like "The Week of Worms"?
Hasn't MSBlaster, MyDoom, Netsky, Baegle, Nimda, SQLSlammer, Code Red,
and all the new works which are too numerous to keep up with taught you
idiots a lesson that if you use Microsoft you will have no security?
What a bunch of dimwits.
And for the AOL crowd, we're sending our trolls over to your group...Enjoy!
Linux Rox!
--
The COLA Quality Control Committee
Shice Beoney
An AOL related crosspoast in A.A-S? I guess that's a bit like the people who
try to get interviews with Marshall McLuhan, not realizing he's been dead
since the 80s.
--
"Piety, most wondrous mask of the drive for life! ... A flight from truth in
order to be able to worship it from afar, shrouded in clouds! ... A
disinclination to solve puzzles because we are not gods! ... Living joyfully
in scorn of life!" -Friedrich Nietzsche, The Dionysiac World View
Peter Bilt
> Idiocy deleted
Moron,
Peter Bilt
Windows XP Pro SP2
GreyCloud
Peter Bilt wrote:
>>COLA Idiot wrote:
>>Idiocy deleted
>
>
>
> Moron,
>
That's rich coming from a wintroll.
--
---------------------------------
The Golden Years Sux.
Peter Hayes
> Longhorn is losing features by the day to make a 2006 release date.
> First it was the TCPA, now it's the WinFS. So, what's next?
Microsoft are desperate to meet a 2005/6 release date because it'll be
integrated with the release of Palladium aka "Fritz Chip" machines.
Everything else is subservient to this goal, even much touted features
like WinFS.
<...>
> Hasn't MSBlaster, MyDoom, Netsky, Baegle, Nimda, SQLSlammer, Code Red,
> and all the new works which are too numerous to keep up with taught you
> idiots a lesson that if you use Microsoft you will have no security?
Microsoft hope that Palladium will see an end to these exploits. Don't
hold your breath.
--
Peter
Peter Köhlmann
>
>
> Peter Bilt wrote:
>>>COLA Idiot wrote:
>>>Idiocy deleted
>>
>>
>>
>> Moron,
>>
>
> That's rich coming from a wintroll.
>
It is even richer coming from Kerke, the cola_masturbator.
There is nothing dumber than he is. Even a loaf of bread is smarter
--
To start your shiny new Pentium IV in Gameboy mode just enter
C:\win
Tom Shelton
TCPA (formally Palladium) was one of the features that has been droped
from Longhorn... That was like a month or two ago.
--
Tom Shelton
Peter Hayes
I missed that announcement, thanks...
--
Peter
mocat
Excellent news.
S.Heenan
Why would that be "excellent news" ?
Peter Köhlmann
> mocat wrote:
< snip >
>>> TCPA (formally Palladium) was one of the features that has been
>>> droped
>>> from Longhorn... That was like a month or two ago.
>>
>> Excellent news.
>
>
> Why would that be "excellent news" ?
Because TCPA sucks. Big time
--
Windows was created to keep stupid people away from UNIX."
-- Tom Christiansen
chrisv
>TCPA (formally Palladium) was one of the features that has been droped
>from Longhorn... That was like a month or two ago.
Awesome. Do you have a handy link documenting this?
S.Heenan
S.Heenan wrote:
> mocat wrote:
< snip >
>>> TCPA (formally Palladium) was one of the features that has been
>>> droped
>>> from Longhorn... That was like a month or two ago.
>>
>> Excellent news.
>
>
>> Why would that be "excellent news" ?
>Because TCPA sucks. Big time
I'm not sure it does or does not. It's important to see the distinction
between the aims of the TCG (https://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/home),
Microsoft's Next-Generation Secure Computing Base (NGSCB) and forms of
Digital Rights Management.
http://researchweb.watson.ibm.com/gsal/tcpa/tcpa_rebuttal.pdf
Peter Köhlmann
> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>
> S.Heenan wrote:
>
>> mocat wrote:
>
> < snip >
>
>>>> TCPA (formally Palladium) was one of the features that has been
>>>> droped
>>>> from Longhorn... That was like a month or two ago.
>>>
>>> Excellent news.
>>
>>
>>> Why would that be "excellent news" ?
>
>>Because TCPA sucks. Big time
>
>
> I'm not sure it does or does not. It's important to see the distinction
No, it is not important. Absolutely not. MS has indoctrinated you pathetic
dimwits.
> between the aims of the TCG (https://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/home),
> Microsoft's Next-Generation Secure Computing Base (NGSCB) and forms of
> Digital Rights Management.
>
You mean that part where people could be hindered to access files they
already paid for? Yeah, dream on, the world will not buy into this scam
>
> http://researchweb.watson.ibm.com/gsal/tcpa/tcpa_rebuttal.pdf
end
--
begin LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.TXT.VBS
I am an email virus. ILOVEYOU. Download me
Kindly check the nonattached LOVELETTER coming from me.
end
S.Heenan
S.Heenan wrote:
> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>
> S.Heenan wrote:
>
>> mocat wrote:
>
> < snip >
>
>>>> TCPA (formally Palladium) was one of the features that has been
>>>> droped
>>>> from Longhorn... That was like a month or two ago.
>>>
>>> Excellent news.
>>
>>
>>> Why would that be "excellent news" ?
>
>>Because TCPA sucks. Big time
>
>
> I'm not sure it does or does not. It's important to see the distinction
No, it is not important. Absolutely not. MS has indoctrinated you pathetic
dimwits.
>> between the aims of the TCG (https://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/home),
>>Microsoft's Next-Generation Secure Computing Base (NGSCB) and forms of
>> Digital Rights Management.
>>
>You mean that part where people could be hindered to access files they
>already paid for? Yeah, dream on, the world will not buy into this scam
Perhaps you can tell me what this is:
/*
* tpm.c
*
* Device driver for TCPA TPM (trusted platform module).
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
* as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
* 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
*
* Note, this chip is not interrupt driven (only polling) and can have
* very long timeouts (minutes!). Hence the unusual calls to
schedule_timeout.
*
* - Added official (misc) device number and removed multiple chip support
* - Added suspend/resume support
*/
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/version.h>
#include <linux/string.h>
#include <linux/ioport.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/sound.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/pci.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/poll.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/smp_lock.h>
#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
#include <linux/tpm.h>
#include <asm/io.h>
#include <asm/dma.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/hardirq.h>
/* #define TPM_DEBUG define this for verbose logging*/
#define ERROR_CHECKING
#define TPM_MINOR 224 /* officially assigned */
#define TPM_MODULE_NAME "tpm"
#define TPM_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT 10 /* in jiffies (about 100 ms) */
#define TPM_TIMEOUT ((2*60*HZ)/TPM_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT)
#define TCPA_ATMEL_BASE 0x400
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH2LPC 0x2440
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH3LPCM 0x248C
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH4LPC 0x24C0
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH4LPCM 0x24CC
/* PCI configuration addresses */
#define PCI_GEN_PMCON_1 0xA0
#define PCI_GEN1_DEC 0xE4
#define PCI_LPC_EN 0xE6
#define PCI_GEN2_DEC 0xEC
/* TPM addresses */
#define TPM_ADDR 0x4E
#define TPM_DATA 0x4F
/* write status bits */
#define STATUS_BIT_ABORT 0x01
#define STATUS_BIT_LASTBYTE 0x04
/* read status bits */
#define STATUS_BIT_BUSY 0x01
#define STATUS_BIT_DATA_AVAIL 0x02
#define STATUS_BIT_REWRITE 0x04
enum {
ICH2LPC = 0,
ICH3LPCM,
ICH4LPC,
ICH4LPCM
MODULE_AUTHOR("Leendert van Doorn (leen...@watson.ibm.com)");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("TPM Driver");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
Did you say "indoctrinated" ?
Tom Shelton
It looks like there are conflicting stories on this... Here is a link
that encapsulates both:
http://www.cdfreaks.com/news2.php?ID=9660
Look at the update at the bottom. Apparently, MS hasn't totally dropped
Palladium. They are just not going to fully implment it until sometime
after longhorn ships. Longhorn may indeed have some bare bones support
for it.
--
Tom Shelton
GreyCloud
S.Heenan wrote:
I just found a M$ subsidiary site for SP2 upgrades and other products.
GreyCloud
S.Heenan wrote:
> GreyCloud wrote:
>
>>I just found a M$ subsidiary site for SP2 upgrades and other products.
>>
>>http://www.crap2idiots.com
>
>
>
> Scatological lame noted.
>
> Feel free to "guffaw" at any time.
>
I noticed that you like it. Read Thursday Dilbert cartoon strip. I
find it very funny.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA!!!!!
S.Heenan
> S.Heenan wrote:
>
>> GreyCloud wrote:
>>
>>> I just found a M$ subsidiary site for SP2 upgrades and other
>>> products. http://www.crap2idiots.com
>>
>>
>>
>> Scatological lame noted.
>>
>> Feel free to "guffaw" at any time.
>>
>
> I noticed that you like it. Read Thursday Dilbert cartoon strip. I
> find it very funny.
>
> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA!!!!!
That is pretty funny.
Far more amusing is seeing Mac and OS/2 proponents posting to COLA.
S.Heenan
How strange...
22 hours and no reply from pIk.
Packet loss perhaps ? Yeah, that's it, that's the ticket !
This has to be a first.
COLA Quality Control Comittee
Peter Bilt's idiocy has been retained for all to see.
I don't know which is more idiotic, the fact that you proclaim that you
use WinXP, or the fact that you proudly proclaim it.
Which reminds me...
What happens to truckers when they get old? They don't die, they just
get a new Peter Bilt.
GreyCloud
S.Heenan wrote:
And very comical to watch a wintroll flounder around in COLA.
mocat
Do you actually know what TCPA *is*?
S.Heenan
Peter Köhlmann
< snip repeat post of module >
Well, do you actually know what TCPA *is*?
Apart from repeatedly posting a non-relevant module listing?
--
Microsoft's Guide To System Design:
Let it get in YOUR way. The problem for your problem.
S.Heenan
:-) HTH
mocat
Admission of ignorance noted.
S.Heenan
Now, who do we know who was working at Transmeta at the time ?
Don't all answer at once.
S.Heenan
S.Heenan
Kindly point out where I'm ignorant.
mocat
It's in front of you.
Peter and I ask if you know what TCPA is. You reply with:
":-) HTH"
GreyCloud
S.Heenan wrote:
You were smiling like the cat that got caught with a few canary feathers
in it mouth.
S.Heenan
> Peter and I ask if you know what TCPA is. You reply with:
>
> ":-) HTH"
Mea culpa, as charged.
Read the entire thread, including the part where he calls a GPL'd device
driver for TCPA, "a non-relevant module listing."
Peter loves to be dismissive. In fact, he's an expert in this regard.
TCPA is the Trusted Computing Platform Alliance, which was replaced by the
Trusted Computing Group, in April of 2003.
Next question ?
Peter Köhlmann
Well, you seem to be able to parrot the official party prawda
Now tell us, do you know what TCPA *is* ??
--
Warning: 10 days have passed since your last Windows reinstall.
S.Heenan
S.Heenan wrote:
> mocat wrote:
>> Peter and I ask if you know what TCPA is. You reply with:
>>
>> ":-) HTH"
>
>
> Mea culpa, as charged.
>
> Read the entire thread, including the part where he calls a GPL'd device
> driver for TCPA, "a non-relevant module listing."
>
> Peter loves to be dismissive. In fact, he's an expert in this regard.
>
> TCPA is the Trusted Computing Platform Alliance, which was replaced by the
> Trusted Computing Group, in April of 2003.
>
> Next question ?
Well, you seem to be able to parrot the official party prawda
Now tell us, do you know what TCPA *is* ??
Asked and answered, five lines above.
Perhaps if you would rephrase the question to ask, "What does the TCPA do?",
I might have a better answer.
Peter Köhlmann
> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>
> S.Heenan wrote:
>> mocat wrote:
>>> Peter and I ask if you know what TCPA is. You reply with:
>>>
>>> ":-) HTH"
>>
>>
>> Mea culpa, as charged.
>>
>> Read the entire thread, including the part where he calls a GPL'd device
>> driver for TCPA, "a non-relevant module listing."
>>
>> Peter loves to be dismissive. In fact, he's an expert in this regard.
>>
>> TCPA is the Trusted Computing Platform Alliance, which was replaced by
>> the Trusted Computing Group, in April of 2003.
>>
>> Next question ?
>
> Well, you seem to be able to parrot the official party prawda
>
> Now tell us, do you know what TCPA *is* ??
>
>
>
> Asked and answered, five lines above.
>
Nope. That was parroting the official MS prawda
> Perhaps if you would rephrase the question to ask, "What does the TCPA
> do?", I might have a better answer.
Nope. You answered with what the TCPA is supposed to be.
Now tell us the real thing behind it
--
Who the fuck is General Failure, and why is he reading my harddisk?
S.Heenan
From: https://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/about/
"The Trusted Computing Group (TCG) is a not-for-profit organization formed
to develop, define, and promote open standards for hardware-enabled trusted
computing and security technologies, including hardware building blocks and
software interfaces, across multiple platforms, peripherals, and devices.
TCG specifications will enable more secure computing environments without
compromising functional integrity, privacy, or individual rights. The
primary goal is to help users protect their information assets (data,
passwords, keys, etc.) from compromise due to external software attack and
physical theft."
Peter Köhlmann
I see. You are mentally unable to do anything than parroting the official
party line prawda.
Not really surprising, since you are also a wintendo luser
You are even unable to post correctly quoted, thanks to your substandard MS
"software"
--
Microsoft software doesn't get released - it escapes, leaving
a trail of destruction behind it.
S.Heenan
Since I am, "unable to do anything than parroting the official party
line...", perhaps you'd like to share what the TCG *really* is, or what it
*really* does.
Peter Köhlmann
< snip >
>> I see. You are mentally unable to do anything than parroting the official
>> party line prawda.
>> Not really surprising, since you are also a wintendo luser
>>
>> You are even unable to post correctly quoted, thanks to your substandard
>> MS
>> "software"
>
> Since I am, "unable to do anything than parroting the official party
> line...", perhaps you'd like to share what the TCG *really* is, or what it
> *really* does.
No. It is you and other assorted ilk too dumb to spill a bucket of water who
constantly spout MS marketing bullshit. You tell us more about TCPA. After
all, it is MS idiocy at its best
Spare Change
I'm using OE 6 and all your posts come out as unreadable attachments.
"Peter Köhlmann" <Peter.K...@t-online.de> wrote in message
news:chdduo$asi$01$1...@news.t-online.com...
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.752 / Virus Database: 503 - Release Date: 9/3/2004
Peter Köhlmann
>
> I'm using OE 6 and all your posts come out as unreadable attachments.
>
I certainly hope so. Idiots like you (who use such incredible garbage like
OE) simply should not be allowed anywhere near a computer connected to the
internet. And since you are JBailo, you should not even be allowed to look
at computers
All others using *real* newsreaders (even on windows) have no problems at
all. But since you assholes pollute newsgroups with such garbage posts, I
see to it that you can't participate in a sensible manner. And I am sure
you have noticed a lot others in this group do likewise
And now get lost, OE using cretin
--
If you had any brains, you'd be dangerous.
Peter Köhlmann
> begin It was on Sat, 04 Sep 2004 22:39:25 +0000, that Spare Change wrote
> this:
>
>> I'm using OE 6 and all your posts come out as unreadable attachments.
>
> Tough. And drop the stupid non-conforming AVG sig. It doesn't mean
> anything on Usenet, unless you like advertising for them.
>
Not just that. It also means that he is legally liable in case his precious
AVG crap did *not* catch some virus and some poor idiot got infected
because of that. Just shows how incredibly stupid these wintendo lusers
really are
--
There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots.
S.Heenan
<Peter.K...@t-online.de> wrote:
> S.Heenan wrote:
>
> < snip >
>
>>> I see. You are mentally unable to do anything than parroting the
>>> official
>>> party line prawda.
>>> Not really surprising, since you are also a wintendo luser
>>>
>>> You are even unable to post correctly quoted, thanks to your
>>> substandard
>>> MS
>>> "software"
>>
>> Since I am, "unable to do anything than parroting the official party
>> line...", perhaps you'd like to share what the TCG *really* is, or what
>> it
>> *really* does.
>
> No. It is you and other assorted ilk too dumb to spill a bucket of water
> who
> constantly spout MS marketing bullshit. You tell us more about TCPA.
> After
> all, it is MS idiocy at its best
Yep, it's all Microsoft marketing. Very good Petey.
Now you know the big secret, you can pack up your marbles and stomp away.
HTH HAND :-)
Peter Köhlmann
In other words, you have nothing to contribute
--
Warning: You have moved the mouse.
Windows will reboot now to make the change permanent
Spare Change
What's weird is that I can read this post, but none other from you...
"Peter Köhlmann" <Peter.K...@t-online.de> wrote in message
news:chdgl5$2ug$02$1...@news.t-online.com...
Peter Köhlmann
>
> What's weird is that I can read this post, but none other from you...
>
That is because I made it readable for idiots also
This will stop now
Spare Change
self selecting....
"Peter Köhlmann" <Peter.K...@t-online.de> wrote in message
news:chdmi3$hji$01$5...@news.t-online.com...
Aquila Deus
> COLA Quality Control Comittee <COL...@linux.org> wrote:
>
> > Longhorn is losing features by the day to make a 2006 release date.
> > First it was the TCPA, now it's the WinFS. So, what's next?
>
> Microsoft are desperate to meet a 2005/6 release date because it'll be
> integrated with the release of Palladium aka "Fritz Chip" machines.
>
> Everything else is subservient to this goal, even much touted features
> like WinFS.
>
> <...>
>
> > Hasn't MSBlaster, MyDoom, Netsky, Baegle, Nimda, SQLSlammer, Code Red,
> > and all the new works which are too numerous to keep up with taught you
> > idiots a lesson that if you use Microsoft you will have no security?
>
> Microsoft hope that Palladium will see an end to these exploits.
And the end of user control over their own computers.
Peter Hayes
> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> S.Heenan wrote:
>
> > Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> >
> > S.Heenan wrote:
> >> mocat wrote:
> >>> Peter and I ask if you know what TCPA is. You reply with:
> >>>
> >>> ":-) HTH"
> >>
> >>
> >> Mea culpa, as charged.
> >>
> >> Read the entire thread, including the part where he calls a GPL'd device
> >> driver for TCPA, "a non-relevant module listing."
> >>
> >> Peter loves to be dismissive. In fact, he's an expert in this regard.
> >>
> >> TCPA is the Trusted Computing Platform Alliance, which was replaced by
> >> the Trusted Computing Group, in April of 2003.
> >>
> >> Next question ?
> >
> > Well, you seem to be able to parrot the official party prawda
> >
> > Now tell us, do you know what TCPA *is* ??
> >
> >
> >
> > Asked and answered, five lines above.
> >
>
> Nope. That was parroting the official MS prawda
>
> > Perhaps if you would rephrase the question to ask, "What does the TCPA
> > do?", I might have a better answer.
>
> Nope. You answered with what the TCPA is supposed to be.
> Now tell us the real thing behind it
This looks to me like you cut and pasted the previous post - the quoting
is missing one chevron all the way through. How come? Or is that another
'feature' of Outhouse Distress?
> From: https://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/about/
>
> "The Trusted Computing Group (TCG) is a not-for-profit organization formed
> to develop, define, and promote open standards for hardware-enabled trusted
> computing and security technologies, including hardware building blocks and
> software interfaces, across multiple platforms,
Is this across multiple <<Windows>> platforms, or can anyone join in?
> peripherals, and devices.
> TCG specifications will enable more secure computing environments without
> compromising functional integrity, privacy, or individual rights. The
> primary goal is to help users protect their information assets (data,
> passwords, keys, etc.) from compromise due to external software attack and
> physical theft."
Now, since TCPA has been ditched from Longhorn V1, will it appear for
free in an SP or in a paid-for Longhorn V2 sometime in 2008/9?
--
Peter
Peter Hayes
Yes, it's just another example of the cure being worse than the disease.
--
Peter
S.Heenan
Apple is as big on DRM as anyone else. Fairplay ring a bell ?
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.html&r=1&p=1&f=G&l=50&d=PG01&S1=20030126445&OS=20030126445&RS=20030126445
Peter Hayes
But Apple isn't a monopoly, Microsoft is.
And Microsoft's track record on honesty and fair dealing isn't exactly
brilliant. There's little reason to suppose that'll change any time
soon.
--
Peter
Liam Slider
> But Apple isn't a monopoly, Microsoft is.
Yes it is...it's as much of a monopoly on the PPC platform as Microsoft is
on the PC platform.
>
> And Microsoft's track record on honesty and fair dealing isn't exactly
> brilliant.
Apple's had a few problems with deceptive ads in the past. Although, to be
honest, Apple is no Microsoft.
Peter Hayes
> On Mon, 06 Sep 2004 23:42:53 +0100, Peter Hayes wrote:
>
> > But Apple isn't a monopoly, Microsoft is.
>
> Yes it is...it's as much of a monopoly on the PPC platform as Microsoft is
> on the PC platform.
In the same way that Ferrari have a monopoly on Testarossas.
In the context of this subthread Apple's monopoly is nowhere.
> > And Microsoft's track record on honesty and fair dealing isn't exactly
> > brilliant.
>
> Apple's had a few problems with deceptive ads in the past. Although, to be
> honest, Apple is no Microsoft.
Have Apple ever created something akin to the AARD code? They did shaft
their users over the NuBus fiasco, but that's nothing similar to the
scams Microsoft have and continue to perpetrate, allegedly.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/09/03/linspire_on_dell_windows_money/
--
Peter
Rick
> On Mon, 06 Sep 2004 23:42:53 +0100, Peter Hayes wrote:
>
>> But Apple isn't a monopoly, Microsoft is.
>
> Yes it is...it's as much of a monopoly on the PPC platform as Microsoft is
> on the PC platform.
Apple is no more a monopoly than Ford is.