Spamowitz strategy: "usual obfuscated set of meaningless self-referencing links"
DFS
Comment by Jack Schofield, 16-Apr-2011@01:16
He has Spamowitz's number.
flatfish+++
A *LOT* of people have Spamowitz's number.
As soon as he steps out into the real world, he gets his ass kicked
because real people, unlike the paranoid drones on his site, expect
verifiable facts to back up statements.
Something that Spamowitz seems to have a problem with.
He's the "National Enquirer" of Linux journalism.
--
flatfish+++
Please visit our hall of Linux idiots.
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
Watching Linux Fail:
http://limuxwatch.blogspot.com/
Desktop Linux: The Dream Is Dead
"By the time Microsoft released the Windows 7 beta
in January 2009, Linux had clearly lost its chance at desktop glory."
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/207999/desktop_linux_the_dream_is_dead.html
Hadron
Yup. I posted a few of Schofield's comments here since many of Roy's
minions, like Chris Ahlstrom for example, refuse to read evidence
proving Roy to be a slimy spammer that comes from outside of COLA
according to them!
flatfish+++
Jack and his followers, which greatly outnumber Roy's band of losers,
have Spamowitz figured out.
Of course Roy cries foul.
The truth is Roy *IS* foul.....
Hadron
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 11:02:29 +0200, Hadron wrote:
>
>> DFS <nos...@dfs.com> writes:
>>
>>> http://www.zdnet.co.uk/blogs/the-open-source-revolution-10014902/articles-of-roy-schestowitz-10022241/#comments
>>>
>>> Comment by Jack Schofield, 16-Apr-2011@01:16
>>>
>>> He has Spamowitz's number.
>>
>> Yup. I posted a few of Schofield's comments here since many of Roy's
>> minions, like Chris Ahlstrom for example, refuse to read evidence
>> proving Roy to be a slimy spammer that comes from outside of COLA
>> according to them!
>
> Jack and his followers, which greatly outnumber Roy's band of losers,
> have Spamowitz figured out.
>
> Of course Roy cries foul.
>
> The truth is Roy *IS* foul.....
If Roy decides to try and steam roller Schofield he has another thing
coming.
Schofield is an industry veteran noted for his independent outlook and
reporting style and is respected by industry luminaries.
Roy is a loony fringe OSS zealot who has contributed sweet FA to the
cause he claims to represent and is supported by a bunch of nym shifting
idiots with Tolkien monikers who know jack about commercial/industry
computing.
Also, as someone recently pointed out, Roy's sites ran/run MS adverts,
most probably to turn a penny.
The one effort to "contribute" something was some silly earch engine
called urine or something. It never progressed Roy's attempt to get the
bearded masses to do the work for him.