<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>comp.object Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.object</link>
  <description>Object-oriented programming and languages.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Rejection</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.object/browse_thread/thread/265269405ff1325d/92c8cb59dbfb4c0e?show_docid=92c8cb59dbfb4c0e</link>
  <description>
  I&#39;m going to invent an awesome new software library. Would you like to use it, &lt;br&gt; for some amazing outputs? &lt;br&gt; Oh, except it uses EBCIDIC, not ASCII, for its source and inputs. You must &lt;br&gt; adjust all your tools to use it. &lt;br&gt; Would you like to use it now?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.object/browse_thread/thread/265269405ff1325d/92c8cb59dbfb4c0e?show_docid=92c8cb59dbfb4c0e</guid>
  <author>
  phlip2...@gmail.com
  (Phlip)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 15:51:21 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Rejection (was: comparing two software implementations)</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.object/browse_thread/thread/265269405ff1325d/dff719fbe145308e?show_docid=dff719fbe145308e</link>
  <description>
  I try not to reject anything for one reason or another. The only thing &lt;br&gt; that would get me to reject a solution is finding a better one. &lt;br&gt; The question I hear all the time: &amp;quot;Is it possible to do x&amp;quot;. The answer &lt;br&gt; is always &amp;quot;yes&amp;quot;, sometimes it is &amp;quot;yes, but it would be ugly and take too &lt;br&gt; long&amp;quot;. Working in a system without unit test tend to fall under the
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.object/browse_thread/thread/265269405ff1325d/dff719fbe145308e?show_docid=dff719fbe145308e</guid>
  <author>
  newsgroup.spamfil...@virtualinfinity.net
  (Daniel Pitts)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:12:03 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: downcasting and model view presenter</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.object/browse_thread/thread/646f36817fa274d9/94b28a8ccc250631?show_docid=94b28a8ccc250631</link>
  <description>
  Out of the two choices, I prefer the latter. If you make a new sub- &lt;br&gt; class of Geometry, you will have to change your createView function &lt;br&gt; (or make another one and have each work on a proper sub-set of &lt;br&gt; geometry objects.) This means that the createView(String type, &lt;br&gt; Geometry model) function is lying when it implies that it can work
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.object/browse_thread/thread/646f36817fa274d9/94b28a8ccc250631?show_docid=94b28a8ccc250631</guid>
  <author>
  danie...@earthlink.net
  (Daniel T.)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:54:51 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: downcasting and model view presenter</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.object/browse_thread/thread/646f36817fa274d9/db0f671bf270042e?show_docid=db0f671bf270042e</link>
  <description>
  If you know the subtype you want to create and you know the &lt;br&gt; subtype of the object that is returned by the Factory, why are you &lt;br&gt; using a Factory at all? Why not just construct an instance of Circle, &lt;br&gt; Box, or Triangle? &lt;br&gt; Alternatively, have the Factory return the appropriate Presenter &lt;br&gt; so that the code that invokes the Factory doesn&#39;t need to know about
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.object/browse_thread/thread/646f36817fa274d9/db0f671bf270042e?show_docid=db0f671bf270042e</guid>
  <author>
  p...@spe.com
  (Patrick May)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:50:53 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: downcasting and model view presenter</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.object/browse_thread/thread/646f36817fa274d9/77247f16dc3510e8?show_docid=77247f16dc3510e8</link>
  <description>
  So you have : &lt;br&gt; Box ISA Geometry ; &lt;br&gt; Circle ISA Geometry ; &lt;br&gt; // etc &lt;br&gt; View createView(Box) ; &lt;br&gt; View createView(Circle) ; &lt;br&gt; // etc &lt;br&gt; and you want to do the following : &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;SomeType&amp;gt; model ; &lt;br&gt; View v = createView(model) ; &lt;br&gt; There are programming languages that, given #3 will select &lt;br&gt; the correct operation in #2 to execute (the process is called
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.object/browse_thread/thread/646f36817fa274d9/77247f16dc3510e8?show_docid=77247f16dc3510e8</guid>
  <author>
  q...@q.net
  (S Perryman)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:36:32 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: downcasting and model view presenter</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.object/browse_thread/thread/646f36817fa274d9/7538eb7b31bb026f?show_docid=7538eb7b31bb026f</link>
  <description>
  Hi Daniel, &lt;br&gt; Let&#39;s say I have a bunch of model classes e.g. &amp;quot;Circle&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Box&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Triangle. &lt;br&gt; All classes are sub classes of bases class &amp;quot;Geometry&amp;quot; To edit certain &lt;br&gt; properties I have a properties view for each type. The specific view is &lt;br&gt; created by a factory that is passed a string to determine the type. Together
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.object/browse_thread/thread/646f36817fa274d9/7538eb7b31bb026f?show_docid=7538eb7b31bb026f</guid>
  <author>
  j.linxwei...@gmx.de
  (Jannis Linxweiler)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:04:07 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: downcasting and model view presenter</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.object/browse_thread/thread/646f36817fa274d9/c5b8ee303eef8fcb?show_docid=c5b8ee303eef8fcb</link>
  <description>
  Not to me: Does Java still lack covariant return types?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.object/browse_thread/thread/646f36817fa274d9/c5b8ee303eef8fcb?show_docid=c5b8ee303eef8fcb</guid>
  <author>
  phlip2...@gmail.com
  (Phlip)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:54:05 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: downcasting and model view presenter</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.object/browse_thread/thread/646f36817fa274d9/b26042e703cfdd1c?show_docid=b26042e703cfdd1c</link>
  <description>
  Let me make sure I have this straight. You are passing in a string to &lt;br&gt; tell the factory what kind of sub-class to create, then you are having &lt;br&gt; to down-cast the object returned to the sub-class you know it is? &lt;br&gt; If that is the essence of what you are saying, then the problem with it &lt;br&gt; should be obvious.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.object/browse_thread/thread/646f36817fa274d9/b26042e703cfdd1c?show_docid=b26042e703cfdd1c</guid>
  <author>
  danie...@earthlink.net
  (Daniel T.)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:40:21 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>free online movies for you id go to this website</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.object/browse_thread/thread/049995276ff61420/157f1e3ed9359890?show_docid=157f1e3ed9359890</link>
  <description>
  &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.healthnews5.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.object/browse_thread/thread/049995276ff61420/157f1e3ed9359890?show_docid=157f1e3ed9359890</guid>
  <author>
  mother.b...@gmail.com
  (bala)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:16:08 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>downcasting and model view presenter</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.object/browse_thread/thread/646f36817fa274d9/979df5e0b7ee759a?show_docid=979df5e0b7ee759a</link>
  <description>
  hi ng, &lt;br&gt; i&#39;ve got a general question concerning downcasts e.g. in context of the mvp &lt;br&gt; pattern. &lt;br&gt; i&#39;d like to refer to the northwind starter kit example on codeplex.com: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.codeplex.com/NSK&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; in this example a navigation service is used to navigate between different &lt;br&gt; view. as i understand the navigation service works like a factory that loads
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.object/browse_thread/thread/646f36817fa274d9/979df5e0b7ee759a?show_docid=979df5e0b7ee759a</guid>
  <author>
  j.linxwei...@gmx.de
  (Jannis Linxweiler)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:53:44 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: comparing two software implementations</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.object/browse_thread/thread/265269405ff1325d/670c12f8af50c6f7?show_docid=670c12f8af50c6f7</link>
  <description>
  Said solutions are not complete without their unit tests. &lt;br&gt; I routinely reject systems - even up-and-coming ones with a lot of promise - &lt;br&gt; because they were not created under test, and they are impossible to test-first.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.object/browse_thread/thread/265269405ff1325d/670c12f8af50c6f7?show_docid=670c12f8af50c6f7</guid>
  <author>
  phlip2...@gmail.com
  (Phlip)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:56:29 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>RKS Fax - Fax Software for Windows</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.object/browse_thread/thread/da493c03733c9e61/8fb9673971421161?show_docid=8fb9673971421161</link>
  <description>
  RKS Fax - Fax Software for Windows &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://freesoftware20.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.object/browse_thread/thread/da493c03733c9e61/8fb9673971421161?show_docid=8fb9673971421161</guid>
  <author>
  hpeee...@gmail.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:10:51 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: comparing two software implementations</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.object/browse_thread/thread/265269405ff1325d/b7558bd149cced16?show_docid=b7558bd149cced16</link>
  <description>
  I would use man-hours. Not just the man-hours it takes to create each &lt;br&gt; solution, but the man-hours it takes to modify them.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.object/browse_thread/thread/265269405ff1325d/b7558bd149cced16?show_docid=b7558bd149cced16</guid>
  <author>
  danie...@earthlink.net
  (Daniel T.)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:27:10 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>comparing two software implementations</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.object/browse_thread/thread/265269405ff1325d/e1b1dac4e4b9efd6?show_docid=e1b1dac4e4b9efd6</link>
  <description>
  how would you compare two software implementations, where one is based &lt;br&gt; on proper domain objects and abstractions, and another one hides &lt;br&gt; complexity by just providing a way to generate code that you have to &lt;br&gt; repeat through some kind of configuration files, etc. &lt;br&gt; many thanks in advance.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.object/browse_thread/thread/265269405ff1325d/e1b1dac4e4b9efd6?show_docid=e1b1dac4e4b9efd6</guid>
  <author>
  vijayakumar.subbu...@gmail.com
  (v4vijayakumar)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:19:39 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>china whole sale versace prada d&amp;g chanel louis vuitton sandals,handbags</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.object/browse_thread/thread/364c336a24a0ee22/82c227834a21b5d0?show_docid=82c227834a21b5d0</link>
  <description>
  Discount Prada Handbags, Chanel Handbags, LV Handbags, (G U C C &lt;br&gt; I)Handbags, D&amp;amp;G Handbags, Chloe Handbags, Hermes Handbags, Guess &lt;br&gt; Handbags, Jimmy Choo Handbags, Bcbg Handbags. &lt;br&gt; Supply Dior Wallet, Fendi Wallet, Coach Purse, Juicy Purse, Miumiu &lt;br&gt; Purse &lt;br&gt; Discount Pro Bowl NFL jersey, NBA Jersey, NHL jersey, MLB jersey
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.object/browse_thread/thread/364c336a24a0ee22/82c227834a21b5d0?show_docid=82c227834a21b5d0</guid>
  <author>
  cnshoe...@yahoo.com.cn
  (www.urbanhotsale.net)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 02:04:18 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
