Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion What is Corba used for?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Ke Jin  
View profile  
 More options May 19 2005, 2:14 pm
Newsgroups: comp.object.corba
From: "Ke Jin" <ke...@borland.com>
Date: 19 May 2005 11:14:55 -0700
Local: Thurs, May 19 2005 2:14 pm
Subject: Re: What is Corba used for?
CORBA, or some other distributed OO middlewares in general, are
designed to fill up the semantic gap between high level distributed OO
architecture design and low level transport. Here, distributed OO
design means, your architecture design partitioned an application into
business objects, located at different locations. As a good practice,
architecture designs are usually business oriented, and avoid specific
physical location, communication, platform, programming language,
details. In this case, either you implement your own middle abstract
layer to fill up this high level abstraction to low level transport,
or, you use a third party middleware, like CORBA.

If your application itself is already system or transport oriented,
such as your purpose is simply sending an email or sending some data
through a socket, you certainly don't need such a middle abstraction
layer, or any CORBA like middleware at all.

See other inline comments.

Ke

Arafangion wrote:
> Hello, I have reciently discovered this whole COM/DCOM/COM+/CORBA/UNO
> and the like, and am very confused.

> I feel like I'm jumping from an imperative coding style, to
functional,
> or from C to C++, in that I wonder why we use this.

> I have searched for ages on www.omg.org, but I could not find
anything
> like a Design Rationale for the effort.

> Why do we do all this work with stubs, why has so much work been done
> with implementing the various CORBA implementations?
> Why is the (Correct me if I'm wrong), network archietecture not
routable?

This is irrelevant. CORBA is not for network routing.

> Why don't we just use shared libs or dll's to share functions?

This is irrelevant either. CORBA is not for sharing functions.

> Finally, I might add that while you may be able to answer most of
these
> questions now, what I am asking for is why was this developed in the
> _first_place_? (Surely there was some document specifying a need, and
a
> solution, ie, the Design Rationale).

> I have poked around the omg.org website, but it seems to have a heck
> alot of technical implementation issues, and I can't find the wood
for
> the trees.

>    Thankyou.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.