The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: comp.object.corba
From: schm...@ace.cs.wustl.edu (Douglas C. Schmidt)
Date: 28 May 2005 09:57:10 -0500
Local: Sat, May 28 2005 10:57 am
Subject: Re: What is Corba used for?
Hi,
>> I agree that system portability is not an issue addressed by CORBA. There have been various efforts in the OMG to standardize this layer >> But it may address that as well? right..?After all, if we are looking >> for truly distributed software systems, we should have mechanism to >> develop such system as welll uniformly? >> So my version is it should not take much for OMG to extend its of abstraction. OCI recently presented a proposal for using portions of ACE to accomplish this. It's not very technically hard to do this - the trick is to get the other ORB vendors to agree. Until they do, of course, you can simply use ACE as a portability layer within your client and servant implementations (it should work with any C++ ORB) and get the same effect. >> My view is mapping may not be standardaized suppose. but the names of I agree that it would be a good idea to standard this sort of stuff. >> stubs/skeleton files can be standardized so that we dont have to change >> the name everytime we change ORB at least? And anyway it doesnt affects >> any other behaviour right? Just a name change. While we're waiting for that to happen, you can already accomplish your objectives by using the CORBA-conf tool at Take care, Doug -- You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||