Rush talking about the iPad2 today
Flint
shop, I heard him going on about how pleased he was with his iPad2.
He mentioned the iPad2's 2X performance, and how some $9 iPad game
outperforms its $60 X-Box version, and its 10+ hour battery life.
--
MFB
Gerry
Flint <age...@section31.org> wrote:
God, did hell freeze over and no one told me!
Snit
everyday-EDA1C0...@reserved-multicast-range-not-delegated.exampl
e.com on 3/14/11 2:07 PM:
Rush generally speaks well of Apple products. Even so, I still think they
are good. Even when he makes a claim I agree with, however, his support is
generally completely irrational.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Jolly Roger
> Listening to Rush Limbaugh on the radio
Why on Earth would you do that?
--
Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me.
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM
filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting
messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google
Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts.
JR
George Kerby
On 3/14/11 3:11 PM, in article C9A3C481.91E27%use...@gallopinginsanity.com,
"Snit" <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
He does it to piss off the Libs. Most liberals are Apple users.
<So are smart Conservatives>
Gerry
George Kerby <ghost_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
May I say an excellent example of an oxymoron!
Snit
3/14/11 2:31 PM:
LOL!
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Snit
everyday-5FCE46...@reserved-multicast-range-not-delegated.exampl
e.com on 3/14/11 3:38 PM:
Isn't an oxymoron a dumb person with zits.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Flint
> He does it to piss off the Libs. Most liberals are Apple users.
>
> <So are smart Conservatives>
I'm not so certain he does it piss off the libs, although I have no
doubt the libs are somewhat beside themselves whenever he does talk
about Apple. Rush has been an Apple user for quite a long time, and
is a bit of a techno geek himself.
--
MFB
Flint
> May I say an excellent example of an oxymoron!
More progressive elitist snobbery fanning the flames of a false
dichotomy (liberals vs conservatives)?
--
MFB
Flint
> In article<illn69$ju9$1...@news.eternal-september.org>,
> Flint<age...@section31.org> wrote:
>
>> Listening to Rush Limbaugh on the radio
>
> Why on Earth would you do that?
>
For enlightening entertainment talk radio - something so called
liberal radio simply can't make work or even offer.
Can you say "RIP: Air America"? (I knew you could).
--
MFB
Jolly Roger
Flint <age...@section31.org> wrote:
you have no idea how caught up in the big game you are, eh?
Alan Baker
Can you actually tell me one real insight you've gained from listening
to Limbaugh?
--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
<http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
Flint
>> For enlightening entertainment talk radio - something so called
>> liberal radio simply can't make work or even offer.
>>
>> Can you say "RIP: Air America"? (I knew you could).
>
> Can you actually tell me one real insight you've gained from listening
> to Limbaugh?
Sure I can - but a more important question is have you listened to him
for any considerable period of time in order to even frame such an
question?
--
MFB
m...@privacy.net
>Sure I can - but a more important question is have you listened to him
>for any considerable period of time in order to even frame such an
>question?
I have and he is a total fuckin moron!
Flint
> In article<ilmbma$ntk$1...@news.eternal-september.org>,
> Flint<age...@section31.org> wrote:
>
>> On 3/14/2011 4:31 PM, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>> In article<illn69$ju9$1...@news.eternal-september.org>,
>>> Flint<age...@section31.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Listening to Rush Limbaugh on the radio
>>>
>>> Why on Earth would you do that?
>>>
>>
>> For enlightening entertainment talk radio - something so called
>> liberal radio simply can't make work or even offer.
>>
>> Can you say "RIP: Air America"? (I knew you could).
>
> you have no idea how caught up in the big game you are, eh?
You're just pissed that no one even wants to *play* your favorite 'big
game'...
Lessee...
Limbaugh, Beck, both successful multimillionaires, and still around
doing what they do despite those that hate them and their best efforts
to get them off the air.
Air America and it's liberal retards: *POOOOOOOOOOOF*
Yeah, I guess I >am< caught up in the big game..... so what?
To borrow a phrase from Mr. Sheen,
"Limbaugh and Beck - WINNING!"
--
MFB
Flint
..... and he's still >W I N N I N G<
--
MFB
George Kerby
On 3/14/11 5:38 PM, in article
everyday-5FCE46...@reserved-multicast-range-not-delegated.exampl
e.com, "Gerry" <ever...@sunrise.net> wrote:
Yes you are. You may.
George Kerby
On 3/15/11 2:30 AM, in article slrninu5cm....@ibook-g4.local,
"Lewis" <g.k...@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:
> In message
> <everyday-EDA1C0...@reserved-multicast-range-not-delegated.example
> .com>
> Rush has always been a Mac user.
At least you have listened.
George Kerby
On 3/15/11 8:13 AM, in article pepun6dkangmpmmd1...@4ax.com,
"m...@privacy.net" <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
Typical response of uninformed. If he is such a moron, how is it that he
makes more in one month than you will in your lifetime?
Jolly Roger
Flint <age...@section31.org> wrote:
That about says it all.
Lloyd Parsons
George Kerby <ghost_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
He's not a moron. His money is being made by feeding a segment of the
population the stories and opinions they already believe. He is quite
good at it.
I don't listen to him very often, and certainly no more than other radio
yakkers on both sides of the fence. But if you do listen to them, it is
easy to see how they all do 'research'.
Basically form the opinion and then look for those things that only
support that opinion. It works even if the 'research' is bogus.
Beck is just a wack-job and it amazes me that he can get and hold an
audience at all. I put him right up there with Charlie Sheen!
--
Lloyd
Alan Baker
Because he's good at pandering.
Fame and fortune are no guarantee of intelligence.
Alan Baker
Flint <age...@section31.org> wrote:
So: what is an example of one of these insights?
Howard Brazee
wrote:
>> > Can you actually tell me one real insight you've gained from listening
>> > to Limbaugh?
>>
>>
>> Sure I can - but a more important question is have you listened to him
>> for any considerable period of time in order to even frame such an
>> question?
>
>So: what is an example of one of these insights?
Demagoguery still sells.
--
"In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
to the legislature, and not to the executive department."
- James Madison
m...@privacy.net
>..... and he's still >W I N N I N G<
at what?
this guy borders on illiterate
m...@privacy.net
>I don't listen to him very often, and certainly no more than other radio
>yakkers on both sides of the fence. But if you do listen to them, it is
>easy to see how they all do 'research'.
you outta here his research on the CFL bulb
and anything green
as an engineer I can tell you he is ILLITEARTE!!!!
Nigel Ratburn
> Flint<age...@section31.org> wrote:
>
>> And he's still winning.
>
> At what?
>
> This guy borders on illiterate.
I corrected your grammar.
Chance Furlong
> Lloyd Parsons<lloydp...@mac.com> wrote:
>
>> I don't listen to him very often, and certainly no more than other radio
>> yakkers on both sides of the fence. But if you do listen to them, it is
>> easy to see how they all do 'research'.
>
>
> And anything green
>
> As an engineer I can tell you he is illiterate!
Then why am I correcting your grammar?
Proper nouns and the beginnings of sentences are capitalised. (British
English spelling)
m...@privacy.net
>Then why am I correcting your grammar?
it was done on purpose u fool
an illustration of how stupid limbaugh is
Chance Furlong
At least I use correct grammar, ditwad.
Todd Allcock
If earnings and popularity are the definitive measure of skill and
intelligence, why all the Microsoft bashing in these groups? ;)
Gerry
Todd Allcock <elecc...@AnoOspamL.com> wrote:
First Microsoft is not earning as much as they used too, second they're
not as popular as before. Need I mention Zune?
George Kerby
On 3/15/11 12:37 PM, in article vs8vn6tpafnd0kob8...@4ax.com,
"m...@privacy.net" <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
"Now that's funny. I don't care WHO you are - that there's FUNNY!"
--Larry
George Kerby
On 3/15/11 3:20 PM, in article iloj1u$tdf$1...@news.eternal-september.org,
"Todd Allcock" <elecc...@AnoOspamL.com> wrote:
Good question.
George Kerby
On 3/15/11 5:19 PM, in article
everyday-9F7329...@reserved-multicast-range-not-delegated.exampl
e.com, "Gerry" <ever...@sunrise.net> wrote:
Jolly Roger
The same reason Paris fuck-for-brains Hilton is so popular.
Howard Brazee
wrote:
>First Microsoft is not earning as much as they used too, second they're
>not as popular as before. Need I mention Zune?
Zune never was profitable. Microsoft clearly isn't growing as fast
as it used to - and someday Apple's growth rate will slow down as
well.
But a quick Google puts some doubt to your first statement.
It will be interesting to see how the gaming market goes with
Microsoft competing with Wii, and now people such as the producer of
Angry Birds saying the console game machine won't be able to compete
with the future of iPad style interfaces.
George Kerby
On 3/16/11 6:43 AM, in article slrnio18je....@ibook-g4.local,
"Lewis" <g.k...@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:
> In message <lloydparsons-D5CB...@port80.individual.net>
> Lloyd Parsons <lloydp...@mac.com> wrote:
>> In article <C9A4D7E4.481AE%ghost_...@hotmail.com>,
>> George Kerby <ghost_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> On 3/15/11 8:13 AM, in article pepun6dkangmpmmd1...@4ax.com,
>>> "m...@privacy.net" <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Flint <age...@section31.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Sure I can - but a more important question is have you listened to him
>>>>> for any considerable period of time in order to even frame such an
>>>>> question?
>>>>
>>>> I have and he is a total fuckin moron!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Typical response of uninformed. If he is such a moron, how is it that he
>>> makes more in one month than you will in your lifetime?
>
>> He's not a moron. His money is being made by feeding a segment of the
>> population the stories and opinions they already believe. He is quite
>> good at it.
>
> He also lies and twist facts into lies.
>
> Remember when he made a huge deal about how the US had more acres of
> forest now than it did in 1776?
>
> He neglected to mention he was comparing the forested area of the enter
> 50 states to the original 13 colonies. What a fucking asshole.
>
Facts are facts. Deal with it.
m...@privacy.net
>Facts are facts. Deal with it.
Limbaugh wouldnt know a fact if it bit him on his fat
ass
MuahMan
> George Kerby <ghost_top...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >Facts are facts. Deal with it.
>
> Limbaugh wouldnt know a fact if it bit him on his fat
> ass
I love Limbaugh. Look how angry he makes the welfare collecting
liberals and Democrats. Anyone that can piss off those free-loading
dbags is ok in my book.
JEDIDIAH
Those aren't facts. Those are (as Disraeli and Twain put it) "statistics".
--
Nevermind the pirates. Sony needs to worry about it's own back catalog. |||
/ | \
Lloyd Parsons
<86896c50-0118-47a7...@fx23g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
MuahMan <mua...@gmail.com> wrote:
Angry? LOL!
He is so funny with all his skewed BS!
--
Lloyd
m...@privacy.net
>I love Limbaugh.
I bet you get a big chubby just thinking abt him
he is too STUPID to piss anyone off....
seriously.... NOTHING he says has any facts behind
it.... none
he blathered on and on abt CFL bulbs and the mercury in
them when in fact there is more mercury in the can of
tuna he had for lunch..... or fillings in his teeth....
or the lump of coal burned to power his incandescent
light
he is without a doubt functionally illiterate... and
the people who BELIEVE him are too
George Kerby
On 3/16/11 10:12 AM, in article qpk1o6t9p8obtfn87...@4ax.com,
"m...@privacy.net" <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
He ain't fat anymore. You didn't know that fact.
George Kerby
On 3/16/11 10:38 AM, in article slrnio1mb...@nomad.mishnet,
"JEDIDIAH" <je...@nomad.mishnet> wrote:
Yes, damn stats. But nothing he said was not factual. Those who heard it
just did not 'listen' to what was said.
One year, on the first day of the fourth month he opened his show
complaining about women farding everywhere: Driving, at work, at lunch, they
always were farding. The callers were HOWLING!
George Kerby
On 3/16/11 11:38 AM, in article epp1o6tuok9tua02p...@4ax.com,
"m...@privacy.net" <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
> MuahMan <mua...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I love Limbaugh.
>
> I bet you get a big chubby just thinking abt him
>
> he is too STUPID to piss anyone off....
>
> seriously.... NOTHING he says has any facts behind
> it.... none
>
I can tell that you REALLY couldn't care less...
BAW-HAW-HAW-HAW!!!!
THAT'S what I mean, LOL!
Clavicus Vile
<m...@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:qpk1o6t9p8obtfn87...@4ax.com...
He's the model of an Apple Fanboi.
Todd Allcock
From: "George Kerby" <ghost_...@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Rush talking about the iPad2 today
Date: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 12:49 PM
On 3/16/11 10:12 AM, in article qpk1o6t9p8obtfn87...@4ax.com,
"m...@privacy.net" <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
> > George Kerby <ghost_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
>>> Facts are facts. Deal with it.
> >
> > Limbaugh wouldnt know a fact if it bit him on his fat
> >ass
>
> He ain't fat anymore. You didn't know that fact.
True. I believe future reprints of Al Franken's book will be retitled "Rush
Limbaugh is a Proportionally-Sized Idiot..." ;)
George Kerby
On 3/16/11 4:58 PM, in article slrnio2cj8....@ibook-g4.local,
"Lewis" <g.k...@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:
> In message <C9A67077.483F2%ghost_...@hotmail.com>
> He's still a lying drug addict adulterer.
And where did he:
1. Lie?
2. Drug Addict (currently addicted)?
3. Cheat on wife?
Hell, that isn't too much different than the heroes in the Democratic Party.
'Clinton', 'Edwards' and 'Kennedy' are names that come to mind...
George Kerby
On 3/16/11 4:58 PM, in article ilrbpo$gj7$1...@news.eternal-september.org,
"Todd Allcock" <elecc...@AnoOspamL.com> wrote:
That book was a flying success, was it not? Must like Franken's career.
But your observation gave me a chuckle! <G!>
m...@privacy.net
>He ain't fat anymore. You didn't know that fact.
I've seen recent pics
he is FAT..... his arms are the size of hams
Lloyd Parsons
George Kerby <ghost_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/16/11 4:58 PM, in article slrnio2cj8....@ibook-g4.local,
> "Lewis" <g.k...@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:
>
> > In message <C9A67077.483F2%ghost_...@hotmail.com>
> > George Kerby <ghost_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 3/16/11 10:12 AM, in article qpk1o6t9p8obtfn87...@4ax.com,
> >> "m...@privacy.net" <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
> >
> >>> George Kerby <ghost_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Facts are facts. Deal with it.
> >>>
> >>> Limbaugh wouldnt know a fact if it bit him on his fat
> >>> ass
> >
> >> He ain't fat anymore. You didn't know that fact.
> >
> > He's still a lying drug addict adulterer.
>
> And where did he:
>
> 1. Lie?
Pretty much every day on the radio.
> 2. Drug Addict (currently addicted)?
Don't know, but the rich can get away with stuff the rest of us don't.
> 3. Cheat on wife?
Which one? I'm constantly amazed he can get anyone to marry him, the
divorce payouts must be stupendous...
>
> Hell, that isn't too much different than the heroes in the Democratic Party.
>
> 'Clinton', 'Edwards' and 'Kennedy' are names that come to mind...
Gingrich comes to mind too... :)
--
Lloyd
m...@privacy.net
>And where did he:
>
>1. Lie?
>2. Drug Addict (currently addicted)?
>3. Cheat on wife?
keep thrashing abt
Todd Allcock
> In article <C9A6A98D.48460%ghost_...@hotmail.com>,
> George Kerby <ghost_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > True. I believe future reprints of Al Franken's book will be
retitled
> > > "Rush Limbaugh is a Proportionally-Sized Idiot..." ;)
> > >
> > That book was a flying success, was it not?
>
Then
> it dropped to number 3. And the audio version won an Emmy.
Actually a Grammy. It'd have to be televised to win an Emmy. ;)
> > Must like Franken's career.
>
> He's a senator; only 100 people in the country can claim that.
100 at any one time, anyway.
"Idiot" was good, but not nearly as funny as "Why Not Me?," the
(obviously) fictional account of Franken's bid for the 2000 Presidential
election, running on a populist platform calling for the elimination of
ATM fees, and the dirty tricks he employs to beat his competitors in the
primaries (e.g. hiring actors dressed as drag queens to waive "Gays For
Gore" signs at Gore's rallies in the deep South.)
It was a clever satire leveled at both parties and, of course, the system
itself. Even two of my conservative friends that I turned on to "Why Not
Me?" found it funny, despite an initial resistance to reading it because
of who wrote it. (I lent them my copy so they didn't have to put money
in an "enemy's" pocket! That, and I had to read Limbaugh's "The Way
Things Are" in a complicated arms-for-hostages reading negotiation!)
George Kerby
On 3/16/11 6:27 PM, in article
michelle-977C09...@news.eternal-september.org, "Michelle
Steiner" <mich...@michelle.org> wrote:
> In article <C9A6A98D.48460%ghost_...@hotmail.com>,
> George Kerby <ghost_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> True. I believe future reprints of Al Franken's book will be retitled
>>> "Rush Limbaugh is a Proportionally-Sized Idiot..." ;)
>>>
>> That book was a flying success, was it not?
>
> It was number 1 on the NYT best seller list for more than two months. Then
> it dropped to number 3. And the audio version won an Emmy.
And the National Enquirer is quite popular as well among the proletariate.
>
>> Must like Franken's career.
>
> He's a senator; only 100 people in the country can claim that.
There must be something in the water in MN. They also elected Jessie
Ventura.
JEDIDIAH
>
>
>
> On 3/16/11 10:38 AM, in article slrnio1mb...@nomad.mishnet,
> "JEDIDIAH" <je...@nomad.mishnet> wrote:
>
>> On 2011-03-16, George Kerby <ghost_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 3/16/11 6:43 AM, in article slrnio18je....@ibook-g4.local,
>>> "Lewis" <g.k...@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In message <lloydparsons-D5CB...@port80.individual.net>
>>>> Lloyd Parsons <lloydp...@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>> In article <C9A4D7E4.481AE%ghost_...@hotmail.com>,
>>>>> George Kerby <ghost_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/15/11 8:13 AM, in article pepun6dkangmpmmd1...@4ax.com,
>>>>>> "m...@privacy.net" <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Flint <age...@section31.org> wrote:
[deletia]
>>>> He also lies and twist facts into lies.
>>>>
>>>> Remember when he made a huge deal about how the US had more acres of
>>>> forest now than it did in 1776?
>>>>
>>>> He neglected to mention he was comparing the forested area of the enter
>>>> 50 states to the original 13 colonies. What a fucking asshole.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Facts are facts. Deal with it.
>>>
>>
>> Those aren't facts. Those are (as Disraeli and Twain put it) "statistics".
>
> Yes, damn stats. But nothing he said was not factual. Those who heard it
> just did not 'listen' to what was said.
I think everyone with half a brain picked up on the apples and oranges
comparison that was made and how historically absurd it is.
If it really only included the colonies, then it wasn't even an accurate
accounting of the entire United States when it's first president was
innagurated.
[deletia]
--
Apple: Because if it's not Quicktime, then it's pirated. |||
/ | \
Flint
> There must be something in the water in MN. They also elected Jessie
> Ventura.
Only thing is, Franken wasn't elected, but 'SE-lected' by MN's Court
system.
--
MFB
George Kerby
On 3/17/11 10:23 AM, in article ilt90n$bde$1...@news.eternal-september.org,
"Flint" <age...@section31.org> wrote:
True dat. I forgot. I thought that was the Left's chant about W in Florida,
LOL!
Flint
I thought I'd use the libtard's own line. :)
--
MFB
George Kerby
On 3/17/11 5:42 PM, in article ilu2p3$1p6$1...@news.eternal-september.org,
"Flint" <age...@section31.org> wrote:
> On 3/17/2011 11:55 AM, George Kerby wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/17/11 10:23 AM, in article ilt90n$bde$1...@news.eternal-september.org,
>> "Flint"<age...@section31.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/17/2011 10:04 AM, George Kerby wrote:
>>>
>>>> There must be something in the water in MN. They also elected Jessie
>>>> Ventura.
>>>
>>> Only thing is, Franken wasn't elected, but 'SE-lected' by MN's Court
>>> system.
>>>
>> True dat. I forgot. I thought that was the Left's chant about W in Florida,
>> LOL!
>
> I thought I'd use the libtard's own line. :)
>
>
And The Most Reverend Wright, more recently, LOL!
Flint
Heh. Guess he's still sore his social justice 'disciple' Obama threw
him under the bus during the run-up to the 08 election, and seems to
be more of a muslim-luvin prez than a 'social-justice' luvin,
community aggitatin', George Soros progressive *puppet*... ;-)
Funny thing is even Bill Maher recently said that Obama "says he's
christian, buuut...not reeeeally".
--
MFB
m...@privacy.net
>Heh. Guess he's still sore his social justice 'disciple' Obama threw
>him under the bus during the run-up to the 08 election, and seems to
>be more of a muslim-luvin prez than a 'social-justice' luvin,
>community aggitatin', George Soros progressive *puppet*... ;-)
>
>Funny thing is even Bill Maher recently said that Obama "says he's
>christian, buuut...not reeeeally".
<yawn>
Howard Brazee
wrote:
>> And The Most Reverend Wright, more recently, LOL!
>>
>
>Heh. Guess he's still sore his social justice 'disciple' Obama threw
>him under the bus during the run-up to the 08 election, and seems to
>be more of a muslim-luvin prez than a 'social-justice' luvin,
>community aggitatin', George Soros progressive *puppet*... ;-)
>
>Funny thing is even Bill Maher recently said that Obama "says he's
>christian, buuut...not reeeeally".
He's the wrong type of Christian except when he's a Muslim or a Kenyan
or an ultra-socialist or anything but a person who is acceptable as
President...
And anybody who looks at the facts is just as bad.
--
"In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
to the legislature, and not to the executive department."
- James Madison
Flint
> He's the wrong type of Christian except when he's a Muslim or a Kenyan
> or an ultra-socialist or anything but a person who is acceptable as
> President...
The problem is that he tries to be all things to all people, all other
countries, foreign leaders/heads of state.
The only thing is, he comes off as a panderer with little or no real
respect, and just like Jimmy Carter, he also comes off weak. The man
has a broken moral compass, or a compass that seems to be spinning
madly... Maybe we've just discovered a methods of early-warning
detection of a pending polar shift due sometime in December of 2012? ;_)
> And anybody who looks at the facts is just as bad.
?
Ok, I'll bite - how are they just as bad?
--
MFB
Flint
Odd that someone expresses dis-interest, but is interested enough to
go out of their way to post a "yawn"...
Spare us the feigned boredom and just go back to sleep... or join in
and vent yer spleen. You know you are just dying to...
I haven't meant a pseudo-progressive libturd usenet troll yet who just
couldn't shut their mouth, or defend their views with logic and
reason, or go all pavlovian at the mere drop of names like "Beck,
Limbaugh, O'Reilly", etc., etc.
--
MFB
George Kerby
On 3/19/11 5:27 PM, in article slrnioabef....@ibook-g4.local,
"Lewis" <g.k...@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:
> In message <ilt90n$bde$1...@news.eternal-september.org>
> The little detail that he got more votes is often overlooked by
> rethuglicans.
>
I can tell that you are the model of "open-mindness" attitudes by that
little muse. Congrats for showing the colors.
As an aside, what do you think about the French jumping in before your boy
decided to go to slummin' in Rio?
I thought so...
Flint
> And then there are the right-wing nutcases like you who spout the shit like
> you do.
>
> You wouldn't know facts, logic, or reason if they stared you in the face.
> Try thinking for yourself instead of regurgitating the shit fed to you by
> Beck, Limbaugh, Hannity, and the like.
It's shit because lying liberal puke retards such as you can't argue
facts - only talking points spoon-fed you indirectly from the real
destroyers of the country: George Soros and his minions(Stern and
Weinstein) and the other 'Frannie' Fox Piven or Fabian Society nut
jobs... and you're all too damn stupid to realize it.
>
> For once, put the nation and its people ahead of your failed and flawed
> ideology; you are destroying the country, and you don't give a shit that
> you are doing it.
Oh really? *Moi*? You mean I have >more< power than your
hoops-luvin, oil price raising political *hack*, pseudo intellectual,
US apologizing, ambulance chasing attorney, socialist big government
is better president does?
BTW, you need to wipe that Obama baby-batter off yer lips now...
--
MFB
Flint
> In message<ilt90n$bde$1...@news.eternal-september.org>
> Flint<age...@section31.org> wrote:
> rethuglicans.
Yeah, especially from a load of voters residing at 1313 Mockingbird
Lane...
--
MFB
Flint
rethuglicans.
>>
> I can tell that you are the model of "open-mindness" attitudes by that
> little muse. Congrats for showing the colors.
>
> As an aside, what do you think about the French jumping in before your boy
> decided to go to slummin' in Rio?
>
> I thought so...
Once again, our fearless leader "leads the way"... down south.
But hey - he needs a 'spring break' from Michelle, no? :)
--
MFB
Howard Brazee
wrote:
>It's shit because lying liberal puke retards such as you can't argue
>facts - only talking points spoon-fed you indirectly from the real
>destroyers of the country: George Soros and his minions(Stern and
>Weinstein) and the other 'Frannie' Fox Piven or Fabian Society nut
>jobs... and you're all too damn stupid to realize it.
And this is somehow different from what conservatives are doing?
Lloyd Parsons
Howard Brazee <how...@brazee.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:15:37 -0400, Flint <age...@section31.org>
> wrote:
>
> >It's shit because lying liberal puke retards such as you can't argue
> >facts - only talking points spoon-fed you indirectly from the real
> >destroyers of the country: George Soros and his minions(Stern and
> >Weinstein) and the other 'Frannie' Fox Piven or Fabian Society nut
> >jobs... and you're all too damn stupid to realize it.
>
> And this is somehow different from what conservatives are doing?
Yeah, it really is funny when one side or the other accuses the other
one of using talking points.
On a recent road trip, I switched back and forth between the
conservative and liberal talk radio on Sirius. Two sides of the exact
same coin. Same point, different views.
The only thing is common between the two was it was all bullshit and not
even quality bullshit!
--
Lloyd
Flint
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:15:37 -0400, Flint<age...@section31.org>
> wrote:
>
>> It's shit because lying liberal puke retards such as you can't argue
>> facts - only talking points spoon-fed you indirectly from the real
>> destroyers of the country: George Soros and his minions(Stern and
>> Weinstein) and the other 'Frannie' Fox Piven or Fabian Society nut
>> jobs... and you're all too damn stupid to realize it.
>
> And this is somehow different from what conservatives are doing?
Sure it is. You *do* understand the difference between them, don't
you? Or perhaps you never heard of the Fabian Society, or Georgie
Soros, or know what they're about, and how they and conservatives
loath each other?
--
MFB
Flint
Its all bullshit to those who foolishly buy into the false dichotomy
of the political status quo, and keep their head up their ass, or
worse, act like a bunch of idiots supporting 'pro-democracy'
revolutionary movements that serve mo purpose save that which
religious radicals or the self-loathing Jew have.
--
MFB
Flint
> It's you motherfraking rightwing liars who are are destroying the country.
Only if by the 'country' you mean the "AmeriKa" you looneytune leftist
nutjob pukes are trying to build, I guess you're right.
> It's not that you're too stupid to realize it; it's that you put your
> failed self-serving ideology above the welfare of the nation and its
> citizens. You just don't give a shit about the country, but only about
> yourselves.
Really? And just what is it about the ideology is it that destroys the
country any where _near_ as effectively as the Obama/Pelosi/Reid
agenda has after pushing the biggest piece of shit healthcare crap
through the way they did, and ran the national debt up in two years
what it took Georgie Bush _EIGHT_ to do, all the while Obama is
whining about the so called 'mess he intereted from his predecessor'?
How the F*CK do you dig yourself out of a hole by digging a DEEPER
hole, firing up the old printing press, devaluing your currency
through debt monetization, and selling out more of the country to
China like this administration has. As I recall, Republicans have
been out of power since 06 when they lost the House to the whacko
botox-bitch.
> Stop fucking up the country and go fuck yourself instead.
And are you ever going to stop licking the prez's balls?
--
MFB
News
> In article<im8epo$btl$1...@news.eternal-september.org>,
> Flint<age...@section31.org> wrote:
>
>>> It's you motherfraking rightwing liars who are are destroying the
>>> country.
>>
>> Only if by the 'country' you mean the "AmeriKa" you looneytune leftist
>> nutjob pukes are trying to build, I guess you're right.
>
> destroying.
>
Now THAT's something we can agree on.
>>> It's not that you're too stupid to realize it; it's that you put your
>>> failed self-serving ideology above the welfare of the nation and its
>>> citizens. You just don't give a shit about the country, but only about
>>> yourselves.
>>
>> Really? And just what is it about the ideology is it that destroys the
>> country any where _near_ as effectively as the Obama/Pelosi/Reid
>> agenda has after pushing the biggest piece of shit healthcare crap
>> through the way they did, and ran the national debt up in two years
>> what it took Georgie Bush _EIGHT_ to do, all the while Obama is
>> whining about the so called 'mess he intereted from his predecessor'?
>
> The healthcare bill isn't destroying the nation; it's a small step towards
> saving it. It's major problem is that it doesn't go far enough; it doesn't
> contain a public option, let alone a single-payer system.
>
> According to US treasury figures, the US Debt increased 2% in FY 2001 (four
> months under Clinton, eight months under Bush) over 2000. In FY 2002, it
> increased 7%; in 2003, 9%; in 2004, 9%; in 2005, 8%, in 2006, 7%; in 2007,
> 6%; in 2008, 11%. In 2009 (four months under Bush, 8 months under Obama),
> 19%; in 2010, 14%.
> <http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/histdebt/histdebt_histo5.htm>
>
> Much of the increases in 2008 through 2010 came from the Stimulus bills,
> which were started under the Bush administration and continued under the
> Obama administration. Without those bills, though, the US would have
> suffered a depression that would have made the Great Depression look like a
> mild recession.
>
>> As I recall, Republicans have been out of power since 06 when they lost
>> the House to the whacko botox-bitch.
>
> Ann Coulter won the House?
>
LOL. They wish.
>> And are you ever going to stop licking the prez's balls?
>
> Are you going to ever stop letting Beck, Hannity, Limbuagh, Savage and like
> keep fucking you in the ass?
>
Owwwwch!
Todd Allcock
Riiight. If you bring up the Trilateral Commission or the Illuminati,
I'm outta here! ;)
[Why is it that conservative think-tanks are just think-tanks, yet
progressive think-tanks are secret societies bent on world domination
like the evil organization in some pulp spy-thriller?]
Todd Allcock
Agreed. Sadly it seems the only way to get ratings is to pander to those
who already agree with you, rather than engage in thoughtful dialog and
try to sway to undecided audience.
There's a guy on Air America Radio in the afternoon called Ed Schultz,
(at least there was the last time I tuned in) who I swear must have
attended and earned top honors at The Rush Limbaugh School of Broadcasting.
His inflections, the pauses, the repetitions of key talking points, and
even the little high-pitched crack in his voice when expressing the
appropriate amount of Mock Incredulity at whatever the Forces of the
Ungodly are up to today, are just a twisted funhouse mirror image of
Limbaugh's delivery. Someone who didn't speak English would have a very
hard time telling them apart!
Fault Limbaugh all you like (and I certainly do!) but he's a master at
his chosen profession and is worth whatever they're paying him.
Lloyd Parsons
Lewis <g.k...@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:
> In message <michelle-71A37E...@news.eternal-september.org>
> Michelle Steiner <mich...@michelle.org> wrote:
> > In article <im8140$1bd$1...@news.eternal-september.org>,
> > Flint <age...@section31.org> wrote:
>
> >> It's shit because lying liberal puke retards such as you can't argue
> >> facts - only talking points spoon-fed you indirectly from the real
> >> destroyers of the country: George Soros and his minions(Stern and
> >> Weinstein) and the other 'Frannie' Fox Piven or Fabian Society nut
> >> jobs... and you're all too damn stupid to realize it.
>
> > It's you motherfraking rightwing liars who are are destroying the country.
> > It's not that you're too stupid to realize it; it's that you put your
> > failed self-serving ideology above the welfare of the nation and its
> > citizens. You just don't give a shit about the country, but only about
> > yourselves.
>
> The Republican party hates the poor, women, and minorities (they see all
> three of these as being the same). They want rape victims to 1) not be
> able to press charges against the rapists (30 GOP Senators voted in favor
> or rapists) and 2) not be able to abort any pregnancies. They expect
> victims of rape and incest to happily carry those babies to term,
> because the GOP believe that every man has the right to impregnate any
> woman at any time. And a woman doesn't have the right to terminate her
> pregnancy even if her own life is at risk. Women must be breeders for
> any male sperm that comes along.
>
> The GOP is trying to pass laws all over the country that make murder of
> abortion providers legally justifiable and at the same time are trying
> to eviscerate every social program that benefits anyone who is not fat,
> rich, and white.
>
> They consider anyone who makes less than $1,000,000 a year to be 'poor'
> and therefore beneath contempt. Anyone who supports the Republican party
> and is not a rich fat white man is a fucking fool.
>
> The richest 1% in the US have more than quintupled their wealth in the
> last 30 years, while the rest of the population (99%) has barely stayed
> even (figures adjusted for inflation). The top 1% pay less taxes than
> they ever have at any point in our history, and the vast uneducated
> conservative mouth-breathers at the bottom believe the rich fat white
> assholes shitting on them from above telling them that 'the poor' (which
> they don't realise includes them) are a 'drain on society'.
>
> The top 1% control more wealth than they ever have, and the gap between
> that top 1% and the rest of the people is larger than it has ever been.
> You have criminals like the multi-billionaire Koch Brothers who are
> pouring money into the pockets of teabagger scum in an effort to destroy
> unions in the US.
>
> Remember what working life was like before the unions?
>
> 10 hours a day, 6 days a week. That was enough to support 1.5 people. No
> weekends. No health care. No vacations. No pensions. No safety
> regulations. No child-labor laws. No sick days. Every one of those
> things was won by the blood (and sometimes the lives) of Unions, and the
> GOP and their teabagger scum are trying to destroy it so they can fuck
> the bottom 99% of the population even more than they have been.
>
> If you are a multi-millionaire and you are a fan of the current
> republican party then you are simply a self-interested soulless asshole.
> But if you AREN'T a multi-millionaire and you support the current
> Republican Party then you are a delusional fool who has failed to open
> your eyes and see the huge dildo they are trying to shove up your ass.
Nice screed... :)
If you believe that either Rep or Dems give a shit about the common man,
you haven't been keeping up. They are both doing what their corporate
masters have bribe... uh, donated to their campaigns, want them to do.
--
Lloyd
m...@privacy.net
> or the self-loathing Jew have
oh I see you are anti semetic as well as being a moron
m...@privacy.net
>The healthcare bill isn't destroying the nation; it's a small step towards
>saving it. It's major problem is that it doesn't go far enough; it doesn't
>contain a public option, let alone a single-payer system.
agreed!!!!!!
m...@privacy.net
>The GOP is trying to pass laws
here in Missouri the GOP is repealing child labor
laws!!!!
Flint
> In article<im8epo$btl$1...@news.eternal-september.org>,
>
>>> It's you motherfraking rightwing liars who are are destroying the
>>> country.
>>
>> Only if by the 'country' you mean the "AmeriKa" you looneytune leftist
>> nutjob pukes are trying to build, I guess you're right.
>
> destroying.
What 'wingnuts' are yoo blathering on about? Be *specific* please...
>>> It's not that you're too stupid to realize it; it's that you put your
>>> failed self-serving ideology above the welfare of the nation and its
>>> citizens. You just don't give a shit about the country, but only about
>>> yourselves.
>>
>> Really? And just what is it about the ideology is it that destroys the
>> country any where _near_ as effectively as the Obama/Pelosi/Reid
>> agenda has after pushing the biggest piece of shit healthcare crap
>> through the way they did, and ran the national debt up in two years
>> what it took Georgie Bush _EIGHT_ to do, all the while Obama is
>> whining about the so called 'mess he intereted from his predecessor'?
>
> The healthcare bill isn't destroying the nation; it's a small step towards
> saving it.
>Saving it<?? How does one 'save' something by letting the
government come in and co-opt it? Show me >ONE< industry the
government has >ever< created or operated better than private
enterprise has. No bullshit please - Fannie & Freddie are only just
two of the most recent failures still fresh on *everyone's* minds.
Answer: you *can't*
It's major problem is that it doesn't go far enough; it doesn't
> contain a public option, let alone a single-payer system.
.... nor does it even come close to addressing real cost driving
factors: tort reform & medical liability.
> According to US treasury figures, the US Debt increased 2% in FY 2001 (four
> months under Clinton, eight months under Bush) over 2000. In FY 2002, it
> increased 7%; in 2003, 9%; in 2004, 9%; in 2005, 8%, in 2006, 7%; in 2007,
> 6%; in 2008, 11%. In 2009 (four months under Bush, 8 months under Obama),
> 19%; in 2010, 14%.
> <http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/histdebt/histdebt_histo5.htm>
>
> Much of the increases in 2008 through 2010 came from the Stimulus bills,
> which were started under the Bush administration and continued under the
> Obama administration.
So you admit then that Obama's administration is the _current_
perpetuator of the problem?
> .... Without those bills, though, the US would have
> suffered a depression that would have made the Great Depression look like a
> mild recession.
Ah - the old Rahm Emmanuel "never waste a good crisis" argument, eh?
Or Obama's "We _had_ to do this because of the mess we inherited"
claim, huh. And of course, this whole mess was caused entirely by
'right wingnuts', and _no_ libtards were tools of a progressive agenda
in any of this, huh? Lessee: Barney Frank (and lover) nd Sen. Chris
Dodd practically causing the mortgage meltdown crisis at FNMA and
Freddie Mac (justy for starters - I could go on.)
>> As I recall, Republicans have been out of power since 06 when they lost
>> the House to the whacko botox-bitch.
>
> Ann Coulter won the House?
Uh, I was referring to the San Fran-sicko Senator Nancy Pelosi...
Y'know, the former 'Sniveler of the House' with a really big house
gavel...
>> And are you ever going to stop licking the prez's balls?
>
> Are you going to ever stop letting Beck, Hannity, Limbuagh, Savage and like
> keep fucking you in the ass?
And just how are they 'fucking' me in the ass? They're occasional
_entertainment'_ - informative entertainment, but nothing more.
Besides, they aren't fucking >me< in the ass so much as the agenda of
libtard radio wannabes who keep trying and >failing< to duplicate the
success of an industry model that they and Mr. Ailes _built_ and
_dominate_. As an Apple product user, you should appreciate that the
parallels are practically microcosmic. (Ironic, since 'Libby' Jobs has
divinely blessed Rupert Murdoch's 'The Daily' iPaD app, no?)
I'll bet you, like all libtards' either haven't or don't listen to
enough of those guys to even know what or why you all rail against
them so much. What amazes me is the self important smugness and
arrogant condescending and self righteousnes
of libtards making whiny claims that a vast army of 'lil ole ig'nert
hillbilly' listewner/viewers are *soo* manipulated by the 'vast'
empire of Murdoch & Co., even though they're outnumbered by the
leftist influenced media outlets by a factor better than 4:1.
Talk about 'crocodile tears'...
--
MFB
Flint
> The debt is 'run up' trying to counter the damage Georgie did.
Even if true, one does not solve a debt problem by making it bigger.
> This
> recession and the trillions it is taking to keep it from turning into a
> full-blown Depression is *ALL* Shrubs fault.
So liberal dems like Chis Dodd, Barney Frank pushing their 'give bad
mortgages to idiots who are dumb to afford them' agenda on banks had
nothing to do with starting the mortgage meltdown crisis, huh?
I guess Georgie's additional debt run-up justifies the Obama's debt
run-up by a factor of better than 3:1 in the same time-frame.
Gee, that's kind of like cutting a finger, and the doctor telling you
you have to amputate, no?
--
MFB