Andrzej Adam Filip <a
...@onet.eu> wrote:
> 1) Is it available somewhere in a *maintained* version?
You mean is this post updated anymore or something similar?
http://groups.google.ca/group/comp.mail.uucp/msg/8c255c314421b663
Not that I know.
> 2) Should we encourage providers to post *short* announcements here
> (with web link to full version) twice a year?
> [or another frequency, just to be cached by search engines]
That would look too much like spam for me. Would rather like a third
party writting in a neutral way.
> I would prefer "1" but "2" requires no maintainer.
> Better this that a "looking dead" newsgroup.
This newsgroup isn't dead yet.
Although I'm making a effort to answer because the new Big-8 management
is in a rampage of group removal. They're happy to go about vacant
moderated newsgroup and zero on-topic newsgroup for now but I don't want
them to ever reach comp.mail.uucp. :)
[If you beleive Jim Riley, 50 non-crossposted articles and less in a
year is a dead newsgroup. <12vhlf7ktuo0...@corp.supernews.com> ]
--
Hugo Villeneuve <h...@EINTR.net>
