Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
Followup-To: comp.mail.sendmail
From: Steve <nore...@crap.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 08:49:56 +0200
Local: Mon, Apr 30 2012 2:49 am
Subject: Re: Sendmail -> Sending directly
Hi Robert,
The problem is that I have no idea what can be the problem and I don't know Today, our email server is using our ISP email server... [ But I would really prefer to deliver directly WITHOUT using the server of If Sendmail can deliver properly, using the ISP email server, it should be That's why I asked the question whether the Reverse MX record could be a I've made some research on DNS problem...( for sending emails .. ) but at Robert Bonomi wrote:
> In article <4f9a5153$0$13188$426a7...@news.free.fr>, > Steve <nore...@crap.com> wrote: >>Hi Again, >>Following my previous question : Question on "Mail Queue" and "sending"
> "It is well known that one horse can run faster than another.
> You don't provide enough _detailed_ information for anyone to provide
>>I would love to send email DIRECTLY, without using my email server's
>>If I have a look on IntoDNS ( http://www.intodns.com/ )
>>- Do you think that this could be the problem of sending email in direct
> "Yes." one of the above.
>>Our Internet provider doesn't block the port 25
>>2) Let suppose that our provider block the port 25. and I decide to listen
> If you do things wrong, they will *NOT* work.
> If your provider blocks -outgoing- 'port 25', that does *NOT*NECESSARILY*
> It is entirely possible to receive on port 25, while being unable to send
>> Any sender will send to the port 25 so, I
> You do appear to have a vague grasp of the concept that if you do things
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||