Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Old sendmail processes are keeping the old inodes - Is this a bug?
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  4 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
alexander.yegorov  
View profile  
 More options Jun 21 2011, 2:28 pm
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
From: "alexander.yegorov" <alex.yego...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:28:17 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Jun 21 2011 2:28 pm
Subject: Old sendmail processes are keeping the old inodes - Is this a bug?
Hi comp.mail.sendmail community,

On our production environment, we got into the situation when the disk
space usage become filling up to 90-100%   on root partition on the
server responsible for relaying the mail. Of course we took the
measures to report such behavior and are restarting sendmail to free
the inodes up and avoid the disk usage issue.
However, it is not a solution to restart the sendmail each time, when
the disk usage goes up to 90-100%. Also as an alternative we looked
into such dirty workarounds as root partition increasing and
RequiresDirFsync option in sendmail.cf, while seeking for more elegant
and less resource expensive variant.
Has someone got handy experience with forcing the sendmail children to
cleanup after themselves?


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
D. Stussy  
View profile  
 More options Jun 21 2011, 3:55 pm
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
From: "D. Stussy" <spam+newsgro...@bde-arc.ampr.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:55:24 -0700
Local: Tues, Jun 21 2011 3:55 pm
Subject: Re: Old sendmail processes are keeping the old inodes - Is this a bug?
"alexander.yegorov" <alex.yego...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:ac273dcc-669d-4fd7-8d85-f1f78e3c6117@33g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...

> Hi comp.mail.sendmail community,

> On our production environment, we got into the situation when the disk
> space usage become filling up to 90-100%   on root partition on the
> server responsible for relaying the mail. Of course we took the
> measures to report such behavior and are restarting sendmail to free
> the inodes up and avoid the disk usage issue.
> However, it is not a solution to restart the sendmail each time, when
> the disk usage goes up to 90-100%. Also as an alternative we looked
> into such dirty workarounds as root partition increasing and
> RequiresDirFsync option in sendmail.cf, while seeking for more elegant
> and less resource expensive variant.
> Has someone got handy experience with forcing the sendmail children to
> cleanup after themselves?

Is there a reason why you can't move the log, spool, and/or mailbox
directories to another file system?

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
alexander.yegorov  
View profile  
 More options Jun 22 2011, 7:42 am
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
From: "alexander.yegorov" <alex.yego...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 04:42:24 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Jun 22 2011 7:42 am
Subject: Re: Old sendmail processes are keeping the old inodes - Is this a bug?
On Jun 21, 10:55 pm, "D. Stussy" <spam+newsgro...@bde-arc.ampr.org>
wrote:

Nice suggestion. Thought about ext3 as an alternative. The drawback is
that production system servers count is more than 100, so I need to
test it out first at one server for some time.
Ok, I shall test and post my results here.
In the meantime, I am still open for new suggestions.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Claus Aßmann -no-copies-please  
View profile  
 More options Jun 30 2011, 10:32 pm
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
From: Claus Aßmann <ca+sendmail(-no-copies-please)@mine.informatik.uni-kiel.de>
Date: 1 Jul 2011 02:32:43 GMT
Local: Thurs, Jun 30 2011 10:32 pm
Subject: Re: Old sendmail processes are keeping the old inodes - Is this a bug?

alexander.yegorov wrote:
> Has someone got handy experience with forcing the sendmail children to
> cleanup after themselves?

No need to force anything.

Please post evidence that this isn't working on your system.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »