Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
How to let the MDA bounce a message
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  3 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
ska  
View profile  
 More options Nov 30 2005, 5:10 am
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
From: "ska" <s...@mail.inf.fh-brs.de>
Date: 30 Nov 2005 02:10:53 -0800
Local: Wed, Nov 30 2005 5:10 am
Subject: How to let the MDA bounce a message
Hello,

is it possible to let the MDA (LDA) ultimately decide during the SMTP
dialogue whether or not a recipient exists, in order to return a non-OK
SMTP code rather than a negative DSN bounce message?

sendmail 8.13.4 with a custom MDA.

Thanks,

Steffen


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Andrzej Adam Filip  
View profile  
 More options Nov 30 2005, 5:26 am
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
From: Andrzej Adam Filip <a...@priv.onet.pl>
Date: 30 Nov 2005 11:26:09 +0100
Local: Wed, Nov 30 2005 5:26 am
Subject: Re: How to let the MDA bounce a message

"ska" <s...@mail.inf.fh-brs.de> writes:
> is it possible to let the MDA (LDA) ultimately decide during the SMTP
> dialogue whether or not a recipient exists, in order to return a
> non-OK SMTP code rather than a negative DSN bounce message?

> sendmail 8.13.4 with a custom MDA.

Could you provide more data?

* Sendmail calls LDA *after* acknowledging all "RCPT TO:"

* Sendmail checks OS account existence for mailers with F=w flag set
before sending reply to "RCPT TO:"
You can compile your own MailboxDatabase routines in sendmail source
code to provide alternative checks

* You can use "socket map protocol" to allow sendmail asking your custom
daemon about recipient existence
e.g. cyrus-imapd has implemented smmapd daemon/service for such purpose

--
[en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : a...@priv.onet.pl : a...@xl.wp.pl
http://www.sendmail.org/faq/ http://www.sendmail.org/m4/readme.html
http://anfi.homeunix.net/sendmail/  Netcraft Site Rank: 488518


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
ska  
View profile  
 More options Dec 1 2005, 7:57 am
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
From: "ska" <s...@mail.inf.fh-brs.de>
Date: 1 Dec 2005 04:57:47 -0800
Local: Thurs, Dec 1 2005 7:57 am
Subject: Re: How to let the MDA bounce a message
Sorry, there is a misunderstanding.

I'm contentedly with the ability of sendmail to detect the existance of
a recipient, but I would fine grain which message gets queued in order
to be delivered in a next run, or which are failed permanently or
temporatily after the SMTP DATA phase.

I know that you have to take precausions, if the mail has multiple
recipients, as the reply effects the deliviery status of all of them.

Steffen


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »