Now I have address AAA and BBB, and I would like to set Reply-To to
both. Now I had set Reply-To as an additional header quite a lot of
time ago, rarely if ever actually using it. Today I tried adding the
addresses - in several different ways either through M S C or editing
.pinerc directly. NO WAY. One works, and is retained, the other one is
pushed to the following line and interpreted as an header and thus
ignored. Even if I put it on the same line in .pinerc, the second one
is ignored.
Though, if I leave the configuration as is, I can add the addresses
manually while composing, and it works like a charm. I JUST CAN'T SET
THEM AS A DEFAULT. (Which is what I reasonably want.) Any workaround
or solution? If that is not possible, I would call it a bug...
Michele
--
Liberta' va cercando, ch'e' si' cara,
Come sa chi per lei vita rifiuta.
[Dante Alighieri, Purg. I, 71-72]
I am my own country - United States Confederate of Me!
[Pennywise, "My own country"]
>Though, if I leave the configuration as is, I can add the addresses
>manually while composing, and it works like a charm. I JUST CAN'T SET
>THEM AS A DEFAULT. (Which is what I reasonably want.) Any workaround
>or solution? If that is not possible, I would call it a bug...
No idea yet?
Michele
--
Se, nella notte in cui concepi' il duce,
Donna Rosa, toccata da divina luce,
avesse dato al fabbro predappiano
invece della fica il deretano,
l'avrebbe presa in culo quella sera
Rosa sola e non l'Italia intera.
- Poesia antifascista
> Now I have address AAA and BBB, and I would like to set Reply-To to
> both. Now I had set Reply-To as an additional header quite a lot of
> time ago, rarely if ever actually using it. Today I tried adding the
> addresses - in several different ways either through M S C or editing
> .pinerc directly.
I can set two addresses using a rule without any problem. I suppose
it's possible to use a rule by default?
--
Niklaus
> On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 15:49:45 +0200, Michele Dondi
> <bik....@tiscalinet.it> wrote:
>
>> Though, if I leave the configuration as is, I can add the addresses
>> manually while composing, and it works like a charm. I JUST CAN'T SET
>> THEM AS A DEFAULT. (Which is what I reasonably want.) Any workaround
>> or solution? If that is not possible, I would call it a bug...
>
> No idea yet?
How about if you add an addressbook entry with a nickname of replyto and
give that entry the two addresses, then use
Reply-To: replyto
in your Customized headers?
Steve
>>> Though, if I leave the configuration as is, I can add the addresses
>>> manually while composing, and it works like a charm. I JUST CAN'T SET
>>> THEM AS A DEFAULT. (Which is what I reasonably want.) Any workaround
>>> or solution? If that is not possible, I would call it a bug...
>>
>> No idea yet?
>
>How about if you add an addressbook entry with a nickname of replyto and
>give that entry the two addresses, then use
>
> Reply-To: replyto
>
>in your Customized headers?
I already have the entry, and that's what I use to manually add it. I
hadn't though of "inlining" it. I'm trying ASAP.
>> Now I have address AAA and BBB, and I would like to set Reply-To to
>> both. Now I had set Reply-To as an additional header quite a lot of
>> time ago, rarely if ever actually using it. Today I tried adding the
>> addresses - in several different ways either through M S C or editing
>> .pinerc directly.
>
>I can set two addresses using a rule without any problem. I suppose
>it's possible to use a rule by default?
To be fair, I know nothing 'bout rules. I'll read something asap.
> To be fair, I know nothing 'bout rules. I'll read something asap.
To be precise I should have been talking about a 'role' which is a
special kind of a 'rule'.
In Alpine:
m s r r a
--
Niklaus
>> Reply-To: replyto
>>
>>in your Customized headers?
>
>I already have the entry, and that's what I use to manually add it. I
>hadn't though of "inlining" it. I'm trying ASAP.
It did work!! Why didn't anybody tell me it would've been that simple?
;)
>> To be fair, I know nothing 'bout rules. I'll read something asap.
>
>To be precise I should have been talking about a 'role' which is a
>special kind of a 'rule'.
>
>In Alpine:
>m s r r a
Actually, the address book entry trick suggested by another user did
work perfectly well. But I'm reading about roles and rules anyway.