Reason is... when I'm corresponding with a company, I would like all
correspondences in one file.
--
William Park <openge...@yahoo.ca>, Toronto, Canada
Slackware Linux -- because it works.
fcc-hook domain +domain
Sven
Thank Sven. This would require a line for each company, no? For
example, if I'm talking with <jo...@abc.com> and <ja...@xyz.com>, then
I would need
fcc-hook abc.com +abc.com
fcc-hook xyz.com +xyz.com
true. however, there is no option for what you want.
Sven [not suggesting to wait for changes in the code, though]
I'll look into the source code, if this bugs me enough.
What would you recommend? Pressing a key to toggle between 'user' part
and 'domain' part? Or, using permanent option in ~/.muttrc, something
like
force_domain_name
save_domain_name
...
;-)
> What would you recommend?
> Pressing a key to toggle between 'user' part and 'domain' part?
> Or, using permanent option in ~/.muttrc, something like
> force_domain_name
> save_domain_name
> ...
well, sure these names come to mind
in accordance with existing names.
but i think there are too many
specific variables already.
i'd rather use some field
name like "%d" for domain.
anyway, i still think that the naming concept
behind the variables in mutt really sucks.
most names were taken from other MUAs
but if you don't know them then you'll
have a hard time understanding them.
i think i still want an internal language
which simply allow all the power you can get.
then it should be as simple as
hook_folder {
default: ...
INBOX: ...
lists: ...
}
hook_save {
default: folder.save_to = sender_address.domain
lists: ...
}
ah, well..
Sven [still dreaming]