comp.mail.headers Google Group

comp.lang.basic.visual.3RDPARTY bread

2008-08-14T19:40:04Z

FACTS SHOCKING BUT TRUE!

2008-08-14T14:58:20Z

Y A O H Ú S H U A
FACTS SHOCKING BUT TRUE!
1. The real, original and genuine Name of our Creator in the
original Hebrew Holy Scriptures is 'YAO-HOO' and that of the
genuine Messiah is 'YAO-HOO-SHUA.'
(accented on the syllable 'hoo')
2. Salvation is found in nobody else for there is no other

C.H.E.A.P...C.I.G.A.R.E.T.T.E.S....

2008-07-27T19:20:23Z

THE BEST CHEAP CIGARETTES SITE EVER 100%!!!
ENTER >>> [link] <<< ENTER
THE BEST CHEAP CIGARETTES SITE EVER 100%!!!
JOIN OUR AFFILIATE PROGRAM AND BECOME RICH IN 10 DAYS!
CLICK HERE >>> [link] <<< NEW FREE SEO TOOLS
GOOGLE SPAM is your chance to EARN CA$H LIVE!!!

Re: Header to track thread

2008-07-24T11:55:05Z

I liked this statement. Anyway I solved it with help of procmail
recipe.
I am reading subject and associating that email with record. subject
has
record id. If user manipulated subject line, I will send mail back to
submitter
asking him to provide record id.
Again thank you all for your information. I learnt a lot from this

665 Wholesale GPS Units 66554

2008-07-16T21:27:15Z

============================== =========
Get A GPS Today At A Low Price!!
[link]
============================== =========
GPS Devices [link]
============================== =========
2X[k \p\)Q\]wCIm @4n&

Re: Header to track thread

2008-07-13T04:55:24Z

In article
<4f6ad6a8-7a8d-477b-9f73-f4c1d 83ff...@f63g2000hsf.googlegrou ps.com>,
How could it be otherwise? If someone wants to send an email in
response to yours, how can you force them to use a "Reply" command
rather than starting a new message?
Email is just a text file being sent from user to user. The

Re: Header to track thread

2008-07-13T02:42:43Z

Is it by design? It is little frustrating :(

Re: Received field must contain "for" word ?

2008-07-11T20:09:34Z

In article <5d1w20mtrp....@Hurtta06k.keh. iki.fi> Kari Hurtta
Yes, of course a "phrase" can have whitespace w/o quoting, not sure what
I was thinking (if at all) there - thanks for pointing it out.
--Per Hedeland
p...@hedeland.org

Re: Received field must contain "for" word ?

2008-07-11T13:31:54Z

p...@hedeland.org (Per Hedeland) writes in comp.mail.headers:
Undisclosed recipients
is allowed (although syntax is unclear).
Undisclosed.Recipients
is not allowed (or is not allowed to be generated, but must
be able to parse.)
Later must be
"Undisclosed.Recipients"

word = atom / quoted-string

Re: Header to track thread

2008-07-11T13:18:47Z

Jagadeesh <mnjagade...@gmail.com> writes in comp.mail.headers:
If you keep track Message-ID header fields which your system sends,
you can try match them to In-Reply-To and References header fields
on replies.
/ Kari Hurtta
( Be carefull with format of Message-ID header field if you generate
it yourself. If format is not correct, it can not be used on

Re: Header to track thread

2008-07-09T13:01:28Z

In article <slrng76dgv.2dc.grahn+n...@fra ilea.sa.invalid>,
And even if there were an immutable header, people could get around it
by not using the Reply command, but instead starting a new thread with
the same subject.
So if people really want to break up a thread, there's nothing you can
do about it.

Re: Header to track thread

2008-07-08T09:40:20Z

If your people can change the headers as they please, how can you find
a header which they cannot change?
I'm sorry, but I cannot see any better option than to follow the
standards and semi-standard conventions in use out there.
/Jorgen

Re: Header to track thread

2008-07-08T06:37:38Z

Let me be clear. in my organization people use many MUA like alpine,
mutt, elm, AppleMail, Thunderbird and JavaMail.
So there are MUAs which allow user to change headers. I am looking for
immutable header that propagets throu emails threads.
Thanks

Re: Received field must contain "for" word ?

2008-07-07T11:47:56Z

In article <slrng73c28.2dc.grahn+n...@fra ilea.sa.invalid> Jorgen Grahn
Yes indeed, the semicolon is part of the "group address" syntax, it's
not a list separator as in the broken M$ form of multi-address lists.
The "group-name" part can be anything of course, undisclosed-recipients
(or some variant thereof) is just a convention commonly used when the

Re: Received field must contain "for" word ?

2008-07-07T05:57:02Z

I was more thinking like "what's a valid, empty group address?" rather
than "what is the official thing to put in To: in an all-Bcc:ed
mail?"[1]. A quick glance at RFC 2822 suggests that the semicolon *must*
be there: it is part of the more general group address form
group-name : mailbox1, mailbox2, ... mailboxN ;