At 23 Feb 2007 06:03:50 -0800 "arlie" <arli...@gmail.com> wrote:
I *think* the original TclODBC is dead/dieing or maybe limited to
> I'm really worried in using TclODBC since it was last updated on May
> So my questions are as follows:
> 1. Is TclODBC dead?
MS-Windows. I could not get the Linux/UNIX version to build or run
*I* re-wrote a TclODBC package from scratch under Linux. See
The original TclODBC is/was full of excessive use of C++ OO nonsense
> 2. How about SybTcl?--
> 3. Why are TclODBC and SybTcl not part standard Tcl/Tk distribution
> since these are industry standard?
> I'm quite serious about this. So I hope someone would give me an
Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933
Deepwoods Software -- Linux Installation and Administration
http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Web Hosting, with CGI and Database
hel...@deepsoft.com -- Contract Programming: C/C++, Tcl/Tk
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.