YES, tk_getOpenFile's -multiple option appeared with 8.3.
I don't understand your question about options and libraries.
Someone help Ms. Shah, please; I might not be around for a few
days. In private correspondence, she appears to be successfully
launching 8.3, but reports, "i have used tk_getOpenFile with
multiple true option.but it gives error like bad command." I
don't know what this means, so I hope someone can talk with her
about:
*) the feasibility of a move to a modern Wish;
*) how exactly she uses [tk_getOpenFile]; and
*) precisely what error wish8.3 gives.
[tk_getOpenFile] works just as *I* expect, and I believe that
applies to all 8.3.x releases.
Could you paste the exact error message you get. I recently fixed a
multiple selection error in tk_getOpenFile
in the 8.5 and 8.6 Tk versions. It's possible that same fix would
back port to 8.3
Please see Bug 1936220 in sourceforge to see if the issue is the same.
2008-08-25 Todd M. Helfter <t...@users.sourceforge.net>
* library/tkfbox.tcl: Fix the multiple selection error for
tk_getOpenFile -multiple 1 which fails on all unix platforms
since the
adoption of ttk widgets. [Bug 1936220]
Is that related at all to this?
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=657656&group_id=12997&atid=112997
Can it be closed?
I filed the original bug 6 years ago, and the last update was from 3
years ago. Now I'm not only married (as per the comment in the
tracker:-) but have a daughter. Do we still have a bug?
No, I think we have a misdesign in ttk. See the discussion in
http://wiki.tcl.tk/20050
Ian
--
*********** To reply by e-mail, make w single in address **************
> >YES, tk_getOpenFile's -multiple option appeared with 8.3.
I just tried it on 8.3.3 and it is not recognized.
On versions where it is recognized, beware that it takes a boolean
argument: -multiple true or -multiple 1
> launching 8.3, but reports, "i have used tk_getOpenFile with
> multiple true option.but it gives error like bad command."
It (8.3.3) says it (-multiple) is an unrecognized option.
Donald Arseneau as...@triumf.ca
Well looking at your test code, this change has not yet been adopted.
Let me see if I can make your patch work in the current code base. I
think it's a good idea.