Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Gambit: questions about getting started
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Ludwig Meier  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7 2012, 2:27 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.scheme
From: Ludwig Meier <quintus.veran...@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 09:27:53 +0200
Local: Wed, Nov 7 2012 2:27 am
Subject: Re: Gambit: questions about getting started
Am 07.11.2012 06:42, schrieb Hugh Aguilar:

 > Well, I'm working through SICP right now. I'll likely read some other

> stuff too, especially some of what Nils wrote.

> I tried learning Factor 3 years ago and wrote a few simple programs. I
> gave up on Factor largely because I didn't understand the concepts.
> Factor's documentation is mostly a reference and assumes that the user
> already knows the concepts. I am learning Scheme now because Scheme is
> an academic language and consequently has beaucoup documentation
> available explaining concepts. Within that context, "ivory tower
> concepts" are largely what I want. After I get a handle on the
> concepts I can apply that knowledge to "real-world programming." It is
> a mistake for me to dive into writing real-world programs without
> first understanding the concepts though --- I would just turn into a
> script-kiddie who can paste together code written by other people, but
> who doesn't know how the code works and wouldn't be able to write a
> program from scratch to save his soul.

> Scheme, and SICP, are a good place for me to learn right now. Later on
> I may go back to Factor and/or jump to CL, both of which are more real-
> world oriented. Or, I may just stick with Scheme --- Gambit is
> designed to work hand-in-hand with C, which definitely implies that it
> is trying to escape from the much-dreaded ivory-tower to be real-world
> applicable. :-)

I completely agree. I am well fluent in markup languages like LaTeX and
XHTML. Besides I have been trying to learn programming for several years
by diving into perl, c and sql; unfortunately without success because
they were not appealing to me and made me yawn. Please don’t get me
wrong: I am allowed to say such a thing just because I am a historian
and do not have to stick to any cs-curriculum. :) SICP finally set me on
fire. It is indeed their much dreaded »academic« approach which appeals
to me. I really do not understand the polemic distinction between »ivory
tower« and »real world« which is found on the web betimes. The concepts
teached by SICP were sufficient for me to understand things like sxml in
order to process xml-files by scheme (this said as a »real world«
application). :)

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.