The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp, comp.lang.scheme
From: ilias <at_n...@pontos.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 10:06:51 +0300
Local: Mon, Sep 23 2002 3:06 am
Subject: Re: LISP - CommonLisp / Scheme - Differences
Feuer wrote: you've uncovered me. > ilias wrote: >>i've read them. >>scheme makes no sense. >>all lisp-dialects => common lisp. >>scheme not. >>scheme = the most stubborn lispers. >>at least it looks so. >>anyway. > You are an idiot. > Common Lisp is only one of a number of Lisps, Common Lisp is the "stop-this-desaster-you-stubborn-kids-lisp" LISP dialects unified. > though more popular than most. Scheme may or may not be a Lisp funny things all this. > (it is a call-by-value impure untyped/unitype functional language > with s-expression syntax, macro systems, a special top-level > environment, and letrec), > but it derives directly from Lisp, aha. > was invented in large part by the creator of Common Lisp, who is that? > and is generally considered a Lisp. Scheme is simply redundant. It should be a subset of ANSI Common Lisp. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||